This is only a preview of the February 2004 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 35 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Simple Supply Rail Monitor For PCs":
Items relevant to "Studio 350 Power Amplifier Module; Pt.2":
Items relevant to "Using The Valve Preamp In A Hifi System":
Articles in this series:
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
Following our description of
the 12AX7 valve preamp in the
November 2003 issue, we’ve had
quite a few letters from readers
asking if it can be adapted for use
in a hifi preamplifier. It certainly
can, and here are the details.
Using the
Valve Preamp
in a hifi system
Fig.1: the frequency response features a slight rise in the
low bass region and is just -1dB down at 180kHz.
By JIM ROWE
This is the original 12AX7 valve preamplifier, as
described in the November 2003 issue of SILICON
CHIP. It’s easy to modify for use as a hifi preamp.
32 Silicon Chip
www.siliconchip.com.au
Fig.2: total harmonic distortion (THD) vs signal output.
It’s almost an order of magnitude better than before.
T
HE 12AX7 VALVE audio preamplifier in the November 2003
issue was “the project that we
swore we would never do”. This may
have been a tad embarrassing but the
project has proved to be surprisingly
popular. It looks like quite a few more
people than we expected did want to
try out “valve sound” for themselves!
The November 2003 design was
intended for use mainly with electric
guitars and musical instruments,
which is why we gave it a gain of
about 60 times. But not long after the
November issue appeared, we started
to get letters and emails from people
wanting to use two or more of the
preamps with their hifi sound systems.
They wanted to know how to adapt
the basic preamp design for this kind
of application.
As it stands, the original design has
far more gain than is necessary and
would be seriously overloaded by
the signals from a CD player, tuner,
cassette deck or whatever. To make it
suitable for these “line level” signals,
we need to lower the overall gain to
about four times. As well, we needed
to show how to fit a volume control,
as the original preamp didn’t provide
one.
Fig.3: THD vs frequency at 2V output. Again, it’s almost
an order of magnitude better than the original circuit.
response curve is shown in Fig.1 and
this also has a very slight rise in the
low bass region. Again, this is largely
academic.
The biggest changes come about
in the harmonic distortion and since
the feedback in the modified circuit
is much greater (ie, we increased the
feedback to reduce the gain), we would
expect to the harmonic distortion to be
considerably lower. And indeed it is.
Fig.2 shows the total harmonic distortion (THD) plotted against signal
amplitude and this demonstrates that
is almost an order of magnitude better (ie, one tenth) than before. On the
downside, the circuit can now only
deliver just over 8V before clipping
sets in (demonstrated by the vertically rising curve) and this is due to
the increased loading of the feedback
network on the plate circuit of the
second triode.
Fig.3 shows THD versus frequency
at a signal output level of 2V and again,
it is almost an order of magnitude better than the original circuit.
Signal to noise ratio is also improved, to -99dB unweighted (22Hz
to 22kHz) with respect to 2V output.
Circuit changes
In talking about the new design, we
will assume that readers have access
Performance
As you would expect, the changes to
the circuit do bring about significant
changes to the performance and these
are all to the better. The frequency
response is now even more extended,
with the -1dB point now being 180kHz
rather than 160kHz, although this is
really academic. The new frequency
www.siliconchip.com.au
Fig.4: the circuit changes are straightforward and involve changing six
resistors and increasing the value of the feedback coupling capacitor to
680nF. A 50kΩ log pot has also been added for volume control.
February 2004 33
Table 1: Capacitor Codes
Value
680nF
220nF
100nF
µF Code EIA Code IEC Code
0.68µF
684
680n
0.22µF
224
220n
0.1µF
104
100n
to the full November 2003 article.
Fortunately, it wasn’t too difficult to
modify the preamp design to lower
the overall gain. As you can see from
the modified circuit in Fig.4, we’ve
mainly lowered the division ratio in
the negative feedback voltage divider,
to give a ratio of about 4:1 ((5.6kΩ +
4.7kΩ + 3.3kΩ)/3.3kΩ = 4.12) instead
of the original 60:1.
