This is only a preview of the July 2011 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 30 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Ultra-LD Mk.3 200W Amplifier Module":
Items relevant to "A Portable Lightning Detector":
Items relevant to "Rudder Position Indicator For Power Boats":
Items relevant to "A Look At Amplifier Stability & Compensation":
Items relevant to "Build A Voice-Activated Relay (VOX)":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
Ultra-LD Mk.3 200W
Amplifier Module
Upgraded design has even lower distortion!
The Ultra-LD Mk.2 (August-September 2008) was the lowest
distortion class-AB amplifier board design ever published. But we
have not rested on our laurels and have found ways to improve
it significantly. The Mk.3 version has less than half as much
distortion at frequencies of 2kHz and above. It also boasts much
improved thermal stability, is slightly quieter and has a flatter
frequency response.
By NICHOLAS VINEN
T
HE NEW AND UPDATED Ultra-LD
Mk.3 is by far the best class-AB
amplifier module design published
anywhere. It has an astonishingly low
total harmonic distortion plus noise
(THD+N) figure of 0.004% at 20kHz
for 100W into 8Ω (20Hz-80kHz measurement bandwidth) and less than
0.0006% THD+N at 1kHz and below.
The signal-to-noise ratio has also
been slightly improved on the previous version (by 1dB) to -123dB with
respect to 135W into an 8Ω load. The
power output figures are unchanged
with regards to the Mk.2 module.
All power measurements were
made with a mains voltage of 230VAC,
which is now common in Australia
(although by no means universal). In
locations with a higher mains voltage, slightly more output power is
available. For example, if your mains
voltage is normally 240VAC, you can
expect about 8% more power output,
eg, 145W into 8Ω.
The quiescent current accuracy, stability and thermal compensation have
been dramatically improved compared
to the Mk.2 and in fact are superior to
any class-AB amplifier that we have
tested. The new module has a trimpot
so that the quiescent current can be set
Specifications & Performance
Output Power (230VAC mains).................................200 watts RMS into 4Ω; 135 watts RMS into 8Ω
Frequency response.................................+0, -0.3dB (8Ω); +0, -1.0dB (4Ω) – 10Hz-20kHz (see Fig.5)
Input sensitivity...................................... 1.26V RMS for 135W into 8Ω; 1.08V RMS for 200W into 4Ω
Input Impedance.............................................................................................................................. 12kΩ
Rated Harmonic Distortion (8Ω)............... <0.004% 20Hz-20kHz, typically 0.0006% (see Figs.1 & 3)
Rated Harmonic Distortion (4Ω)............... <0.007% 20Hz-20kHz, typically 0.0006% (see Figs.2 & 4)
Signal-to-Noise Ratio....................123dB unweighted with respect to 135W into 8Ω (22Hz to 22kHz)
Damping Factor.....................................................................~180 with respect to 8Ω at 1kHz & below
Stability......................................................unconditionally stable with any nominal speaker load ≥ 4Ω
30 Silicon Chip
to the optimum (the Mk.2 was a bit hit
and miss in this regard).
The new thermal compensation arrangement keeps the quiescent current
well under control, even during and
after sudden changes in dissipation.
This contributes to the low distortion
as it means that the output stage is
always correctly biased.
Rationale
Making these improvements to an
amplifier that already had outstanding
performance may seem like gilding
the lily. But there are two important
reasons why we decided to improve
on the Ultra-LD Mk.2.
First, we felt that we could produce
a design that was even closer to that
holy grail of amplifier design: a highpower class-AB module with the low
distortion of a Class-A amplifier. In
fact, the new design is tantalisingly
close to the benchmark SILICON CHIP
Class-A amplifier (May-Sept. 2007).
Astute readers may have noticed
that while the Ultra-LD Mk.2 was
clearly superior to the original UltraLD amplifier (SILICON CHIP, March
& May 2000), it actually had higher
distortion for frequencies above 6kHz.
This is because the original Ultrasiliconchip.com.au
The Ultra-LD Mk.3 Audio
Amplifier module features
pluggable connectors,
improved thermal stability
and extremely low noise and
distortion figures. It’s built
on a double-sided PCB and
is attached to a large finned
heatsink which carries the
driver and output transistors
and a central VBE multiplier
transistor.
LD featured a more linear output
stage, consisting of two complementary compound transistor pairs. By
contrast, the Ultra-LD Mk.2 used a
standard complementary Darlington
emitter-follower output stage, for better current sharing between the output
transistors (allowing it to reliably drive
4Ω loads).
Since then, we have tweaked the
emitter-follower output stage to improve its linearity at high frequencies
(more on this later). The end result
is that the Mk.3 has distortion lower
than or equal to both the original
Ultra-LD and the Ultra-LD Mk.2 at all
frequencies.
siliconchip.com.au
It may seem that the distortion products of very high frequencies (10kHz &
above) are irrelevant, since they will
all be above the audible range. The
second harmonic of a 10kHz signal
is 20kHz and the third is 30kHz and
these are not audible so why are we
trying to minimise their level?
The answer is intermodulation.
While lower order harmonic distortion
may be relatively benign, the associated and inevitable intermodulation
distortion is definitely not benign; it
is audibly unpleasant.
