This is only a preview of the April 2008 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 29 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Charge Controller For 12V Lead-Acid Or SLA Batteries":
Items relevant to "12V-24V High-Current DC Motor Speed Controller, Pt.2":
Items relevant to "Two-Way Stereo Headphone Adaptor":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
Beyond the capacitor there is
Ultracapac
And you always thought that the Farad was a ridiculously
large unit . . . Start thinking in KILOFarads!
by Ross Tester
S
ome time in the not-very-distant future you will pick
up your cordless drill and start drilling away – with
more power than you ever thought possible. And it
will keep on drilling for much longer than you thought
possible.
The drill will look and feel the same as current cordless
drills but it will have one major difference: it won’t contain
a battery. Instead, it will get its power from a capacitor.
Needless to say, it won’t be a “normal” capacitor. In
fact, it’s so abnormal it has a new name: an ultracapacitor
(or sometimes a supercapacitor). While the terms have
been somewhat interchangeable, they’re starting to be
used more selectively, with ultracapacitors denoting the
larger values.
Already (at least in the US) there are rechargeable tools
on the market which use ultracapacitors instead of batter-
ies, such as the Coleman Flash Cell Screwdriver and the
Superior Tool Co Ultracut Cordless Tube Cutter.
And without realising it, you may well be using one
already: many computers these days use an ultracapacitor,
or at least a supercapacitor, in place of the batteries once
used for CMOS backup. They’re also found in many other
devices doing the same task – video recorders and even
digital alarm clocks, for example.
We’re already seeing ultracapacitors starting to be used
in a wide variety of industrial applications, such as lifts
(elevators) and electric forklifts. In both of these, power is
used to lift a load and until now, power has been required
to limit the downward travel, or at best hydraulics used,
with the energy wasted.
Now ultracapacitors are finding their way into new designs. When the lift descends, its motor-generator pumps
A hybrid test car on a test track in England, powered by the CSIROdeveloped UltraBattery – a combination of an ultracapacitor and leadacid battery. Photo courtesy Advanced Lead-Acid Battery Consortium.
12 Silicon Chip
siliconchip.com.au
citor!
power back into an ultracapacitor. When a forklift brings a pallet
down from the warehouse shelf, its motor converts to a
generator and recharges the ultracapacitor.
Another interesting ultracapacitor application, already
in use, is in wind turbines. Some now have ultracapacitors
to supply the power needed to turn the blades into the
wind or adjust blade angles when they themselves are not
supplying power, or to smooth out the variations caused
by changing windspeed.
Start thinking big!
The backup supercapacitors used in computers, DVRs
etc, are midgets compared with those used in vehicles and
industrial tasks.
You can already find supercapacitors at your local lolly
shop, with ratings of perhaps 0.5F to 50F and voltages up
to (usually) 5.5V. Ultracapacitors are still rather harder to
get (and very much more expensive). They tend to start at
about 100F and go up into the kFarads – but more importantly, voltage ratings are up into the 100V+ range and if
you believe recent publicity from one US manufacturer,
well up into the thousands of volts. That becomes very
important, as we shall see.
By the way, you did read that correctly: Farads. Not
nF or even mF. Not so long ago, a 10,000mF capacitor was
regarded as very big. And remember when you started in
electronics and wondered why the Farad was the unit of
capacitance, when everyone knew it was a huge value and
you always had to divide by a million or more to get to
useable values? Not any more!
Electric vehicles
In the future, both hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and
plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs, ie, electric power only)
may be powered by ultracapacitors, perhaps instead of
batteries but just as likely, as current research suggests, in
tandem with them.
The photo on the facing page shows a Honda Insight
HEV fitted with an UltraBattery, developed by Australia’s
CSIRO, built by the Furukawa Battery Company of Japan
and tested in the United Kingdom through the Americansiliconchip.com.au
Ultracapacitor
+ Lead Acid Battery
= UltraBattery
Australia’s CSIRO has combined a supercapacitor and a lead acid battery in a single unit, creating a hybrid car battery that lasts longer, costs less
and is more powerful than current technologies
used in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs).
Tests have shown the UltraBattery has a life cycle
that is at least four times longer and produces 50%
more power than conventional battery systems. It’s
also about 70% cheaper than the batteries currently
used in HEVs. By marrying a conventional fuelpowered engine with a battery to drive an electric
motor, HEVs achieve the dual environmental benefit
of reducing both greenhouse gas emissions and fossil
fuel consumption.
