This is only a preview of the October 1997 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 28 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Build A 5-Digit Tachometer":
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "PC Controlled 6-Channel Voltmeter":
Items relevant to "The Flickering Flame For Stage Work":
Items relevant to "Building The 500W Audio Power Amplifier; Pt.3":
Articles in this series:
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
VINTAGE RADIO
By JOHN HILL
Wave-traps: another look
A versatile wave-trap can be a useful accessory
in any area where there is a strong local station.
A wave-trap can make a big difference when it
comes to tuning other stations and all my
vintage receivers, superhets included, perform
better when used with a wave-trap.
As the crow flies, 3CV Central
Victoria on 1071kHz is about six
kilometres from where I live. Its 5kW
output belts out 24 hours a day and
to a vintage radio enthusiast such as
myself, my local station is a complete
pain in the neck – so to speak!
When it comes to crystal sets, simple regeneratives and TRF receivers,
3CV dominates the dial. When listening to a simple crystal set, the local
station can be heard over the full
tuning range. TRF receivers handle
the situation a little better but the
amount of interference can still be
very annoying.
Even superhets with their superior
selectivity are not immune to the
problem and splatter from 3CV can
be heard some distance either side
of the 1071kHz position on the dial.
My local radio station has not always caused such frustration. Some
years ago, 3CV ceased transmission
at 11pm every night, thus providing
a good opportunity to listen beyond
the usual veil of interference.
Using a simple crystal set, I
was amazed to find other stations
out there just waiting to be heard.
These included 3BO Bendigo, 3BA
Ballarat, 3LO Melbourne, and even
5AN Adelaide on odd good nights.
However, those exciting late-night
Only a few components are required to build an
effective wave-trap. Shown is an old variable
capacitor, a reel of enamel covered wire & a
cardboard former.
88 Silicon Chip
long distance DX sessions with crystal sets came to an abrupt end when
3CV changed to 24-hour nonstop
broadcasting.
It was much the same when I was a
lad living in Bendigo. Back then, 3BO
swamped my crystal sets and little
regenerative receivers. So local radio
stations have been an annoyance to
me for most of my life.
It is not surprising, therefore, that I
have spent some time experimenting
with wave-traps. The basic function
of such a device is to block out any
unwanted frequency (the strong local)
yet, at the same time, let all the other
frequencies through. It sounds good
but there are trade-offs as you will
see later on.
Different designs
Wave-traps (or rejector circuits
as they are correctly termed) are
nothing new and many old wireless
magazines published details on how
to build them. I have tried several
different types over the years and
have found that they all have advantages and disadvantages. Finally,
I have come up with a fairly good
compromise.
There are quite a few different
designs of wave-trap but three in
particular are applicable to vintage
radio receivers. The first one to be
discussed is the common parallel
tuned trap (Fig.1).
As can be seen from Fig.1, this type
of trap is connected in series with the
aerial lead. When tuned to resonance
with the strong local station, it blocks
(or rejects) that frequency while
allowing other frequencies to pass
through it (apart from those close to
the resonant signal).
This type of wave-trap works very
well on superhet receivers and the
Fig.1: the parallel tuned
wave-trap is easy to
build. It uses just a coil
and a variable capacitor.
Fig.2: by connecting the
aerial to different points on
the coil, the effectiveness of
the trap can be varied.
This is the author’s “Super Wave-Trap”. It can be changed from a parallel-tuned
configuration to a secondary-tuned configuration at the flick of a switch. What’s
more, in secondary-tuned mode, the aerial can be switched to any of the four
taps on the primary winding.
previously mentioned splatter either
side of 3CV is reduced to nothing.
But this benefit is not without a
small cost.
Other nearby stations are reduced
in volume a little as a result of using
the trap and there is also some degree
of attenuation over the rest of the dial.
So what the trap giveth with one hand,
it taketh away with the other.