To demonstrate, let’s say we have
an audio signal consisting of a 10kHz
sinewave mixed with an 11kHz sine-
wave. Their second harmonics are at
20kHz and 22kHz respectively and
are not audible, but the difference
products of 1kHz, 2kHz & 12kHz certainly are audible and are musically
unrelated.
So by minimising harmonic distortion at high frequencies, we are also
minimising intermodulation – a far
more unpleasant distortion product.
Quiescent current
Second, we just weren’t satisfied
with the quiescent current and thermal compensation arrangement of
the Ultra-LD Mk.2. That was our first
design using the On Semiconductor
July 2011 31
THD+N vs Frequency, 8, 100W, 20Hz-80kHz BW
THD+N vs Frequency, 4, 100W, 20Hz-80kHz BW
05/20/11 12:27:35
Ultra-LD Mk.2
Ultra-LD Mk.3
Ultra-LD Mk.2
Ultra-LD Mk.3
0.01
Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise (%)
Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise (%)
0.01
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.0005
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.0005
0.0002
0.0002
0.0001
20
05/20/11 12:27:35
0.02
0.02
50
100
200
500
1k
Frequency (Hertz)
2k
5k
10k
Fig.1: total harmonic distortion plus noise across the
audible frequency range for an 8Ω load driven at 100W.
This is an “apples-to-apples” comparison between the
old and new amplifier modules with an identical power
supply and test set-up. The Mk.3 is superior at all
frequencies but especially above 1kHz.
“ThermalTrak” transistors, which
have integral diodes. The literature
for these devices claims that they
eliminate the need for quiescent current adjustment as well as providing
much better thermal tracking than a
traditional VBE multiplier circuit.
Our initial prototypes seemed to
confirm both points. But as more
people built modules based on that
design, it became apparent that the
ThermalTrak transistors vary somewhat from batch to batch and therefore
we do in fact need a method to trim
the quiescent current.
Also, for reasons we shall explain
later, many of the Ultra-LD Mk.2 modules built do not have good thermal
tracking. That is to say, their quiescent
current can vary considerably depending on the output device temperature,
which can vary rapidly depending on
the program material being played.
Once we found out about these
problems we took a closer look at the
ThermalTrak transistor data sheets. It
turns out that the ThermalTrak diode
temperature coefficient doesn’t necessarily match that of the accompanying
transistor and so using the diodes
alone for thermal compensation is not
satisfactory.
In some cases, the diode temperature coefficient is so much lower than
the transistors’ that the result can be
thermal runaway – as the transistors get hotter, the quiescent current
increases, making them hotter again
32 Silicon Chip
20k
0.0001
20
50
100
200
500
1k
Frequency (Hertz)
2k
5k
10k
20k
Fig.2: the total harmonic distortion plus noise across the
audible frequency range for a 4Ω load driven at 100W. The
performance improvement for the Mk.3 module is even
larger with a 4Ω load, with less than half the distortion
of the Mk.2 version across a large portion of the audio
frequency range.
until eventually they blow; definitely
not a good state of affairs!
Back to the drawing board
Actually, building a class-AB amplifier with accurate thermal compensation that responds quickly to changes
in dissipation is a very difficult task.
The basic problem is that to get good
performance, the standing current
through the push-pull output transistors must be kept within a relatively
small range (in this case, about 70140mA per pair).
If the quiescent current is too low,
the result is significant crossover
distortion. As the output voltage
passes through zero, the load current
is “handed over” from one of the output transistors to the other. Without
sufficient bias, one transistor turns off
faster than the other turns on, resulting
in a discontinuity in the output stage
transconductance (ie, the ratio of its
input voltage to output current).
This makes the amplifier as a whole
less linear and so increases its distortion.
The opposite problem occurs if
the quiescent current is too high. In
this case there is actually a sudden
increase in the transconductance in a
voltage band around 0V. This is called
“transconductance doubling” and
again reduces linearity.
When the quiescent current is in the
correct range, these two effects tend to
balance out and so the transconduct-
ance curve for the output stage is as
flat as possible, maximising linearity
and thus minimising distortion. So we
want to set it within that range and
keep it there.
High quiescent current also causes
excessive dissipation in the output
devices – we don’t have to explain
why that’s undesirable.
Thermal tracking
If the transistors were all kept at a
constant temperature, correct biasing
could easily be arranged by simply
placing an adjustable floating voltage
source between the base of the two
driver transistors and then trimming it
with an eye on the current through the
output stage. This bias voltage sets the
VBE across the driver and output transistors, resulting in a constant standing
current through the output stage.
Unfortunately, the required VBE for
constant current through a transistor
depends on its junction temperature.
Since the output transistors heat up
and cool down during use in an unpredictable way (depending on the
program material, load impedance,
ambient temperature, airflow, etc), we
must come up with a way for the bias
voltage to vary with driver and output
transistor temperature, to keep the
quiescent current as stable as possible.
