This is only a preview of the July 2005 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 37 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Remote-Controlled Automatic Table Lamp Dimmer":
Items relevant to "Lead-Acid Battery Zapper":
Items relevant to "PICAXE In Schools, Pt.3":
Articles in this series:
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
GETTING Part 3:
INTO infrastructure,
APs, PoE and
much more!
by Ross Tester
When we ran out of space last month, we’d just explained how easy
it was to install an “ad hoc” Wi-Fi network to wirelessly connect
a few computers. Now we’ll move on to the next logical step, the
“infrastructure” network and connection to the world via the Internet.
A
ccess Points (APs) are sometimes referred to as wireless base stations, WAPs, even (albeit incorrectly)
as hubs or routers. You may also see terms like
residential gateway or Internet gateway device mentioned.
Despite the number of synonyms, as far as the wireless
network is concerned, they all mean basically the same
thing. Some may have more features than others, which
often explains their incorrect names – eg, a WAP can have
a hub or router built in.
First of all, though, if the ad hoc system works, why
do you need to go to the expense of buying this extra
equipment? Can’t you do a lot with the simpler ad hoc
network?
Yes you can, but. . .
As we briefly mentioned last month, it is possible (for
example) to connect to the internet from an ad hoc network.
It is also possible to set up a wireless access point using
software on perhaps an old PC – that is, without buying
extra hardware. But the truth is that it is not very often
done – most wireless networks use the infrastructure mode
with an AP. Why?
(a) it offers more features and more security than the ad
hoc mode;
(b) it is usually much simpler to go the hardware route,
especially if you want to do more than swap files; and
(c) if you only have a dial-up conenction, there are good
reasons, associated with the way IP addresses are handed
out, not to use a software AP.
You would normally also expect better range from an
AP, if for no other reason than the AP can be mounted in a
much more beneficial location. In an ad hoc system, communication is direct from the wireless network card in each
computer to its counterpart in another computer.
But unless there is a (often lossy!) antenna extension
cable, the antenna is normally located hard up against the
back plane of the computer – it normally directly screws
Two different types of Access Points, showing both front
and rear so you can see the difference. At left is a Wireless
Router/AP ($179 from Jaycar Electronics) which combines
the functions of an AP for wireless networks and a router
for wired networks. At right is a basic Access Point ($99
from Freenet Antennas).
8 Silicon Chip
siliconchip.com.au
DESKTOP PC
WITH WIRELESS
CARD
NOTEBOOK WITH
WIRELESS USB “STICK”
ACCESS POINT
Reproduced from Part 1 of this
series, this diagram shows the basic
arrangement for an infrastructure
mode wireless network. This isn’t
the only possible arrangement: it’s
quite likely that at least some of
the computers would be in a wired
network. There may also be more
than one access point if larger areas,
or more difficult wireless areas,
needed to be covered. The main
point to note from this diagram
is that data does not travel from
computer to computer, as it does in
an ad hoc network. Here the access
point acts as a “traffic cop”,
sending ‑data direct to the
appropriate device.
NOTEBOOK WITH
WIRELESS PC CARD
INTERNET
VIA DIALUP,
BROADBAND,
ETC
PC WITH WIRELESS
PCI ADAPTER
PDA WITH
WIRELESS
into the internal wireless network interface card, or NIC.
And the computer is often at floor level or hard up against
a wall – hardly the best radio environment. In any event,
the bulk of the computer case often provides a very effective radio shield over about 180°!
The AP too usually has integrated antenna(s) but it can
be mounted well clear of obstacles, filing cabinets, people
. . . we’ll get back to this shortly.
Naturally, all computers on the wireless network will
still have to have a wireless NIC to be able to talk to the AP
(many modern laptops have them built in). But it helps to
have the AP mounted in as good a position as possible to
give each of those computers a fighting chance!
AP cost
With the price of all wireless hardware – not just NICs
but APs as well – dropping all the time (prices have probably halved even in the last year), there now really isn’t a
good reason to suffer the limitations of an ad hoc system
for the sake of a few pennies.
A good, “no frills” access point these days should be
no more than about $100 – and possibly less if you hunt
around. We’ve seen a lot of refurbished, guaranteed Netgear
WG602 (802.11g) access points – basic but with a good
reputation – being sold on Ebay lately for sub-$50 (and
even less).
