This is only a preview of the November 1997 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 35 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Heavy Duty 10A 240VAC Motor Speed Controller":
Items relevant to "Easy-To-Use Cable & Wiring Tester":
Items relevant to "A Regulated Supply For Darkroom Lamps":
Items relevant to "Build A Musical Doorbell":
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
Making old
ships go faster
Photo: Blohm + Voss GmbH
A new marine propulsion system using an
ABB motor and generator has boosted the
speed of three rebuilt US container ships
from 18 to 21 knots. Instead of “power take
off” (PTO), it makes use of the “power take
in” (PTI) concept to transmit 4000kW to the
ships’ main shafts.
Vessels (ACV). Ten years later, speed
has become the dominating factor for
these vessels, with large container capacities given only a second priority.
The most obvious way to increase
the speed of the ships was to reduce
their length and to equip each of them
with a new forebody and afterbody
plus a new propulsion plant. However, that idea was rejected as being
economically inviable.
Three US container ships were
recently upgraded at the Hamburg
shipyard of Blohm + Voss GmbH by
shortening the vessels and installing a
new marine propulsion system.
The reasons for the modifications to
the three vessels were straightforward.
Operators of container ships have had
to adjust to a vastly changed economic
situation in recent years. The need
today is for faster, smaller container
vessels with a capacity of 2500 to 6000
TEU (equivalent unit for 20-foot containers) and able to travel at a speed
SL-31 – a brand new concept
72 Silicon Chip
of at least 21 knots.
Recognising this trend, the SeaLand Division of CSX Corpo
ration
in the USA began looking for ways
to modernise its large and relatively
slow container ships. These were built
in Korea in the early 1980s for United
States Lines (USL).
The vessels, which when new were
among the most economical container
ships in service, originally had a storage capacity of approximately 3900
TEU and a speed of 18 knots. USL
operated the ships as Atlantic Class
The shipyard and shipowner
eventually agreed on a complete
ly
new concept. The project name that
was chosen was SL-31 (SL stands for
Sea-Land, 3 for 3000 TEU and 1 for
21 knots). It proposed a reduction in
the length of the ACV container ships
by three hatch groups (bringing their
length down from 279 metres to 248
metres), a more streamlined forebody
and a higher power rating for the
propeller.
Extensive calculations and tests
were carried out by the shipyard at
the HSVA marine test insti
tute in
Hamburg to make sure that a speed of
21 knots would actually be achieved.
An increase in the drive power rating
would be necessary, as would modifications to the shape of the forebody.
The changes that had to be made
to the body of the ship called for
precision work. For example, during
the removal of the midbody, a flamecut with a length of 330m had to be
made in one operation and with an
accuracy that would ensure that no
remachining of the storage structures
would be necessary after the forebody
and afterbody had been floated back
together again. In addition, the electrical power connections between the
two halves of the ship, involving about
350 cables and large numbers of pipes,
had to be separated.
After the midbody had been cut out
and temporary bulkheads had been
fitted, the forebody and the midbody
were floated and pulled out of the
dock by tugs. After this, the forebody
was moved to within about 300mm of
the afterbody. The dock was then floated again and the forebody pushed up
against the afterbody, aligned, tacked
and welded in place.
The most critical part of this operation was the manoeuvring and
alignment of the two halves. Very
high precision was necessary, as a
deviation of just a few millimetres
from the original longitudinal axis
would translate into a loss of speed.
Optical measuring equipment was
used to ensure a perfect fit.
It is worth remembering that the
Photo: Blohm + Voss GmbH
The “Sea-Land Pride” in Dock 10 after the forebody had been cut away and with
the midbody being prepared for removal. The photo on the facing page shows
the ship after conversion. Next to it, on the left, is the “Sea-Land Value”.
parts being manoeuvred weighed
several thousand tonnes and that they
had to be moved by tugs to precise
positions in the dock. This part of
the modernisation alone was a considerable achievement on the part of
the shipyard.
Increasing the drive power
A new approach was also necessary
for the upgrade of the propulsion
systems. The installed machines,
Sulzer 7 RLB 90 engines, were rated
at 20,590kW (100%) and 18,530kW
(90%). In order to run the ships at
21 knots without modifying the ves-
sels, it would have been necessary to
increase the engine power to about
30,000kW.
By streamlining the forebody
through hydrodynamic improve
ments, an initial power saving of
3700kW could be achieved. Also the
reduction in length by three hatch
groups reduced the ships’ frictional
resistance, allowing a further saving
of 1500kW (or 5200kW in total). This
meant that, to achieve the required
speed of 21 knots, an additional 38004000kW would have to be fed into the
propeller shaft system.
To raise the drive power rating to the
a
b
Fig.1: ACV container ship conversion based on the SL-31 concept: (a) forebody cut away and midbody
removed; (b) shortened ship with new forebody.
November 1997 73
Photo: Blohm + Voss GmbH
This photo shows the new, more streamlined forebody being fitted to the “SeaLand Pride”.
2
n = 102
min-1
New propeller
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
Fig.2: design of the new marine propulsion system with booster motor: (1)
Sulzer diesel engine, 20,588kW; (2) Controllable-pitch propeller; (3) Gearing;
(4) Booster motor, 4000kW; (5) Switchboard, 6.6kV; (6) Wartsila diesel engine,
4860kW; (7) Generator, 4374kW; (8) To bow thruster, 1800kW.
