This is only a preview of the December 1993 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 29 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Build A Low-Voltage LED Stroboscope":
Items relevant to "A Low-Cost 25W Amplifier Module":
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
|
SERVICEMAN'S LOG
Whingeing Willie & the bouncing TV
What does one do when a set bounces? Much
depends on why it has bounced but there is
also the customer’s reaction to consider. Most
customers are understanding & reasonable –
even apologetic. But every so often ...
Yes, every so often one strikes a
stinker and this is about one such
customer. But first, why do sets
bounce? Broadly, there are two categories. The one we all dread is the
one which, strictly speaking, is our
own fault.
The scenario is typical: an intermittent fault with erratic behaviour,
resulting in a long and involved process of trial and error to track it down.
Usually, this involves re-making suspect joints, running the set through
hot and cold cycles, and replacing
the most likely components, based on
previous experience, measurements
and a certain amount of gut feeling.
Nothing works at first but, eventually, one particular effort seems to
be the answer; the set runs for days,
or even weeks, without so much as a
hint of trouble. So back it goes to the
customer.
A week later – or even sooner – it
is back in the shop, with the customer
complaining that it is just as bad as
ever. The customer’s approach will
vary. If they have been warned as to
such a possibility – and I make it a
point to do this – they will usually
accept the situation philosophically,
or even apologetically. A few will be
more upset, but mostly at the device
rather than the serviceman.
In any case, one can only start over
again, and write off the extra time
to experience – the only good point
being that many suspect components
have already been eliminated. And,
with persistence, the real culprit will
eventually be found.
The other bounce
The other kind of bounce is quite
different and typically involves a dead
set with a routine fault that’s easily
recog
nised. The faulty component
is replaced, any minor adjustments
attended to, and the set goes back to
the customer – another job completed.
Except that, a week later or so, it’s
back in the workshop – dead again.
It’s a completely different fault, of
course, and it is not the serviceman’s
fault, but one can hardly blame the
customer for not always appreciating
this point.
But again, most customers will
accept a truthful explanation, if it is
carefully presented. And I normally
waive any further labour charge in
the interest of goodwill. But, as I said
at the beginning, once in a while one
strikes a stinker.
56 Silicon Chip
This story started with a phone call
from a stranger. He opened the conversation by asking whether I provided
warranty service for Samsung sets. I
said “yes” and asked what was the
nature of the problem. It was quite
simple as he described it; the picture
had crept down from the top and up
from the bottom ever so slightly, revealing “...a little black line”.
So I said, “OK, bring it in and we’ll
have a look at it”. And so it duly turned
up at the shop, along with the various
sales dockets which I had asked him
to bring along, to substan
tiate the
warranty claim. The set turned out
to be a model CB-3325J, fitted with a
P/58SC chassis. I turned it on while
he was there and, yes, his description
was quite accurate; a very marginal
degree of vertical underscan.
I told him it looked as though it
needed nothing more than a small
adjustment and suggested that
he leave it with me for an hour
or so. I would have to remove
the back of the set and I wanted
time to confirm that the fault
was a simple as it looked.
As it transpired, he had
other things to do, so he
suggested that he leave
it with me and call
back in a couple of
days. Well, that was
fine by me; it would
mean that I could
fit it in with other
jobs more conveniently and
also allow me to
soak test it for a
couple of days.
So everyone was
happy.
I also took advantage
of the extra time to run
the set for several hours before I touched it. And it simply
performed as it had when first
switched on; there was no change
of any kind.
Subsequently, I pulled the back off,
reset the height control and looked
for anything else that was obviously
wrong, but found nothing. I then replaced the back and ran the set daily
until the customer returned. It ran
perfectly during all that time.
When he returned, I filled out the
necessary warranty claim, demonstrated the set to him, and sent him
on his way. And, as usual, one tends
to mentally write off such jobs almost
immediately; there are other jobs to
do.
The balloon goes up
But a couple of weeks later the
balloon went up. The customer was
on the phone in a most belligerent
manner. His complaint now was that
the picture had shrunk drastically;
it was now only about 10cm high in
the centre of the screen. But more to
the point, he was accusing me of not
having fixed the set in the first place.
I pointed out that there was no “fixing” involved in the first call; it was a
simple adjustment. His reply was that
I should have seen that this was going
to happen, to which I testily replied
that my crystal ball had been a mite
cloudy that day. At a more practical
level, I advised him to bring the set
back in. It was still under warranty
and it would cost him nothing to
have it fixed.
And so the set landed back on the
bench and the owner went on his way
muttering all kinds of nasty things
about Samsung, yours truly, and the
industry in general. I let him rave; I
had the more important job ahead of
finding the fault.
