This is only a preview of the September 1989 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 46 of the 112 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
|
It's a long way to trip a ''rarery''
Sorry about that heading but it was the only way I
felt I could sum up this month's main story. The
fault was a real "rarery"; so rare as to be possibly
unique. And tripping it did involve a long path,
mainly through a maze of circuit diagrams and
board patterns.
The story concerns an AW AThorn video tape recorder, model
AV-14. This model first appeared
about 4 or 5 years ago and carried
a 4-year warranty - a warranty
that still covered this particular
recorder.
According to the owner the
machine would usually perform
when first switched on, after which
it might run for half an hour or
more and then shut itself down just as if it had been switched off.
And if it was then left in that situation, it could just as suddenly come
good.
On the other hand, it would also
sometimes run indefinitely without
any problems at all.
When the customer first delivered it and described these symptoms, I set it up while he was there
and gave it a trial run. Neither of us
was particularly surprised when it
worked perfectly; according to the
customer, that was exactly what he
had expected. Hopefully, a longer
run would display the fault.
I had no manual for this machine,
although I had some for earlier and
later models, so I rather hoped that
the fault would turn out to be fairly
obvious. But it refused to show up. I
tested the machine many times over
the next few days, running it for
long periods under varying
temperature conditions, but it
wouldn't fail.
Finally, I rang the customer, explained the situation, and suggested
he take it back until the fault
became more predictable. But he
said he was about to leave on
several weeks' holiday and that I
might as well hang on to it and keep
trying.
0
ACCOROlt\\G i'O 1'\-\£ OWNE.-1<,
,He:
N\OCMINE: WOUL-t) USUAU...'-< P6-RF'ORIV'
WHe;N l='"IRS1 SWr,C.HE:O ONooo
40
SILICON CHIP
So for the next week or so I did
just that, all to no avail. Somewhat
discouraged , and facing the
pressure of other work, I was forced to push it to one side. Time slipped by and the next thing I knew
the customer was on the phone, announcing his return from holidays
and enquiring about the recorder.
Feeling a bit guilty, I told him I
had been unable to fault it so far
but suggested that he give me a few
more days. He agreed quite readily.
So I set it up again, removing the
main cover this time in the hope
that this might provide access to an
appropriate check point if the fault
showed up. This didn't help much.
The main printed board sits pattern
side up above the drum and
transport system and lifting it out to
get at the component side is quite
an involved procedure.
So, for the moment, I simply switched the machine on and let it play,
as I had already done umpteen
times. But this time I was lucky; it
ran for about an hour then suddenly shut itself down. So now it was
time to lift the board out of the
chassis.
There are several minor boards
at the front of the machine: a board
holding the timer controls, one
holding the tracking controls, one
holding the function buttons, and
one holding the on/off and timer
switches. These boards are all connected to the main board by flat
multi-conductor cables and must be
removed from the chassis (by
unlocking the pressure tabs) before
the main board can be lifted.
The same routine applies in
order to perform a head and drum
cleaning operation. It's a real pain
in the neck!
Anyway, having lifted the main
board I was able to identify some
components in the power supply
section, where I suspected the fault
might be. Then, making sure it was
-
V
+30V
C"'79
'"""
; IN-.,C?tX'
1sse2
AE C T OUT
iSAl/1.S<at>,®
:SAl/750,®,©
TV12V
}
PCB-MAIN
(TUNER/VJF)
IQ903! 2SC2603<at>.®
Lh
E9
0907 2SC2603<at>
jPOWERI
'
!_ _
_
_ __ _
-
-
-
-
-- --- -
--- -- -
----- -
-
-- -- ---- -
BF
BO
CTEJ
!'
PCB.TIMER
-
-
-
-
---- -
-
--- -
-
-
-
-
-- -
-- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-- ---- -
'
-------~
Fig.1: the circuit of the AWA AV-14 VCR power supply, where the first clue to the fault was observed. It generates no
less than four supply rails, two of which failed ( + 12V and + 9V) when the fault occurred.
safe to run the recorder in its partially disembowelled state, I switched it on again. Again it came on normally but this time it ran for only
about 10 minutes before it failed.
In fact, its behaviour became
fairly predictable from here on.