In the Mk.2 amplifier, the bias was
developed by passing a constant current through the four ThermalTrak
diodes contained within the output
siliconchip.com.au
Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise (%)
0.05
THD+N vs Power, 8, 1kHz, 20Hz-20kHz BW
05/20/11 14:59:08
0.1
Ultra-LD Mk.2
Ultra-LD Mk.3
0.02
0.01
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.0005
0.0002
05/20/11 14:57:55
Ultra-LD Mk.2
Ultra-LD Mk.3
0.02
0.01
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.0005
0.0002
0.06 0.1
0.2
0.5
1
2
5
Power(W)
10
20
50
100
Fig.3: total harmonic distortion plus noise against power
level for 1kHz into 8Ω. The slightly lower noise figure
makes the Mk.3 marginally superior at low powers,
with it pulling further ahead above 4W due to its lower
harmonic distortion. Note that the maximum power
available has hardly changed from the earlier design; the
small variation is mainly due to the test procedure.
transistor packages. As the output
transistors heated up, the required VBE
for a given current dropped and so did
the forward voltage of the associated
diodes. If the two thermal coefficients
matched, then theoretically the diodes
would correctly compensate for the
changing transistor properties with
temperature.
Since that clearly wasn’t happening, we decided to ignore what the
application literature said about these
transistors and instead analyse the
circuit from first principles. We are not
the only people to notice this problem.
Douglas Self experienced similar difficulties using this type of transistor,
which he documents in his Audio
Power Amplifier Design Handbook
(Fifth Edition).
In that book, he points out that if
the ThermalTrak transistor data sheet
is correct, the diode forward voltage
temperature coefficient is -1.7mV/°C
but the transistor VBE temperature
coefficient is -2.14mV/°C. Clearly then,
we cannot use a single ThermalTrak
diode to compensate for a single ThermalTrak transistor without risking
thermal runaway (or at least a wildly
varying quiescent current).
But that wasn’t the only problem.
The four ThermalTrak diodes compensated for four transistor VBE drops but
only two of those drops are from the
base-emitter junctions of the power
transistors that the diodes thermally
siliconchip.com.au
0.0001
200
0.06 0.1
0.2
track. The other two are the driver
transistors (Q10 and Q11, MJE15030/
MJE15031). So even if the diode
thermal coefficients matched those of
the output transistors, they wouldn’t
necessarily correctly compensate the
driver transistors.
Also, there is significant thermal lag
between the output transistors and the
driver transistors, since during periods of high output power, the power
transistors can get significantly hotter
than the heatsink. It takes a while for
the heatsink temperature to heat up in
response to the increased dissipation
and then there is a further thermal lag
from the heatsink back to the driver
transistors.
Fig.5: the frequency
response for the
Ultra-LD Mk.3
module. Note that
there is less roll-off
at both the lowfrequency and highfrequency ends for
the Mk.3 compared
to the Mk.2. The
high-frequency rolloff is greater for 4Ω
loads (about -1dB at
20kHz). This can be
slightly improved (to
-0.7dB) by changing
the inductor – see
Pt.2 next month.
0.5
1
2
5
Power(W)
10
20
50
100
200
Fig.4: total harmonic distortion plus noise versus power
for 1kHz into 4Ω at a range of power levels. Here the
Mk.3 module really shines, providing significantly lower
distortion across the entire range. The Mk.3 can easily
produce the rated power of 200W into 4Ω. Note that the
measurement bandwidth (20Hz-20kHz) is smaller than in
Figs.1 & 2, so the figures are better.
+1.0
We had to find a better solution. As
a result, we came up with several ideas
for circuits that would provide a bias
voltage with more accurate and reliable thermal tracking, then ran them
through circuit simulations before
building a prototype incorporating the
most promising.
New design
Our new solution harks back to
that tried and true bias compensation
scheme, the good old VBE multiplier.
But we have also incorporated the
ThermalTrak diodes as they are critical
in allowing us to provide compensation for rapidly varying output device
temperature.
Frequency Response, 4 & 8, 1W
05/20/11 12:43:21
Ultra-LD Mk.2 (8)
Ultra-LD Mk.3 (8)
Ultra-LD Mk.3 (4)
+0.5
0
Amplitude Variation (dBr)
0.0001
THD+N vs Power, 4, 1kHz, 20Hz-20kHz BW
0.05
Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise (%)
0.1
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0
-2.5
-3.0
10
20
50
100
200
500
1k
2k
Frequency (Hertz)
5k
10k
20k
50k
July 2011 33
Fig.6: load lines
for the Ultra-LD
Mk.3 amplifier.
The red line is
the 1-second Safe
Operating Area
(SOA), outside of
which transistor
second breakdown
becomes likely. The
mauve and green
lines represent
realistic speaker
operating areas for
8Ω and 4Ω units
respectively, taking
into account their
reactance.
Ultra-LD Mk.3 Load Lines (4 Output Transistors)
10
2 x ThermalTrak 1 second SOA, 90% Sharing
8 Resistive Load
8 Reactive Load, 135W (5.6+5.6j)
8
Resistive Load
Collector Current (Amps)
Reactive Load, 200W (2.83+2.83j)
6
4
2
0
0
20
40
60
80
Collector-Emitter Potential (Volts)
We are now using two ThermalTrak
diodes to compensate for the two power transistor VBE drops, in series with
a VBE multiplier to compensate for the
driver transistor VBE drops. The VBE
multiplier transistor is mounted on the
heatsink, between the driver transistors, to best track their temperature.
