This is only a preview of the April 1991 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 49 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Build The SteamSound Simulator":
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
|
SERVICEMAN'S LOG
Mystery, mystery & frustration
This month, I have three short stories, two of
which introduce an element of mystery and
the third a sense of frustration. It is unlikely
that we will ever know the answers to the
mysteries but the cures were obvious.
The first story concerns a Toshiba
48cm colour TV set, model C-2020.
As is often the case, the customer's
complaint over the phone was rather
vague. His first statement was to the
effect that "it keeps going off", but
further remarks suggested that the
"off" was poor performance rather
than total failure. And the "keeps
going" suggested it was probably
intermittent. Anyway, I suggested he
bring it in for closer inspection.
So he duly turned up and I set it up
while he was there. The picture was
faint and lacking contrast. I forced it
up to a more recognisable level with
the brightness control and
was then able to see that it
was riddled with hum. The
vertical:; were weaving back
and forth and it was also displaying hum bars.
Well, it looked like a snack.
It was obviously a power supply fault
and this was a power supply with
which I was very familiar. I mentally
registered that it was almost certainly
the main filter capacitor, C810, a
680µF electrolytic (top of Fig.1). I'd
seen the symptoms many times before .
At the first opportunity, I pulled
the back off and checked the HT rail.
This should be about 110V but was
only 86V, measured at the emitter of
the regulator (Q801). On the other
hand, the collector was at 133V which
is almost spot on. This raised some
doubt about the capacitor but per-
haps not as much as it should have.
Anyway, I rustled through my
stocks for a replacement. As it happened, I didn't have an exact replacement but I did find one that would
do, but which would need some extra
work to fit.
By now I wasn't so sure about the
capacitor and, with the need to do
this extra work, I was less inclined to
rush in. I tacked a couple of leads
onto the capacitor, then patched it
into circuit across the suspect unit. It
had no effect whatsoever.
So much for my original "snack"
diagnosis; it was time to stop guessing and start working. The circuit is
not particularly complex and is quite
conventional. There are three transistors: Q803, error detector (bottom of
diagram); Q802, regulator driver
(above it); and Q801, which is the
main regulator (top of diagram). The
other major component is the bridge
rectifier, consisting of diodes D801,
D802, D803 and D804.
I went immediately to the voltage
adjustment control, R851, a 1.5kQ
variable resistor in the base circuit of
the error amplifier. This sets the HT
rail to the required voltage but I wasn't
really surprised that adjusting it had
no effect.
Next I made a preliminary check of
those minor components most likely
to have upset the regulator action and,
while I couldn't be absolutely certain, all the indications were that
these were OK.
Which transistor?
So that left the transistors. Both the
error amplifier (Q803) and the regulator driver (Q802) have given trouble
in the past, with the symptoms ranging from the simple to the weird. The
regulator transistor can fail just as
readily as the other two, but it is normally a catastrophic failure; breakdown between emitter and collector,
creating an excessive HT rail voltage
(typically around 135V) and causing
40
SILICON CHIP
C+)f2y)
QBOI
2SCI 195 FA-I
POWER REGU,
GRN
I
L1
~C809
R_~ii(G)
USOI
D813
-
3,3)1
(160V
L901
1S1942
APF SWITCH
TSB-2056<2055>
DEGAUSSING COIL
POWE_R_B_OA_R_D~PW~-~,,~10._.
Fig.1: the power supply circuit for the Toshiba C-2020. Q801 is the regulator
transistor, Q802 the driver transistor, and Q803 the error amplifier.
the set's protective circuits to shut it
down.
So where should I start testing?
Murphy's Law states that whenever a
faulty component is one of a string, it
will always be at the end opposite to
that at which one starts. And if one
attempts to minimise this effect by
starting in the middle, it will always
be at the far end of the last leg
checked.
But I had to start somewhere and,
Murphy aside, I had a funny feeling
that this time it was the regulator transistor (don't ask me why). So I disconnected the base and emitter leads
and made a simple ohmmeter check
in the time honoured fashion.
This failed to reveal anything amiss,
even when I went looking for leakage.
Nevertheless, the funny feeling persisted and, with the leads disconnected, it was just as easy to try a
replacement. I didn't have the exact
replacement (2SC1195) but I found a
BU126 which is an acceptable substitute.