Voltage checks
While it was running normally I
made some voltage checks around
two transistors and one IC which I
had nominated as part of the power
supply. I was hoping that when it
failed, further voltage checks
would provide a clue. Unfortunately, these results were inconclusive,
with no drastic changes which
might have helped.
By now it was obvious that this
was not a simple fault which was
going to show up in a routine
voltage check, particularly without
the benefit of a manual. I was going
to need all the help I could get. I
placed an order for the manual $25 worth, incidentally, but that's
cheap as VCR manuals go.
The manual arrived quite promptly and I turned immediately to
the power supply circuit (on the
reverse side of a sheet marked 2/3).
It was something of a shock to
realise that, whereas I had identified two transistors and one IC,
this section contained no less that
nine transistors and two ICs. It is
reproduced here as Fig.1.
The power supply generates no
less than four supply rails. Q901 is
supplied with - 38.8V at its collector (derived via transformer T971 ,
diode D901 and filter capacitor
C902) and delivers - 30V at its
emitter. It did this, even in the fault
condition.
Similarly, Q902 is supplied with
+ 45V via diode D905 and filter
capacitor C907, and delivers + 30V
at its collector. Once again, this
value was correct in the fault
condition.
Which brings us to Q904. This is
supplied with + 19V from the
bridge rectifier (D908-D911) and is
supposed to deliver + 14V at its
emitter. And this was the first clue
to the fault, because there was no
+ 14V output in the fault condition.
And as I half expected, there was
no + 14.4V on the base.
Normally, I would have tried to
track down the missing base
voltage as the next step but I was
sidetracked. Q904 is mounted near
the edge of the main board and I
found that if I exerted pressure on
this part of the boa rd, I could
sometimes create or cure the fault.
This effect was not consistent but it
seemed likely that Q904 was faulty.
So I pulled it out. It tested OK but
that meant very little, so I replaced
it. All of which was a furphy; the
fault remained. By now, incidentally, the fault was much more in
evidence and would usually appear
within a few minutes of switch-on.
So back to the circuit. The
+ 14.4V for Q904's base comes
from the collector of Q908, the emitter of which is fed from the
aforementioned + 19V rail. The
+ 14.4V rail is also fed to zener
SEPTEMBER 1989
41
diode network D917 & D918, which
in turn supplies + 12.5V to the base
of Q905. The collector of Q905 is
fed from the + 19V rail and it
delivers + 12V at its emitter.
This + 12V rail is fed to the tuner
and video IF circuitry and also
feeds voltage regulator IC902
which provides a + 9V rail. So
absence of the + 14.4V rail shuts
down two supply rails: + 12V and
+ 9V. And if you found all that hard
to follow I can assure you that it
was even harder to work out in the
first place.
But the reason for the missing
+ 14.4V was still a mystery, except
that Q908 obviously had to be turned on in order to create it. And
equally obviously, Q907 had to be
turned on in order to turn on Q908.
The base of Q907 is shown as
+ 0.6V and this voltage was present in the no-fault condition but
vanished in the fault condition.
Well, we seemed to be making some
progress.
But it wasn't quite as clear cut as
this. When the system failed . the
+ 0.6V on Q907 didn't simply drop
to zero; it dithered its way down
and the system continued to function down to around + 0.4V. But at
+ 0.38V everything collapsed. And
in between these two values all
sorts of funny things happened to
the + 14.4V; it couldn't make up its
mind whether to come or go.
The next stage down the line was
Q906. Unfortunately, there are no
voltages given for this stage which
meant that I had to go through the
routine of measuring them when
the system was working and then
again when it failed. From this, I
established that there was supposed to be + 0.6V on Q906's base but
that this also collapsed with the
fault.
This left only R909 (390k0) and
l!>'< NOW ,.,.. w~s o~v,oos
w~s
42
-n4~-r "ffi\S
NO"r F\. S\N\?l-E. FAUL--,•••
SILICON CHIP
diode D913 as possible suspects in
this area but they were quickly
cleared.
So the upshot of all this effort
was simply to establish that there
was nothing wrong with the power
supply; it wasn't generating the
necessary rail voltages because it
wasn't receiving the correct
voltage from somewhere else. It
was a negative kind of achievement
in some ways, although it did mean
progress. But little did I realise
what kind of a search lay ahead of
me.