Now that we have a VBE multiplier,
this allows us to easily provide an
adjustment by placing a trimpot in the
multiplier network. This means that
the quiescent current can be configured correctly regardless of variations
in the output transistors.
The adjustment will however
slightly degrade the thermal tracking,
since in changing the absolute voltage
contribution of the VBE multiplier (by
changing the multiplication factor) we
also change its thermal coefficient.
But our testing shows that this is a
relatively minor factor and the tracking
is still more than good enough.
Actually, because the temperature
coefficient of the ThermalTrak diodes
is lower than that of the associated
transistors, in order to achieve correct compensation, the VBE multiplier
must slightly over-compensate for
changes in temperature. We found
that if we used a BD139 for the VBE
multiplier, we achieved the required
over-compensation. Simulation shows
that the resulting quiescent current
variation with temperature is virtually flat.
The prototype Ultra-LD Mk.3 modules were built from two different
batches of ThermalTrak transistors
and they bear this out. As a happy
coincidence, it turns out that the
34 Silicon Chip
100
120
best current to use for the new bias
generating arrangement is the current
that we originally chose for the UltraLD Mk.2 (9.5mA) to provide the best
performance.
Parallel diodes
While we stated earlier that we are
only using two of the ThermalTrak
diodes, we have actually wired up all
four on the PCB, in two parallel pairs
which are then connected in series.
This makes it possible to build the amplifier with only two output transistors
(the outer pair), for applications where
less power is required. The supply
voltage is also reduced in this case,
to reduce overall power dissipation.
Lower distortion
As stated, the Ultra-LD Mk.3 has less
than half the distortion of the Mk.2 at
frequencies of 2kHz and above (see
Figs.1-4). It also has lower distortion
at low frequencies but there is so little
to measure that it tends to be lost in
the noise floor (not that there is much
of that either).
There are two main changes which
reduce the distortion and these are the
new frequency compensation arrangement and the new driver transistor
emitter resistor configuration (ie, for
Q10 & Q11). Of these, the latter is the
most important but they both contribute to the excellent performance.
With the Ultra-LD Mk.2, the driver
emitters were connected to the output
via 100Ω resistors. For the new circuit,
the emitters are instead connected to
each other via a 220Ω resistor which
is bypassed with a 470nF capacitor.
This allows the driver transistors
to reverse-bias one pair of the output transistors to switch them off
quickly, when the slew rate is high
(ie, at high frequencies). This was not
possible with the old arrangement.
Reverse-biasing the output transistor
base-emitter junction rapidly removes
the charge carriers from it, preventing
conduction which would otherwise
occur for some period after the normal
base drive was removed.
The 470nF bypass capacitor assists
in the switch-off process. The bottom line is lower distortion at high
frequencies.
Two-pole compensation
The new compensation scheme also
helps to lower the distortion. Instead
of a single 100pF, 100V ceramic capacitor between the base of Q8 and
the collector of Q9, we now have two
180pF 100V polypropylene (plastic
dielectric) capacitors and a 2.2kΩ
resistor. This dramatically increases
the open-loop gain within the 20Hz20kHz frequency range without affecting stability.
For more details on why and how
this works, see the separate feature
article titled “Amplifier Stability and
Compensation” in this issue.
We found that polypropylene capacitors gave measurably less distortion compared to C0G/NP0 ceramic
capacitors of the same value, presumably due to their higher linearity. Ceramic capacitors can be used but the
distortion at 20kHz will increase from
around 0.0048% to about 0.0055%
(with proportionally similar increases
at lower frequencies, down to about
1kHz).
Feedback network changes
During the course of testing the
prototypes, we ran into a problem with
the capacitor in the feedback network
(above and to the left of Q8). The purpose of this capacitor is to reduce the
amplifier’s DC offset at the output, by
reducing the DC gain to one.
The original capacitor was specified as 220µF but we found that if
the capacitor value was on the low
side and/or the capacitor used had
particularly bad non-linearity (as is
sometimes the case), the result could
be a significant rise in distortion below
50Hz. By changing this capacitor to
1000µF, we eliminated that possibility.
This also improves the signal-to-noise
siliconchip.com.au
Fig.7: an oscilloscope screen grab illustrating the shape of
the distortion residual waveform for a 20kHz sinewave at
100W into 8Ω. It is primarily second harmonic, with some
third harmonic (how much depends on how well-matched
the output transistors are in terms of beta). We have to
demonstrate the distortion at a high frequency and power
level otherwise it’s hard to see!
ratio, by about 1dB, because it lowers
the source impedance seen by the
inverting input (the base of transistor
Q2) at low frequencies. In addition, it
flattens the low frequency response,
as can be seen in Fig.5.
Input filter changes
We have increased the value of the
RF filter capacitor at the input, from
820pF to 4.7nF. This allows it to better reject supersonic components of
the input signal (eg, digital-to-analog
converter switching artefacts). This
value suits signals sources with low
output impedance (0-220Ω). Virtually
all CD/DVD/SACD/BluRay players,
preamplifiers, computer sound cards
and DACs should be within this range.
