This is only a preview of the March 1991 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 43 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
|
-
ctr,c
Electronic control
circuitry has a big
role to play in
modern electric
vehicles. We look at
the brain that
controls the drain.
By GERRY NOLAN
limb in, switch on and start a
conventional (ICE) motor ' vehicle and it usually settles into
a steady idle. This is because the
engine controller is set up to make it
do just that.
Basically, the accelerator is sprung
to the fully closed position and idle
jets in the carburettor control the fuel/
air mixture ratio and amount to produce the idle. If the engine is cold,
the choke (manual or auto) is used to
vary the ratio and quantity.
The same result is achieved in a
C
different way with fuel injected vehicles. By contrast, if you climb in
and switch on your electric vehicle,
nothing happens until you press the
accelerator.
When you press the accelerator in
your ICE vehicle, you increase the
amount of fuel/air mixture introduced
to the cylinders to be burnt, thereby
increasing the amount of energy released to be converted into power and
VROOM! VROOM! - engage low gear and
away you go.
In your electric vehicle, as you accelerate abruptly away without the
benefit of gears, the complete lack of
VROOM! VROOM! will make you feel
even more strongly that what is happening shouldn't be happening.
EV motors and controllers are so
closely combined that discussing one
without the other is difficult so we
have arbitrarily decided to discuss
controllers first and then motors in
the next instalment..
Theoreticaliy, the power control of
an electric vehicle is as simple as
controlling the volume on your radio
or television. But what about the
losses Virginia?
Obviously, using a whacking great
rheostat would result in enormous
power losses, especially at low
speeds. Remember, we're talking several hundreds of amperes here. Even
racing model electric cars have up to
160A pulse ratings for braking.
Something with a little more finesse
is called for and now power control-
lers are almost all based on some form
of digital, solid state circuitry, many
of which use MOSFET inverters with
more and more using microprocessors to completely automate motor
control.
Much of recent electric vehicle
development is focussed on the use
of laptop or small built-in computers
for the collection of data over the
whole charging and running regime
of the vehicle. This data is then used
to write software that will "tell" the
vehicle what to do when particular
demands are made on it.
When enough data has been collected, it can be used to program a
microprocessor chip to carry out all
of the requirements automatically and
efficiently.
What are the requirements?
Perhaps the most important requirement is that the control system responds quickly and smoothly to the
driver's signals for higher or lower
speed. While it is doing this, it should
provide overload protection for the
battery, drive motors, drivetrain and,
not the least important, for itself. It
must be able to do this while using
the minimum energy, with the minimum losses and, at the same time,
maximise the energy available for the
vehicle and reduce battery and motor
losses.
Because of the very rapid acceleration capabilities of electric vehicles,
the power controller should also have
Pt.3: motor control - the part
6
SILICON CHIP
ductors while the motor is running,
the main methods of control are field
and armature control, or a combination of both.
DRIVER ELECTRICAL
INPUT, EG ACCELERATOR
PEDAL
DC motor control
'\V
SPEED OR P0SITION
/
CONTROL
LOGIC
'
i/
'
CURRENT LEVEL
\ / , I/ \V
DRIVE SHAFT
'
/
POWER
CONTROLLER
'/
DRIVE
MOTOR
I
Block diagram of electric vehicle (EV) motor control
Fig .1: the motor and its controller are closely interrelated. If the driver
wants to increase speed, for example, he presses on the accelerator
and the control logic senses this via the output from a small potentiometer
controlled by the accelerator pedal. This 'increase power' signal goes to
the power controller, which increases the power to the motor. As the
motor speeds up, a tachometer sends a signal back to the control logic
where it is compared with the original input signal. When the motor
speed reaches the desired level, the input and feedback signals will
balance each other and no further 'increase speed' signals are sent to
the power controller.
an inbuilt "high-pedal lockout." This
is a time delay so that, if the accelerator pedal is accidentally knocked
down hard from fully off, the vehicle
will not jerk away and injure someone.
Also very important is the regenerative braking capability of the controller. This is its ability to enable
energy that would normally be dissipated as heat during braking to be
used to recharge the batteries - a vital
factor in increasing vehicle range.
How the controller works
Essentially, the control logic senses
the speed required by the driver, from
the position of the accelerator pedal,
and adjusts the amount of power
going to the motors to achieve this
speed. The block diagram of Fig.1 will
give you a clear picture.
The torque, speed and regeneration
characteristics of electric motors are
primarily governed by the following
factors:
• armature current;
• magnetic flux per pole;
• number of armature conductors;
• number of poles;
• armature speed; and
• field current.
As it is impractical to change the
number of poles and armature con-
played by electronics
One way to achieve this is to vary
the resistance of the armature or of
both the armature and field windings
by switching resistances in and out of
the motor circuit with contactors. This
may be achieved manually or through
sensing the motor speed but, either
way, the discrete changes in voltage
produce a jerky motion. And of
course, it produces high FR losses.
A more efficient but no less jerky
way is to use contactors to switch the
batteries into different combinations
of series and parallel to provide more
or less power to the armature.
These methods are rarely used now,
even for model electric vehicles. High
power solid-state controllers offer the
most practical, reliable and efficient
method of motor control, through
pulse width modulation (PWM), frequency modulation and a combination of these two techniques.
The PWM technique uses a constant DC voltage which is "chopped"
into pulses of varying widths (see
Fig.2). At low speed, the ON pulses
are quite short in relation to the OFF
pulses, while at high speed they are
proportionally longer, right out to top
speed where they are effectively 100%
DC.
