This is only a preview of the January 1994 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 29 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "40V 3A Variable Power Supply; Pt.1":
Items relevant to "A Switching Regulator For Solar Panels":
Items relevant to "Printer Status Indicator For PCs":
Items relevant to "Simple Low-Voltage Speed Controller":
Items relevant to "Computer Bits":
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Control Stepper Motors With Your PC":
|
Electronic
Engine
Management
Pt.4: Changing The System – by Julian Edgar
There is a widespread perception
that a modern engine managed car is
not open to engine modifications; that
this type of system is signed, sealed
and delivered. To some extent, this
is true. Manufacturers leave little adjustment capability in an electronic
engine management system, with often
only the idle mixture and ignition
timing open to change. In some cars,
even these – ostensibly, at least – are
non-adjustable.
In a standard car, there are good rea-
sons for this approach. With exhaust
gas oxygen feedback loops in operation, immediate ECM recognition of
sensor failure, and limp-home modes
of operation, the last thing that the
manufacturer wants is someone armed
with a screwdriver and a hammer
deciding that the car needs a tuneup! A modern car might not need the
mixture adjusted even once in 150,000
kilometres, for example.
For those who like to tinker with
their cars – to gain more power by
fitting twin carbies, for example – the
old days seem to be over.
However, as with previous automotive technologies, there are ways
of getting an electronic system to do
as you want. Basically, there are four
different approaches which can be
taken:
(1). The engine management system
can have new inputs fed into it, thus
giving changed outputs.
(2). The system can have mechanical,
electrical or electronic additions made
to it.
(3). The original manufacturer’s software can be changed – ie, the chip can
be rewritten.
(4). The original ECM can be removed
and replaced with an after-market, fully programmable engine management
computer.
In this feature, we’ll look at the first
two methods – crude, often effective
and always cheap!
The need for modification
The engine coolant temperature sensor is just one of several sensors that
provide information to the ECM. This ECM input is one of the easiest to fool.
8 Silicon Chip
But why would you want to modify
the engine management system, anyway? A turbocharged car is probably
easiest to understand in this context,
because the power produced by the
engine is so easily increased.
A naturally aspirated engine has
air pushed into it by atmospheric
pressure – through the air filter, past
the throttle butterfly, into the plenum
chamber, down the cylinder runner,
EXTERNAL CONNECTIONS
SEAL
WATER (COOLANT)
CONTACT ZONE
THERMISTOR
Fig.1: basic construction of a typical
coolant temperature sensor. A
thermistor is used as the sensing
element.
past the inlet valve and then (finally)
into the cylinder. As the piston sinks
on its intake stroke, a partial vacuum
is created within the cylinder, and one
bar of atmospheric air pressure does
the pushing.
The amount of air that the engine
inhales depends on its size, on how
much flow loss is experienced by the
air on its torturous path into the cylinder, and how quickly the engine is
rotating (its rpm). However, if the air
If data showing the sensor’s temperature/resistance relationship is not available,
then some testing with hot water, a thermometer & a multimeter
will soon reveal its characteristics.
pressure is raised above atmospheric
by a turbocharger or supercharger,
then greater flows will occur. With
extra fuel added, more power will be
produced.
The induction pressure above atmospheric which the turbo produces
(called turbo boost pressure) greatly
influences the air mass passing into
COEFFICIENT OF ENRICHMENT
1.0
the engine. Manufacturers are often
conservative in their boost pressure,
generally using around 0.5 bar (about 7
psi). However, most turbo engines will
happily cope with 0.7-0.8 bar without
mechanical modification.
The problem comes when the volume of air passing into the engine is
much greater than the manufacturer
designed the EFI (electronic fuel injection) system to cope with. To some
extent, the system will self-compensate for changes. The airflow meter
will signal the greater air mass flowing
to the ECM and this in turn will control the injector pulse width to give
CONTACT TEMPERATURE
Above: this close-up view shows a
typical coolant temperature sensor.
It is usually mounted close to the
thermostat.
Fig.2: the enrichment pattern as a function of engine temperature in a
VL Holden Commodore.
January 1994 9
A resistor or potentiometer wired in series with the
coolant temperature sensor will cause the ECM to provide
more fuel – a very cheap modification.
the appro
priate mixture. However,
if the airflow is increased too far, the
stage will be reached where the mixture starts to become lean – with not
enough petrol being mixed with the
air. In this situation, the injectors may
be held open continuously but their
flow rate may be insufficient.
Other causes of increased induction
flow which may cause leaning-out
include traditional “hotting-up”
methods like larger exhaust systems,
head modification by bigger valves,
and so on.
Fooling the ECM
The ECM computes injector pulse
width on the basis of its inputs and
on its internal base fuel figures. If the
coolant temperature sensor indicates
that the engine is cold, then more
fuel will be injected – the equivalent
of a choke in a car with a carburet-
A microswitch can be used to cause full-throttle
enrichment to occur at an earlier throttle opening than
normal.
tor. Similarly, if the throttle position
switch (TPS) indicates that your foot
is hard down, then the mixture will
be slightly enriched to give maximum
engine power.
If any conditions which would
cause the ECM to enrich the mixture
are artificially created, then the fuel
flow into the engine will be increased,
assuming that maximum fuel flow isn’t
already occurring.