But any good 5-valver can make
up for any losses the parallel-tuned,
series-connected wave-trap may in-
troduce. Lesser receivers are not so
tolerant, namely crystal sets and small
regenerative receivers.
The effect of a parallel-tuned trap
on a crystal set is interesting. However, before going into details, mention
should be made of another powerful
local station.
Some 145km away at Horsham,
the 50kW transmitter used by 3WV
on 594kHz is powerful enough to be
considered a strong local station. In
crystal set terms, it supplies quite
Fig.3: the tuned secondary
wave-trap works well with
crystal sets and simple
regenerative receivers.
good listening volume and is the
second most powerful station in my
listening area.
Now when a parallel tuned wavetrap is used with a crystal set and
is tuned to reject 3CV, there are two
noticeable effects. First, it is so effective it blocks out 3CV as though
it doesn’t exist. Second, it broadens
the tuning of 3WV to such an extent
it can be heard over the entire range
of the dial. When trying to tune in
3WV, the tuning never peaks on the
station. It’s everywhere but nowhere
in particular.
In this case, the wave-trap not only
filters out 3CV, it also disrupts the
receiver’s tuning circuitry. As far as
crystal sets are concerned, a parallel
tuned trap is much too severe and a
more compatible trap is required.
Simple regenerative receives do not
perform that well on a parallel tuned
trap either. The trap is effective as
far as controlling the local station is
concerned but there is a tendency to
block out a sizeable band of frequencies on either side of the resonant
frequency. So this type of trap is by
no means suitable for use with all
vintage receivers.
Tapping the coil
The trap shown in Fig.2 is a variation of the parallel tuned trap and
incorporates a tapped coil. By tapping
the aerial into the coil at different
connection points, the effectiveness
of the trap can be altered. Perhaps the
best setup would be to have a sliding
contact so that the aerial can be connected to any part of the coil.
October 1997 89
A tuned secondary wave-trap with a 6-turn primary is the ideal wave-trap for
the author’s crystal set (shown here) and the prevailing reception conditions.
Although I have never used this
type of trap, it seems to have very
good possibilities.
Tuned-secondary wave-trap
At this stage of our story it is time to
discuss the third type of trap. This is
known as the tuned secondary wavetrap and is shown in Fig.3.
There are some significant differences between this design and the
previous ones. The most obvious is
that there are now two windings and
the tuned section is inductively cou-
pled to the primary through which
the aerial is connected.
In this design, the effectiveness of
the trap depends to a large extent on
the number of turns on the primary.
These turns are wound directly over
the secondary winding and the greater
the number of primary turns, the more
effective the trap.
Experiments with crystal sets have
indicated that about six turns on the
primary winding are just about right
for my reception conditions (and for
the type of crystal set being used). And
This 2-valve regenerative receiver’s performance is greatly improved when
using a secondary tuned wave-trap with a 24-turn primary.
90 Silicon Chip
with so few turns, there are no adverse
effects. No longer is 3WV spread
across the entire dial, nor is there a
void near the resonant frequency as
previously mentioned.
The tuned secondary trap only
moderately suppresses 3CV and allows sufficient signal to pass through
to enable the station to be heard at a
normal listening level. Without the
trap, the headphones are too loud for
comfortable listening and when they
are laying on the bench they can be
heard “barking” away from anywhere
in the room.
However, a 6-turn primary is not
sufficient for a 1-valve regenerative
receiver as the local station is still
quite unrestrained and swamps half
the tuning range. Instead, simple
regenerative receivers seem to work
better with about 20 or more turns on
the primary. Even then, 3CV is still
fairly broad in its tuning but it is not a
bad compromise considering the type
of receiver and the close proximity of
the station.
A point worth mentioning is the
fact that two secondary tuned wavetraps can be used in series to trap
out two strong local stations without
greatly affecting the signal strengths
of other stations.
The super wave-trap
Each type of vintage radio requires
its own special wave-trap setup. This
could lead to a situation where one
has half a dozen or so different traps
in order to obtain optimum results
from a number of receivers.