Circuit tracing
The first thing to do was to trace
the run from the base of Q906. This
part of the circuit is on a 6-section
foldout sheet portraying, in addition to the power supply, the servo
and the mechanism control sections. After getting lost a couple of
times, I traced the run from Q906 to
pin 20 of the microprocessor,
IC5AO, a 64-pin chip at the other
end of the sheet.
Pin 20 was marked as being at
4.8V and this proved to be correct
in the no-fault condition. However,
it collapsed in the fault condition so
I was still making progress. But
where to from here? A faulty
microprocessor chip? It could be
but I didn't think so and, with 64
pins involved, I didn't want to think
so.
The alternative was that the
microprocessor was not being fed
with the correct instruction on its
input side. The problem was to
identify this circuit. The circuit
identifies the pins only by a system
of alphanumeric codes and there is
no list of these in the manual. I was
on my own.
I decided on a different approach. Assuming that the missing
voltage was an instruction to the
power supply to activate the
various supply rails, it was most
likely to originate at a switch probably the on/off switch. So I
decided to take a punt and start at
the on/off switch and trace back
from there.
Does this sound simple? It was
anything but.
This switch is mounted on one of
the sub-boards already mentioned
(PCB-SW) and its circuit is on
another fold-out sheet marked 3/3.
According to this the two active
contacts of the on/off switch were
connected to pins 6 and 7 of connector F2. And pin 6 was marked
"STBY" (standby) and " - 5V". Pin
7 was marked simply "PSW".
So was this the voltage that was
fed to the microprocessor, to eventually appear as a signal on its pin
20? The minus sign was confusing,
because I was looking for a positive
voltage.
In fact, that sign was a furphy;
the voltage was positive and the
minus sign on the circuit was simply a draughting error.
I began tracing. The mate to F2
was found near the microprocessor, back on sheet 2/3 where I'd
started, which looked promising but
wasn't. The connection to pin 7 left
this board immediately via one of
the flat cables (connection 22).
After much page shuffling I picked
up connection 2 2 again on the back
of foldout sheet 1/3, which portrays
the timer board.
From here it ran to pin 16 of the
timer chip, ICBAO, and then the
length of this sheet, through
another switch (S8A2, RESV) to pin
17 (RES) of the timer chip, ICBAO.
So I had two inputs to the timer chip
and no idea where the vital signal
voltage would reappear. In fact, the
circuit involving switch S8A2 turned out to be a red herring and I
never did work out its function.
I was grasping at straws now. I
went over the timer IC diagram and
checked each pin designation (there
are 64) until I came to pin 36. It was
marked "PWV" and "4.9V". Both
rang a bell. The 4.9V was close
enough to the 5V I was chasing and
PWV was the designation of the
lead to the base of Q906, where I
started.
I followed it. It left the timer
board at connection 24 and turned
up again at connection 24 on the
back of sheet 2/3 where I'd started.
From here it ran straight to pin 41
of the microprocessor chip, IC5AO.
This was the "input" terminal I had
been seeking since I had determined that the output, on pin 20, was
failing when the whole system
failed.
So that was the complete path; at
least on paper - literally. It was a
place to start but that was all. I had
PCB-SW
[ill[IT)
Fig.2: this section of the circuit shows
how the control voltage (PSW) is
applied to the main board via F7 and
then routed away from the board (to
the timer board) via cable connection
22. As shown, it is deceptively simple.
The physical path is actually much
longer and far more complex.
identified the major intermedia te
points but the physical path between these points still had to be
traced out.
This turned out to be a most
laborious task; so much so that it is
virtually impossible to describe it in
any way which would do it justice.
Suffice it to say that it took a long
time. And a major problem was the
need to wait for "go" and "no-go"
states in order to establish just
where the circuit was failing.
Voltage checks
I decided to start at the switch
and the + 5V supplied to it. If the
voltage failed at this point I would
have to back track to find its origin.
If it didn't I would have to trace forward, initially via the points I had
already identified.
The situation was quickly
clarified; the voltage held on both
sides of the switch in the no-go
state. So far , so good. The next
check point was at pin 7 of connector F on the main board. After some
waiting for the no-go state, the
system was cleared to this point.