Probably the easiest sensor input to
fool is the coolant temperature sensor.
This sensor consists of a thermistor
located in the engine cooling system,
usually close to the thermostat. Fig.1
shows an example of a coolant temperature sensor. In Fig.2, the pattern
of enrichment which the ECM carries
out in response to low engine temperature is shown for a VL Holden
Commodore.
As the coolant temperature rises, the
FULL THROTTLE CONTACT
THROTTLE SHAFT
CONTACT PATH
(CAM)
IDLE CONTACT
(MICROSWITCH)
ELECTRICAL
HARNESS PLUG
10 Silicon Chip
Fig.3: basic layout of a
typical throttle position
switch (TPS). The idle
contact microswitch is
normally closed at idle
& opens as the throttle
moves off its stop. The
full throttle contacts are
normally open but close
at full throttle settings
to provide extra fuel
enrichment.
resistance of the sensor decreases. A
typical coolant temperature sensor has
the following characteristics:
0°C
6000 ohms
20°C
2500 ohms
30°C
1800 ohms
40°C
1200 ohms
70°C 450 ohms
90°C 250 ohms
100°C 190 ohms
110°C 110 ohms
If a 5kΩ pot is placed in series with
the sensor, then the ECM can be easily persuaded that the engine coolant
temperature is anything from 0°C to
its real value! Feeding information to
the ECM which understates the actual
temperature of the coolant will cause
the mixture to become richer than it
otherwise would be. More fuel will
be injected as the ECM program tries
to overcome the expected cold-engine
affects of poorer fuel atomization,
thicker oil, and so on.
However, while enrichment may
be quite substantial at some rpm settings, it’s unlikely that the ECM was
designed with the idea that the engine
will be revved at 6000rpm with the
coolant temperature at 5°C! Cold-start
enrichment usually declines with increasing load and/or rpm. On the other
hand, if the engine runs slightly lean
throughout its rev range (because of
engine modifications), then a potent
iometer in series with the cold-start
sensor can be a very good starting point
in overcoming it.
If full throttle enrichment is wanted earlier in the throt
tle opening,
then a microswitch operated by the
rotation of the throttle shaft can be
used to trigger this input – a func-
tion usually provided by the throttle
position switch (TPS). Fig.3 shows a
typical TPS.
The correction coefficient used with
the base fuel figures increases with
increasing rpm – and the final correction step is inducted by the throttle
position switch. Other sensors with
the potential for deliberate misuse
include the knock sensor (to retard
timing), the airflow sensor (to change
mixtures), the vehicle speed sensor (remove speed limiter), the MAP sensor
(remove turbo over-boost fuel cutoff),
and the induction air temperature
sensor (change mixtures).
Extra Injectors
If the injection system provides
insufficient fuel flow at full load, then
extra fuel injectors can be added. The
most sophisticated way of doing this
is to control the extra injector by the
use of a commercially-made supplementary injection computer, which
has various inputs to monitor load and
rpm. However, because full load usually coincides with maximum airflow,
the accuracy with which fuel mixtures
must be held for good performance is
fairly low.
An extra injector can be mounted prior to the plenum chamber to
promote good fuel mixing and can
be wired in series with one of the
normal injectors. To prevent it from
enriching the mixture constantly, it
needs to be switched on and off. In
a turbocharged car, the simplest way
of achieving this is to use a pressure
switch which is mounted on the plenum chamber. Adjust
able pressure
switches – under the Hobbs brand
name – are available from automotive
instrument suppliers.
However, switch-on of the injector
can be triggered in a more sophisticated manner by monitoring one or
more of the stan
dard engine management sensors. By using voltage
comparators, the airflow meter and
throttle position switch could be
monitored, with the extra injection
occurring only at high gas flows and
wide throttle openings.
Of course, the extra injector does
not come on stream gradually with
this system. Instead, the mixture
undergoes a sudden enrich
ment by
10-20% (depending on the supple
mentary injector size). To overcome
this, a circuit can be made up which
duplicates the commercially availa-
Ancillary injectors can be used to provide more fuel if the original injectors
prove to be inadequate after engine modifications. The injector on the left is a
cold-start injector, while at right is an injector from a 4-cylinder Nissan engine.
The typical cost from a wrecker would be $10 each.
This Holden VL Turbo Nissan engine has been fitted with extra fuel injectors
which, along with other modifications, provide a 50% power boost. The
additional injectors are triggered by manifold pressure switches & are pulsed
by the standard computer.
ble injection computer by increasing
supplementary injector pulse width
in response to greater gas flow, etc. In
prtactice though, this is not always
needed. Another approach is to use
two sequentially-operated low-capacity supplementary injectors.
The extra injector load placed on
the output transistors of the ECM
doesn’t appear to cause problems,
although the supplementary injectors
should be of the same resistance as
the original injectors. The power
capability of the ECM output tran-
sistors may also vary from computer
to computer.
With extra injectors available cheap
ly from wreckers of Japanese engines
(about $10 each), a supplemen
tary
injection system can be added for very
low cost. The final mixtures should
always be checked. The best way to do
this is to use a chassis dynamometer
in conjunction with a four-gas exhaust
analyser. Another (cheaper) method is
to build an oxygen sensor output meter
and closely monitor the mixtures in
SC
real driving conditions.
January 1994 11
|