If a volume control potentiometer is
to be installed immediately before the
power amplifier, with no buffering between the two, or if the signal source(s)
will have an output impedance above
220Ω, reduce this capacitor value to
1nF. Otherwise, the high frequency
response of the amplifier will suffer.
PCB improvements
As well as updating the board to
include the circuit changes, we have
made further tweaks to the PCB pattern itself. The most important is that
we completely removed the three top
layer tracks which connected Q12,
Q13 and Q14 to their supply rails,
which were on the bottom side of the
board.
siliconchip.com.au
Fig.8: by contrast with Fig.7, this scope grab shows the
extremely low distortion when delivering 100W into 8Ω
at 1kHz. Note that the distortion is virtually buried in the
noise (blue trace). Averaging the distortion product signal
shows it to be mainly second harmonic at a very low
level. This low-level harmonic distortion is virtually the
same whether at 50mW or 100W.
That current is now routed entirely
through bottom layer tracks, eliminating 30 current-carrying vias, six wire
feed-throughs and one signal via (a
via makes an electrical connection
between tracks on different layers of
the PCB).
We have also “tented” all the vias
on the board, except for those which
require wire feed-throughs to be
installed (for robustness under fault
conditions). This means that the solder
mask layer goes over the vias, exposing
as little copper as possible and thus
reducing the chance of short circuits
when probing around the board.
Some vias have also been moved
under components, further ensuring
that you can’t accidentally make contact with them. For boards without
plated through-holes or solder masks,
feed-throughs can still be installed in
these locations since the components
they are under (the 5W resistors) are
mounted proud of the PCB anyway.
We also rearranged some components to take account of the range
of sizes available. This includes the
220nF 400V capacitor at the output,
the 470µF 63V bypass capacitor for
the negative rail and the 47µF bipolar
input capacitor. There should now
be enough space for just about any
components with these ratings.
Note that the PCB retains the most
important aspect of the previous design: the layout of the current-carrying
tracks results in the induced magnetic
fields being almost perfectly cancelled,
keeping the distortion low even with
a high output power. The updated
output filter also improves the outputcurrent magnetic field cancellation,
reducing high-frequency distortion
by around 20%.
Better connectors
For the Mk.3 design, we have also
changed the connector arrangement.
All connectors are now pluggable,
making it easier to install and remove
the module and simplifying testing
and repair.
Making reliable connections to a
terminal block can be awkward with
the module inside a case. More than
once we thought we’d made a solid
connection but then found that we
could easily pull the wire out. The new
connectors eliminate that problem.
We have replaced the signal input
terminal block with a right-angle
RCA socket. For the power input and
speaker/headphone outputs, we are
now using Molex “Mini-Fit Jr” plastic
locking connectors (in horizontal or
vertical format). The power connector
has three keyed pins and the speaker/
headphone connector has four keyed
pins, so that they can’t be swapped
around or connected backwards.
The Mini-Fit Jr connectors are rated
at 9A per pin, which is sufficient for
this application.
In addition, the final version of the
PCB (not shown here) can also accept
July 2011 35
210mV
Q3
BC546
B
A
K
D1, D2: 1N4148
4.7nF†
100
E
C
B
E
C
E
C
210mV
K
180pF
100V
D1
470 F
63V
D2
A
Q4
BC546
A
K
B
C
E
180pF
100V
2.2k
B
B
B
E
K
A
K
A
C
E
K
A
DQ14
K
A
120
VR1
1k
B
330
DQ12
Q7
BF470
Q9
BF469
C
C
E
68
2SA970, BC639
2.2k
E
Q8
BC639
22k
C
12k
100nF
B
2.2k
56.3V
1000 F
16V
510
6.2k
6.2k
B
Q6
BC556
* Q16 IN THERMAL CONTACT
WITH HEATSINK NEAR Q10 & Q11
100nF
68
B
Q1, Q2:
2SA970
68
C
E
100
2.2k
47 F
35V
ULTRA-LD MK.3 200W AMPLIFIER MODULE
† USE 1nF IF
Z source > 220
10
1M 12k
47 F NP
6.8k
1W
B
47 F
35V
E
E
C
C
C
E
Q14
NJL1302D
B
C
B
E
BD139,
BF469, BF470
B
B
C
C
100nF
E
MJE15030,
MJE15031
Q15
NJL1302D
FUSE2
6.5A
C
E
0.1
5W
0.1 7-10
5W mV
7-10
mV
E
E
C
0.1
5W
B
100nF
0.1 7-10
5W mV
E
C
Q13
NJL3281D
FUSE1
6.5A
7-10
mV
B
Q12
E NJL3281D
C
Q11
MJE15031
B
10 1W
BC546, BC556
B
B
Q10
MJE15030
470nF
MKT
2.2V
56V
56V
100
DQ15
Q16*
BD139
DQ13
100
100nF
C
B
E
390
1W
–57V
(NOM.)
0V
0V
SPEAKER
OUT
PHONES
OUT
CON3
CA
K
NJL3281D, NJL1302D
1000 F
63V
220nF
400V
6.8 1W
L1 10 H
1000 F
63V
+57V
(NOM.)