If you’re prepared to settle for an 802.11b AP, you could
pick one up for a song. Incidentally, you shouldn’t notice
any Internet performance difference between 802.11b and
802.11g. The limitation will be the ’net, not your AP.
Even all-singing, all-dancing AP models (such as the
siliconchip.com.au
“MAIN” PC
WITH MODEM
Linksys WAG45G wireless router, switch, ADSL modem
and gateway, so you get everything you need in one package) retail for well under $200 (eg, www.freenet-antennas.
com.au).
And there’s the power wastage factor too: an old computer
set up as a software access point will normally consume
a hundred watts plus (even without a monitor on) while
a dedicated access point might draw one tenth of this.
While the power cost is minimal, remember these devices
are usually left on 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It
all adds up!
APs with two antennas
Apart from their cost, whether they are “b” or “g”
models and their reputation (sometimes unearned!), one
other thing you might notice about APs is their physical
construction. Some have one antenna (or provision for
connecting an antenna); others have two, as depicted in
the diagram above.
What’s the difference? APs with two antennas are almost
invariably what is known as a “diversity” models. This
means that a comparator of some type (usually controlled
by a microprocessor) keeps monitoring the signal level at
each antenna and uses the one which is picking up the
best signal at that moment in time. It can – and does –
switch back and forward at will, sometimes many times
per second.
Because the wavelength of microwave signals is so small,
they are subject to a lot of reflections, interference, etc – so
the signals arriving at the two antennas can be quite different, even spaced as closely as they are.
July 2005 9
A 20m Power-over-Ethernet (PoE) cable ($40 from FreenetAntennas) – note the DC connectors as well as the RJ45s.
This gives you the ability to provide power to your Access
Point without running extra cables or looking for a power
outlet at the top end.
Diversity APs are usually better performers than their
single-stick cousins.
What is infrastructure mode?
Look at that name – infrastructure. It implies equipment and planning (as distinct from ad hoc, or “throwing
something together”). And that’s just what infrastructure
mode is – a network which is planned to perform bigger
and better functions and has the hardware to do so.
In a wireless network set up in infrastructure mode, data
doesn’t directly flow from computer to computer; instead,
the access point acts like a traffic cop and directs data to
the appropriate place.
It also acts as a bridge, linking the computer containing
your internet connection to your wireless network. For this
reason, the access point is almost invariably connected to
the computer which connects you to the wonderful world
wide web (wwww!).
All computers on the wireless network have their own
wireless network card (which you might also called a network adaptor or even a WNIC).
We’re getting just a bit ahead of ourselves here but all of those
adaptors need to have the same service set identifier (SSID)
so that they all know they are on the same network; they also
need to have the same encryption (WEP or WPA) keys so they
can actually understand each other. You set the SSID and WEP/
WPA keys as part of the installation process.
Don’t get too worried about all these acronyms and terms
– the computer industry breeds them like no other – but
most will become clear as you set things up (or you don’t
need to know what they mean anyway!).
Setting it up
As suggested for the ad hoc mode last month, it’s always
a good idea to plan your wireless network before rushing
in boots and all. That way, you can get a better idea of how
the various bits DO connect to each other.
It also helps you work out what you need to buy, avoiding costly mistakes. And if something doesn’t work as it
should (or something fails in the future) a network plan
can really help in troubleshooting.
Incidentally, there’s not much difference between a wireless network and a wired network from an operational point
of view – if you were putting in wire instead of wireless
you should do the same thing and plan it out first. The
10 Silicon Chip
biggest difference between wired and wireless is that the
speed of a wireless network will decrease as the quality of
the wireless signal decreases (either by range, obstruction,
etc) whereas a wired network normally keeps working
until it drops out.
In some cases, you might be adding a wireless network
onto an existing wired network – perfectly practical and
often done. For example, a company might expand. It
already has a wired network but wishes to add a few new
users. Way to go: wireless!
Or even in a new installation, you might find there are
a couple of computers (or more) on which it makes sense
to network with wire (using Cat5e for example) – wireless
NICs, even though cheaper these days, are still relatively a
lot more expensive than Ethernet NICs (you can often pick
those up for just a few dollars).