I wasn’t expecting it to be a particularly difficult job but, as I have
mentioned in these notes before,
Samsung circuits and manuals are
disturbingly short on voltages and
waveforms. In some cases, the only
voltages given are the rail voltages
and this is something which can cause
a lot of wasted time.
One important point I noted about
the fault was that there was no suggestion of non-linearity; it was a simple
loss of amplitude only. Such a clue
could be valuable in nominating the
most likely fault areas, or in interpreting CRO patterns.
I began by making a preliminary
check around IC301 (KA2131), a 9-pin
vertical output IC – see Fig.1. My first
check was at pin 4, the supply rail pin.
This connects to the 25V rail via diode
D302 and it checked OK. From here,
I went to the height control, VR301
(1kΩ) and simply tried varying it. I
wasn’t really surprised when it had
only a marginal effect.
Jungle chip
My next stop was IC101, a 28-pin
jungle chip which, among other
things, contains the vertical oscillator,
horizontal oscillator and the sync separator. I spent some time here with the
CRO, particularly around pins 3 and 4.
Pin 3 carries the vertical drive signals
for IC301, entering that IC on pin 6.
Pin 4 takes feedback signals from the
output circuitry of IC301.
Well, there were waveforms at all
these points and most of them seemed
to have reasonable shape but, without
any reference, I was flying blind in
regard to amplitude. However, I was
somewhat suspicious of the oscillator
amplitude (or vertical drive voltage)
on pin 3. It did seem a bit light on.
This thought lead me to pin 2, which
is the supply rail for what is labelled
the “Ramp Gen” but is really the vertical oscillator. This pin is connected to
the 12V rail via a 470kΩ ¼W resistor
(R302). And this was the culprit; it
had gone high.
December 1993 57
SERVICEMAN'S LOG – CTD
Fig.1: this diagram shows the jungle IC (IC101) & the vertical output IC (IC301
at top right) in the Samsung CB-3325J colour TV set.
It was routine from there on. I fitted
a new resistor, reset the height control,
checked everything over once again,
and gave it a soak test for several days.
I also took the opportunity to make a
complete voltage check around these
two ICs, and other important points,
and filed them with the manual. I then
called the customer and told him it
was ready.
He called in the next day, signed
the warranty claim, and went on his
way grumbling and mumbling, mainly
along the lines that the set was “no
so-and-so good” etc, etc. I didn’t bite;
I was only too happy to see the back
of him and I hoped that it would be
for good.
Alas, it was not to be. Would you
believe that he was back on the phone
again barely a week later? His complaint was legitimate enough – the set
was now completely dead. Privately, I
wondered what I had done to deserve
such bad luck. Of all the customers
they could have picked, the gods had
to pick Whingeing Willie.
OK, so he did have a gripe. But
what really annoyed me was that he
was now quite abusive at a personal
level – as if the failure was my fault.
And customer or not, I made this point
quite strongly. The failure was not my
fault; odd components can fail at any
time and it was just unfortunate that
there had been two such failures in
58 Silicon Chip
quick succession. Such a coincidence
was rare but it was not the first time it
had happened.
And I went on to state the situation
as I had before; the set was still under
warranty, he could bring it in at any
time, I would give it priority, and it
would cost him nothing.
So he duly turned up with the set
and continued his tirade of abuse. But
I wasn’t prepared to take it lying down
and took the opportunity to have my
say. I repeated the point that the failure
was not my fault, emphasising that it is
virtually impossible to predict when a
particular component is going to fail.
Fig.2: the horizontal output stage in
the Samsung CB-3325J. It failed when
IC101 shut-down due to some other
fault.
On a percentage basis, component
failure rates are remarkably low – and
have improved amazingly in recent
years – but the day of zero failure is a
still long way off.
That is one of the reasons why manufacturers provide war
ranty cover.
And in this case the warranty service
had been close at hand, he had not had
to resort to a commercial carrier, and
the job had been done in the shortest
possible time. In view of this, I told
him that he didn’t really have much
to complain about.
I doubt that I really convinced him
but it quietened him down somewhat.
Anyway, he went off, still in something
of a high dudgeon but with a silencer
now fitted.
And so I turned to the more practical problem of finding this new fault.
It wasn’t very hard really, although
there was a side effect. It soon became apparent that IC101 was again
involved, since it now appeared to
be completely inoperative. This lead
me to the supply pin (pin 7) which
is supposed to be at +12V. Only there
wasn’t any voltage on it. The culprit
was resis
tor R121, a 1.5Ω resistor,
apparently part of a decoupling net
work. It was open circuit.
A new resistor soon had the set up
and running again but it was still not
quite right. It was now suffering from
significant horizontal underscan. I was
glad I had caught that before Whinging
Willie had had a chance to see it; he’d
have had a seizure on the spot.
