This is only a preview of the April 1995 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 29 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Build An FM Radio Trainer; Pt.1":
Items relevant to "A Photographic Timer For Darkrooms":
Items relevant to "Balanced Microphone Preamplifier & Line Mixer":
Items relevant to "50W/Channel Stereo Amplifier; Pt.2":
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
|
Electronics in the
Electronically controlled fuel injection &
ignition timing is now common but the
engine management system can also be used
to control other functions. The latest Falcon
range also uses electronic control for the
radiator cooling fans & the variable intake
manifold.
To meet styling and aerodynamic
criteria, the new EF Falcon was designed to draw all of its engine cooling
air from an opening positioned under
the front bumper. This required the
design of a new intake duct, with the
opportunity also taken to develop
dual electronically controlled electric fans.
The design of the new intake duct
was undertaken using CAD techniques, with numerical modelling of
the airflow being used to plot streamlines. In particular, the shape of the
duct was tuned so that only attached
(ie, laminar) airflow was present for
the majority of the duct system. This
design was then tested at the Ford
Lara Proving Ground and in an environmental testing room. The results
indicated a 32.7% improvement over
the cooling system intake used in the
previous model.
In addition, cooling test comparisons between a convention
al
engine-driven fan and electric fans
showed that the latter configuration
gave better cooling performance. This
showed up in two ways: (1) increased
headroom between the coolant temperature and its boiling point; and
(2) a reduction in the airconditioning
refrigerant pressure (due to more efficient condensation).
However, the new duct’s 32.7% improvement in heat rejection over the
previous design was reduced to only
19.8% with the electric fans fitted and
operating in their “off” mode. This reduction in free-flow 80
km/h heat rejection was
due to the obstruction
posed by the fans and
Pt.2: engine management secondary control
4 Silicon Chip
e new EF Falcon
By JULIAN EDGAR
their shroud. Even so,
it still represented a significant improvement
over the EA Falcon’s
non-ducted radiator
and engine-driven fan
design.
As can be seen from
the photos, the Fairmont
model has slightly different front-end styling
to that of the Falcon.
The “grille” located
between the headlights
is actually a fake and
has no bearing on engine cooling airflow.
However, the “styling
bar” placed across the
lower intake was found
to have a poten
tially
adverse effect on cooling air intake – if it was
angled at four degrees
from the horizontal, it
degraded engine cooling
by 8%! For this reason, production line
assembly of this component must be
very accurate.
Supplementing the improved intake
duct is the twin electric fan package.
This was also designed to give greater
air flow through the radiator. One fan
is a single speed unit, while the other
has two speeds.
These fans are controlled by four
relays linked to the EEC-V engine
management computer. These relays
operate the fans by means of series
and parallel circuits – see Fig.1.
Although seven fan-speed combinations are possible, only four are used
in practice. Potential problems with
NVH (noise, vibration & harshness),
caused by fan beats and a whirling
noise, precluded the use of all speed
combinations and, in any event,
proved unnecessary.
The fans may be operated by the
engine management system at idle,
depending on engine coolant and
airconditioning refrigerant temperature. In fact, in hot environments,
the airflow provided by low-speed
driving and during city driving is insufficient to cool the airconditioning
condenser.
The EEC-V module controls the fan
speeds using the follow
ing inputs:
(1) engine coolant temperature; (2)
RELAY 1
N/O
RELAY 3
N/C
RELAY 2
N/O
M2
M1
M1
SINGLE
SPEED
FAN
RELAY 4
N/C
M2
TWO SPEED
FAN
Fig.1: the dual electric fans are
controlled by the EEC-V engine
management system via relays.
Four different fan speeds can be
selected, depending on engine coolant
temperature; airconditioning head
evaporative temperature; engine
speed; transmission temperature; &
heater fan speed.
air
c onditioning head evaporative
temperature; (3) engine speed; (4)
transmission temperature; and (5)
heater fan speed.
Relay operation of the fans was
Dual electric fans have
replaced the enginedriven fan of the previous
model. These are
controlled by the EEC-V
engine management
computer on the basis of
five inputs.
April 1995 5
SECONDAY
RUNNER
PRIMARY
RUNNER
CROSSOVER
VALVE
Fig.2: this sectional diagram shows the dual-resonance intake system
used in the EF Falcon. The crossover butterfly valves are controlled
by the EEC-V engine management system. The cutaway view of the
variable length intake manifold at right clearly shows one of the
crossover butterfly valves. The valve operation is dependent on engine
rpm.
decided on after evaluating a pulse
width modulation (PWM) system.
The PWM system had the advantage
of allowing stepless variable fan speed
control but it was not selected because
it was not sufficiently proven to meet
Ford in-service durability criteria.
Intake manifold control
The new EF Falcon features a clever and compact dual intake runner
system for the manifold. Depending
on the movement of six
internal crossover butterfly
valves, the intake air is either
forced to flow through a short primary
runner only or to take a longer path
through a secondary runner. Fig.2
shows a cross section of the intake
system.
The different resonance characteristics of the dual length runners means
that the volumetric efficiency of the
engine is boosted at two different rpm
points, rather than at a single point as
for a single fixed length runner. By using dual-length runners, the resonant
behaviour of the intake system can
be tuned to provide maximum torque
at low engine speeds and maximum
power at high engine rpm, without
one compromising the other.
Engine dynamometer testing by
Ford indicated that a transi
t ion
between short and long runners at
3800rpm gave the best results for the
Falcon’s engine. In particular, the new
engine has worthwhile improvements
in both power and torque compared to
the previous single length manifold
ED design.
Engine rpm is the single control
criteria used to activate the manifold
changeover. This is achieved by using the EEC-V module to control a
solenoid which, in turn, directs an
engine vacuum source to actuate the
SC
butterflies.
Acknowledgement
The bar across the under-bumper air intake on Fairmont models (left) needs
to be precisely angled during manufacture so that it doesn’t degrade cooling
performance. The above-bumper grille is a dummy & is there for styling only!
6 Silicon Chip
Thanks to Ford Australia and the
Society of Automotive Engineers
for permission to use material from
the “SAE Australasia” journal of
October/November 1994.
|