Frequency modulation maintains a
constant pulse width but varies the
rate at which the pulses occur until
again, at maximum speed, there is
practically no time between the
pulses. A combination of these two
techniques may also be used.
Until recently, power transistors,
thyristors, SCRs and bipolar junction
transistors (BJTs) were used to achieve
the high switching rates needed for
both PWM and frequency modulation methods. In the last few years,
the development of high powered
metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs), with much
faster switching times and the ability
to be switched directly by logic gates,
has made them the preferred option.
One of the reasons David Gosden
of Sydney University opted for
MOSFETs, despite the availability of
much higher powered and cheaper
thyristors and bipolar junction transistors, was because of their superior
MARCH 1991
7
Fig.2(a): a constant
frequency, variable
pulse width (PWM)
waveform. The motor
slows down as the
pulses become
narrower & speeds up
as the pulses widen.
VOLTAGE
VARIABLE
-
k:
, -
Tfixed
'
/
- -
>
TIME
A
switching capabilities. Switching
times are an order of magnitude
shorter than BJTs, allowing the
switching frequenci es to be increased
to over 15kHz. This gets it out of the
unpleasant 2-BkHz range of BJT inverter switching frequ encies and al lows much quieter vehicle operation.
AC motor controllers
Although new developments in DC
motors and controllers may change
the situation at any time, at present
the trend is to us e AC motors for electric vehicles.
The General Motors Impact is powered by two 3-phase , AC inductiontype motors, each driving one of the
front wheels. Together they develop
85kW at 6600rpm and the full torque
of 1.27Nm over the whole speed
range. Inverters convert DC from the
batteries to AC and the whole system,
which is capable of handling up to
100kW, weighs only 28kg.
Pulse width modulation (PWM)
and frequency modulation inverters
(FMI) , and various combinations of
the two , are both used in AC motor
controllers.
Braking
During mechanical braking of a
vehicle, kinetic energy is dissipated
as heat in the brakes, which of course
wear out over a period of time.
In an EV, the life of the mechanical
brakes can be increased by using the
drive motor/s as a generator supplying a resistive load, thus providing a
braking torque to the wheels. This
type of braking, in which the vehicle's
kinetic energy is dissipated in resistance, is known as "dynamic braking". Both mechanical and dynamic
braking dissipate the kinetic energy
as heat, which is therefore wasted.
When the vehicle is travelling faster
than the speed required by the driver
(that is, over-running), the drive motor/s may be used as generators to
convert a part of the kinetic energy
loss to electrical energy which is then
used to recharge the batteries. This is
"regenerative braking" and is used in
all modern electric vehicles in the
forward direction and by some in the
reverse direction.
Regenerative braking is not an option that is available to internal combustion engine vehicles and, in a
world where non-reusable energy
resources are perceived to be running
out, any means by which energy wastage can be limited obviously has valuable advantages.
Nevertheless, because there is a
lower speed limit to the use of regenerative braking, all EVs also have a
mechanical braking system similar to
that used in conventional vehicles.
Energy management
This photograph shows the solid state control & inverter circuitry in the Sydney
University Suzuki Carry Van. (Photograph by Robert MacDonnell) .
8
SILICON CHIP
An important function of the EV
power control system is to provide
the driver with information about the
amount of energy remaining. As
mentioned in the previous instalment,
VOLTAGE
Fig.2(b): a variable
frequency constant
pulse width
waveform. The higher
the pulse frequency,
the higher the motor
speed.
FIXED
~ T variable
>
TIME
B
this is not quite as simple as providing a battery state-of-charge indication to replace the current fuel -remaining gauge.
Some of the things an energy management system (as relate d to batteries) should do are:
• provide battery state-of-charge indication;
• control the maximum current drawn
from the battery;
• control the· depth of discharge;
• control charging characteristics;
The Solar Star, which recently
broke the world-speed record for a
solar/electric vehicle (see story this
issue). actually provides a range-atpresent-rate-of-discharge readout by
using a small on-board computer.
When all the bugs have been worked
out of the software being used in this ,
it is hoped that it wUl be developed
into a microchip that can be used in
off-the-shelf instruments .
As mentioned above , microprocessors are used in conjunction with
computers to facilitate the testing of
various motor control strategies and
combinations of strategies with few
or no hardware changes. For example,
Sydney University uses an Intel
80C196 processor in conjunction with
a laptop computer. It has operated
the motor in such a way that the stator currents are determined by the
torque demand and, in another series
of tests, where the motor is operated
under torque control.
It is safe to assume that, by the time
EVs are out of the experimental stages
and accessible to the motoring public , every aspect of the vehicle con-
trol will be under the direction of
microprocessors .
Even the steering signals from the
driver may be modified according to
speed, gradient and so on, p erhaps
even to the extent that the controller
will automatically slow the vehicle
down if it is going too fast for the
amount of steering input indicated.
The Solar Star already has a 'cruise
control' selection to optimise energy
usage for a given speed.
Once we realise that, being electric , the EV is a fertile fi eld for all the
clever ideas already developed in
electronics - that we can control every aspect directly and not be restricted to controlling various valves,
diaphragms an d pumps - deve lopments in EV control will take a quantum leap.
SC
VOLTAGE
I~
ton
Fig.2(c): the
waveform from a
variable frequency/
variable pulse width
controller.
VARIABLE
-
k
T variable
'
-->
TIME
C
MARCH 1991
9
|