It took only a few minutes to fit it
and - presto! - that was it; a normal
picture and no hum problems. All
that was needed was a marginal adjustment of R861 to bring the HT rail
down a few volts.
I ran the set for the rest of the day,
with no sign of trouble, than rang my
customer with the good news. As
stated earlier, there was a hint of intermittency in the customer's original
complaint but there was no sign of it
on my bench. In any case, subsequent
follow-ups confirmed that all was
well.
Transistor checks?
But I was still puzzled as to what
was wrong with the transistor.
Granted, the simple checks I made
are not always conclusive and, for
this reason, I use a curve tracer as a
back-up in sticky situations.
So I hooked the tracer up to the
CRO, set it up for power transistor
checking, and tried the transistor. And
it traced out a virtually perfect curve.
So, was it breaking down - or something - at the higher voltages in the
set?
It is possible to vary the operating
conditions of this equipment to a
limited extent, so I adjusted the settings to increase the base current and
also to increase the collector sweep
voltage, within these limits.
But there was still no sign of a fault.
I left it running like that for an hour
or so, at the end of which time the
transistor was quite hot; I could touch
it briefly but it was too hot to hold.
And still a perfect curve. However,
this involves only relatively low voltages; not more than 30V on the collector.
And that's about as far as I can go. I
still think the most likely explanation involves the higher operating
voltages which I cannot duplicate. But
now, having made these checks, I
would dearly like the chance to put it
back in the set, or another one like it.
This is out of the question at the
moment but I'm keeping it handy,
should the opportunity arise.
So for now, the mystery remains.
A record for rarity
The next story also poses a mystery
but of a completely different kind.
And it must surely set some kind of a
record for rarity; I'd be prepared to
bet long odds that no one has ever
encountered it before. Rash words?
Well, see what you think.
The culprit was a Mitsubishi model
CT-2963 68cm colour TV set. It was
brand new, straight out of the carton
at my local retailer colleague's shop.
It is an upmarket model which, in
addition to the large screen, boasts a
flat, square picture tube.
An intriguing aspect of the set was
that it was made in Scotland. A Mitsubishi TV set made in Scotland! it's almost a contradiction in terms.
Perhaps these sets should be renamed
Macsubishi?
All right, so I digress. Now to business. My colleague had unpacked the
set, to put it on display, when a preliminary check indicated that all was
not well. So he brought it around to
me, complaining that "it's got hum
on the picture".
The model was new to me, apart
from showroom acquaintance, and I
APRIL 1991
41
SERVICEMAN'S LOG - CTD
.,~9,... _
~ ..... A. N\\-r"SOS\SHl
-rv se..-r
ff. ..
N'A"DE- IN ~-n.ANT)f
had no data on it. So my first reaction
was that I would have to obtain a
manual. But I thought I might as well
have a look at it anyway, just to confirm my colleague's symptoms.
So I unpacked it and set it up. And
as luck would have it, it was switched
to SBS which was running a test pattern; I couldn't have wished for a better demonstration of the fault .
On the other hand, describing the
fault is not easy, so please bear with
me. Those familiar with SBS will
know that, superimposed on the test
card itself, are two running displays,
one near the top , carrying program
data and channel data, and one near
the bottom of the picture, carrying
the title and other data on the music
being played.
And it was the bottom display
which exhibited the fault. The message comes in from the right and this
was quite normal for the first few
centimetres, until it reached the first
vertical colour bar; green at the top
and blue at the bottom. Here it kicked
upwards for about 15cm, then ran
downhill towards the centre of the
screen, where there is a short red colour bar.
From here it ran uphill and traced
what was virtually a mirror image to
42
SILICON CHIP
the left hand side of the screen; up to
the magenta bar, a short downward
kick, then straight out the left.
Any ideas? Forget it; you'd never
guess it in a month of Sundays .
Shock, horror
My own reaction was one of bewildered shock. I could understand why
my colleague had described it as hum.
He is familiar with the classic hula
girl pattern caused by hum in the
horizontal system and, with his limited technical knowledge, assumed
something similar in the vertical system.
And, while I ruled out hum, I went
through the mental exercise of trying
to visualise what kind of vertical
waveform distortion could cause such
an effect. After a couple of tries, I
gave up; the brain simply refused to
cope.
