This is only a preview of the May 1999 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 33 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "The Line Dancer Robot":
Items relevant to "An X-Y Table With Stepper Motor Control; Pt.1":
Items relevant to "Three Electric Fence Testers":
Items relevant to "Heart Of LEDs":
Items relevant to "Build A Carbon Monoxide Alarm":
Articles in this series:
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
When most people think of radio controlled aircraft, they imagine
small models that fly around a small field. But this Australian
designed and manufactured aircraft has crossed the Atlantic and
performed many other record feats.
The idea of a robot aircraft flying
at 40,000 feet and with a range of up
to 7000km takes some getting used
to, especially when you realise that
commercial jet aircraft fly at the same
height and have a similar range.
Add in the fact that this radiocontrolled aircraft has a wing‑span
of only three metres and weighs only
15kg and the feat is all the more incredible.
In what must be one of the leastpublicised epics for some time, the
North Atlantic was crossed by the
Australian-designed Aerosonde robotic aircraft in August 1998. The
Aerosonde was the first robotic aircraft
to cross the North Atlantic Ocean and
it was also the smallest aircraft ever
to do so.
8 Silicon Chip
As you might imagine, for a crossing
of the Atlantic the aircraft is not under
radio control for most of the flight.
Instead, the Aerosonde employs an
autopilot and GPS fixes to guide it
most of the way. So notable has this
aircraft become that it is now a joint
development with the US military
and its future uses could be quite
widespread.
The history‑making Aerosonde,
nicknamed “Laima,” landed smoothly
on a field at the Benbecula military
range in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland,
after a 27‑hour non‑stop flight from St
Johns, Newfoundland, Canada.
By BOB YOUNG
Powered by a tiny one‑cylinder 20cc
engine, the aircraft autonomously
guided itself across the 3200km stretch
of the North Atlantic while burning
less than six litres of fuel!
The Aerosonde rigorously maintained a flight path approved by aviation authorities and landed exactly
as scheduled while collecting meteorological data throughout the flight.
The tiny aircraft is packed with
computers, a communications radio,
a GPS satellite guidance system and
meteorological instruments.
This crossing followed extensive
trials held in Australia, Canada and
Asia over the previous year. It followed
a path similar to that taken by the first
Atlantic manned crossing by Alcock
and Brown.
Hard to believe, but as the tiny Aerosonde makes a low pass over an airfield it could be coming in to land
after a flight of thousands of kilometres from who knows where.
The flight was conducted by the
University of Washington and US engineering company, The Insitu Group,
using aircraft purchased by the University from co‑developer Environmental
Systems and Services.
“We’ve flown the same mission as
a $10 million unmanned craft at a
fraction of the cost,” said Professor
Juris Vagners of the University of
Washington Aeronautics and Astronautics department. The aircraft cost
$US25,000.
Aerosonde development has been
underway since 1992. Phase I Aero-sondes were given their full operational trial by the Bureau of Meteorology in early 1998 and passed with
flying colours.
In addition, Aerosonde RA have
conducted several missions in Australia, Taiwan, Canada and the United
States, including flights of over 30
hours and at 16,000 feet.
To date over 30 Phase I Aerosondes
have been delivered. Their specifications are as shown in Table 1.
Aerosonde is currently working on
a Phase 2 version which will have
a range up to 7000km, up to 5 days
endurance and a ceiling of 40,000 feet.
While Aerosonde resembles a model
aircraft externally, this resemblance is
purely superficial.
True, some components are essentially model aircraft components,
however the operationing systems are
structured along traditional military
lines.
Take‑off and landings are arranged
so that manual or automatic control
can be engaged. Manual control is en-
gaged when the pilot plugs his control
box into the computer control console.
Currently, all take‑offs and landings
are done under manual control.
The Aerosonde uses a gyroscopic
autopilot and standard model aircraft
servos but the details of these have not
been released.
The aircraft is a joint Australian/
American design and manufacture
has commenced at Melbourne. Component manufacture is contracted to
a number of Australian and interna-
Table 1: Phase 1 Aerosonde Specifications
Wingspan: .............. 3 metres
Weight: ................... 15kg
Engine:.................... 20cc petrol (Avgas)
Performance:........... Cruise 20‑30m/s
Range:..................... >3,000km,
Endurance .............. >30 hours
Height Range: ........ Surface to 16,000 feet
Payload:................... 1‑2 kg
Operation:................ Autonomous
Navigation:.............. GPS
Communication:...... UHF Radio, Satellite
Observations:.......... Wind, Pressure, Height, Temperature, Moisture
MAY 1999 9
tional groups.
