This is only a preview of the August 1990 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 57 of the 112 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Digital Sine/Square Wave Generator; Pt.2":
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
|
REMOTE CONTROL
By BOB YOUNG
Bluff body design &
automotive aerodynamics
Having concluded our discussion on the
aerodynamics of full size aircraft, we will now
look at how those principles apply to motor
vehicles. This should be of interest to the R/C
model car enthusiast.
As the speed of a road vehicle increases, the benefits of aerodynamic design become more and
more important, particularly when
combined with the spiralling costs
of fuel and the fact that petroleum
is a finite resource.
To give an example of the savings
involved, in the UK alone it has
been estimated that reducing
freight vehicle drag by 10% would
result in a fuel saving of 300,000
tonnes per year.
Keeping in mind our earlier
discussion on drag, it is obvious
that once again our old enemy
"velocity squared" is in there stirr-
~ -====
ing up trouble as usual. The
ramifications of the vZ problem
when applied to the Very Fast
Train (SILICON CHIP, March 1990),
for example, are extensive. Not only does drag increase with vZ but
lift increases also. This could result
in loss of traction and possibly even
contribute to the train leaving the
rails under certain adverse conditions.
As discussed in previous columns, fuselage lift for aircraft can
be quite considerable and exactly
the same principles apply to ground
vehicles, which if not very carefully
designed cease to be ground
BASE -
PRESSURf/
--l--o.76
l'\J'45•
15
L
/
STING
ALL DIMENSIONS IN mm
Fig.t(a): experimental wind tunnel arrangement for determining the
drag coefficient of two discs mounted in tandem. The resulting drag is
much lower (within limits) than for a single disc.
88
SILCON CHIP
vehicles and become airborne. This
happened to the Stanley Steamer in
a very early speed run on Daytona
Beach. It became airborne at
150km/h and crashed.
Vehicle aerodynamics
Vehicle aerodynamics involve all
sorts of components. The overall
flow field consists of streamlines,
wakes, vortices, interference with
the road surface and rotating
wheels, surface pressures, and
noise and rain effects. These must
all be taken into account.
Stability at high speed, particularly the response to side winds
(yaw) and gusts can be deficient,
especially in low slung streamlined
sports cars.
An adequate flow of cooling air is
needed to remove heat from the
radiator. Intakes for internal ventilation, heating or air conditioning
have to be placed where the
dynamic air pressure is favourable
and will not result in exhaust fumes
being drawn into the vehicle.
A particular problem involving
heavy vehicles is the generation of
large sheets of spray in rain. This
creates a potential danger for overtaking cars, especially in dark and
foggy conditions. Reducing air
resistance and adding fairings
helps to minimise this problem, as
well as making the vehicle more
fuel efficient.
All of these problems respond to
the vZ law. Even the windscreen
wipers get into a frenzy at high
speeds and will lift off the windscreen in some vehicles.
Thus, we see that the science of
aerodynamics is very important to
all citizens of the modern world and
affects us greatly, in matters as
diverse as our methods of travel,
safety and pocket.
\J
I
I
1.4
I
I
I
I
I
I
0, 1 02 = , .o
1.2
02 = 70 mm
I
I
Bluff Body design
Vehicle design is generally
lumped under the scientific title of
"Bluff Body, Ground Proximity"
aerodynamics.
This is a quaint way of saying
that the space inside the vehicle is
more valuable than the space
devoted to streamlining. To understand this, we must now move on to
some of the very interesting aspects
of Bluff Body aerodynamics.
To begin, drag, not lift is the major item of interest in vehicle
aerodynamics. Not only is lift not
required, it is positively dangerous,
as we have already noted.
Now the measure of aerodynamic
cleanliness is the "Coefficient of
Drag" (Cd) and is in effect a comparison of the drag of the body
under examination to the drag of a
flat disc of equal cross sectional
area. This flat disc is said to have a
Cd of 1.00.
The usual figure quoted for Cd on
modern cars runs around 0.3 to
0.35, which simply means that a
typical car has about one third of
the drag of a flat disc with area
equal to the vehicle's frontal area.
Referring back to airfoil theory
we can see that an airfoil can have
a Cd as low as .01. Cars are a long
way from this figure due to the ratio
of their length to cross sectional
area. A good rule of thumb for the
ideal streamline shape is a ratio of
16:1. Thus, a vehicle with a frontal
area of 2 square metres should be
32 metres long.
Plainly, this is impossible. To
overcome this problem, we have
the science of "Bluff Body aerodynamics".
The really interesting thing about
air is that in essence it is quite
capable of helping itself but is
hindered by a finite response time
of 335m/s (ie, the velocity of sound
in air). Bluff Body aerodynamics
relies heavily upon this ability of air
to help streamline itself. Transonic
aerodynamics is the art of dealing
with air which can no longer help
itself.
I
I
I
I
I
,.,
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0
I
I
0 .9
Fig.l(b): the graph plots the drag
coefficient vs. gap length (L) for two
discs of equal diameter. The Co is a
minimum at L/D2 = 1.55.