2940
7700
2860
1
ø 620
2
Fig.3: shaft arrangement for the booster motor and tunnel gearing: (1) Booster
motor; (2) Tunnel gearing.
74 Silicon Chip
required level, Blohm + Voss GmbH
developed a new, unconventional
concept that “reverses” the standard
shaft generator system commonly in
use. Previously, electrical power has
been fed into the onboard power system from the main machine by means
of a gear system with an attached
generator.
The new drive makes use of the
“power take in” instead of “power take
off” concept (Fig.2). In this method,
4000kW is transmitted via a 6.6kV
electric motor to the main drive shaft
by means of tunnel gearing which is
flanged via a Vulcan coupling to the
flywheel of the main machine (see
Fig.3). The electric motor is fed with
4860kW (100%) or 4374kW (90%)
from an additional Wartsila-Diesel
generator set with a 6MVA alternator.
The high-voltage switchgear and diesel-generator set are installed in a new
engine room on the main deck. Many
new, innovative control features were
required to link the slow-speed main
machine to the electric motor via the
tunnel gearing.
The power is transmitted to the water by a new controllable pitch propeller with a diameter of 7.1 metres. This
propeller can absorb up to 24,400kW
which is also the maximum power
transmitted to the shaft. Although
the new propeller is 0.5m smaller in
diameter than the original unit, its
special shape enables it to produce
20% more power.
Using the machine data as a basis,
the propeller power was calculated to
be 19,160kW. Tests with a draught of
10m and a speed of 21 knots showed
the power demand to be 18,639kW,
giving a safety margin of 521kW. After converting this extra power into
speed, the maximum predicted speed
possible is 21.2 knots.
Booster drive system
As with many seemingly simple
solutions, it was the small details
that caused the main problems. A
slow-speed diesel engine with oscillating torque had never before been
combined with a constant-torque
electric motor on a propeller shaft. To
protect the electric motor and gearing
system from the vibrations caused by
the main machine, tunnel gearing was
chosen. This transmits the electric
motor power via a multi-disc clutch
to the gear system and then via a Vulcan coupling direct to the flywheel of
the main machine and the propeller
shaft. The energy flow in the shaft is
shown in Fig.4.
To enable the two different systems
to be used together, new automatic
controls had to be developed for the
drive system. These had to be completely reliable in every operating
mode. This problem alone presented
a major challenge, especially in view
of the limited time that was available
for the development work. For this
particular application, a new digital
control system was installed.
The new main-machine/booster
system was rigorously tested by the
US Coast Guard (USCG) and the
American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)
with the help of Failure Mode Effective Analysis (FMEA). This involved
a run-through of all possible service
profiles, both in the dock and at sea,
to ensure the safety and reliability of
the booster system.
The new electrical auxiliary system
for the booster installation receives its
power from the booster diesel-generator set via a 6600/480V, 500kVA
transformer.
Photo: Blohm + Voss GmbH
The new booster generator is used to feed an additional 4000kW (before losses)
to the main drive shaft.
87 kW Electrical loss
Self-supporting system
400 kW
Booster drives bow thruster
Since the booster diesel-generator is
not required for docking manoeuvres
or when the ships are in port, it can
also be used to drive the newly installed ABB bow thruster. Thus, the
booster diesel-generator has two tasks
in that it supplies: (1). additional
energy for the main drive (PTI); and
(2). drive power for the bow thruster.
The diesel-generator set supplies
power to a 6.6kV substation with load
feeders to the booster motor, the bow
thruster and an auxiliary transformer.
For this project, the Marine, Oil and
Gas Industry Division of ABB Indust
rietechnik AG supplied the electrical
booster plant, the electrical equipment
for the bow thruster and all of the
cabling for the electrical systems.
During the conversion, it was necessary, among other things, to shorten
all of the cables to the forebody. This
involved cutting a 40m-long section
out of approximately 350 cables and
then reconnecting the cables using
heatshrink joints. This work was carried out in close collaboration with
the shipyard and the suppliers of the
other systems to ensure full compliance with ABS and USCG regulations.
80 kW
Electrical
loss
Booster
motor
4000 kW
159 kW
Gear loss
210 kW
Shaft loss
Alternator
Wärtsilä6000 kVA Diesel engine 12R 32
4860 kW
Main engine
Sulzer
7 RLB 90
20,588 kW
Gearing
3822 kW
24,410 kW
20,588 kW
Sea margin 3184 kW
Fig.4: energy flow in the propeller shaft.
Sea trials with the first ship to be
completed, the Sea-Land Pride (formerly Galveston Bay), were carried
out in the summer of 1994 and underscored the success of the project. The
vessel, which had been running with
a speed of 18 knots, achieved 19 knots
without the booster system and almost
22 knots with it. In the same year,
its two sister ships, Sea-Land Value
and Raleigh Bay, were also handed
over to the customer after successful
SC
conversions.
Acknowledgement: this article has been
adapted from an article that appeared in
the March 1997 issue of ABB Review,
published by Asea Brown Boveri Ltd.
November 1997 75
|