To remedy this situation, the “Super
Wave-Trap” has been built. The Super
Wave-Trap incorporates the best of
both designs and can be changed from
parallel-tuned to secondary-tuned
at the flick of a switch. In addition,
when switched to secondary mode,
the tapped primary can be switched
from six to 24 turns in increments of
six turns at a time.
Wiring up the trap was a bit of a
nightmare and two switches (a rotary
and a double-throw multi-pole) were
used to sort out the problem.
Now some experts may suggest that,
in theory, the last thing a low-performance receiver such as a crystal set
needs in its aerial system is a network
of tapped coils and switches. The
theory is that RF currents are impeded by such things and, therefore, the
Super Wave-Trap may defeat its own
Silicon Chip
Binders
REAL
VALUE
AT
$11.95
PLUS P
&P
1920s receivers such as the “three-valver” lack selectivity and are easily over
powered by local transmissions. A wave-trap can help overcome this problem.
purpose by having too much high-frequency impedance.
This theory did not hold up in
practice and while there might be
losses, in practice they are too small
to detect. The advantage of using the
trap far outweighs any disadvantages.
The Super Wave-Trap has what
some may consider an odd addition
– an earth terminal. It’s not that a trap
actually needs one but it can be convenient to have both aerial and earth
leads coming from the same part of the
bench. The earth lead simply passes
through the cabinet of the trap. While
such a setup is unnecessary, it’s OK
as far as I’m concerned.
Talking about earth leads, it is a
good idea to use an earth on any re-
Crystal set DX’ing
Back in my boyhood days, the term
“wave-trap” meant nothing to me. Yet,
if I had known then what I know now,
my crystal set listening may not have
been restricted to one station.
DX’ing with a crystal set is a lot
more practical today than it ever was
in the past. Transmitters operate at
much higher wattages now and effective crystal set range has increased
accordingly. But although increased
power can be an advantage, it can
also be a disadvantage if a powerful
transmitter is in your neighbourhood.
Simple regenerative receivers and
crystal sets, in particular, benefit from
such a device because these receivers
lack selectivity. A wave-trap helps
to reject the stronger signals these
simple receivers cannot cope with.
If you are having reception problems
due to a nearby transmitter, then a
wave-trap may help solve or at least
SC
reduce your problem.
★ Hold up to 14 issues
★ 80mm internal width
★ SILICON CHIP logo printed in
gold-coloured lettering on spine
& cover
Price: $A11.95 plus $A3 p&p in
Australia; or $A11.95 plus $A8
p&p in NZ & PNG. Not available
elsewhere.
Silicon Chip Publications
PO Box 139
Collaroy Beach 2097
Or fax (02) 9979 6503; or ring (02)
9979 5644 & quote your credit
card number.
Use this handy form
Even superhets can have some minor
problems with nearby transmitters
and, in some cases, a wave-trap can
be of assistance. Shown is a dualwave AWA Radiolette.
ceiver that’s connected to a wave-trap.
Although the trap works without the
receiver being earthed, it seems to be
more effective if it is.
In a very strong local signal area,
the lead from the wave-trap to the
receiver’s aerial terminal should be
as short as possible. If living under
the shadow of a transmission tower,
a long lead from the trap to the aerial
terminal will only pick up unwanted
RF signal. If the lead has to be long,
it’s advisable to use coaxial cable to
make the connection.
These binders will protect your copies of SILICON CHIP. They feature
heavy-board covers & are made
from a dis
tinctive 2-tone green
vinyl. They hold up to 14 issues &
will look great on your bookshelf.
Enclosed is my cheque/money order for
$________ or please debit my
❏ Bankcard ❏ Visa ❏ Mastercard
Card No:
________________________________
Card Expiry Date ____/____
Signature ________________________
Name ___________________________
Address__________________________
__________________ P/code_______
October 1997 91
|