In order to do this, we had to increase the value of the first triode’s
(V1a) cathode bias resistor to 3.3kΩ
(from 1kΩ), so that the overall divider
resistance wouldn’t be too low – which
would have provided excessive loading on the plate of the second triode
(V1b). But because increasing the
Fig.5: here’s how to install the parts on the PC board and wire up the
volume control. Make sure that the high-voltage components are covered
with neutral-cure silicone sealant.
value of V1a’s cathode resistor
reduces that valve’s plate current,
we also had to increase the value
of its plate load resistor, to bring its
quiescent plate voltage back to around
half the HT supply.
So that’s why the plate load resistor for V1a is now 270kΩ, rather than
the original 100kΩ. Even with these
changes, the negative feedback divider
still has a somewhat lower resistance
than in the original design (ie, 13.6kΩ
rather than 67kΩ).
To compensate for this additional
loading on V1b, we’ve increased the
quiescent plate current of that triode
stage by reducing its cathode bias
resistor to 560Ω (from 1kΩ) and also
reduced the value of its plate load resistor to 68kΩ (from 100kΩ) to again
bring the quiescent plate voltage back
to around half the HT supply.
Performance
Frequency Response: +0.5dB at 16Hz and -1dB at 180kHz (see
Fig.1)
Harmonic Distortion: 0.2% for output levels up to 6V RMS (see Figs.2
& 3)
Signal-to-noise Ratio: -99dB unweighted (22Hz to 22kHz) with respect
to 2V RMS output
Voltage Gain: 4
Input Impedance: 1MΩ
Output Impedance: 600Ω approx. (before volume control)
34 Silicon Chip
The only other circuit change has
been to increase the value of the coupling capacitor between the plate of
V1b and the negative feedback divider,
to compensate for the lower divider resistance and ensure that the preamp’s
bass response is not degraded. The
capacitor value has been increased to
680nF (from 220nF).
Volume control
What about the volume control?
This is simply a 50kΩ log pot connected to the output of the preamp, as
you can see from the circuit.
Of course, if you intend building
two of these valve preamps for stereo,
you’d use one half of a dual 50kΩ log
pot for each channel.
We should also mention that although the plate current of both triode
stages has been changed in this version
of the preamp, the total HT current
drain is almost exactly the same as
that of the November 2003 version. So
the HT power supply described in the
November article is quite capable of
running two of the modified preamps,
for stereo operation.
In fact, it could be used to drive
quite a few other valve stages, if that
was ever required.
Construction
The modified preamp can be built up
on the original PC board, because only
the component values have changed.
Almost all of the changed component
www.siliconchip.com.au
values have the same physical size as
those in the original preamp, too, so
in most cases it’s simply a matter of
fitting the different value parts into the
board using the new overlay diagram
as a guide.
The only exception to this is the
680nF 630V feedback coupling capacitor, which you’ll find is somewhat
larger than the original value of 220nF.
You may have to bend the leads of this
capacitor inwards so they’ll go through
the board holes, and you may even
have to mount the capacitor “leaning
over” so it will fit between the surrounding components.
As shown in the overlay diagram,
the output RCA socket is no longer
on the PC board, since in this version,
the preamp output connects only to
www.siliconchip.com.au
the volume control pot. You can then
connect the output from the pot using
a short length of screened audio cable
to an RCA socket.
If you’re building up dual preamps
Is It Really Necessary?
If your power amplifier has an
input sensitivity of 1V RMS or
less, for full power output, then
strictly speaking, you don’t really
need a preamplifier of any sort for
line level signals. All you need is a
volume control.
However, since so many people
have asked for this circuit, we
have gone ahead and shown what
needs to be done.
for stereo, they can be mounted side
by side on the lid of a diecast metal
box like the Jaycar HB-5046 (171 x 121
x 55mm), with the HT power supply
and the dual volume control pot inside
the box.
The output cables from the volume
controls could be terminated at insulated single-hole-mounting RCA
sockets fitted into the end of the box
remote from the +12V power input,
ready for a standard stereo lead to a
stereo power amplifier. This would
make quite a neat arrangement, while
still allowing the preamp valves to be
“on display”.
Finally, note that the high-voltage
components must be covered with
neutral-cure silicone sealant, to guard
against electric shock – see Fig.5. SC
February 2004 35
|