From here on it was a different
story. As already mentioned, this
circuit is shown leaving the main
board again (reference point 22)
without making any other connections. Fig.2 shows the relevant section of the circuit and this indicates
a short run into the board and out
again.
In fact, point 22 is much further
away physically than the circuit implies, while the copper pattern connecting it to connector F is much
longer again. More importantly, a
check at point 22 indicated that the
voltage was failing here when the
system failed. So the fault was
somewhere along this circuitous
copper track. But where, and why?
I went back to connector F and,
using a pair of stainless steel test
prods with very sharp points, I
began working along the copper
track. And here I encountered the
pressure sensitive situation that I
mentioned earlier.
In fact, connector F is not very
far away from the various power
supply components (Q901-Q909 etc)
where I had experienced this
before. Now I found that the
pressure I was exerting on the
prod, to penetrate the protective
lacquer, would sometimes change
the state from a no-go to a go.
But the effect was not consistent
and I couldn't make any real sense
out of it. All it indicated was that
there was a dicey connection
somewhere in the vicinity. In an effort to minimise this effect, which
seemed to be hindering rather than
TETIA TV TIP
Sanyo CTP6631 (BOP Chassis)
Symptom: No sound or picture. No
output from power supply although
all fuses are intact. Collector of
chopper transistor is likely to be
carrying anything up to full bridge
output voltage . Warning: discharge the main filter capacitor
(C308) before carrying out any
tests around the chopper.
Cure: R302 (390k0 ½W) open
circuit. This resistor supplies bias
to the chopper transistor and
without bias the chopper can
never start up. Note: any attempt
to test the chopper transistor in circuit may lead to its destruction if
C308 has not been discharged .
TETIA TV Tip is supplied by the
Tasmanian branch of The .Electronic Technicians' Institute of
Australia. Contact Jim Lawler, 16
Adina St, Geilston Bay, Tasmania
7015.
SEPTEMBER1989
43
SERVICEMAN'S LOG -CTD
helping, I decided to work from the
other end of this track, starting at
reference point 22, where the cable
joined the board.
From here I made my way along
the track, a few centimetres at a
time, and this did seem to avoid the
pressure sensitive situation. It all
took time of course but eventually I
reached a point about one third the
way along it, where it runs hard
against the extreme edge of the
board. In fact, it is one of a group of
three tracks between the edge of
the board and IC5A2.
And here I encountered something which was not indicated on
either the circuit or the board
diagram; a small polyester
capacitor connected between pins
1 and 3 of IC5A2. It was fairly obviously a manufacturer's modification - not that additions like this
are all that strange in modern
equipment.
What was strange was the fact
that in addition to being soldered into the circuit - which should have
provided more than enough support
- it had been laid over on its side,
across the three tracks just mentioned, and glued into place.
Yes, glued; why I can't imagine,
but there it was.
More importantly, it quickly
became evident that this was where
the trouble lay, because the voltage
on the track on the other side of this
component was normal. Somewhere under that capacitor the
copper track was damaged; and
damaged so delicately that it was,
in effect, a high resistance joint.
The cure
I took the easy way out and
bypassed the faulty section of track
with a short length of tinned copper
wire, routed over the top of the
capacitor. And that fixed it; it was
almost an anti-climax after all the
sweat and bother of tracking down
the fault.
Unfortunately, a few questions
remain unanswered. Apart from
querying why the capacitor was
glued in the first place, it is
reasonable to ask what caused the
track to fail. Was there a defect at
that point initially, which was aggravated by whoever mounted the
capacitor'? Or, more likely I
suspect, did the glue contain some
corrosive component which attacked the copper'?
If the latter is true, what are the
chances of the two remaining
tracks surviving'? Since this is all
pure speculation I'm afraid that
that's a risk that will have to be
taken. At least, if I strike more trouble in this machine, I'll know where
to look first.
So there it is; one of the rarest
faults I have ever encountered. And
how did I come out of it financially'?
Not very well I'm afraid, though it
could have been worse.