Again, it didn’t take long to find
the culprit. It was another resistor,
this time R411 (68Ω). This resistor
supplies current from the 16V rail to
the collector of the horizontal driver
transistor (Q401) via the primary of the
horizontal drive transformer (T401)
–see Fig.2. It had gone high by just
enough to affect the drive.
But it wasn’t really the resistor’s
fault. Deprived of drive from IC101,
Q401 would have been drawing excessive current and R411 would have
been well on the way to complete
failure.
Anyway, it was easily fixed. I went
over the set again, made sure all adjustments were optimised, tried to
visualise what else might go wrong,
and finally pronounced the job finished. I made out the warranty claim
and rang the customer.
He wasn’t any happier when he
called this time. He con
tinued his
abuse of both Samsung in general and
myself in partic
ular. Among other
things, he declared his temptation
to “...go and wrap the set around Mr
Samsung’s ears”.
I told him I didn’t think that would
do him any good and I think this made
him realise just how
ridiculous the suggestion was. And I had the
last word – I reminded
him again that he had
been given first class
service, with no argument, at no cost, and
a minimum of waiting
time. What more did he
expect?
At that he went
on his way and that,
thankfully, was the last
I saw of him. It all happened many months
ago and I am hopeful
that this happy state
will continue. I don’t
want his custom again.
Customer ignorance
But the incident did make me think.
Although this was an extreme case,
customer dissatisfaction along these
lines is nothing new; it has been cropping up from time to time for as long
as I can remember.
So why does it happen? Basically, it
is due to customer ignorance, although
the industry itself may be at least partly
responsible.
More exactly, this ignorance is in the
form of two fundamental misconceptions. The first is that the serviceman,
by some magical process, is able to test
– or even look at – any component and
predict it’s end-of-life point.
The second misconception arises
December 1993 59
out of the first. It assumes that because such predictions are possible,
a competent serviceman will check
all components in the device being
serviced and replace all those which
are about to “wear out”. And this
“wear” concept is another part of the
misconception; the idea that all parts
will eventually wear out. I won’t dwell
on the impracticality of testing every
component in a set; suffice it to say
that the mind boggles!
So the message we have to try to
put across is that very few modern
components have a predictable life.
Valves did and picture tubes still do
but most others have a theoretically
infinite life. When they fail, it is usually a catastrophic failure which can
happen at any time.
And, of course, it is quite impractical to test all the components in a set.
Does the customer have any idea how
many there are? In most cases, the part
would have to be removed for testing
and then replaced.
Quite apart from anything else, this
could easily create more faults than
it would prevent and it would really
amount to a virtual rebuilding of the
set. Would the customer be prepared
60 Silicon Chip
to pay for such an exercise? Of course
not.
Having written all that, I am forced
to concede how seemingly impossible
the task would be. Nevertheless, I
think we should keep these misconceptions in mind and, whenever the
opportunity is favourable, do our best
to gently nudge the customer’s thinking in the right direction. Who knows;
we might score once in a while.
J. L.’s routine faults
But enough of the philosophising;
its time to get back to the bench –
J. L.’s bench, that is, where we left
him last month running through some
typical routine faults. More precisely,
he had just solved an acute case of the
warbles in a Sharp audio cassette deck.
He goes on.
The next job on the bench was
another audio cassette tape deck,
this time an Hitachi model. A note
taped to the top of the cabinet said
that the machine had been “wowing”
for some time but had now stopped
altogether.
I soon had the cover off and began
a close inspection of the works. There
was nothing wrong with the power
supply or the electronics. It seemed
to me that this had to be another
mechanical problem.
In fact, when I turned the power on, I
noticed that the capstan flywheel made
a short movement in the direction of
normal rotation but then sprang back
to its original position. It was obviously being jammed by some very elastic
medium.
I examined the cassette well, half
believing that it was another pinch
roller, like the last job. It wasn’t but
it was another perished rubber part.
This time it was the main drive belt.
This is a flat belt, about 5mm wide. It
had softened and stuck to the motor
pulley. When the motor started, it
stretched the belt and wound several
layers around the pulley.
The belt was a write off, so I had to
remove the motor and its mounting
plate, fit a new belt, then reassemble
the motor and test the unit. It wasn’t
quite as easy as it sounds, since the
remains of the old belt were very
difficult to remove from the motor
pulley. I had to use copious quantities of spirit to soften the deposit,
then scrape and wipe until it was
all gone.
Following these two audio jobs,
it was back to colour television for
another brief exercise. This was a
50cm Philips set fitted with a KT2A-2
chassis. The owner reported that the
on/off switch must be broken because
the set would not switch on.
