This is only a preview of the December 1998 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 37 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Engine Immobiliser Mk.2":
Items relevant to "Thermocouple Adaptor For DMMs":
Items relevant to "A Regulated 12V DC Plugpack":
Items relevant to "Build Your Own Poker Machine; Pt.2":
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
Hifi Review
Harman Kardon Signature Series
Harman Kardon is a name long associated with
high fidelity sound reproduction and they’re
still going strong with the release of their
Signature Series – a 200 watt per channel power
amplifier and a Dolby Surround Processor/
Tuner. We recently had a chance to have a close
look at both of these products.
Actually there are three products
in the Signature Series range, the two
already mentioned and a 5-channel
Surround Sound amplifier. While
the two power amplifiers are fairly
con
vention
al, the Signature Series
2.0 Dolby Digital Surround Processor/
Tuner is quite different in that it packs
all sorts of features into a case which
has few external controls. In fact, it
has just nine pushbuttons and a large
knob as its control complement. The
real control complexity is “hidden”
and only becomes evident as you
use the remote control and the menu
system on the front panel display.
The remote control has quite a good
layout of buttons, 61 in all, which are
easy to read – an important point.
The labell
ing on some remotes is
4 Silicon Chip
very difficult to read, especially in
subdued light and you wonder if the
designers have ever used them in a
typical home situation.
One feature that we particularly
liked was the “sending” LED which
flashes whenever you push a button.
It is amazing how often a TV set or
other appliance will not respond to
a remote command and you immediately wonder whether the set is at
fault or the remote. With this Harman
Kardon remote, at least you know that
it is “sending” the command.
Since this Processor/Tuner is designed to be the heart of a Surround
Sound system, its remote handset
should ideally control the TV set or
video projector and the VCR or DVD
player, as well as any other sources
such as CD player and tape decks.
For this reason, the remote control is
a “learning” type and so it can learn
all the other remote control functions.
This is good because if you do have
a full Surround Sound system, you
don’t want to be juggling three or four
remote controls.
While the front panel of the Processor/Tuner is sparse, the rear panel is
crammed with lots of input and output sockets to handle audio and video
signals from a wide range of sources.
Six pairs of audio analog (line level)
sources, such as CD players and tape
decks, can be selected and these
can be paired with three composite
video inputs or two S-video inputs.
This means that sources such as hifi
VCRs, DVD and laserdisc players can
be fully controlled.
Up to six separate digital program
sources may be connected, via four
coax and two optical data inputs. As
well, you can connect the six Surround Sound decoded outputs from
another source (should you be so
well-heeled) so that you have centra
lised control of everything via the
remote handset. There are also two
pairs of outputs for connection to tape
decks and six outputs for surround
The apparent simplicity of the Harman Kardon Signature Series 2.0 Processor/
Tuner belies the complexity of its features. This is reinforced by the array of
input and output sockets on its rear panel.
sound; ie, left & right front, centre,
rear left & right and subwoofer.
Mind you, there is one input
omission which may or may not be a
drawback, depending on the program
sources you normally use. If you like
listening to vinyl records, you will
need an external preamplifier for the
magnetic cartridge signals.
As well as all the audio inputs and
outputs, there are antenna connections for AM and FM stereo tuners,
an RS-232 socket and sockets for IR
remote and trigger control signals.
As you can imagine, when the majority of these inputs and outputs are
in use, the result is a mass of cabling
but the real complexity lies in the
circuitry inside the Processor/Tuner.
Not only does it provide Dolby Digital
(AC-3) and Dolby Pro Logic processing and digital to analog decoding of
purely digital sources, it also makes
use of the RDS data system in
use in Europe although this is
of no use in Australia.
Naturally, in line with other
Dolby Pro Logic decoders, the
Harman Kardon provides a
full range of theatre sound
modes (four), music modes
(also four), plus stereo, mono
and mono plus. The latter is a
mono mode for Dolby Digital.
We don’t know why you’d
want it, but there it is. When using a
Dolby Digital source, there is even a
“late night” mode which while maintaining full signal bandwidth, reduces
the peak audio levels to one quarter
or one third of normal.
We interpret this as a reduction in
peak levels of 10 to 12dB, a significant decrease. Harman Kardon refer
to this as the “good neighbour” since
it mutes loud audio transients such
as explosions or musical crescendos.
Just to show how complex the
Processor/Tuner is, the owner’s instruction manual has no less than 65
pages (all English). This impression of
complexity is reinforced when the top
cover of the case is removed, revealing
a myriad of integrated circuits and
LSIs dotted over a number of large
PC boards. Even the power supply
is quite complex, employing two
The remote control has lots of buttons
but is fairly self-explanatory in use.
