This is only a preview of the December 2012 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 24 of the 112 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "A 2.5GHz 12-digit Frequency Counter, Pt.1":
Items relevant to "USB Power Monitor":
Items relevant to "High-Energy Ignition System For Cars, Pt.2":
Items relevant to "High-Power Class-D Audio Amplifier, Pt.2":
Items relevant to "Modifications For The Induction Motor Speed Controller":
Items relevant to "Hacking A Mini Wireless Web Server, Pt.2":
|
SILICON
SILIC
CHIP
www.siliconchip.com.au
Publisher & Editor-in-Chief
Leo Simpson, B.Bus., FAICD
Production Manager
Greg Swain, B.Sc. (Hons.)
Technical Editor
John Clarke, B.E.(Elec.)
Technical Staff
Ross Tester
Jim Rowe, B.A., B.Sc
Nicholas Vinen
Photography
Ross Tester
Reader Services
Ann Morris
Advertising Enquiries
Glyn Smith
Phone (02) 9939 3295
Mobile 0431 792 293
glyn<at>siliconchip.com.au
Regular Contributors
Brendan Akhurst
Rodney Champness, VK3UG
Kevin Poulter
Stan Swan
Dave Thompson
SILICON CHIP is published 12 times
a year by Silicon Chip Publications
Pty Ltd. ACN 003 205 490. ABN 49
003 205 490. All material is copyright ©. No part of this publication
may be reproduced without the written consent of the publisher.
Printing: Hannanprint, Noble Park,
Victoria.
Distribution: Network Distribution
Company.
Subscription rates: $97.50 per year
in Australia. For overseas rates, see
the order form in this issue.
Editorial office:
Unit 1, 234 Harbord Rd,
Brookvale, NSW 2100.
Postal address: PO Box 139,
Collaroy Beach, NSW 2097.
Phone (02) 9939 3295.
Fax (02) 9939 2648.
E-mail: silicon<at>siliconchip.com.au
ISSN 1030-2662
Recommended and maximum price only.
2 Silicon Chip
Publisher’s Letter
Smart power meters ain’t smart
Recently there has been quite a lot of media comment
on the Federal government’s plan to rein in power costs
for consumers which seem to be rising inexorably at
way above the Consumer Price Index. Naturally there
have been accusations from one side of politics that it
is green power subsidies that are causing the majority of
the tariff increases. Meanwhile the green side of politics
has retorted that it is caused by the power distribution
companies “gold-plating” their systems or that they are
over-building merely to cope with power peaks that
occur only a few times a year.
First of all, it is undeniable that some of the increases in domestic electricity tariffs have been caused by green power subsidies. The fact that the power
companies are legally bound to buy solar and wind power at much higher
rates than payable to coal fired power stations is unchallenged. While I regard
these measures as a considerable misallocation of resources, ie, from the longsuffering consumers, some people regard it as essential to mitigate the effects
of so-called “carbon pollution”.
It is also necessary to refute the charge that the energy distribution companies
are “gold-plating” their networks, commonly referred to in media parlance as
“poles and wires”. Such accusations are rubbish. In fact, over the past four or
five decades, state governments have seriously run down the grid infrastructure
which consists of far more than “poles and wires”. We are talking about substations, high-voltage transformers and switch-yards, high-voltage transmission
lines and so on. Much of this stuff is very old and often much older than the
coal-fired power stations, many of which have been running for more than 40
years. Many suburban substations are more than 60 years old.
Even the power poles and transmission wires in Australian cities are very
old and are seldom maintained in any way except to replace poles that are
rotten or to repair damage from storms and road accidents. This infrastructure
doesn’t last forever and so ongoing upgrades are required.
And any suggestion that “smart” power meters might enable consumers to
lower their electricity bills is just nonsense. “Smart” meters might be smart
for the energy retailers, enabling them to have much more expensive tariffs
at times of peak demand but they are certainly not smart for the consumer.
The idea that they are “smart” for the consumer implies that he or she can
plan activities during the day to avoid high tariff times and do stuff at night.
Great. But wouldn’t it be so much “smarter” and equitable if the so-called
smart meter had a large display inside the home indicating the tariff and cost
of power being consumed at all times? That would be “smart” but that is not
part of the plan. No, the plan is to jack up the tariff and if you need to cool
your home after a long hot day, then you can simply cop it sweet and pay. Lots.
And we also know what happens when consumers do manage to reduce their
consumption of electricity or water or gas, don’t we? The companies concerned
still manage to increase their overall revenues by jacking up the tariffs even
further and also the daily tariff charges.
No wonder some people are looking to install their own self-contained solar
power systems so that they can disconnect from the grid. The rising tariffs make
such moves economical and they also have the advantage that when there is
a system blackout, you still have power.
I guess that might even make the greens happy. Power to the people!
Leo Simpson
siliconchip.com.au
|