The combined wired/wireless network approach is often
handy to remember if you get into signal problems with
wireless. You might find that you have plenty of signal
in one room but nothing in the next. It could be the wall
construction (metal or insulation in the wall?), could be
a wireless black spot (shielded by something?), could be
simply running out of puff (too far from the access point).
. . or it could simply be wireless acting ornery (it does that
sometimes!).
By the way, brick walls are often a real drama – especially
external brick walls. It’s not so much the bricks themselves
but the fact that bricks naturally absorb water when they get
wet. And as you will find out, water absorbs microwaves
very nicely!
When planning the network, consider which computer
you are making the “main” computer. It’s almost certainly
the one which has your internet connection (eg, modem)
and probably has your printer and other peripherals attached. That’s the one which should also have your access
point attached.
Physically locating the Access Point
The key word here is access – you must be able to access
the AP itself and wireless signals also must have access. This
rules out anywhere with aluminium foil-type insulation,
for example (as is often used under roofs and sometimes
within walls). Remember too that in many old buildings,
fine-mesh chicken wire was used under tiles and in walls.
Fine mesh (say 1cm or less) wire will stop WiFi signals
very nicely. Plaster and brick walls are also quite unkind
in many cases – and if you’re sharing with next door, trees
and shrubs are a no-no.
The problem with trees and shrubs is that they contain
water and they also get wet (rain, dew, etc). Would you
believe I have a normally excellent wifi network between
myself and my next-door-neighbour which stops dead when
it rains – that’s when the wood paling fence between us
gets wet! (If I raise my laptop above fence height, away it
goes again).
If possible, keep your access point at least a few metres
away from anything else which shares the 2.4GHz band –
and that includes microwave ovens, digital cordless phones,
some intercoms and baby monitors, wireless doorbells,
home automation equipment, etc. The other gear doesn’t
even have to share the same 2.400-2.483MHz frequency
range to severely upset your wifi network.
It also makes sense to keep the AP away from electric
siliconchip.com.au
motors, fluorescent lights and so on which might generate
fields which upset the AP operation.
If you are linking to a wired network, the AP also needs
to connect to your router, hub or switch, so it needs to be
within reasonable cable distance. And finally, it also needs
a source of power. That’s usually not so much a problem
(what else were extension cords invented for?). Or . . .
POE: Power over Ethernet
There is an excellent alternative in finding a site for your
AP – and it’s even more a proposition when power is a long
way away, or needs to be supplied outside. It’s called Power
over Ethernet, or PoE, and as its name suggests, power for
the AP comes over the same cable which takes signal from
the AP to the computer.
In an normal Ethernet cable (Cat5e, for example), there
are four pairs of wires. Two of these pairs are not normally
used (pairs 7/8 and 4/5), so can be used for other purposes
– like running power! It is usual that both wires of each
pair are used (ie, two wires in parallel for each polarity).
Even though the IEEE has a PoE standard (IEEE 802.3af)
which should determine which pairs are which polarity,
unfortunately many manufacturers have done their own
thing and ignored the standard, so there is no hard-and-fast
rule. Cisco, for example, use pairs 7/8 for +12V and 4/5 for
0V but Intel, Orinoco and others use the opposite.
Most APs are very low power devices – a few tens of
milliwatts or so. But even higher power APs (up to the 4W
legal limit) can be run via PoE – even the thin wires in the
Ethernet cable can normally handle the required current
with ease, especially as they are paralleled.
PoE-fitted Ethernet cables are readily available made up
in various lengths. If you buy your cable from the same place
you buy your AP, the chances are it will be correct for that
AP (but don’t bet the house on it!). If in any doubt, check
and check again. Freenet Antennas have 20m PoE cables
in the $40-$65 range (see picture) and they allow you to
site the AP where you want it for optimum performance,
without having to worry about finding local power.
Interference
It may seem like commonsense but one other consideration is the location of the rest of the devices on your
network. If you have some “must always have on” devices,
the AP location should favour those to some degree.
Otherwise it makes sense to locate your AP at about the
central point for all your devices. If you find you have a
rock-solid signal for most devices but one or more at the
extremeties suffer dropouts or slow speed, you might want
to move the access point closer to them if the rest of the
devices can handle it.