The Harman Kardon Signature Series
1.5 stereo amplifier is well finished, with
an absolute minimum of ornamentation.
December 1998 5
TOP: inside the Harman Kardon amplifier, showing the large toroidal power
transformer and the heatsink fabricated from sheet aluminium. The rear panel
view is shown above.
E-I transformers with copper straps
around them to reduce hum radiation.
Stereo power amplifier
By contrast with the Processor/
Tuner unit, the Signature Series 1.5
power amplifier is simplicity itself.
But it is large, and heavy. It measures 438 x 191 x 387mm and weighs
21.4kg. Apart from the on/off switch
and a power indicator, the front panel
is devoid of any ornamentation. The
back panel is pretty sparse too, with
just two pairs of loudspeaker terminals, two RCA input sockets and a
6 Silicon Chip
socket for a trigger control, referred
to earlier. There is also a small slide
switch to provide bridged operation
of both channels.
Sparse it may be, but this is an
impressive unit, especially when you
remove the top cover. This reveals a
large toroidal transformer mounted
vertically against the front panel. This
may seem unconventional but as we
found with our own 100W/channel
amplifier published in February 1988,
this arrangement gives minimum hum
pickup in the two audio channels.
As far as we can tell, the pow-
er transformer has separate centre-tapped secondary windings to
effectively provide two completely
separate power supplies to feed the
two power amplifiers. This arrangement maximises channel separation
although it does mean that more components are required; ie, an additional
bridge rectifier and filter capacitors.
The power amplifier circuitry itself
is largely hidden from view by the
very large heatsink which occupies
most of the chassis. The heatsink is
interesting because it is not the usual
large aluminium extrusion but has
been fabricated from sheet aluminium. The chassis and top cover have
been well and truly perforated to
provide plenty of ventilation for the
heatsink, so that no fan is necessary.
As far as we can tell, the Harman
Kardon power amplifier employs
bipolar transistors throughout and
has separate relay muting for each
channel.
As well as the main power transformer, there is a separate smaller
transformer and power supply board
and this evidently provides the standby function, so that the power amplifier itself can be switched on and off
by a trigger signal of between 6V and
12V from the Processor/Tuner unit.
The Harman Kardon amplifier is
rated at 200 watts per channel into 8Ω
loads and 325 watts per channel into
4Ω, for a rated harmonic distortion
of less than .03%. In bridged mode,
it will deliver 650 watts into an 8Ω
load, again for a rated distortion of
less than .03%.
While being delightfully vague
about circuit configurations (ie, they
tell you nothing), Harman Kardon emphasise that they only use a minimum
of negative feedback to achieve their
amplifier performance. The implication is that lots of negative feedback is
somehow “bad” and the less feedback,
the more merit in the design. They
state that the negative feedback in the
amplifier is less than 25dB.
Naturally, we don’t agree with this
approach. If using lots of negative
feedback achieves high performance,
then it is all to the good, as far as
we are concerned. Harman Kardon’s
figure of 25dB probably applies to
the overall negative feedback from
output to input but in our experience, any amplifier design which
performs well and uses little overall
negative feedback actually uses lots of
SILICON
CHIP
This advertisment
is out of date and
has been removed
to prevent
confusion.
The interior of the Processor/Tuner is complex indeed, with lots of ICs, LSI
chips and surface mount devices.
local negative feedback around each
stage. Often this feedback may take
the form of emitter degeneration or
lag compensation but it is feedback
nonetheless.
So while we would not criticise an
amplifier with low overall negative
feedback just because the designer
took that approach, we do think it is
doing it the hard way.
The other notable feature of the
Harman Kardon amplifier is its very
high output current capability and
this amplifier is rated at ±130A.
Again, while we don’t think high
current capability is bad, we cannot
see why any amplifier of this power
rating could ever need to deliver a
peak current in excess of 125 amps.
To explain further, a power ampli-
AUDIO PRECISION SCTHD-W THD+N(%) vs measured
10
LEVEL(W)
21 AUG 98 10:54:28
ELECTRONIC
COMPONENTS &
ACCESSORIES
• RESELLER FOR MAJOR KIT
RETAILERS
• PROTOTYPING EQUIPMENT
• CB RADIO SALES AND ACCESSORIES
1
• FULL ON-SITE SERVICE AND
REPAIR FACILITIES
• LARGE RANGE OF
ELECTRONIC DISPOSALS
(COME IN AND BROWSE)
0.1
0.010
M
W OR A
EL D IL
C ER
O
M
E
Croydon
Ph (03) 9723 3860
Fax (03) 9725 9443
Mildura
Ph (03) 5023 8138
Fax (03) 5023 8511
Truscott’s
0.001
0.5
1
10
100
300
Fig.1: harmonic distortion versus power into 8Ω loads, with both channels driven. Distortion is well below the rating of .03%.