CON2
Fig.9: the complete circuit diagram for the Ultra-LD Mk.3 amplifier. Changes from the Mk.2 circuit are highlighted with yellow boxes. We have improved
the output stage bias circuit and the compensation network, while a new driver emitter resistor configuration speeds output transistor switch-off, reducing
distortion. A larger feedback capacitor (1000μF) lowers noise and extends the bass response. In addition, L1 has been increased from 6.8μH to 10μH which
partially cancels the magnetic field produced by the output current, reducing high-frequency distortion.
2011
SC
CON1
SIGNAL
IN
C
E
100
45V
Q5
BC556
100
220
36 Silicon Chip
siliconchip.com.au
vertical connectors in two locations
(ie, a vertical RCA socket for the signal
input and a vertical 3-way Mini-Fit Jr
connector for the power input). These
let you build a stereo amplifier, with
the two amplifier modules mounted on
either side of the case. The new, slimmer power supply board (described
next month) can then fit between them.
Heatsinking
As stated, the additional transistor
for the VBE multiplier is located on
the heatsink between the two driver
transistors (Q10 & Q11). To make
room, the output transistor pairs are
now closer together. This allows us
to position the mounting holes for all
transistors so that they fall in between
heatsink fins, with the board centred
on the heatsink.
It is therefore no longer necessary
to blind-tap the mounting holes or
to offset the board from the centre of
the heatsink if the transistor machine
screws are fastened with nuts, as was
the case with the Mk.2 design.
Note that if you plan to run the
amplifier at continuous high power
levels (100W or more) into a 4Ω load
then it will probably be necessary to
use a larger heatsink (with lower thermal resistance to the air) and/or fanforced cooling. If driven at full power
(200W) into a 4Ω load continuously,
the heatsink becomes too hot to touch
even in free air (70°+) and this will be
even worse if it is mounted in a chassis
with limited ventilation.
For continuous high power levels
into 8Ω, a larger heatsink is also a good
idea although it may not be strictly
necessary if the ventilation is good.
Note that in either case (4Ω or 8Ω),
for music program material, if the
amplifier is not driven into clipping
then heatsinking should not be an
issue. This is because even heavily
compressed pop music typically has
a dynamic range of at least 10dB, so
even if the peak power is close to
maximum, the average power will be
significantly less.
Load lines
When we described the Ultra-LD
Mk.2, we did not publish any load line
curves. Such graphs show the range of
transistor currents and dissipations
that can occur with speaker loads
(resistive and reactive) and the Safe
Operating Area (SOA) of the transistors in the amplifier.
siliconchip.com.au
The relevant load lines and the SOA
curve for the Mk.3 are shown in Fig.6.
By comparing the SOA curve for
a pair of ThermalTrak transistors to
reactive load lines for typical 4Ω and
8Ω loudspeakers, we can determine
whether the transistors are likely to
exceed their ratings during periods
of high power output. If they can
be driven beyond the safe operating
area, the output transistors may be
destroyed by second breakdown.
Second breakdown is a phenomenon which can occur in bipolar
transistors, where high temperature
and dissipation lead to thermal run
away in a small area on the silicon
die, ultimately resulting in the silicon
melting. We need to ensure that this is
not possible under normal conditions.
As you can see from Fig.6, the load
lines for 4Ω and 8Ω resistive and reactive loads are within the safe operating
area. This curve is computed based on
the ThermalTrak transistor data sheets
and assuming that no single output
transistor is required to carry more
than 55.6% of the total load current.
It is specified for signal durations of
one second.
Since the reactive load curves are
within the SOA then the amplifier
should be quite robust. Unless the load
impedance is dramatically less than
we are assuming (eg, due to a short
circuit at the output), the power transistors should be safe from destruction.
All in all, plotting the load lines
gives us a reasonable idea of how close
to the limits we are pushing the power
transistors.
Circuit description
Let’s now look at how the circuit
works in more detail – see Fig.9.
As shown, the input signal is applied to CON1 and is coupled to the
WARNING!
High DC voltages (ie, ±55V) are present
on this amplifier module when power is applied. In particular, note that there is 110V
DC between the two supply rails. Do
not touch the supply wiring (including the
fuseholders) when the amplifier is operating, otherwise you could get a lethal shock.
base of PNP transistor Q1 by a 47µF
non-polarised capacitor. The intervening RC filter (100Ω/4.7nF) attenuates
any supersonic signals present, eg,
switching artefacts from a DAC. The
12kΩ resistor provides the bias current
for Q1’s base.
PNP transistors Q1 and Q2 are the
differential input pair, with Q1’s base
being the non-inverting input of the
amplifier and Q2’s base being the
inverting input. These are configured
as a “long tail pair”, fed with current
by PNP transistor Q5, which is configured as a current source. The 100Ω
resistor at its emitter sets the current
through this stage to around 6.5mA
(0.65V/100Ω).
Some of this current flows through
Q1’s collector-emitter junction and
the rest flows through Q2’s. How the
current is split depends on the difference in voltage between the two bases.
Most of this current then flows through
NPN transistors Q3 and Q4, which are
configured as a current mirror.
This current mirror keeps the current through Q3’s collector-emitter
junction equal to the current through
Q4’s, so any difference in the current
through Q1 and Q2 must then flow
to the base of Q8. Thus the current to
Q8 is proportional to the difference in
voltage between the bases of Q1 and
Q2, ie, the two amplifier inputs.
