This is only a preview of the December 2007 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 32 of the 112 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Infrared Audio Headphone Link For TV":
Items relevant to "PIC-Based Water-Tank Level Meter; Pt.2":
Items relevant to "Playback Adaptor For CD-ROM Drives; Pt.2":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
SILICON
SILIC
CHIP
www.siliconchip.com.au
Publisher & Editor-in-Chief
Leo Simpson, B.Bus., FAICD
Production Manager
Greg Swain, B.Sc.(Hons.)
Technical Staff
John Clarke, B.E.(Elec.)
Ross Tester
Jim Rowe, B.A., B.Sc, VK2ZLO
Mauro Grassi, B.Sc.(Hons.)
Photography
Ross Tester
Reader Services
Ann Morris
Advertising Enquiries
Glyn Smith
Phone (02) 9939 3295
Mobile 0431 792 293
glyn<at>siliconchip.com.au
Regular Contributors
Brendan Akhurst
Rodney Champness, VK3UG
Kevin Poulter
Mike Sheriff, B.Sc, VK2YFK
Stan Swan
SILICON CHIP is published 12 times
a year by Silicon Chip Publications
Pty Ltd. ACN 003 205 490. ABN 49
003 205 490 All material copyright
©. No part of this publication may
be reproduced without the written
consent of the publisher.
Printing: Hannanprint, Noble Park,
Victoria.
Distribution: Network Distribution
Company.
Subscription rates: $89.50 per year
in Australia. For overseas rates, see
the subscription page in this issue.
Editorial office:
Unit 1, 234 Harbord Rd,
Brookvale, NSW 2100.
Postal address: PO Box 139,
Collaroy Beach, NSW 2097.
Phone (02) 9939 3295.
Fax (02) 9939 2648.
E-mail: silicon<at>siliconchip.com.au
ISSN 1030-2662
* Recommended and maximum price only.
2 Silicon Chip
Publisher’s Letter
Electric cars are viable
right now
Peter Seligman’s articles on “How to Cut Your
Greenhouse Emissions” in the July, August & September issues certainly stirred up some controversy. One
good thing about that is that it clearly demonstrated
that the simplistic solutions often bandied about in the
popular press are not workable. Making large cuts to
greenhouse gases is neither easy nor simple.
Much of the controversy stirred by Peter Seligman’s
articles revolved around his conclusion that electric cars were not a useful approach when most of the power stations are coal-fired, as they are in Australia.
Quite a few people disagreed but went on to quote figures drawn from overseas
sources where the power generation mix is quite different to here. Even so, there
have been disagreements about the estimated efficiency of electric vehicles. A
representative letter in that vein is included in the Mailbag pages this month.
For our part, we are very attracted to the concept of electric vehicles and do
believe that a modern electric car employing similar technology to the much
vaunted Tesla Roadster would be quite successful. In fact, we think such cars
should be on Australia’s roads in large numbers right now, in spite of the fact
that they would ultimately draw their electricity from mostly coal-fired power
stations. In any case, it is unlikely that any new power stations in Australia will
be coal-fired. They are far more likely to be gas-fired since they are much more
efficient and put out considerably less greenhouse gases for the electricity they
generate. So with future Australian electricity supplies likely to be much cleaner,
we should be planning for electric vehicles.
In the meantime, consider the potential advantages of electric vehicles if they
were in Australia right now. In heavy traffic or on the open road, they generate
no pollution at all. They would not contribute to Australia’s growing import bill
for oil and petrol. When stopped, they are silent, apart from the possibility of a
ventilation fan running. And when driving along the road, there is virtually no
noise at all, apart from that generated by the tyres, suspension and any wind
noise. That is a pretty attractive proposition. More importantly, such a car would
require virtually no regular maintenance and very few visits to the local garage
for costly service – no oil changes or engine service – just check the tyres and
the water level for the windscreen washers. Now that is attractive.
Sure, batteries are an expensive component in an electric vehicle’s first cost
but if NiMH or Lithium-ion batteries are used, they should last for many years.
In fact, wear in the motor should be very low, so electric vehicles could be very
long-lived.
Sadly, there are only a handful of electric cars on the road in Australia and to
our knowledge, virtually all of these have been built by enthusiasts. In fact, the
Australian Electric Vehicle Association (AEVA) had a recent field day in Sydney
and a number of such vehicles were on display. But sadly too, they were all far
shy of what can be achieved with technology presently available in Australia.
For example, they all used lead-acid batteries and DC motors (not brushless)
without regeneration. Significantly too, most of them would be dicey in a major
collision and none had air-conditioning.
By contrast, it would be possible to put together a consortium of Australian
suppliers right now, to manufacture a world-class electric vehicle with good
performance and range, able to accommodate four people and their luggage and
with full crash safety. I wonder if any of our local car manufacturers is actually
working on such a project right now. I hope so.
Leo Simpson
siliconchip.com.au
|