This is only a preview of the November 2000 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 38 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Santa & Rudolph Christmas Lights Display":
Items relevant to "2-Channel Guitar Preamplifier":
Items relevant to "Message Bank & Missed Call Alert":
Articles in this series:
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
The easy way into electronics Pt.3
This month we feature a few more circuits based on the 555
timer. As we shall see, this chip can be used in more than just
timer and oscillator circuits. You can even use as an audio
amplifier and in pulse width modulation circuits.
By LEO SIMPSON
B
UT FIRST, AS THEY say in the
news programs, we have some
corrections to make on last
month’s circuit. Red faces all around
here because the circuits published
on page 61 both had the same mistake: the 1kΩ and 10kΩ resistors
were swapped for both IC1 and IC2.
Both circuits will still work but the
negative pulse widths will be about
10 times narrower than those shown
on the oscillo
scope waveforms on
page 63.
That error was bad enough but we
also made a mistake with the Proto
board wiring layout shown on page
62. In this case the connection of
potentiometers VR1 and VR2 is different from the circuits on page 61
and to compound the misery, the pot
values were actually 50kΩ instead
of 100kΩ. Again, the circuits still
work but the pulse width is variable
instead of being fixed and the range of
frequencies is not as large with 50kΩ
as it would be with 100kΩ.
Why did these mistakes happen?
Put it down to old age, poor eyesight, Olympic Games’ distractions
or straight out incompetence – we’ll
own up to all of those and will now
try to make amends.
In fact, these mistakes demonstrate
how easy it is easy to make changes
to circuits when you are using Proto
boards and at the same time, how easy
it is to make mistakes. You have to
keep your wits about you and carefully
check that what you think you’ve done
is actually what you should have done!
It is also very easy to push a wire into
the row or column next to the one you
really want. So look before you jab!
OK. Fig.1 shows the high frequency
part of the Siren circuit as it should
have been on Fig.1, page 61, of last
month’s article. Fig.2 shows the circuit
actually depicted in the Protoboard
layout on page 62 of last month’s issue.
If you wired up your version along
the same lines, you will find that the
This photo features all
the components shown
in the diagram of Fig.3.
You can use this layout
to demonstrate how a
555 timer can be used
as an amplifier for
the signal from a CD
player.
86 Silicon Chip
frequency and negative pulse width
are variable.
If you haven’t tried the circuit, wire
it up now on your Protoboard. The
wiring layout is shown in Fig.3. This
has extra parts associated with pin 5
and these should be omitted for the
time being. The scope waveforms of
Figs.4 & 5 demonstrate the circuit’s
performance.
Fig.1: this 555
oscillator circuit
has a fixed resistor
between pin 6 & 7 and
this results in a fixed
negative pulse width
as the frequency is
varied over a wider
range.
Square waves not possible
Two things are demonstrated by
the waveforms of Figs.4 & Fig.5. First,
when the resistance between pins 7
and 6,2 is variable, as it is in Fig.2, the
negative pulse width is also variable;
when the resistance between pins 7
& 6,2 is fixed, as shown in Fig.1, the
negative pulse width is fixed. This is
be
cause the aforementioned resistance determines the discharge time
for the capacitor at pin 6.
But the other consequence of this
is that this 555 circuit cannot ever
deliver a perfect square wave; ie, a
waveform with 50% duty cycle or to
put it another way, where the positive
and negative pulse widths are equal.
You might get close to 50% at one
particular frequency (as shown in the
waveform of Fig.5) but as soon as you
change the frequency, the duty cycle
goes far off that for a square wave.
So is it impossible to get a square
wave from a 555? No. It can be done
Fig.2: this version of the 555 circuit uses exactly the same components but now
the resistance between pins 6 & 7 is variable and this results in variable negative
pulse width over the entire frequency range.
Fig.3: use this diagram to wire up the circuit of Fig.2 but leave out VR2 and the components associated with pin 5 for
the time being.
November 2000 87
Fig.4: this waveform demonstrates the fixed negative pulse
width produced by the circuit of Fig.1. This is determined
by the time constant of the 1kΩ resistor and 0.1µF capacitor.
but the circuit has to be changed so
that the internal transistor at pin 7
no longer does the discharging of the
capacitor.