I don’t know why customers always
blame the power switch when a set
won’t start. There are a hundred other
things that could be blamed but it’s the
power switch that cops all the stick!
(It’s obvious J. L.; when they press
the switch nothing happens – so the
switch must be at fault!)
On this occasion, I was soon able to
absolve the switch simply by putting
my ohmmeter across the active and
neutral pins on the power plug. The
meter showed infinity when the switch
was off and a hundred or so ohms with
the switch closed.
Next, I went to the power supply
section on the horizontal output board.
The supply configuration in this set
is most unusual. It’s effectively two
separate DC supplies, connected in
series by a Triac that’s triggered by a
variable pulse derived from one of the
bridge rectifiers.
It’s a funny arrangement and one
that is not at all easy to service if any
part of it breaks down. In this case, I
was lucky; I found the cause of the
trouble after only 10 minutes’ work.
I established that there were correct voltages being supplied from the
bridges but very little at the output.
So it seemed reasonable to assume
that the regulator was at fault and my
usual practice is to test transistors and
diodes first.
I was only a few minutes into the
testing when I noticed a dry joint
at one of the regulator transistors
attached to a large heatsink. It didn’t
look bad enough to be totally open
circuit but it was and a touch with the
iron soon restored the set to working
order. So much for a “faulty” power
switch!
The last job for the day was a General Electric portable colour TV set,
said to have an intermittent colour
problem. The problem was intermittent but not in the usual sense of the
word.
When first switched on, the set
would come up with a good black and
white picture. Then, after anywhere
from 30 seconds to five minutes later,
the colour would snap on and stay
that way as long as the set was left
untouched. Switching off or changing
channels would lead to a repeat of the
black and white process.
The fault was easy to diagnose. It
was caused by maladjustment of the
sub-carrier oscillator. The oscillator
was tending to run off-frequency and
the AFC circuit was having difficulty
pulling it back. The service manual
gives details of the adjustments required and it took only a minute or
two to effect a complete cure.
The adjustment calls for the AFC
circuit to be disabled so that the
colour can be “floated” by tuning the
oscillator. As the adjustment is made,
the colours run first one way then the
other. The correct setting is between
the two runs, where the colour just
stands still. When the AFC is re-enabled, the picture should be in colour
and should stay that way. In this case,
it did and the set went home to a happy
customer.
After that, it was time for me to go
home. Not every day is as straightforward as this one. But then, if I didn’t
get an occasional day free from the bad
SC
jobs, I’d go stark raving mad.
VIDEO
& TV
SERVICE PERSONNEL
TV & VIDEO FAULT LIBRARIES
AVAILABLE AS PRINTED MANUALS $90 EACH + $10 DELIVERY
BOTH MANUALS VIDEO & TV
$155 + $15 DELIVERY
OR AS A PROGRAM FOR IBM COMPATIBLES $155 + $10 DELIVERY
FOR MORE INFORMATION
CONTACT
TECHNICAL APPLICATIONS FAX / PHONE (07) 378 1064
PO BOX 137 KENMORE 4069
AUSTRALIAN MADE TV
TEST EQUIPMENT
12 Months Warranty on Parts & Labour
HIGH
VOLTAGE
PROBE
Built-in meter
reads positive
or negative 0-50kV. For checking EHT &
focus as well as many other high tension
voltages. $120.00 + $5.00 p&p
DEGAUSSING
WAND
Great for comput er moni to rs. Strong
magnetic field. Double
insulated, momentary switch operation.
Demagnetises colour picture tubes, colour
computer monitors, poker machines video and audio tapes. 240V AC 2.2 amps,
7700AT.
$85.00 + $10.00 p&p
TV, VCR
TUNER REPAIRS
From $22. Repair or exchange plus p&p.
Cheque, Money Order, Visa, Bankcard
or Mastercard
Phone for free
product list
216 Canterbury Rd, Revesby,
NSW 2212, Australia.
Phone (02) 774 1154 Fax (02) 774 1154
D & K WILSON ELECTRONICS
Have you found those components yet?
We know that it can be difficult, frustrating
and a waste of your valuable time.
So why haven’t you contacted us?
We specialise in hunting down and locating
components – old, obsolete, leading edge,
normally available but now scarce due to
allocation by overseas manufacturers.
Integrated circuits, resistors, capacitors,
transistors, diodes, valves, varistors, etc.
Any brands
Let us save your valuable time
Contact us now on 833 1342
We are also distributors for Electrolube lubricants and chemicals
Hakko - desoldering & soldering irons;
SMD tools; replacement parts
NTE - replacements semiconductors
2/87a Queen St, St Marys, NSW 2760.
Phone (02) 833 1342 Fax (02) 673 4212
December 1993 61
|