The UltraBattery also has the ability to provide
and absorb charge rapidly during vehicle acceleration and braking, making it particularly suitable for
HEVs, which rely on the electric motor to meet peak
power needs during acceleration and can recapture
energy normally wasted through braking to recharge
the battery.
Over the past 12 months, a team of drivers has put
the UltraBattery to the test at the Millbrook Proving
Ground in the United Kingdom, one of Europe’s leading locations for the development and demonstration
of land vehicles.
CSIRO’s ongoing research will further improve
the technology’s capabilities, making it lighter, more
efficient and capable of setting new performance
standards for HEVs.
The UltraBattery test program for HEV applications
is the result of an international collaboration. The
battery system was developed by CSIRO in Australia,
built by the Furukawa Battery Company of Japan and
tested in the United Kingdom through the Americanbased Advanced Lead-Acid Battery Consortium.
UltraBattery technology also has applications for
renewable energy storage from wind and solar. CSIRO
is part of a technology start-up that will develop and
commercialise battery-based storage solutions for
these energy sources.
(CSIRO)
The Coleman “Flash Cell”
cordless screwdriver, now
available in the US, uses a
5.4V ultracapacitor
instead of a battery.
It has a 90-second
recharge.
MA
arch
pril 2008 13
based Advanced Lead-Acid Battery Consortium.
The most significant aspect of the photo, taken at the
Millbrook Proving Ground in the UK, is that this Honda
has exceeded 160,000km on the test track.
Like just about all ultracapacitor manufacturers, the
CSIRO and the consortium are keeping the details of the
UltraBattery pretty close to their collective chests but as
we saw in the article in SILICON CHIP February 2008, it is
not too-difficult a task to add significant battery capacity
(or in this case UltraBattery capacity) to the Honda to give
it a much greater range on battery power alone.
Incidentally, Honda has also developed an ultracapacitor in conjunction with a fuel cell in their quest for the
perfect HEV/PEV.
Yet another use of ultracapacitors is in electric buses and
trains, where ultracapacitors not only supply accelerationfrom-rest (ie, peak) power but can also handle and store
the regenerative braking energy which batteries find much
more difficult, thus saving up to 30% of total energy.
The same system is very likely to find its way into HEVs
and PEVs as they start to become more popular. A huge
amount of research is currently under way around the
world into these vehicles as the search for an alternative
to fossil fuels hots up.
Despite the fact that ultracapacitors appear to be a recent
development, they have been around for decades – at least
in the laboratory and in some specialised (expensive!)
applications. They got a big “kick along” late last century
when NASA realised that they would be very useful as
peak-power enhancers in spacecraft. Fuel cells used in
spacecraft are somewhat similar to batteries: great at supplying base-load power but needing help to supply peakload power. Ergo, ultracapacitors.
Why the hype?
OK, so what is the big advantage of ultracapacitors over
rechargeable batteries?
There are several:
(1) They offer much better peak power performance than
a battery. A battery’s output is basically limited by the rate
of the chemical reaction inside it without overheating. An
ultracapacitor has no chemical reaction so peak currents
can be much higher.
(2) There is less heat to dissipate.
(3) They can be discharged much more deeply than a
A 2500F (or 2.5kF) Maxwell Power Cache Ultracapacitor.
Note the low operating voltage (2.7V) – this means that
many of these must be used in series to obtain any type
of reasonable voltage rating. The photo at right show
the same capacitors installed in a Honda EV conversion.
(Photos courtesy www.metricmind.com).
battery (in fact, usually to zero, long past the point where
most batteries will have been irreparably damaged if not
destroyed). To be fair, that’s also long past the point where
the ultracapacitor can supply any useful power.
(4) They can be charged very, very quickly – with many
ultracapacitors already in use in road vehicles, the time
to charge is not too dissimilar to the time to fill fuel tanks
(a few minutes or so). Battery recharge time is usually
measured in hours.
(5) They are lighter (sometimes very significantly so)
than batteries of similar ratings and occupy no more space
(usually less).
(6) They can be cycled many, many more times than a
battery. With careful cell management, most rechargeable
battery systems are limited to perhaps 10-20,000 charge/
discharge cycles. Ultracapacitors are usually rated at between 100,000 and 500,000 cycles (and we’ve seen some
claims of a million).