I let the set run while I went on
with a couple of other jobs, hoping
for inspiration. None was forthcoming - at least not directly. But while
working on other sets, I had been
made more aware of the difference in
picture tube faceplate curvature, between the old tubes and the new.
When I went back to the Mitsubishi, I idly ran my hand over the
tube, mentally assessing the curvature - just to reassure myself that it
was not truly flat. It was not of course
- it was significantly convex, just as I
knew it would be.
At least most of it was. When I ran
my hand across the bottom of the tube
I suddenly realised that a particular
area (need I say where) was not convex but concave, with about the same
order of curvature as 'the convex area.
So that was it; it wasn't an electronic fault at all, it was an optical
effect caused by a distorted picture
tube faceplate. And that was the end
of the exercise as far as I was concerned; the set was going straight back
to Mitsubishi. The warranty payment
for changing a picture tube is not
exactly generous and their service
department can do the job cheaper
than I can.
But my main reaction was that I
wanted the thing out of my workshop
as quickly as possible. Maybe I was
over reacting but I felt sure that any
tube with a distorted faceplate - and
certainly one as bad as this one - was
a prime candidate for spontaneous
implosion. (I've seen the result of an
implosion and it isn't funny).
I don't know much about the glass
technology of picture tube design but
I do know that the curvature is a vital
factor in tube strengtp.. And I understand that the so-called '"flat" tubes
have only been made possible by
modern computer design techniques,
which have been able reduce the curvature significantly while retaining an
acceptable safety margin.
That, in my language, means that
they have pushed the design about as
far as they dare. Not that there is anything wrong with that in itself, but
does it allow for the kind of distortion I found in this tube?
More to the point, how did this
tube ever get into the field? How did
it pass the tube manufacturer's inspection and how did it pass the set
manufacturer's inspection?
The drifting Tandy
My next story concerns a Tandy
48cm colour TV set, a CTV-2001. It's
not a very profound story technically
but it does emphasise some of the
day-to-day problems and traps one
encounters.
One problem was to get a clear history of the fault, which came in dribs
and drabs. The set came to me from a
local Tandy dealer, who had sold it to
one of his customers. It was a new set
and still under warranty. The customer's complaint was that it "drifted"
off channel after running for some
time.
Fortunately, I have a colleague - a
fellow serviceman - who works for
another Tandy outlet several suburbs
away. The local Tandy dealer had
approached him first , since he had
the service facilities, but had been redirected to m e.
The main reason for this was the
distance involved. Everyone is anxious to avoid transport costs these
days, so my colleague suggested th at
I could handle the job.
The warranty situation did not present any problem, even though I do
not normally handle these sets on this
basis. The plan was for the Tandy
dealer to pay me normal rates, then
straighten this out between the two
. Tandy outlets.
That was about as much information as I had when the set came to me
and so I immediately rang my colleague, first to confirm the arrangement and second to find out what I
could about this particular model. I
Mitsubishi/AWA AV10
Symptom: no sound or picture.
All mechanical functions are normal and the machine will record
normally for playback on another
VCR. Playback audio and video
are present at the NV output sockets but not via the RF out.
Cure: RF modulator unserviceable. The usual procedure is to
replace the modulator at considerable cost. However, replacing
the TA7673 IC in the modulator is
worth a try. The chip is cheap and
has cured the problem on at least
one occasion .
TETIA TV Tip is supplied by the
Tasmanian branch of The Electronic Technicians' Institute of
Australia. Contact Jim Lawler, 16
Adina St, Geilston Bay, 7015.
didn't even have a circuit.
The business side of things was
quickly confirmed and we moved on
to techicalities. On the basis of the
APRIL SPECIALS FROM RAYTEC
MOTHERBOARDS 11
12MHz 8088
31MHz 8088
$109.00
$189.00
12MHz 80286
$299.00
16MHz 80286 Neat $449.00
16MHz 80386
$899.00
TV TEST EQUIPMENT THAT WILL EARN
YOU MORE MONEY
CASES
Baby AT 200 W P/S
$249.00
Mini Tower 200W P/S
Maxi Tower 200W P/S
$299.00
$399.00
KEYBOARDS
101 Enhanced Keyboard $ 89.00
GRAPHICS CARDS
VGA
VGA
II
_ MEMORY
2 Mb AT OK RAM
256K 16Bit $225.00
512K 16Bit $299.00
I POWER
SUPPLIES
XT 150 Watt
AT 200watt
$ 99.00
$149.00
I
CARDS
32Mb XT/AT OK RAM
I
I
$199.00
$299.00
MOUSE
Mouse for PC XT/AT
(AUSTRALIAN MADE)
12 Months Warranty
S ORTED TURNS TESTER
Built-in Meter to check EHT transformers
including split diode type, yokes and drive
transformers.