The 100Ω resistors at the emitters of
You Must Use Good-Quality Transistors
To ensure published performance, the 2SA970 low-noise transistors must
be from Toshiba. Be wary of counterfeit parts.
We recommend that all other transistors be from reputable manufacturers,
such as NXP Semiconductors, On Semiconductor, ST Microelectronics and
Toshiba. This applies particularly to the MJE15030 & MJE15031 output driver
transistors.
During the course of our testing, we came across some BC556 transistors
which, when used in the amplifier, resulted in excessive distortion. Despite
this, their hFE figure tested as normal. Replacing them with a different batch
returned the distortion to normal. Use good-quality transistors throughout to
guarantee good performance.
July 2011 37
Parts List
1 double-sided PCB, code
01107111, 135 x 115mm
1 black anodised aluminium
heatsink, 200 x 75 x 45mm
(L x H x D)
4 M205 PCB-mount fuse clips
2 6.5A M205 fast-blow fuses
(F1,F2)
1 10µH air-cored inductor (L1) (or
1 20mm OD x 10mm ID x 8mm
bobbin and 2m of 1mm diameter
enamelled copper wire, plus one
length of 10 x 20mm diameter
heatshrink tubing)
1 1kΩ multi-turn vertical trimpot
(VR1)
2 TO-220 mini flag heatsinks, 19 x
19 x 9.5mm
5 TO-220 silicone insulating
washers
4 TO-264 or TOP-3 silicone
insulating washers
2 transistor insulating bushes
Screws, nuts, spacers & washers
4 M3 x 9mm tapped spacers
7 M3 x 20mm machine screws
2 M3 x 10mm machine screws
8 M3 x 6mm machine screws
9 M3 nuts
9 M3 flat washers
Connectors
1 black PCB-mount switched RCA
Q1 and Q2 are “emitter degeneration
resistors” which provide some local
negative feedback, increasing their
linearity at the cost of reduced gain
(which in turn reduces the overall
open loop gain of the amplifier). The
6.8kΩ resistor simply reduces the
dissipation in Q5. The 68Ω emitter
resistors for Q3 and Q4 improve the
accuracy of the current mirror.
Voltage amplification stage
The circuitry described above comprises the first stage of the amplifier
and as explained, it converts the differential input voltage into a proportional
current. This current is then converted
back to a single-ended voltage, relative
to the negative rail, by the following
stage (the “voltage amplification stage”
or VAS). This consists primarily of
NPN transistors Q8 and Q9 as well as
PNP transistor Q7.
38 Silicon Chip
connector, or one vertical PCBmount RCA connector (CON1)
1 Molex Mini-fit Jr 3-pin rightangle PCB-mount male
socket (Element14 order code
9963545); OR one vertical
PCB-mount Mini-fit Jr male
socket (Element14 order code
9963570) (CON2)
1 Molex Mini-fit Jr 4-pin rightangle PCB-mount male socket
(CON3, Element14 order code
9963553)
1 Molex Mini-fit Jr 3-pin female
line plug (CON2, Element14
order code 9963480)
1 Molex Mini-fit Jr 4-pin female
line plug (CON3, Element14
order code 9963499)
7 Molex Mini-fit Jr female pins (for
CON2 & CON3, Element14
order code 9732675)
1 MJE15031 PNP transistor
(Q11)
2 NJL3281D NPN ThermalTrak
transistors (Q12,Q13)
2 NJL1302D PNP ThermalTrak
transistors (Q14,Q15)
1 BD139 NPN transistor (Q16)
2 1N4148 signal diodes (D1,D2)
Semiconductors
2 2SA970 low-noise PNP
transistors (Q1,Q2)
2 BC546 NPN transistors (Q3,Q4)
2 BC556 PNP transistors (Q5,Q6)
1 BC639 NPN transistor (Q8)
1 BF470 or 2SA1837 PNP
transistor (Q7)
1 BF469 or 2SC4793 NPN
transistor (Q9)
1 MJE15030 NPN transistor (Q10)
Resistors (0.25W, 1%)
1 1MΩ
1 220Ω
1 22kΩ
1 120Ω
2 12kΩ
6 100Ω
1 6.8kΩ 1W
3 68Ω
2 6.2kΩ
1 10Ω 1W
4 2.2kΩ
1 10Ω 0.25W
1 510Ω
1 6.8Ω 1W
1 390Ω 1W
4 0.1Ω 5W
1 330Ω
2 0Ω
2 68Ω 5W (for testing)
NPN transistor Q8 amplifies the current from the previous stage and feeds
it to NPN transistor Q9. Together they
form a compound transistor similar
to a Darlington, which is set up as a
common-emitter amplifier. PNP transistor Q7 is the current source load for
this amplifier and the standing current
is set to around 9.5mA by the 68Ω resistor (0.65V/68Ω). This current flows
from Q7, through the output stage bias
network (DQ12-DQ15 and transistor
Q16) and thence to Q9.
This common-emitter amplifier converts the current delivered to the base
of Q8 into a voltage, at Q9’s collector.
This voltage is then proportional to the
input voltage differential at the base
of Q1 and Q2.
