This is only a preview of the March 1991 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 43 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
|
The Story Of
Electrical Energy, Pt.8
Since AC power transmission first began,
there has been a trend to higher and higher
voltages, to keep resistance losses to a
minimum. But there is a limit to the use of
very high voltage AC and when this is
reached, DC transmission must be used.
By BRYAN MAHER
The year was 1983, the location
Foz do Iguacu, in Brazil the day overcast and hot. Watched by an assembly of invited guests, a VIP mounted a
decorated dais to ceremoniously
throw a small control switch. In response, giant transformer circuit
breakers in an adjacent hall slammed
closed, bringing on line generators of
the Brazilian Itaipu hydroelectric
system.
Thus was initiated the first stage of
the world's greatest power line which
when completed would operate at 1.2
million volts and carry up to 6.3 gigawatts of electrical power.
The receiving substation for this
project was 800 kilometres distant on
the opposite side of the country at
Sao Roque, a suburb of Sao Paulo.
Question: how can you economically transmit these large quantities
of electrical energy over such great
distances? And sell power to neighbouring nations as well? The partial
answer is to use very high voltages.
We have seen previously in this
series the need for high voltages in
long power lines. Not only are transmission losses reduced but also the
corridor needed can be narrower for a
given power to be carried. To transfer
7.5GW at 330kV would require about
seven double circuit lines in parallel.
These would occupy a corridor 250
metres wide. The same quantity of
7
__'_J
I
333MVA ISOLATED
, - - - TRANSFORMER
I
CORE AND CASE
330kV
INPUT
2.255MV SUPPLY
TO TEST LINE
.,.
FIG.1: THE TEST ARRANGEMENT used for the ASEA transformer set at the
test range at Lakerville, USA. The core & case of the final transformer is alive,
at 345kV above ground potential. A test cage allowed various weather
conditions such as rain & mist to be simulated.
82
SILICON CHIP
power could be carried by one 1200kV
3-phase line which would fit within
a corridor 90 metres wide.
UHV problems
Ultra high voltage AC systems are,
however, beset with problems. The
extra insulation required can be
mostly provided by the simple extension of known technology. But other
difficulties emerge. Some countries,
notably Russia, Sweden, the USA and
Italy have been using experimental
megavolt research installations for the
p2.st 15 years.
In the USA, west of Lakeville, Indiana, ASEA (now ABB) established a
UHV test line of five spans on towers
61 metres high. Voltages up to
2.255MV are produced by a triple
bank of cascaded ASEA transformers.
The final transformer has its core and
case alive, 345kV above ground potential, as shown in Fig. l.
This complete transformer, weighing 290 tonnes , was mounted on a
giant insulated pedestal. Conductor
bundles of more than 1.2 metres in
diameter, consisting of 18 subconductors, each 30mm diameter, have been
tested.
A 2.255MV disconnect switch and
a test cage wherein various weather
conditions such as rain and mist can
be produced at will, are provided.
Instruments measure voltage surges,
control operation, effects of conductor height, RFI, ozone, corona power
loss , audible noise, high frequency
components and weather conditions.
Switching surges of up to 100% overvoltage have been observed in some
cases.
The Ohio Brass Company contributed its laboratory facilities for insulator testing and other UHV research
institutes from Canada, Italy and
France cooperated.
The ASEA company has always led
the field in power line practice above
400kV, both in AC and DC applica-
THIS HISTORIC PHOTOGRAPH shows the world's first 10kV mercury arc
rectifier. It was developed at the ASEA laboratory in Ludvika, Sweden, from
1929-33.
tions. That company inspired the
world's first 400kV national grid system in Sweden as far back as 1952.
EPRI research
The Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) of USA contracted with
the General Electric Company to conduct UHV tests at GE's facility at
Pittsfield, Massachusetts. Threephase lines of 1.5MV (1500kV) and
500 metres long are used to investigate optimum design. A wide range
of factors must be optimised: height,
phase spacing, bundle diameter and
the number of parallel subconductors.
Measurements made included RFI
in the broadcast band and corona effects using different types of corona
shields. The test line uses gantry span
towers, 71 metres wide and 21.5
metres high, with the three phases
suspended below the cross member
on V-shaped suspension insulator
strings bf glass, porcelain and other
materials.
Soviet UHV
The Russians possess test rigs for
designs up to 5MV or even 7.5MV
(7500kV). Much research and development was done into 1150kV circuit
breaker design , protection systems,
transformers and electric field intensity.