$78.00 + $3.00 p&p
.HI-VOLTAGE PROBE
Built-in meter reads positive or negative 050kV. For check ing EHT and focus as well as
any other Hi-tension voltages.
$98.00 + $5.00 p&p
LOW VOLTAGE PROBE
Ideal for checking microwave ovens and
TVs. The ranges are from 0 to 5kV Negative
and from 0 to 10kV Positive. Double
insulated for safety.
$94 .oo
$ 99.00
• Systems built to your personal requirements.
• We stock a full range of Roctec external disk drives.
• We also carry a full range of monitors, disk drives,
modems, printers and other computer accessories.
• Enquire about our comprehensive range of Australian
made lighting surge arrestors, power and telephone
line filters as well as standby and uninteruptable power supplies.
• Phone today for details and competitive pricing. liiiiMiil
* Mail and phone orders welcome. _ _ _ _ - ~
RAYTEC DATA SYSTEMS
Phone (043} 23 1966
Fax _ (043) 23 3760 _ _ _
symptom:,, my colleague suggested
that I look immediately at the tuner
control board. Though these sets are
very well made in most respects - a
fact that I confirmed later - they appear to have one weakness.
To understand this it is necessary
to jump ahead a little and describe
the layout of the set. The main board
is about 25cm square and sits in the
bottom of the cabinet, mounted in a
reasonably substantial moulded plastic frame to give it additional strength.
The whole assembly is held by four
screws, one at each corner.
This plastic frame also serves to
support the tuner control board which
is a narrow board, about as long as
the main board is wide. This is
mounted vertically on the main board
at the fron_t of the cabinet, in a vertical section of the moulded plastic
frame. The top edge of the control
board sits just below the bottom of
the picture tube. This board carries
the tuner programming ICs and all
the front panel controls. The tuner
itself is mounted on the rear of the
main board, allowing the antenna
coax to connect directly to it.
So what was the weakness? Accord-
TETIA TV TIP
PO Box 1174
Gosford Sth, 2250
• Freight chartge on normal size Items $10.00. Monttors etc. $15.00.
• lnsurnce charge is 1% of total order value.
PRICES VALID FOR THE MONTH OF PUBLICATION OR WHILE STOCKS LAST
+
$5 .oo p&p
DEGAUSSING WAND
7,700 apere turns. Strong magnetic field, larger
than usual coil with multicore centre. Double
insulated for safety with momentary on/off switch.
240V A/C 2.2 amps.
$75.
This one is just about as important as having a
soldering iron in your toolbox'
. 0 p&p
r'_:. . . . . .,
REMOTE CONTROL TESTER
~ ,
r'\'\
" ,. '.J;y
$85.00 + $4.00 p&p
TUNER REPAIRS
(INFARED OR ULTRASONIC)
Designed to test any lnfared or Ultrasonic
control units. With the extension lead you can
also test infared units which cannot be placed in
front of the testing unit. Requires a 9V battery .
Output is via the LED diode and piezo speaker.
from only $11.00 + p&p
Chekque,dMonMey Order,d
8 an ea~ or asterca~
TIJNERS[\216 Canterbury Road, Revesby,
~
NSW, 2212, Australia
Telephone (02) 774 1154
We also repair most tuners on an exchange basis.
TV
1'• •
APRIL 1991
43
SERVICEMAN'S LOG - CTD
ing to my colleague, it was the "just
below" which wasn't "below" enough
- if you follow me. In other words, the
tuner board was too close to the bottom of the picture tube.
And the end result was that, if the
set received a moderately severe jolt,
as in transit, the board and picture
tube could come into contact with
enough force to crack the board or, at
least, some of the tracks on the board.
It had happened on a number of occasions and was now the first thing to
be checked whenever any tuning
problems were ,encountered. Hence
his advice to check this board.