(7) Overall life expectancy is a lot longer than a battery – the guarantee is usually 10 years but this would
be regarded as a minimum. Theoretically, the life of an
ultracapacitor is indefinite.
(8) Ultracapacitors do not deteriorate anywhere near
as much in performance as they age. With batteries, the
chemical reaction decreases as they age.
And the negatives?
Having digested all that, there must be some disadvantages. Yes, there are a few:
Honda’s ultracapacitor module was designed for the
Honda FCX Clarity hydrogen fuel-cell-powered car (shown
right), which goes on limited lease in the US around the
middle of this year.
14 Silicon Chip
siliconchip.com.au
TELGESIS ETRX2
ETRX2 Actual size - 37.75 x 20.45mm
WORLD’S FIRST
ZigBee PRO
COMPLIANT MODULE
(1) Until now, ultracapacitors have not had the energy
density of batteries. However, that may be changing – and
significantly – if recent manufacturers’ announcements
come to fruition.
(2) Voltage ratings of the current crop of ultracapacitors
are very low. With PEVs operating anywhere up to a few
hundred volts, you need to put a lot of ultracapacitors in
series. And when you connect capacitors in series, the
capacitance decreases.
(3) The moment you start using power from an ultracapacitor, the voltage starts to drop and keeps dropping. It
obeys all the usual laws of capacitors! This may or may
not be a problem, depending on the device being powered.
When used in conjunction with a battery as a peak-load
supply, as soon as the peak load is delivered the battery
will recharge the ultracapacitor.
(4) They’re expensive! So are high-power rechargeable
batteries, of course – and the price of both will come down
as volumes increase.
(5) Finally, there is a lot of hype. Some amazing claims
have been made by ultracapacitor manufacturers (to impress investors?) and in too many cases, they have turned
out to be vapourware.
What’s inside an ultracapacitor?
No one has re-invented the laws of physics when it comes
to ultracapacitors. They are still capacitors and they obey
all the rules we’ve learned long ago.
First, let us refresh your memory about the construction
of capacitors. Here, two conductive “plates” are separated
by an insulating material which we refer to as a dielectric.
The capacitance is directly proportional to the size of the
plates and the dielectric constant of the insulating material.
At the same time, the capacitance is inversely proportional
to the distance between the plates; the smaller the spacing,
the larger the capacitance.
In the case of electrolytic capacitors, the “plates” take
a different form. The capacitor is a wound element of
aluminium foil which has been etched to greatly increase
its surface area. At the same time, its surface has a very
thin oxide layer produced during manufacture. Finally, it
is wound with a porous paper layer which is impregnated
with a conductive electrolyte paste and this makes the
siliconchip.com.au
PRESS RELEASE
ZigBee module makes the Pro league
The Telegesis ZigBee module product range has
successfully achieved certification based on the
ZigBee Pro feature set of the ZigBee standard.
The widely-acclaimed Telegesis AT Command
layer has been tested by US test house National
Technical Systems, where Telegesis was granted
ZigBee certification.
This makes the Telegesis ETRX2 the world's
first ZigBee Pro compliant module. The ETRX2
is a low-cost low-power ZigBee transceiver that
can be embedded in a wide range of devices to
produce self-organising self-healing wireless
meshes.
All Telegesis ZigBee Pro products are built
around the Ember EM250 chip with core mesh
networking technology provided by Ember
Corporation's EmberZnet 3.1 software.
The new meshing RF module will allow
companies to tap into the lucrative ZigBee
market for wireless control and monitoring
products with no in-house RF engineering
experience.
ZigBee is now a technology that is
truly ready for use in real-world
applications and Telegesis envisage
rapid expansion throughout
2008 as ZigBee is applied to a wide
range of wireless solutions.
TELEGESIS ETRX2: EXCLUSIVELY FROM
01010101
Telelink Communications
e-mail Jack Chomley –
jack<at>telelink.com.au
or call (07) 4934 0413
or 0428 199 551
www.telelink.com.au
April 2008 15
the total mass. Taken together, that means the ultracapacitor
achieves one quarter of the theoretical capacitance based
on electrode area and ion size.
The future of ultracapacitors
This illustration, courtesy of electronicdesign.com, shows
the inside of an ultracapacitor. It’s easy to see why they are
regarded as two capacitors in series.
electric connection to the can of the capacitor.