Due to transformer leakage reactance and circuit capacitance, voltage
ringing oscillations occur when
switches are opened. In one Russian
case, sinewaves of 400kV at a frequency of 1800Hz were found superimposed on a 1150kV 3-phase line
during switching operations. The
insulation on lines, equipment and
particularly transformer windings
must be sufficient to cope with these
overvoltages.
But three fundamental problems of
UHV 3-phase AC lines are harder to
alleviate. These are line inductance,
line capacitance and the noise generated by corona discharge.
Inductance and capacitance
As we have previously seen, any
cable has inductance which produces
an AC voltage drop proportional to
the product of current, inductance
and frequency. Also, we have noted
THE ASEA/AEP 2.255MV research
substation. The high-voltage
transformer is mounted on an
insulated platform (bottom of photo),
while the 2.255MV busbars are
mounted 23 metres above ground.
MARCH 1991
83
':Qt!Q!:!Yll!:!:.!.~
1oc--
3-PHASE
GRID SYSTEM
CONTROLLED
INVERTER
L
TRA~Wci~~ER
.,.
STEP-DOWN
TRANSFORMER
--1oc
SENDING END - - - - - - i
t-------
RECEIVING END
-------t
FIG.2: BASIC SCHEME for a high-voltage DC transmission system. Either 50Hz or 60Hz AC power is
generated in the usual fashion at the transmission end & this is then rectified to DC for transmission
over the line. At the receiving end, the DC is converted back to AC & transformed down so that it can be
fed into the system grid.
that the natural phase to phase and
phase to ground capacitance demands
a charging curreBt. This can run to
many hundreds of amperes and is
also proportional to frequency. Capacitance charging current is an insurmountable problem in AC underground and submarine power cables.
The close spacings of conductors and
earthed shields results in huge capacitance values.
In fact, inductive and capacitive
effects greatly exceed the line voltage
loss due to ohmic resistance of the
conductors.
Compensators
Excessive inductance in an AC
power line can be compensated for
by inserting capacitors in series with
the line at intervals. However, this is
very expensive. Compensation by this
method becomes uneconomical for
lines carrying lGW or more over distances exceeding 500 kilometres.
To correct for the high values of
shunt capacitance in long high voltage underground cables, inductors
must be used. These are connected in
parallel with the line at intervals along
its length. But again, the cost escalates way above the cost of cable and
simple trenches.
For long undersea cables though,
this form of compensation is impossible.
In wet and foggy weather, the corona phenomenon generates a lot of
noise as well as a characteristic blue
glow around the conductors. The
noise , based on the system frequency
(50 or 60Hz) and its harmonics, can
be a loud buzzing and sputtering with
components from 50Hz to many kilohertz.
The DC solution
Wouldn't it be nice if we could
remove all these frequency dependent problems? Well, we can - just
reduce the frequency to zero! Then
line inductance would not be important during steady current flow. Further, line capacitance would produce
no further effects after initially being
energised and charged. Corona would
still produce a pretty blue glow
around conductors in the rain, but
the generated noise levels would be
vastly reduced, down to a faint hissing sound.
The answer, of course, is to use
high voltage DC. Thomas Edison
would stand up and cheer were he
still alive.
Nearly a century ago, AC transmis-
ISOLATED AC SUPPLY
/
WATER
COOLER
AND PUMP
VACUUM TIGHT
HVBUSHING
-
TANK ALIVE AT
POSITIVE DC
POTENTIAL
-
EVACUATED
WATER COOLED
STEEL TANK
+15DOVDC
LOAD .
PERHAPS.
5kA
FLOOR
Corona noise
Corona, as we saw in past chapters,
does not cause large losses, though it
does increase dramatically in damp
weather, especially in wet snow. The
deleterious effects of corona are RFI
and acoustic noise.
84
SILICON CHIP
FIG.3: A MERCURY ARC rectifier consists of an evacuated steel tank containing
a mercury pool, an anode & a starting electrode. A starting current is used to
vaporise the mercury to produce electrons & positive ions. When the anode
swings positive, the electrons quickly accelerate towards it & a high current
flows. However, when the anode swings negative, the heavier ions accelerate
towards it quite slowly & so only a very small back current is produced.
sion was chosen in preference to the
DC systems advocated by Edison;
purely because of the ease of transforming an AC voltage. The world
has now turned full circle; we are
facing the difficulties engendered by
the frequency factor as we build
higher and higher voltage AC systems.