To explain, let us examine two
very interesting and curious
phenomena, the first being a sphere
which has a minus drag coefficient.
This means that it generates a
small amount of thrust from its own
drag. At first glance, this statement
indicates that we should all be
travelling in spherical cars and aircraft but the truth is that the gain is
so small that any protrusions such
as wheels destroy any benefits.
It is also not a very practical
shape to work with. It is very poor
directionally and easily blown off
course by cross winds, due to the
lift and thrust generated on the
sides. The early aerial bombs were
spherical and were difficult to aim
accurately as a result. The shape of
the modern bomb is no accident.
The second curiosity is the "two
disc" pair. This arrangement is
simply two discs in tandem (Fig.la)
mounted in such a way that the
separation between them is variable. Fig.1 b shows that the drag
coefficient of the pair is related to
the ratio of their diameters and the
distance between them and is much
lower than for a single disc. The
reason for this is simply that air
will form its own streamlining from
eddy currents.
Here then is the saving grace for
the modern motor car and the core
facet of Bluff Body design. The trick
is to get the air to do the streamlining for you. Figs.Za & Zb illustrate
this quite clearly and show the Cd
for squareback and fastback
vehicles.
By setting up the correct conditions for eddy currents behind the
car, it is possible to simulate a full
streamline flow of near ideal proportions. By pumping air into this
zone or bleeding air out, quite a low
Cd can be achieved. Much work is
being done in this area to create the
ideal low drag motor vehicle.
Modern designs
In the early days, the designers
of streamlined cars attempted to
create a shape that was like a halfteardrop with a very rounded front
and a gently tapered rear. However, this had to be impractically
long, as noted, to give any worthwhile drag reduction and was
often directionally unstable. Almost
all moderately sized cars now have
a distinctly short afterbody and
these are characterised by definite
f IXl.1!
~s:~: ,s_f~'>)Jl>>
.
. .,:
Fig.2(a): by setting up the correct eddy current conditions behind a car,
the air will form a streamlined flow and quite a low drag coefficient
(Co) can be achieved.
AUGUST
1990
89
o·
10°
20°
30°
so•
SQUAREBACK-TYPE
FLOW FIELD.
Fig.2(b): the drag coefficient is extremely sensitive to the angle of the back
window. The lower drag of the fastback is one reason for the increasing
popularity of this style of vehicle.
wake flows and vortices.
Two types of afterbody flows are
shown in Fig.3. The recirculating
bubble or spiral vortices determine
the drag and stability. They also
determine how much of the dirt
thrown up by the rear wheels is
deposited onto the rear window and
body.
The drag coefficient is extremely
sensitive to the angle of the back
window as in Fig.2b. The lower
drag of the fastback is marked and
accounts for this increasingly
popular although rather angular
shape.
Air does not like abrupt changes
in direction and sharp corners increase drag tremendously. The early Volkswagen Kombi of the 1960s
is a good example of the advantages
to be gained from wind tunnel
testing. The original design had
sharp front edges and wool tufts
placed along the sides showed that
the airflow completely broke away
and was turbulent. Even quite
modest rounding of the front edges
and corners streamlined the
airflow and reduced the drag by
40%.
The important point to remember
is that air is limited to a response
time of 335 metres per second. This
is quite slow and so we have to
adopt special techniques to achieve
streamlining. We do this by design90
SILICON CHIP
ing our shapes so that the airflow
does not have to make abrupt
changes in direction.
Some indication of the progress
being made in drag reduction of
vehicles can be gained from the Cd
figures over the years. In the 1920s,
average American car Cds were
0.7, falling to 0.5 by 1940. In
Europe, the average Cd for 86
popular makes was as high as 0.46
even in the 1970s, the actual range
of values being 0.37-0.52.
Reynolds numbers
Great care is needed in quoting
and interpreting drag coefficients
for motor cars. Tests done by
General Motors on a 1/4-scale
fastback gave a Cd of 0.27 at a
Reynolds number of 700,000, which
decreased to 0.23 at R = 2,000,000.
Often, tunnel models are simple
shapes that don't include all the
practical details.
The Reynolds number is far too
complex in concept for a full explanation here but briefly, Reynolds
in 1883 combined a host of factors
influencing surface flow. These included form, waviness or roughness, speed of the mainstream,
distance over which the flow has
passed on the surface, and the ratio
of density to viscosity of the fluid.
He combined these into a single
figure derived from the following
formula: Re = Density/Viscosity x
Velocity x Length.
As a general rule, the higher the
Reynolds number the more efficient
the result.
It is here that we see the problems arising in model aircraft with
tapered, high aspect ratio wings
such as in scale models. For any
given airspeed, the Reynolds
number will always be lower at the
tip than at the root. When combined
with the high angle of attack at landing and tip vortices, there is a
great danger of the tip stalling first ,
causing the wing to drop and the
model to fall into a spin.