If you have to mount the AP in an unfavourable location
(and there are times when you must), consider connecting a
gain antenna to help it out. There is nothing magical about
a gain antenna – you don’t get something for nothing. A
gain antenna merely sacrifices performance in one direction
for better performance in another. The higher the gain, the
more accurately the antenna must be aimed.
If your AP is at one end of the house and the other wireless devices are at the other, an antenna with some gain
aimed towards the other end might do wonders.
Note that running long antenna leads is not a good idea
due to the high losses of most coax cables at 2.4GHz. All coax
siliconchip.com.au
has loss and the higher the frequency, the higher the loss.
For example, common RG58 cable has a loss not too far off
1dB/m at 2.4GHz. That means you are going to lose most of
your signal in the cable. Run a 10m cable and a 10dBi antenna
and you are pretty much back to square one!
Some cables are available which have lower loss – for
example, Freenet-Antennas have various CFD400 coax cables from 6m to 15m in length (losses from 1.3dB to 3.3dB
loss <at> 2.4GHz) which can be fitted with N-male or N-female
connectors to order – a 6m cable with N-connectors would
cost you $60.00; the 15m version $84.00.
A better answer? Mount the AP close to the antenna with
a short antenna lead and use a long ethernet cable from
the AP back to the computer. I can’t think of a situation
where you can’t get away with a lot longer ethernet cable
than you can a long antenna cable.
If all else fails, another AP can usually be connected to
the system in a location which picks up the black spots. Or
you can buy a repeater (sometimes called a signal booster)
which does much the same thing. But these devices are
starting to get a little outside our “simple” wifi system.
Finally, you may find that a few centimetres (or tens of)
in the location of your AP (or its antenna/s) makes a lot of
difference in the performance of your wireless network.
Even though you have decided on the “optimal” spot, be
prepared to experiment a little later on to see if you can
get better range and/or speed by moving it slightly. Also
remember that the antenna(s) on most APs can be rotated
through about half a sphere, so don’t be afraid to experiment there as well. Should we have to say it? All antennas
need to be oriented, or polarised, the same way. That is, if
some vertical, all are vertical – and vice versa.
Trial and error might not be the most scientific way to
determine best positioning but failing some pretty fancy
test gear, it might be the most sensible!
Installing the AP
This is the easy bit! Once you’ve decided on the location, there are two parts to getting it going: plugging it in
and running installation software. As a general rule (in
other words, not always!), if your
AP comes with its own installation
disk (CD, usually these days) it’s
a good idea to run that, if only to
take advantage of any “extras” your
particular AP might offer.
Note that some APs need to be
plugged in and turned on before
software installation; others require
the software installed first. And
some we have seen must be plugged
in and/or turned on at a certain
(prompted) point in the installation.
This 8dBi omindirectional collinear
antenna called “The Stick” has an
N-type connector and is shown here
with a pipe-grip base for external
mounting. However, it can also
be fitted to a magna-base, which
comes with 3m of low-loss coax
terminated in a reverse-polarity
SMA connector. (Antenna only: $70
from Freenet-Antennas).
July 2005 11
Simply follow the instructions which came with your access point.
As we said last month, Windows XP has a very easy, very
smooth installation process for wireless networks (as it does
for wired networks). Simply click on to Control Panel, My
Network Places and “Set up a Wireless Network for Home
or Small Office”, then follow the bouncing ball.
If your AP doesn’t come with a disk (or you’ve lost it),
use the Windows XP install. Later, you might be able to
log onto the manufacturer’s website and download up-tothe-minute installs.
Sharing your internet connection
Now that you have your wireless network up and running, you want to be able to share the internet connection
over the network.
Again, Mr Gates’s disciples have provided a very simple,
step-by-step way to do this. It’s called “Internet Connection Sharing” (ICS). If you get stuck, Windows “Help and
Support Centre” will get you out of trouble.
Sharing the internet with a neighbour
Now you know that you can share the internet connection
via WiFi amongst the computers on your network, what it
to stop you sharing it a bit further afield – say with your
next-door neighbour?
As we have said time and time again, not only is this
possible, it’s probable – if you haven’t enabled (at least)
WEP and preferably WPA (not to be confused with mobile
phone WAP). Your sharing might not even be by choice!