But note that it is the AC line fre quency, not the voltage, that gives
trouble. Therefore, DC was chosen for
that monstrous 6.3GW power line
mentioned at the start of this episode.
AC-DC-AC
Nobody in his right mind would
attempt to generate huge quantities of
high voltage DC in rotating machinery. No! We still generate AC at 50Hz
or 60Hz in normal alternators, at voltage in the 1 lkV to 33kV range. Transformers then raise the voltage to UHV
(ultra high voltage) values around the
sub-megavolt region. This is then rectified to DC for transmission over long
distances.
At the far end of the line, more
equipment inverts the DC currents
back to AC at normal system frequency (50 or 60Hz, depending on
the country). This AC is usually transformed down (in a normal transformer) to feed into the system grid at
the load end. The block diagram of
Fig.2 explains the concept.
Rectifier valves
The transformers used are just extensions of known designs. But what
was needed was the development of
some types of valves to rectify these
high AC voltages to DC, then subsequently to invert back to AC at the far
end.
The story starts way back before
any of us were born. Though Thomas
Edison discovered the vacuum diode
rectifier in 1885, he saw no applications for it; nor did he give the modern theory of its operation.
Physicists like Richardson (1902)
explained valve rectification of AC to
DC as being due to flows of negative
charges to a positive anode . But a
negative anode would support no
such flow. So AC supply could sustain current flow in one direction only
through such a valve. Rectification of
AC to DC was thus achieved.
As we survey the evolution of
HVDC systems, it is interesting to note
how early some of the techniques
were known. Richardson gave the
THIS IS ASEA's high-voltage DC laboratory at Trollhatten, Sweden, in 1944.
Note the steam produced by the water-cooled load resistor when testing HVDC
valves at full power.
name "thermions" to his mobile negative charges within a valve. Today we
simply call them "electrons", the
Greek word for amber. His vacuum
tube diode rectifiers in 1902 were
called kenotrons.
Around the turn of the century,
scientists had perfected the use of
these tubes in rectifying 100kV AC to
high voltage DC. The small currents
available were used for x-ray experiments. By 1932, Cockroft and Walton
were producing 700kV DC supplies
from voltage quadrupling diode rectifiers. Other engineers in the 1920s
were using gaseous valves to rectify
AC INPUT
STEEL
TANK
~ 'POSITIVEGRIO
--,-
·PULSE SUPPLY
ANO TIME'R
-
PULSE
TRANSFORMER
CONTROL
GRID
LOAD
FIG.4: THE OUTPUT VOLTAGE of a mercury arc rectifier can be varied by
interposing a control grid in the electron stream between the mercury cathode
and the anode. If a sufficiently large negative potential is applied to this grid,
all electrons in the mercury plasma gas will be repelled and none will pass to
the anode. The valve is then in the cutoff state and no current can flow.
MARCH 1991
85
V4
V6
pelled and none will pass to the anode. The valve is then in the cutoff
state and no current can flow.
In this way, a mercury arc rectifier
can be used as a controlled rectifier,
similar to an SCR.
V2
Switched operation
f.~
~
I--
V1
:!,p_HASE
OUTPUT
TRIGGER PULSES
TO EACH VALVE
V3
V5
SYNC
SIGNAL
INPUT
--i □ C
HVDC LINE
NEGATIVE RETURN
FIG.5: BLOCK DIAGRAM of a DC-AC inverter at the receiving end. V1-V6 are
controlled high-voltage mercury arc valves which are switched in turn to
provide current waveforms to a 3-phase output transformer. The trigger pulse
generator turns off each rectifier at the correct time by injecting a large negative
pulse to the anode via a capacitor for a sufficient time to allow the arc to cease,
thus giving control back to the grid
much greater currents in 600V to 3kV
circuits. One of the gases used was
mercury vapour.
Mercury arc valves
Soon this technique led to larger
valves in which the cathode was simply a pool of mercury at the bottom.
In the late 1920s, these mercury arc
rectifiers were widely used for supplying rail traction currents at . voltages in the 600 to 1500V range. The
original glass envelope had then been
superseded by steel tank models. Fig.3
shows a typical mercury arc rectifier
which uses an evacuated steel tank.
To start the rectifier, a current is
passed through the mercury pool and
an initial arc drawn. This vaporises
some mercury to a heavy gaseous
plasma of electrons and po_sitively
charged mercury ions.