Transistor Q6 provides the negative feedback for both current source
transistors (Q5 and Q7), regulating the
current through them. The two 6.2kΩ
Capacitors
2 1000µF 63V electrolytic
1 1000µF 16V electrolytic
1 470µF 63V electrolytic
2 47µF 35V electrolytic
1 47µF non-polarised (NP)
electrolytic
1 470nF 63V MKT
1 220nF 400V MKT
5 100nF 63V MKT
1 4.7nF 63V MKT
2 180pF 100V polypropylene
(Rockby Stock No 36350)
resistors, in combination with the
47µF capacitor, form a bootstrapped
current sink which turns on both Q5
and Q7. Once the right amount of current is flowing through each, Q6 turns
on and reduces the base current to both
in order to maintain it at that level.
The two 180pF capacitors and the
2.2kΩ resistor between Q8’s base and
Q9’s collector are the compensation
network described earlier, which takes
the place of the traditional Miller capacitor. This reduces open loop gain at
high frequencies by reducing the gain
in this stage, as well as linearising the
operation of Q8 and Q9.
The negative supply rail for this
stage and for the previous (input) stage
is filtered using a 10Ω resistor and a
470µF capacitor. This low-pass filter
prevents 100Hz power-supply ripple
from coupling into the signal path,
especially when the output power is
siliconchip.com.au
Another view of the completed Ultra-LD Mk.3 amplifier module. The full
constructional details will be published next month.
frequencies where the load’s reactance
may cause the amplifier to oscillate.
The parallel 6.8Ω resistor acts as a
“snubber”, preventing the output filter
from oscillating in response to signal
pulses from the amplifier.
The inductor also prevents any RF
signals picked up by the speaker leads
from being coupled to the base of Q2
where they may be rectified to an audio
frequency signal. The 220nF capacitor,
in combination with the inductor and
resistor, presents the amplifier with a
constant load to high frequencies and
keeps the output impedance low at
high frequencies, even if no speaker
is connected. This ensures that oscillation can not occur.
Any output cable capacitance will
be swamped by the 220nF capacitor
across the output. This filter arrangement was developed by A.N.Thiele
(Load Circuit Stabilising Network for
Audio Amplifiers, Proceedings of the
IREE 299, September 1975).
Power for the output stage is filtered by 1000µF and 100nF bypass
capacitors across each rail. If an output
transistor fails, one or both of the 6.5A
fuses will blow, protecting the power
supply.
Loudspeaker protection
high. It’s the negative rail that requires
filtering most of all because the output
voltage of the VAS common-emitter
amplifier is relative to this.
Output stage
The output stage is a current buffer/
unity gain voltage follower formed
from two complementary emitterfollowers. These are arranged in Darlington configuration, with a single
driver transistor for each half (Q10 and
Q11) providing current to the bases of
two output transistor pairs (Q12/Q13
and Q14/Q15 respectively).
There is a 100Ω resistor in series
with the base of each driver transistor,
to limit current in the event of a (brief)
output short circuit. The voltages at
the bases of the two driver transistors
are controlled by the common-emitter
amplifier in the previous stage. The DC
voltage between them is set by the bias
generator described earlier.
The 100Ω resistors also function as
RF “stoppers” which reduce the possibility of parasitic oscillation in the
emitter-follower output stages.
The class-A amplifier (VAS) current
passes through the bias generator and
siliconchip.com.au
the voltage across it is determined by
the forward voltage of the two ThermalTrak diodes which have the lowest
forward voltage within each pair, plus
the voltage across the VBE multiplier.
The voltage across the VBE multiplier
is roughly Q16’s base-emitter voltage
multiplied by a factor set by VR1. This
bias voltage varies with the junction
temperatures of Q10-Q15.
The 0.1Ω emitter resistors for Q12Q15 force each pair (Q12-Q13 and
Q14-Q15) to share the load current,
as well as providing a small amount
of current feedback.
RLC filter
After the output stage is the RLC
filter consisting of a 10µH air-cored
inductor, 6.8Ω resistor and 220nF
capacitor. This isolates the amplifier
circuitry from any load reactance (capacitance or inductance) caused by
the cabling or loudspeakers.
The 10µH inductor presents a low
impedance to audio-frequency signals
but a high impedance at supersonic
frequencies, at which the amplifier
might oscillate. Therefore it isolates
the amplifier from the load at critical
Note that it is necessary to connect
a loudspeaker protection module between the amplifier and speaker terminals, so that the load is disconnected
in the event of an amplifier failure.
Failures usually cause the output to
be connected directly to one or other
of the ±57V supply rails and unless a
protection module is present to immediately disconnect the loudspeaker,
it may be damaged and quite possibly
catch fire due to the resulting high
current flow through the voice coil.
More to come
That’s all we have space for this
month. Next month, we will describe
how to assemble, test and adjust the
amplifier module and also present an
updated version of the power supply
board. That article will also include
some suggestions for putting it all
together in a case, as a mono or stereo
power amplifier.
Finally, for those who have already
built an Ultra-LD Mk.2 module, don’t
despair. We plan to present a small
adaptor board which will allow you
to fully upgrade its performance to the
SC
Mk.3 standard.
July 2011 39
|