So in an electrolytic capacitor, the positive “plate” is
the wound aluminium foil element and the aluminium
oxide “skin” is the dielectric. Finally the electrolyte paste
is the negative “plate”. This combination of a very large
surface area (ie, the etched surface) together with a very
thin dielectric (aluminium oxide) layer gives rise to the
very large values of capacitance that we have come to
expect with electrolytic capacitors. But ultracapacitors far
surpass electrolytics!
Ultracapacitors also contain two “plates” of sorts. But
the “plates” are formed on the surfaces of nano-porous
materials, typically activated charcoal or carbon nanotubes
surrounded by an electrolyte. These nano-porous materials
have much larger surface areas than the etched aluminium
foils of electrolytic capacitors.
Nor do ultracapacitors have a conventional dielectric,
as such. They are based on a structure that contains an
electrical “double layer”. In a double layer, the effective
thickness of the “dielectric” is exceedingly thin – in the
order of nanometres – and that, combined with the very
large surface area, is responsible for their extraordinarily
high capacitances.
When a DC voltage is applied across the porous carbon,
compensating accumulations of cations or anions develop
in the solution around the charged electrodes. If no electron
transfer can occur across the interface, a “double layer” of
separated charges (electrons or electron deficiency at the
metal side and cations or anions at the solution side of the
interface boundary) exists across the interface.
The amount of capacitance depends on the area of those
porous carbon electrodes and the size of the ions in solution. The capacitance per square centimetre of electrode
double layers is roughly 10,000 times larger than those of
ordinary dielectric capacitors.
That’s because the separation of charges in double layers is about 0.3-0.5nm, a lot less than the 10-100nm in
electrolytics and the 1000nm in polystyrene or mica types.
However, you never get something for nothing. Effectively, you have two capacitors in series. So straight away
capacitance is halved.
The double-layer configuration reduces the potential
capacitance of a practical device yet again because the ultracapacitor consists of a pair of electrodes, each with half
16 Silicon Chip
We alluded to some pretty amazing claims earlier.
EEstor, one of the up-and-coming performers of the US stock
market recently, has been researching nanotube technology
and have also announced what amounts to breakthrough
technology in their ultracapacitors.
EEstor use barium titanate coated with aluminium oxide and glass to achieve a level of capacitance claimed to
be much higher than anything else currently available in
the market. While yet to be independently verified, the
claimed energy density is a whopping 1.0MJ/kg – actually
higher than a battery. Existing commercial supercapacitors
typically have an energy density of the order of 0.01MJ/
kg and a lithium-ion battery has an energy density of
0.54-0.72MJ/kg.
If true, there is a rather significant downside: a PEV using
such ultracapacitors could not, using existing technology
and domestic wiring, plug in! To transfer that amount of
energy in the times claimed would melt the local substation. OK, slight exaggeration perhaps – but the point is real.
It has been suggested that a second EEstor ultracapacitor could be used to slowly charge, using cheap off-peak
power – and that plug into the PEV to transfer the energy
in say 5-10 minutes.
Someone must believe EEstor because they have had
some significant money invested in them, including the
Canadian ZENN motor company (which plans to release an
EEstor-powered electric vehicle this year) taking an EEstor
licence worth an estimated $US3-5 million and venture
capitalist house KPBC putting in another $US3 million.
Incidentally, EEstor are not the only ones researching
ultracapacitors. Australia’s own CSIRO is also one of the
main players in the game (see press release earlier) and
there are many organisations around the world trying to
come up with their version of the holy grail.
The leading manufacturers of ultracapacitors today are
Maxwell Technologies in the United States, NESS Capacitor
Company in South Korea, Okamura Laboratory in Japan,
and EPCOS in Europe.
Energy
Finally, we mentioned earlier that the voltage rating
of a capacitor (including, of course, an ultracapacitor) is
very important.
The reason for this lies in the formula for energy stored
in a capacitor:
E = 0.5CV2
It’s the V2 term that makes all the difference. Doubling the
voltage doesn’t simply double the energy – it quadruples it.
So running an electric vehicle, a drill, a forklift – anything
– from a higher voltage is very advantageous.
The problem is, as we have seen, ultracapacitors have a
very low voltage rating. Ultracapacitor cells must be stacked
in series to lift that rating and as every electronics student
knows, you get lower capacitance that way.
Some researchers are claiming much higher cell voltage
ratings: the world is waiting to see if they can deliver! SC
siliconchip.com.au
|