Which brings us to the point where
I had the set on the bench and was
ready to turn it on and see what happened. The first surprise was that
, there appeared to be no channels
programmed into the tuner. Initially,
I wondered whethe:r this was a manifestation of the drift problem but, fortunately, I had occasion to talk to my
colleague again before I acted on this
thought. It was then that I learned
that the set had only ever been used
with a video recorder. In fact, it was
used in a coffee shop/milk bar to play
video clips for the entertainment of
its teenage patrons. So it had only
been programmed for channel 1.
Since it was easier to use off-air
signals, I set to and programmed the
tuner for the local VHF channels, plus
SES on the UHF channel. Then I
switched it to channel 2 and let it
run. It ran like this for some hours,
with no sign of trouble, which didn't
seem to tally with the description of
the fault - at least in terms of time.
·So I turned to the pattern generator,
set it to channel 1, and fed the signal
into the set. And that did get results;
in a very short time, the signal started
to drift. This was a bit puzzling, so I
repeated the test on some of the high
band VHF channels and also on the
UHF channel. They were all rock
steady.
By now I was having definite second thoughts about the cracked board
theory; the selective nature of the fault
suggested an internal tuner fault. But,
in any case, the board had to come
out for inspection; if there was a
"funny" due to damage and I missed
it after being warned, I'd never hear
the end of it.
I pulled the back off the set and
then, on impulse, tried another tack. I
ran the set on all channels in turn, at
the same time applying pressure and
a twisting action to the tuner.
None of this had any effect until I
reached channel 1, whereupon it responded immediately; by applying
the twisting action in the right direction and with the right pressure, I
could virtually tune the signal in or
out. This was even more evidence to
support the faulty tuner theory.
But I still had to clear up any suspicion of a cracked board. I pulled the
board assembly out, unscrewed the
control board from its frame - to get it
in a good light - and went over it
carefully, using a jeweller's loupe.
After much searching, I was forced to
the conclusion that there were no
cracked or damaged tracks. While it
was thoughtful of my colleague to
warn me - and I'm passing the warning on - it was not the problem this
time.
.1.m.,.;. r.:.1;i:.11:
RCS Radio Pty Ltd is the only company which
manufactures and sells every PCB & front panel
published in SILICON CHIP, ETI and EA.
651 Forest Road, Bexley, NSW 2207. Phone (02) 587 3491.
44
SILICON CHIP
So back to the tuner. I turned the
main board over and examined the
various soldered connections to the
tuner pins, again with the jeweller's
loupe. I could find nothing wrong. I
then set up a meter to monitor the
tuning voltage but again drew a blank;
it was perfectly steady.
Finally, more or less in deperation,
I went over the soldered connections
and remade each one. It was more to
be able to say that I had done it than
any real hope that it would effect a
cure. Imagine my surprise, therefore ,
when I set everything going again and
found that the fault had vanished.
None ofmy previous tricks to bring it
on had any effect.
So what had I done? Had there been
a faulty joint which was not visible?
Perhaps, but I was not convinced. The
whole setup just didn't jell. I couldn't
reconcile the channel selective nature of the fault with a faulty joint.
Nevertheless, the set ran for the rest
of that day without missing a beat, in
spite of all the twisting, pressing and
bashing I could dish out.
Murphy's little joke
So I finished up with a conflict of
ideas. The more emotional line of
thought wanted to believe that the
fault was fixed; the commonsense line
told me that such a cure just wasn't
on. It was all one of Murphy's horrible jokes.
But the set ran all the next day and
all the following day. By this stage, I
was about to send it back to the customer but then, on the fourth day,
there was the fault, exactly as before.
It was a narrow squeak.
More to the point, I had no doubts
now that it was an internal tuner fault.
And that meant a new tuner, which
seemed simple enough until we tried
- and by "we" I mean the Tandy personnel as well as myself. The final
answer was: "On back order; delivery
date uncertain."
I didn't go into the finer details of
this situation, or who or what was to
blame. Suffice it to say that there
seemed to have been a miscalculation somewhere. But that's not unusual.
So the set is sitting in a corner of
my bench, waiting until a tuner becomes available. In the meantime, I
have left it to the Tandy dealer to
make peace with his customer. It's all
very frustrating.
SC
|