Following a series of engineering
demonstrators built in 1992-94, the
first Aerosonde suitable for field testing was flown in June 1995.
In November, the Aerosonde Development Consortium took several
examples to Melville Island north of
Darwin for the Maritime Continent
Thunderstorm Experiment. This was
primarily for engineering trials, since
at the time of deployment they had
flown less than 50 hours
Since then, Aerosondes have come
a long way.
They can be used for meteorological
and environmental monitoring. For
example, they are able to do some very
useful work in monitoring sea breeze
fronts, gust fronts and storms, working
with Doppler radar.
Winds and thermodynamic data
measured during the more interesting
missions, along with more details on
the aircraft, are available on the MCTEX web page at www.aerosonde.com
An interesting point is that the
Aerosonde cannot determine wind
by the standard wind‑triangle method
whereby wind is calculated directly
by differencing groundspeed and airspeed vectors.
This is because while it has vector
groundspeed from its GPS, it does not
have a heading sensor. Hence true
airspeed is known only as a scalar.
It turns out that vector groundspeed
and scalar airspeed provide sufficient
information for wind‑finding if they
are compared through the course of
a turn, say through about a quarter of
a circle. The algorithm is given in the
Aerosonde RA publications.
Aerosonde flight‑plan segments
therefore include a specified interval
for wind‑finding S‑turns.
Wind-finding requires about 10 seconds manoeuvring (spatial resolution
of about 200 metres).
The following flight reports downloaded from the Aerosonde web site
make interesting reading:
“1996: 24 HOUR FLIGHT ‑ 21st
November 1996
At about 5 in the afternoon of 21
November 1996, Aerosonde Morti‑
cia landed at Geelong, having flown
around the local model‑aircraft field
for 24 hours at about 300m altitude. It
Fig.1: this is the flight track of the record‑breaking North Atlantic flight. This consisted of a series of way points for a route
that went slightly south of a great circle (shortest distance) to the landing site at DERA Benbecula Range in the Outer
Hebrides. The altitude was specified at 1680m, dropping to around 150m on approach to Benbecula. Before launch,
complete flight simulations had been made using winds provided by the US NOAA/NCEP model to provide approximate
times at each way point.
10 Silicon Chip
some tall clover.
Overall the performance was quite
comparable to a good manual land‑
ing. Although the landing was done
under autopilot, it was not quite au‑
tonomous; guidance onto the runway
centreline was done visually from the
ground station rather than being left
to the onboard tracker.
However the test produced good
results in position measurement by
differential GPS, so the next step to
fully autonomous landing will be
straightforward.”
The Aerosonde is normally launched from a cradle atop a car roof rack.
Takeoff is normally under manual control but can be be completely automatic,
as can the landing on a remote field.
had enough fuel on board for another
10 hours or so of flying.
Meteorological data were reported
throughout, in conditions ranging
from fair at the start to blustery, with
heavy showers as a cold front moved
through early on the 21st.
For us this was a milestone in not
only basic performance, but also
reliability and readiness for routine
operations.
Several more such flights will have
to be successful before we feel con‑
fident but certainly the program is
steadily developing towards reliable
and repeatable operations.”
“1997: AUTOMATIC TAKEOFF
AND LANDING ‑ 22nd September
1997
On 22nd September 1997 an impor‑
tant step was taken toward automatic
rather than manual control of takeoff
and landing. In a one‑hour test at
Trout Lake in Washington, Aerosonde
Millionaire flew under autopilot con‑
tinuously from launch to touchdown.
Figures show the landing as plotted
on ground‑station displays.
The aircraft touched down smoothly
on the Trout Lake runway, made one
small bounce and a large‑angle yaw,
and then decelerated rapidly through
All in all the Aerosonde project is
a credit to the dreamers who dared to
make it happen. What an audacious
project: to send a single engine, miniature aircraft across one of the most
hostile stretches of ocean in the world.
Once again we see vividly demonstrated, that by standing on the shoulders of giants, we can see past the
crowds who would otherwise limit
our vision.
Where will this all lead? The developers envisage a global robotic
airline operating out of Australia with
a distributed set of launch and recovery sites (“airports” if you like) and a
global command site possibly located
SC
in Melbourne.
Acknowledgement:
Much of the material in this article
courtesy of Aerosonde Robotic
Aircraft Pty Ltd.
For more information, visit their
website, www.aerosonde.com.au
MAY 1999 11
|