The circuit of Fig.6 shows how it
can be done. Instead of charging the
capacitor from the positive supply
and then discharging via pin 7, the
charging and discharging of the capacitor at pins 2 & 6 is done from
pin 3. So pin 7 has no connection in
this circuit.
Square wave circuit
To change your Protoboard circuit
from that shown in Fig.2 to that of
Fig.6, remove the 10kΩ resistor connecting pin 7 to the +12V line and
move the pot lead that connects to
pin 7 so that it now goes to pin 3.
And leave the speaker disconnected
for the moment.
Fig.5: this waveform looks much the same as in Fig.4 but
now the negative pulse width is variable as well as the
frequency, as per the circuit of Fig.2.
The scope waveforms of Figs.7 &
8 show that the output waveform at
pin 3 (Ch2 – lower trace) now has
a duty cycle of close to 50%. Fig.7
shows the circuit oscillating at around
138Hz with pot VR1 set for maximum
resistance while Fig.8 shows it running at around 6.8kHz, with VR1 set
for minimum resistance.
Two things can be noted about the
“square” waves of Figs.7 & 8. First,
the duty cycle is not exactly 50%, in
spite of what we said above. Second,
in Fig.8 the tops of the square wave
are sloping rather than dead square.
Both of these effects are caused by the
output stage of the 555.
If we had a “perfect” output stage in
the 555, it would switch between the
full supply voltage (12V nominal) and
0V. But it doesn’t. Depending on the
current it has to “source” or “sink”,
Fig.6: by charging and discharging the capacitor at pin 6 from a variable
resistance connected to pin 3, the 555 can be made to deliver a square
wave regardless of its frequency of operation.
88 Silicon Chip
it typically won’t quite get to 0V and
it will do worse in switching up to
the positive supply. In our circuit for
example, it will switch down to about
0.1V but will only switch up to within
about 0.4V of the positive supply rail.
Furthermore, if we make the 555
drive the speaker via a 68Ω resistor
and 100µF capacitor, it will have to
source and sink substantially more
current (around 110mA) and so it will
do considerably worse.
In fact, Fig.9 shows how bad it
is. The output waveform is considerably reduced in amplitude, with
the negative excursion now being
about 1V (instead of close to 0V) but
the positive excursion is only about
+8.5V. Clearly, the output stage of the
555 is far from perfect and nor is it
symmetrical.
The result of this is that the output
waveform from pin 3 is now nothing
like “square” as the positive excursions of the waveform are now more
than double the negative excursions.
Because the output at pin 3 is not
switching as high as it should, it is
taking that much longer to charge the
capacitor at pins 2 & 6.
OK. So if we want a near perfect
square wave from a 555 we can use the
circuit of Fig.6 but we have to maintain the minimum possible loading on
the output at pin 3. In other words,
don’t connect the speaker.
You might ask why most 555 circuits do not use the configu
ration
of Fig.6 since it gives a more ideal
square wave. The answer is that the
conventional circuits of Fig.1 & Fig.2
are normally preferred because they
give much better frequency stability.
Fig.7: this shows that the 555 can produce a near ideal
square wave, using the circuit of Fig.6. In this case, the
circuit is set to oscillate at 138Hz and the loading on pin
3 is minimal.
The frequency is less affected by
circuit loading at pin 3 and is almost
entirely independent of supply voltage variations. So, for example, for
a given setting of VR1 in Fig.2 and
with the speaker disconnected, the
frequency will be substantially the
same, regardless of whether the supply voltage is 3V or 15V.
That’s a pretty good result for an
oscillator.
Fig.8: when set for the maximum frequency, the circuit
of Fig.6 still delivers a duty cycle of close to 50% but the
higher loading on pin 3 means that the tops of the pulse
waveform are no longer square.
Fig.9: with the
speaker connected,
there is high
loading on pin 3
and so the output
is much reduced
and no longer can
be called a square
wave.
Frequency modulation
While most oscillator circuits using
555s tend to be along the lines we
have discussed so far, few make any
use of pin 5 which is usually referred
to as the CV or Control Voltage input.