ELECTRONIC WORLD Pty Ltd
ACN 069 935 397
30 Lacey St
Croydon Vic 3136
24 Langtree Ave
Mildura Vic 3500
December 1998 7
AUDIO PRECISION SCTHD-W THD+N(%) vs measured
10
LEVEL(W)
21 AUG 98 13:56:00
1
0.1
0.010
0.001
.0005
0.5
1
10
100
500
Fig.2: harmonic distortion versus power into 4Ω loads, with both channels driven. Distortion is still well below the rating of .03% while maximum power
is more than 360W.
AUDIO PRECISION SCTHD-W THD+N(%) vs measured
10
LEVEL(W)
21 AUG 98 12:12:52
1
0.1
0.010
0.001
.0005
0.5
1
10
100
1k
Fig.3: harmonic distortion versus power into an 8Ω load in bridge configuration.
Maximum power before clipping is over 700W.
fier rated to deliver 200 watts into
an 8Ω load will have a peak output
voltage of ±56.6V. In order for it to
deliver 125 amps, the load impedance
would have to drop to below 0.45Ω
or 450 milliohms.
Now we know that some loudspeakers have very nasty dips in their
impedance curves but we have never
8 Silicon Chip
come across one that dipped below
1Ω. And any loudspeaker with such
a dip in impedance would have to be
regarded as a bad design anyway, not
worthy of being connected to high
quality equipment such as this.
Test results
Testing this elaborate equipment
was neither simple nor quick as there
were so many functions to look at. In
the end, we had to be realistic and be
content to test only a few functions
of the Processor/Tuner while being
much more comprehensive in testing
the stereo power amplifier.
In short, we were able to confirm
all the specifications of the Processor/
Tuner that we actually tested and can
state that it is fairly conservative in its
ratings. Total harmonic distortion is
quoted as less than .03% from 20Hz
to 20kHz and it easily meets that as it
does for its frequency response rating
of 20Hz to 50kHz within ±0.5dB.
For the Harman Kardon power
amplifier, we easily confirmed the
power ratings, as the accompanying
power/distortion curves demonstrate.
Harmonic distortion was typically
below .01% which is considerably
below the rated figure of .03%.
The power amplifier is very quiet
as well, delivering a figure of -116dB
(unweighted) with respect to 200W
and -120dB A-weighted. Its frequency
response is very wide and is only 2dB
down at 200kHz.
Listening tests confirm that this is
fine equipment indeed but where it
really performs is on music that “begs
to have the wick turned up” such as
full symphony orchestral performances and on pipe organ. This reviewer
is a fan of Wurlitzer theatre organs
and when playing this material, the
Harman Kardon amplifier is simply
awesome. Mind you, you do need
speakers to handle the power and a
large listening room to really enjoy it.
Overall, we were very impressed
with the Harman Kardon Signature
Series equipment. The stereo power
amplifier is beauti
fully engineered
and has bags of output power while
the Proces
sor/Tuner is a technical
tour-de-force, with more than enough
facilities to satisfy the requirements of
the most comprehensive home theatre
sound system.
Recommended retail prices are as
follows: Signature Series 2.0 Processor/Tuner $4395; S/Series 1.5 stereo
amplifier $2895 and S/Series 2.1
5-channel power amplifier $2995.
For further information on the
Harman Kardon Signature Series
products, contact the Australian distributors: Convoy International Pty
Ltd, Unit 7, Discovery Cove, 1801
Botany Road, Botany NSW 2019.
SC
Phone (02) 9700 0111.
MAILBAG
Technology disposal
to cry about
I’d like to make some observations
and comments regarding your editorial in the September 1998 issue. First,
as an amateur constructor, designer
and would be trainee electronics tech,
your notes hit the mark perfectly. I
regularly scour the tips in this area
looking for items of “junque” that
may be either recycled, repaired or
experimented upon. You would be
flabbergasted at the treasures that
surface at more than regular intervals.
However, nothing can be got for free
these days so a token payment to the
salvager who owns the rights to the
tips I scour sees me get away with
some awesome bargains.
For example, the desk at which I’m
sitting ($20) is fully electronically
height adjustable, weighs 160kg and
cost me less than 5 cents to repair (a
roll pin). It cost $2000 new! The 15inch SVGA monitor ($3) I’m looking
at cost the price of 25mm of 0.8mm
solder to refix the data input plug
to the main board, courtesy of the
Queens
land Education Department.
