This is only a preview of the March 1997 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 24 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Plastic Power PA Amplifier":
Items relevant to "Build A Jumbo LED Clock":
Items relevant to "RGB-To-PAL Encoder For The TV Pattern Generator":
Items relevant to "Audible Continuity Tester":
Articles in this series:
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
Publisher & Editor-in-Chief
Leo Simpson, B.Bus., FAICD
Editor
Greg Swain, B.Sc.(Hons.)
Technical Staff
John Clarke, B.E.(Elec.)
Robert Flynn
Rick Walters
Reader Services
Ann Jenkinson
Advertising Manager
Brendon Sheridan
Phone (03) 9720 9198
Mobile 0416 009 217
Regular Contributors
Brendan Akhurst
Garry Cratt, VK2YBX
Julian Edgar, Dip.T.(Sec.), B.Ed
John Hill
Mike Sheriff, B.Sc, VK2YFK
Philip Watson, MIREE, VK2ZPW
Bob Young
Photography
Glenn A. Keep
SILICON CHIP is published 12 times
a year by Silicon Chip Publications
Pty Ltd. A.C.N. 003 205 490. All
material copyright ©. No part of
this publication may be reproduced
without the written consent of the
publisher.
Printing: Macquarie Print, Dubbo,
NSW.
Distribution: Network Distribution
Company.
Subscription rates: $54 per year
in Australia. For overseas rates, see
the subscription page in this issue.
Editorial & advertising offices:
Unit 34, 1-3 Jubilee Avenue, Warrie
wood, NSW 2102. Postal address:
PO Box 139, Collaroy Beach, NSW
2097. Phone (02) 9979 5644. Fax
(02) 9979 6503.
PUBLISHER'S LETTER
Pay TV picture
quality is poor
So how many of you have signed up for Pay
TV with Optus or Foxtel? Not many I hope, for
your sake, because a high proportion who do
quickly become disenchanted. Sure, there are
lots of channels but most of them you wouldn’t
be bothered watching. The “Discovery” channel
on Foxtel is worth watching but most of the
others you would have to consign to the video
dustbin. Yes, I know that some people sign up
to get sports programs but they are special cases.
Even if you are perfectly happy with the program selection, eg, 24-hour cartoons, weather, endless re-runs of “I Love Lucy” or limited movies, the picture
quality is distinctly poor. In fact, one of the so-called advantages of Pay TV is
that you get the “free to air” channels free. So you can dispense with your ugly
old TV antenna. In fact, I have seen some people argue in favour of (ugly) cable
TV because it will eliminate all those ugly TV antennas!
Well, you don’t have to be really discerning to see that the picture quality of
the free-to-air channels as fed down the cable is far inferior to viewers’ reception
from their own TV antenna. There are some exceptions, of course, and people
in difficult reception areas, such as the beachside suburbs of Sydney, will get
better free-to-air channel pictures than off their old TV antenna; better, but still
not first class.
In general, compared to the first class picture quality available from free-to-air
channels in most areas of Sydney, the cable pictures are smeary and lack colour
saturation. In fact, there is even ghosting present! What a big advance that is.
This is what people are paying for and now digital TV has been announced with
its extra channels and better picture quality. If cable TV is what some people
are prepared to accept, why bother with digital TV?
And what if you do decide to get rid of your old TV antenna? There is a catch.
Say you want to watch the cricket on Channel 9 and your wife wants to watch
something on SBS or one of the pay TV channels. Sorry, no can do. You can only
watch one signal at a time, regardless of how many sets you may have in your
home. If you want to watch different channels on multiple sets simultaneously,
you have to pay for extra decoders. So you really can’t afford to get rid of your
old antenna, can you?
It seems to me that if the cable TV people cannot manage to deliver picture
quality which is at least as good as you can get from your own ugly TV antenna
then they are going to have even more problems when it comes to delivering the
more hi-tech services they are promising such as optical fibre modems, interactive
TV and all the rest of the pie in the sky stuff. Sure it will eventually come but
when it does it won’t be as half as good as it is cracked up to be.
Leo Simpson
ISSN 1030-2662
WARNING!
SILICON CHIP magazine regularly describes projects which employ a mains power supply or produce high voltage. All such projects should
be considered dangerous or even lethal if not used safely. Readers are warned that high voltage wiring should be carried out according to the
instructions in the articles. When working on these projects use extreme care to ensure that you do not accidentally come into contact with
mains AC voltages or high voltage DC. If you are not confident about working with projects employing mains voltages or other high voltages,
you are advised not to attempt work on them. Silicon Chip Publications Pty Ltd disclaims any liability for damages should anyone be killed
or injured while working on a project or circuit described in any issue of SILICON CHIP magazine. Devices or circuits described in SILICON
CHIP may be covered by patents. SILICON CHIP disclaims any liability for the infringement of such patents by the manufacturing or selling of
any such equipment. SILICON CHIP also disclaims any liability for projects which are used in such a way as to infringe relevant government
regulations and by-laws.
Advertisers are warned that they are responsible for the content of all advertisements and that they must conform to the Trade Practices Act
1974 or as subsequently amended and to any governmental regulations which are applicable.
2 Silicon Chip
|