In most circuits, it is not connected
at all or it might be connected to the
0V line via a capacitor. However, it
can be used to produce pulse width
modulation or looking at it another
way, frequency modulation.
To demonstrate this effect, let’s
change the circuit to that of Fig.10.
The Protoboard can
be mounted on a
simple folded
aluminium
baseplate, with the
pots and DC power
socket mounted on
the front panel.
November 2000 89
Fig.10: used to
demonstrate pulse width
modulation, this circuit
is similar to that of Fig.2
except that we have
another 50kΩ pot, VR2,
connected between the
positive and negative
supply and its wiper
goes to pin 5 via a 10kΩ
resistor. Ignore the
components shown in
red for the moment. Note
that the capacitor value
at pins 2 & 6 is now
.01µF instead of 0.1µF.
Fig.11: these wave
forms demonstrate
pulse width
modulation with the
555. The top trace is
the 500Hz sinewave
applied to pin 5
while the lower
trace is the pulse
width modulated
waveform which is
running at around
5kHz.
This is similar to that of Fig.2 except
that we have another 50kΩ pot, VR2,
connected between the positive and
negative supply and its wiper goes to
pin 5 via a 10kΩ resistor.
Note that the capacitor value at pins
2 & 6 is now .01µF instead of 0.1µF.
Now by leaving the setting of VR1
constant and varying VR2, we can
vary the frequency and pulse width
over a very wide range.
To demonstrate the effect, connect
the speaker (if not already connected)
and wind VR2 over its full range. If
VR1 is already set for a reasonably
high frequency (say 3kHz) you will
find that VR2 will vary the frequency over a range from 3kHz to above
20kHz (ie, supersonic).
But not only do we vary the frequency, we are varying the pulse
width. This can be seen on a scope
if you have one but if you don’t you
can still demonstrate that the pulse
width is varying. How? By using your
multimeter to measure the average DC
90 Silicon Chip
voltage at pin 3. If you go through the
same exercise in varying VR2, you
will find that the DC voltage at pin 3
varies from about 2V to 10V.
This principle is widely used in
pulse width modulation circuits to
vary the average DC or power level
to a load.
PWM amplifier
Finally, we can use this pulse width
modulation principle to make the 555
function as an audio amplifier. To do
this, we connect the positive electrode of a 10µF electrolytic capacitor
to the wiper of VR2 and the negative
lead of the capacitor is connected to
0V via a 4.7kΩ resistor.
These extra components are shown
in red on Fig.10. VR2 and these extra
components are included in the Protoboard layout of Fig.3 and you can
plug them in now.
We now connect an audio signal
to the 4.7kΩ resistor. In our case,
we applied a 500Hz sinewave signal
of about 2V RMS and the result can
be seen in the scope waveforms of
Fig.11. The top trace is the 500Hz
sinewave while the lower trace is the
pulse width modulated waveform
which is running at around 5kHz or
thereabouts. Note that the wide pulses
correspond to the positive peaks of
the sinewave modulation signal and
the narrow pulse correspond to the
negative peaks.
If you listen to the speaker it won’t
sound too pleasant but if you wind
up VR1 or VR2 so that the “carrier”
frequency becomes supersonic, you
will then hear a clear 500Hz tone.
You can play around with the settings of VR1, VR2 and the input signal
level to get the loudest and clearest
signal from the speaker. So there you
are – it works as an amplifier.
If you don’t have an audio oscillator, don’t worry. You can feed in the
signal from a standard CD player.
Go ahead and try it. It won’t be high
fidelity but you can listen to it – a
555 does work as an audio amplifier.
What is happening here is that we
are pulse width modulating a carrier
frequency of say 30kHz with an audio
signal. The speaker cannot respond to
the 30kHz signal but it can respond
to the average DC level and this is
the audio signal we feed in from the
CD player.
Feedback wanted
Finally, we’d like some feedback
about these Protoboard articles.
Do you like them? Do they explain
enough? And would you like a particular circuit demonstrated and
explained? Please email your comments to leo<at>siliconchip.com.au SC
|