Bar codes
Tu~ 4-·9V WA.'S c1--ose:. 6NOO~ -ro 111e:
5V t w~~ Cl-l~~•~G & -PWV w~s '1\-\e:
DE.S\GNJ.\-rtOI\\ OF "tl\~ t-eAt> TO ..-Hf;
"B~'S~.
44
SILICON CHIP
1: F " O ~ \,.
To finish off this month, I have to
acknowledge a letter from P. Dunford, of Christchurch, NZ, which
appeared in the July 1989 issue,
page 5.
This was prompted by comments
in the April issue concerning VCR
digital scanners. I questioned the
usefulness of these devices, inasmuch as I had yet to see any programs with bar codes. I now
understand that one Sydney
newspaper, the Sunday Telegraph,
provides this service with its TV
guide.
Even so, I still have my reservations. As my correspondent points
out, some people have difficulty using the scanner but there is a more
serious limitation. It's not the fault
of the system as such but rather
problems caused by incorrect
transmission times.
Late night programs in particular
can be early or late by anything up
to 30 minutes, with the indicated
running time also sometimes in error. Having been caught myself
several times I now straddle such
2
3t
.1 20
,a
,
__________._
·_·1_·_·_·_
· _·_·_ _· _·_·_· ~ - - - ~ ~
r
t
l
Fig.3: this diagram shows the physical layout of the relevant circuitry on the
main board, simplified for ease of presentation. Connector F is to the lower
right and the copper track from its pin 7 runs off to the left, via a couple of
bridges, to the extreme left of the board. From there it runs vertically past
IC5A2, then turns right and runs along the top of the board to cable point 22.
programs with at least 30 minutes
at either end, using a 180 tape for a
2-hour program or a 240 tape for
anything longer. But there is no way
to do this using published bar
codes, thus largely negating their
value.
Mr Dunford also comments on my
query as to why some machines
now load the tape against the control head immediately the cassette
is inserted. In fact, I followed up
this point after I had raised the matter and came up with the same explanation that he so clearly set out.
I refer you to it.
Indexing gimmicks
Later I was able to pursue this
further at a 2-day National
Panasonic seminar in Canberra. A
whole range of topics was covered,
some of which I may deal with in
later notes, but for the moment here
are some details on the latest indexing gimmicks (models NVD-38,
NVD-48, F-70, H-75 and D-80).
The system provides for up to 20
indexing signals to be entered onto
a tape while recording. An indexing
signal is entered automatically
when the record button is pressed,
either to start recording or during
recording to index a particular
segment.
When such a tape is re-inserted
for replay, it may be run in the normal way by pressing the play button. If the play button is not pressed, it will immediately go into the
fast forward mode. Then, as each
indexing signal is encountered, it
will generate a 1/9 size picturewithin-picture of the following
10-second segment in the top right
corner of the screen. If the play button is then pressed during this
period, normal play results.
If the play button is not pressed,
the last frame of the 10-second segment is frozen in the 1/9 area frame
and fast forward continues until
the next index signal is encountered. This generates another
1/9 area frame below the first one
and, at the next signal, a third one
below that. A fourth signal replaces
the first image, and so on.
As each new frame is presented,
the index number is also displayed,
there being a facility to recall a segment by feeding in this number. A
segment can also be recalled be
feeding in the elapsed time from the
beginning of the tape, assuming this
is known.
Apart from these indexing
facilities, there are several other
features, such as a picture-withinpicture facility to enable monitoring
of one channel while another is by
ing watched, and so on.
It's all very clever of course, but I
do wonder whether we really need
all these facilities, or how many
people will use them.
Still, the makers say we need
them, so I suppose we must.
[lEI
FIX-A-KIT
Kit Repairs - $1 5 per hour.
Normal Rate -
$35 per hour.
No charge for kits that can't be
repaired .
3 month Warranty on repairs .
Construction - fixed or hourly
1 2 Month Warranty on
Manufactured Kits.
Custom Designing,
Manufacturing, Large or Small
Quantitites.
HYCAL
INSTRUMENTS
Design, Manufacture, Repair of
Electronic Equipment.
(02) 633 5897
Unit 4,
62 Great Western Highway,
Parramatta, NSW 2150.
Trading hours:
8am to 3pm Monday to Friday.
SEPTEMBER1989
45
|