The AC supply is connected to an
anode of iron, carbon or patented alloys. Whenever the AC on the anode
swings positive, it attracts electrons
and, because these have only a tiny
mass, they accelerate very quickly,
flowing during the whole positive
86
SILICON CHIP
half-cycle. Moving electrons constitute an electric current, and so many
thousands of amperes can flow
through the rectifier.
When the AC supply on the anode
swings negative, it attracts the heavy
positive gaseous mercury ions. But as
these ions have very great mass, they
accelerate only slowly. The result is
that the negative half cycle is over
before any appreciable number of
positive ions arrive at the anode. This
back current can be measured in
microamps or milliamps.
Thus, a mercury arc valve rectifier
passes useful current only when the
anode is positive. The output is taken
from the steel (cathode) case of the
rectifier.
Control grid
The output voltage of a mercury
arc rectifier can be varied by interposing a control grid in the electron
stream between the mercury cathode
and the anode, as shown in Fig.4. If a
sufficiently large negative potential
is applied to this grid, all electrons in
the mercury plasma gas will be re-
Once in conducting mode , the
mercury valve continues passing current as long as the anode is positive,
without any regard to the grid potential. We thus need a method of interrupting this current flow and this can
· be achieved in two ways.
The first , employed where the receiving end has no local AC supply,
uses a transformer or inductance in
series with the DC line to each valve
as shown in Fig.5. To stop the valve
conducting, the continuous DC supply must be interrupted momentarily
and the grid held at cutoff negative
bias.
To achieve the currents in the three
output phases, the appropriate pair
of valves is switched on by releasing
the negative bias on them at the correct timing. Then, when the output
current in that phase is to be stopped,
the grid is taken negative beyond
cutoff and a large negative pulse injected at the valve anode.
This momentarily makes the anode
negative for a sufficient time for the
mercury arc to cease, giving control
back to the grid. Six timing circuits (3
for the anodes & 3 for grids) are required.
Instead of transformers, series inductance and capacitance coupled
anode pulses may be used. These
methods are seldom used nowadays
as systems expand.
First HV mercury valve
Building on their own experience
and earlier German and English results in 1.5kV traction rectifiers , the
ASEA company of Sweden developed
a lOkV prototype from 1929-33. This,
the world's first high voltage mercury
arc valve, was set up in their laboratory cJ,t Ludvika for testing in 1933.
Though mercury arc valves give no
problems in the 600V to 3kV range,
the idea of rectifying voltages up to a
megavolt is frightening. In the conducting mode, the forward drop is
only 15V and so there are no problems here. However, in the reverse
mode, with the anode negative at
hundreds of kilovolts , you would
100kV AC SUPPLY FROM TRANSFORMER
ample power was available. Mercury
arc valves were tested using a steaming water resistor as a high power
load.
METAL
1-r-..---...-.-1---- ANODE
World's first HVDC line
C
EVACUATED
- - CERAMIC
HOUSING
FREQUENCY
COMPENSATED
VOLTAGE
DIVIDER
TIMER
SIGNAL
--------++UPPER
COOLING
SYSTEM
NEGATIVE GRID
BIAS AND POSITIVE 1----1---1-- _
TRIGGER PULSE AND
TIMER SYSTEM
CONTROL
GRID
I
..!_ _ _
CIRCULATING
WATER
JACKET
FIG.6: TO OVERCOME BREAKDOWN problems when rectifying high voltages,
ASEA developed a mercury arc rectifier with a series of nine intermediate
electrodes between the anode & control grid. A voltage divider connected to
these electrodes thus provides 10 steps of lOkV each, which means that the field
experienced by any one positive ion is drastically reduced (10kV vs. lOOkV).
naturally expect voltage breakdown
under such a tremendous electric
field.
To overcome this problem, ASEA
researchers developed a more advanced valve which reduced the electric field experienced by any positive
mercury ion. This was achieved by
having the electron stream pass
through a series of nine intermediate
electrodes, each at equal smaller increments of voltage, obtained from a
frequency compensated voltage divider - see Fig.6. The whole compound-anode assembly was mounted
inside a ceramic extension of the
water cooled steel tank.
A valve with nine intermediate
grating-like electrodes plus one final
solid anode would have the full voltage, say lO0kV, applied to the top
electrode. The voltage divider provides 10 steps of lOkV each in the
space between intermediate anodes.
This is sufficiently low to prevent
voltage flashover or breakdown during the negative half cycle when the
valve is in the non-conducting state.