For this reason, washout (reduced angle of attack) at the tips is a bsolutely essential on this type of
model.
Conflicting requirements
The skill of the vehicle designer is
also shown in the way he blends the
conflicting aerodynamic requirements into a working motor car. A
good example of this is the Lotus
Elite GT 4-seater. It is low and wide
and the top of the windscreen is
more than half way towards the
tail.
The curved wedge-like forebody
was kept low by having retractable
headlights and a canted engine
block (the resulting aerodynamic
drag power is only 30kW at
160km/h). A serious consequence of
this, found in experimental models,
was a large upward lift on the curved forebody which decreased adhesion of the front wheels. This would
have made it dangerous in crosswinds.
The cure was to fit a wide scoop
under the front of the engine. This
collected high speed air and passed
it through a shallow, wide radiator
so that the retarded air was ejected
into the boundary layer on the top
of the curved forebody, thereby
breaking the lift suction. In this
way, drag, stability, lift and cooling
airflows were all combined successfully.
Lift reducing traction and steering is a serious problem for vehicle
designers and many solutions have
been tried. The large inverted airfoil seen on some of the dirt track ·
racers is, to my mind, the least
elegant. While it does generate a
STATIC RAM
62256
4425
2764
4116-5
$19.95
$18.00
$3. 00
$1.25
41256
$5.00
4464
$6.00
2114 -2
$1.00
4164-12 x 9 SIMM
Modules $12. 95 ea
SPEAKERS
12 " 100 Watt Woofer
12" 30 Watt Woofer
1O" 25 Watt Woofer
8" 20 Watt Woofer
$59.95
$42 .50
$25.50
$18 .50
ea
ea
ea
ea
CAPACITORS
10,000 nf 40 Volt
DIODES 4002 1A
$4 .50 ea
$5.50/100
$65.00 ea
INFARED DETECTORS
Limited Quantity, 40' to 80' range, adjustable.
MICROWAVE OSCILLATORS
VA221 B 7.255 - 7.555 Ge
V220D 6.575 - 6.875 Ge
$25.00 ea
NICAD BATTERIES
Fig.3: the afterbody airflows for two different vehicles. The recirculating
vortices for the lower model determine the drag and how much of the dirt
thrown up by the wheels is deposited on the back of the vehicle. In practice,
the drag coefficient is extremely sensitive to the angle of the rear window (see
Fig.2b).
downward force on the wheels, it
creates a lot of drag and therefore
is somewhat self defeating.
A more elegant approach is to
convert the underside of the vehicle
into a venturi by fitting a fairing.
This serves a twofold purpose.
First, it eliminates underbody drag
from the rough underside which
can amount to as much as 5 o/o of the
total drag. Secondly, in keeping
with Bernoulli's Theorem, it generates a low pressure area under the
vehicle and thus provides a
downward force on the tyres.
This could be an important point
in R/C model cars where the light
axle loadings result in very low
footprint pressures. Traction in a
model car is all important and much
care is required in selecting the
correct tyres for the conditions
under which the car is being raced.
Again in electric racing cars,
cooling air forced over the motor
batteries will help improve battery
efficiency and life.
See you next month.
~
D Size 1.2V 4Ah
AA 500mAh
$23.00 pair
$5.95 pair
STEPDOWN TRANSFORMERS
240 Volt to 110 Volt 1OOvAh
250vAh
TELECOM Microphone Inserts
Double Adaptors
$89.95
$29.95
.95c ea
$1.95 ea
CANNON PLUG and SOCKET 5 pin
$8.00 ea
TRIMPOTS 50k 1 O Turn
DISK BOXES
4 for 1.00
5.25" Holds 100
3.5 " Holds 8Q
$13 .50 ea
$13 .50 ea
IEC Filter Socket with Fuse
DB25 Male and Female
DB25 Male PCB mount
JIFFY BOX with METAL LID
130mm x 68mm x 41 mm
PL 15 40Va
$4.50 ea
.85c ea
.85c ea
$1.70 ea
10 for $15.00
$12.50 ea
Low Profile Transformers
ULTRA MINIATURE RELAY
12V DPST
$2.50 ea
700 ohm Resistance 14mm x 10mm x 9mm
MINI MICRO SWITCH SPDT
.95c ea
20mm x 10mm x 6mm
PCB TOSHIBA LITHIUM BATTERY
.I.E...;. r.at;■f..fffi
RCS Radio Pty Ltd is the only company which
manufactures and sells every PCB [, front panel
published in SILI CO N CHIP. ET I and EA.
651 Forest Road, Bexley, NSW 2207. Phone (02) 587 3491.
2032
$1.50 ea
Shop 30, Patrick St, Central Plaza,
BLACKTOWN, NSW 2148
Tele: (02) 621 1494
Mon-Wed, Fri 9-5.30 ,Thurs 9-8pm, Sat 9-3pm
AUGUST 1990
91
|