This is only a preview of the February 2009 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 32 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Tempmaster Electronic Thermostat Mk.2":
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "10A Universal Motor Speed Controller, Mk.2":
Items relevant to "Programmable Time Delay Flash Trigger":
Items relevant to "Multi-Purpose Car Scrolling Display, Pt.3":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
SILICON
SILIC
CHIP
www.siliconchip.com.au
Publisher & Editor-in-Chief
Leo Simpson, B.Bus., FAICD
Production Manager
Greg Swain, B.Sc. (Hons.)
Technical Editor
John Clarke, B.E.(Elec.)
Technical Staff
Ross Tester
Jim Rowe, B.A., B.Sc
Mauro Grassi, B.Sc. (Hons), Ph.D
Photography
Ross Tester
Reader Services
Ann Morris
Advertising Enquiries
Glyn Smith
Phone (02) 9939 3295
Mobile 0431 792 293
glyn<at>siliconchip.com.au
Regular Contributors
Brendan Akhurst
Rodney Champness, VK3UG
Mike Sheriff, B.Sc, VK2YFK
Stan Swan
SILICON CHIP is published 12 times
a year by Silicon Chip Publications
Pty Ltd. ACN 003 205 490. ABN 49
003 205 490. All material is copyright ©. No part of this publication
may be reproduced without the written consent of the publisher.
Printing: Hannanprint, Noble Park,
Victoria.
Distribution: Network Distribution
Company.
Subscription rates: $89.50 per year
in Australia. For overseas rates, see
the order form in this issue.
Editorial office:
Unit 1, 234 Harbord Rd,
Brookvale, NSW 2100.
Postal address: PO Box 139,
Collaroy Beach, NSW 2097.
Phone (02) 9939 3295.
Fax (02) 9939 2648.
E-mail: silicon<at>siliconchip.com.au
ISSN 1030-2662
* Recommended and maximum price only.
2 Silicon Chip
Publisher’s Letter
New Zealand has lifted the
ban on incandescent lamps
Back in December last year, the New Zealand government reversed the ban on incandescent lamps.
What an incredibly sensible thing to do! The overall
difference in the energy consumption New Zealanders
would have achieved in avoiding incandescent lamps
and using more efficient types such as compact fluorescent lamps instead would hardly amount to much
anyway. The same comment would apply much more
forcefully to Australian energy consumption, given that
our economy is so energy-intensive, with our large-scale mining and agricultural
sectors. But I wonder if there is much likelihood of our Government also reversing
the ban? Very little, I would think. That would be too sensible.
Whether or not the Government does have a rethink may be irrelevant now in
any case. Incandescent lamps are becoming difficult to obtain, particularly as some
major retailers seem to have abandoned them and even major hardware chains
such as Bunnings seem to be reducing their range. My advice to readers is that you
should stock up on incandescents, particularly the harder-to-get types. In years to
come, you may well have to replace many of your lamp fittings because of this silly
edict and as everyone should be well aware, it will make precious little difference
to your annual energy consumption.
We also note that the UK government is reported to be instituting a ban on power
hungry plasma TVs. The New Zealand government has also rejected this approach,
arguing that consumers should make their own choice, after they have been provided
with the necessary information. Again, this is eminently sensible. But New Zealand
is in a temperate zone and not nearly as cold as England. In the UK, a big plasma
set would merely cause a slight reduction in the amount of central heating which
is typically required for eight or nine months of the year. The fact that big plasma
sets can function as room-warmers could be regarded as a bonus!
One has to ask the question: “Why do Governments feel that it is necessary to
introduce these silly edicts, supposedly in the interest of reducing energy consumption?” Is it merely to be seen to be “doing something” in the face of the advancing
terrors of global warming? Undoubtedly that is true but we think there is also a
“kill joy” component to all of this. You cannot have a big plasma TV or big 4-wheel
drive, or even a big house (a McMansion perhaps?) for that matter, because these
things use more energy. Never mind that that consumers implicitly know that
already and are quite prepared to pay for it.
Realistically, governments around the world have to face up to the fact that making large reductions in carbon dioxide emissions is difficult and very expensive.
More importantly, obtaining such reductions in particular sectors of the economy
can have many ramifications which were initially not apparent. In any case, with
much of Europe presently freezing in the depths of winter, they might welcome
some global or at least, local, warming.
So how should governments proceed? Given that much of the interpretation of
long-term weather records is extremely difficult and the forecasting of future trends
is almost impossible, Governments probably could take the prudent approach as
far as climate change is concerned and just “wait and see”.
On the other hand, there is a great deal more certainty about oil and gas energy
which is likely to become much more expensive in the future. In this case, governments need to ensure that their nations always have a secure supply of energy in
the future. If that means making major reductions in energy consumption, then
that is wise.
But that does not mean banning incandescent lamps and big plasma TV sets.
Leo Simpson
siliconchip.com.au
|