In 1943, an assembly consisting of
four parallel mercury valves was
tested in the ASEA laboratory at
Ludvika. Each valve contained nine
intermediate electrodes, and the
whole arrangement ran successfully
on 40kV at a group current up to 200
amps.
Trollhattan Hydro
Under a 1944 agreement with the
Swedish state power board, ASEA
conducted further high power mercury valve tests at Trollhattan, close
to the hydroelectric power station.
A point readers may not have considered is: how do you conduct a full
power test on any power equipment
unless you have that much power
available? For this reason, ASEA
shifted its research and development
facility to this new location where
In 1946, the many years ofresearch
by ASEA engineers and scientists
came to fruition. In that year, the
world's first high voltage DC power
line was built and put into operation.
This 60 kilometre feeder operated at
90kV DC and carried 6.5 megawatts
of power from Trollhattan power station northwards to Mellerud on the
shores of the Vanern . So successful
was this line that the concept of mercury arc rectifiers, inverters and
HVDC power transmission was becoming a reality.
Subsequently, a power supply was
needed from mainland Sweden to
Gotland, an offshore island in the
Baltic Sea. An undersea cable was
proposed from Vastervik on the mainland to Visby on the island, a distance of 105 kilometres. As the seabed along the route does not exceed
100 metres in depth , laying the cable
was not a problem.
Specifications called for 20 megawatts to be carried at lO0kV. At such
a high voltage, an AC undersea cable
would have been impossible due to
capacitance effects. So, in 1950, ASEA
was contracted by the Swedish State
Power Board to develop and install
suitable mercury arc valves.
As there already existed a power
station on the island, the DC link
could in principle carry power in either direction. Thus, rectifiers and
inverters were made as identical
twins, and the timing sequences to
the valve grids would decide the
power flow direction.
The Gotland Link made history in
1954, being the world's first high voltage DC undersea cable. The fame of
that line is understandable as it
opened the way for cross-channel
power transfer anywhere in the world,
a concept totally foreign to AC designs.
Exhaustive tests on 140 mercury
arc valve designs occupied four years
of intense development. To carry the
required 200 amps DC current, ASEA
installed a bridge circuit at each end
of the line. Each diode therein consisted of a grid controlled mercury
arc rectifier having two parallel anode assemblies rated at over lO0kV.
MARCH 1991
87
DEVELOPED BY ASEA at Ludvika in 1943, these four high voltage mercury arc
valves contained nine intermediate electrodes (see Fig.9) & ran successfully on
40kV with a group current (anodes paralleled) of 200 amps. The nine
intermediate electrodes of each rectifier are mounted inside a ceramic tube
which sits atop the water-cooled steel tank.
Each anode contained at least 10 intermediate electrodes.
Undersea cable
The single-core undersea cable was
specially designed and manufactured.
To achieve the greatest active conductor area in a given space, each
copper strand was squashed from circular to roughly hexagonal cross section. Thus, 60 copper strands were
laid up in a 5-layer pattern. The surrounding 150kV insulation was itself
encircled by a neutral shielding layer,
aluminium tubing, layers of steel
armour stranding and a waterproof
covering.
Note that you cannot operate a steelarmoured single core cable on AC. If
you do, the current carried by the
copper will set up strong AC magnetic fields in the steel. The resulting
88
SILICON CHIP
eddy currents in the armouring will
overheat the cable, damage the insulation and cause breakdbwn.
But the same cable carrying DC
gives no problem. Sure, there are
strong magnetic fields in the steel,
but DC fields do not induce eddy
currents!
Sea return
Another innovation inspired by the
historic Gotland DC submarine cable
is the idea of sea re.turn. In this
scheme, the copper cable carries current for one half of the circuit, while
the return current flows through the
seawater. This practice does more
than just save a copper return cable.
As the ocean has an almost infinite
cross section, the sea return path has
almost zero resistance. Thus, cable
losses are half that which would re-
sult if a copper return cable were used.
Electrodes of large surface area
implanted in the sea at both ends of
the line provide the connection to the
salt water.
ASEA continued their research and
development of controlled mercury
arc rectifiers and inverters for a further 17 years. Later valves carrying
1000 amps per anode at voltages up
to 135kV established the HVDC concept beyond doubt. Installations all
over the world followed and then
solid state inverters appeared on the
scene. We hope to cover these in a
future issue.
SC
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to ABB Australia
and Sweden for supplying historic photographs and data; to
ASEA Journal and Action; to
General Electric and IEEE Spectrum.
|