The 586/100 ($6) that’s doing the
number crunching cost $100 for a used
210Mb HDD, courtesy of an unnamed
national company. I’ve since added a
32X CD-ROM, 1.2Mb 5.25-inch floppy,
sound card, more RAM (from 12Mb to
16Mb), PCI video card and a BJC255SP
printer, all new at retail prices.
Oh! I almost forgot the gas strut
office chair ($5) re
p aired with a
20-second burst of the MIG welder.
How’s that?
What I’ve just described has taken
me some two years to complete and
doesn’t happen every day. Every other
day sees 386, 286 and XT computers,
monitors from mono to SVGA, washing ma
chines, stereo components
(wow, that’s another story!), lawn
mowers, whipper snippers, lashings
of various parts, reusable timber, glass
panes, light fittings, heavy timber
doors, telephones, hand and electric
tools and small stationary engines
(some brand new!) added to the list.
I’m not kidding!
Now for the frightening part. How
about computers that have become
superfluous to company needs for
whatever reason(s) that still have
(working) hard drives installed, from
financial insti
tutions, accountants,
hospitals, homeowners, etc. I’m not
kidding! How do I know? The hard
drives are still full! I wipe ’em and
sell ’em but the information on some
of them would make your eyes pop!
What can one do with such “ancient
technology”? This is not my idea but
I thought it was a beauty. I discovered a book by R. A. Penfold (Babani
Electronics Books BP272) entitled “Interfacing PCs and Compatibles” that
describes in detail the use of 74LS138
decoders and 82 (C)55 PPI (Programmable Peripheral Interface) to
interface computers with external I/O
for use with relays and data-logging
circuits using BASIC programming.
My specific use for this is a watering
system for my yard, presently switching 24 taps at programmed intervals
to water my 6-acre yard.
Another good point is the use of
my 586 to do the programming and
compiling to an EXE file This is then
copied to a boot disk and fired up
using the autoexec.bat file right after
the computer boots. Once the bugs are
ironed out, the 286 I use for the inter
facing can use a floppy to boot up – no
hard drive or monitor is needed, just
a keyboard and video card.
S. Clavan,
Black River, Qld 4818.
Old PCs needed
for schools
I write with regard to your editorial
in the September 1998 issue of SILICON
CHIP. Yes, there is a need and use for
386/486 vintage computers. I am an
electronics, systems technology, robotics teacher (secondary) who could
use such machines. My primary use
would be to run the many programs
that work quite happily with Windows 3.1 – programs such as LEGO
Control Lab, PC Logo, Intellecta and
the Softmark interface project from the
last issue of SILICON CHIP, to mention
but a few.
My secondary uses would be to
teach computer repair and upgrade
skills to students. I believe some local
schools are already into this activity.
To emphasise the need, this year
my school received a donation of 4
x 486 computers, without monitors,
mice or keyboards from Alcoa. Setting
up the computers with monitors, etc,
broke our budget and we may be able
to find enough money with P & C help
next year to provide software and site
licences.
I am at a reasonably well-off secondary school in Perth but there are
many other schools not so well off,
especially the smaller primary schools
(and country schools) who could also
put such computers into productive
classroom activities.
To your readers, if you have such
computers to give away, please contact
your local schools.
M. Callaghan,
Maddington, WA.
Old computers
are not useless
I found your editorial on old PCs
very thought provoking, to the point
that I am tempted to put pen to paper
– electronically speaking, that is.
In my semi-retirement I have made
up many inexpensive computers from
leftover parts for friends and those who
cannot afford the latest technology (ie,
$50 286s) with which they can accomplish almost anything apart from
playing fast RAM-hungry games and
perhaps running some of the high-end
business graphics.
I am amazed that the Educa
tion
Departments have seen fit to issue
Pentiums to our schools when those
in the USA are quite content to utilise
other departments’ outdated models,
which in this country are virtually
given away to stunned bidders at local
auctions! Is Australia really so affluent;
can we actually afford it?
Thus, in answer to your editorial, I
do not find those unloved machines
useless – they are indeed a most useful
tool and teaching aid. Dare I suggest
that the educa
tors of this country
think again before squandering huge
sums on machines that really are not
necessary in the circumstances?
J. Harding,
Lauderdale, Tas.
December 1998 9
SILICON
CHIP
If you are seeing a blank page here, it is
more than likely that it contained advertising
which is now out of date and the advertiser
has requested that the page be removed to
prevent misunderstandings.
Please feel free to visit the advertiser’s website:
www.dse.com.au
SILICON
CHIP
If you are seeing a blank page here, it is
more than likely that it contained advertising
which is now out of date and the advertiser
has requested that the page be removed to
prevent misunderstandings.
Please feel free to visit the advertiser’s website:
www.dse.com.au
|