But is it legal to share internet next door?
We touched on this in the first part of this WiFi series
(May issue) but since then we’ve done a lot more research
on the subject.
We’ve often heard it claimed (even since May!) that
sharing an internet connection over the boundary of your
property is illegal. It harkens back to the days of the Wireless
Telegraphy Act of (I think!) 1906, where running any form of
communications over a property boundary was specifically
not allowed – mainly because when that Act was written and
for maybe half a century later, “communications” involved
running a wire over the property boundary.
But this is 2005 – and things have changed a little. For
a start, that Wireless Telegraphy Act has been replaced (by
many volumes of Acts!).
While we are only bush lawyers (whose advice is normally worth about the same as is charged for), the bottom
line appears to be, at least as far as the powers-that-be are
concerned, that allowing your next door neighbour to log
on to your wireless network and use your internet connection for free is perfectly legal.
Note that word, for free: that is, as long as you don’t
charge your next-door-neighbour for the privilege. If you
do that, then under one of those Acts, legally you have
become a carrier and require a carrier licence (and that’s
expensive ~$10,000!).
Of course, if you shared your wireless network with a
neighbour and a slab or two of universal currency appeared
on your back doorstep every couple of months – your
neighbour just being friendly, of course – then that hardly
counts as charging, does it?
That, at least, appears to be the official line from the
Australian Communications Authority (ACA) who are re12 Silicon Chip
sponsible for administering everything to do with wireless
in Australia (yes, even WiFi).
You might have read, because it is often said, that WiFi
(or at least 802.11/b/g) is in the 2.4GHz “unlicenced” band
– but the ACA is very quick to point out that there is no
such thing in this country. Everything, even flea-powered
WiFi, is licenced – it’s just a matter of how!
WiFi equipment broadly fits into a class of communications gear known as LIPD, or Low Interference Potential
Device. It’s covered by a “class licence” which basically
means you can use it as long as you (a) don’t modify it and
(b) don’t interfere with other spectrum users. If other people
cause you interference, tough luck: you are not offered any
protection nor redress.
And your ISP?
OK, so that’s the Government line. But what about your
Internet Service Provider (ISP)? Do they like you doing it?
Obviously they’d much rather your next-door-neighbour
sign up for their own broadband service. In fact, some
ISP contracts specifically prohibit you from sharing your
broadband connection with others. Then again, some don’t
even mention it.
Elsewhere in this issue, I mention that I have installed
the Unwired wireless broadband system. Their contract
simply says, “You must not use our Services or attempt to
use our Services or allow our Services to be used by anyone else.” Gee, that’s pretty tough. Anyone? What about
your own family members? (It’s OK, Mr Unwired. I don’t
share yours – my next-door neighbour shares his [wired]
connection with me).
Optus cable doesn’t appear to worry about it. All they
say is you are responsible for any charges including extra
download charges if applicable!
Check the fine print on your ISP broadband (ADSL or
cable) agreement/contract to see where you stand. Whether
you take too much notice of fine print is entirely up to you
(it’s much like all those software agreements where everyone ticks the “I agree” box at the end. If you actually read
half of them, you’d be too scared to turn the computer on,
let alone use the software!).
But here’s the rub: by sharing your broadband connection
with your next-door-neighbour, you can probably afford
to go for a much better service – faster and with perhaps
unlimited downloads. (Of course, once again, we’d never
say something like suggesting you share costs).
But if you go for an unlimited (or even high limit) download agreement, who’s to know that you haven’t started
downloading full-length movies or lots of music off the
net? Hence your usage might . . . umm, double?
The ISP is unlikely to complain because you are paying
them more for the better service!
That’s my own situation. My NDN and I share his unlimited (12GB/month at full speed) broadband. He initally
installed this service because he needed speed – he virtually never even made it to 1GB. A few months back, the
download limit was increased from 3GB to 12GB at no
extra charge (reduce the price instead? Naah!) – and even
between us, we never get anywhere near 25% of that limit.
And apart from my battles with the wet paling fence, it
works well, too.
Gee, I must remember to buy a slab or two on the way
home. Now what does he drink again . . .
SC
siliconchip.com.au
|