This is only a preview of the February 2013 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 19 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "High Performance CLASSiC DAC; Pt.1":
Items relevant to "Do-It-Yourself Seismograph With Tsunami Alarm":
Items relevant to "Mobile Phone Loud Ringer":
Items relevant to "Improved Jacob's Ladder":
Items relevant to "Accurate GPS 1pps Timebase For Frequency Counters":
|
THE HISTORIC
RUBICON
HYDROELECTRIC
SCHEME
By Dr David Maddison
Very few people would have heard of the historic Rubicon
Hydroelectric Scheme – it’s not in the national consciousness like
the Snowy Mountains Scheme. But at one time it was a significant
source of power, supplying almost 17% of Victoria’s electricity.
L
ocated about 140km east of Melbourne, construction
of the entire scheme was completed in 1929 (but some
parts became operational in 1928) and it is still in
operation and largely original condition, although now it
generates just 0.2% of Victoria’s electricity.
It is an early example of a system using remote control
and fault monitoring technology. It had a number of automatic features to shut the system down to prevent damage
in the event of a fault condition.
At one time it coexisted with major logging operations
in the area and it has survived numerous bushfires. In addition, its environmental impact is relatively low.
The Rubicon Scheme has very much a rustic “steampunk” aura to it and was built in a time when engineering
infrastructure was built to last and remain productive for
an almost indefinite time. One might surmise that the
reason for this was that the rate of technological progress
was much slower then than now.
It made sense to build infrastructure that lasted the long
16 Silicon Chip
periods of time expected until new technological developments had been made. In any case, some engineering
solutions are universally applicable and at the macro level,
if this scheme was constructed now it may not be much
different to that implemented.
The scheme includes four hydroelectric power stations
ranging in capacity from 300kW up to 9.2MW, for a total
capacity of 13MW as shown in the table below. The maximum output is achieved during winter.
Until becoming privately owned (by AGL), the Rubicon
Scheme was the oldest publicly-owned hydro scheme on
Power Station
Royston
Rubicon Falls
Rubicon (two turbines)
Lower Rubicon
TOTAL
Total Capacity (MW)
0.8
0.3
9.2
2.7
13
siliconchip.com.au
A closer look
Inlet side of the Royston Power Station showing penstock.
As power stations go, it’s not the largest in the world . . .
the Australian mainland. The 2MW Duck Reach Power
Station in Launceston, Tasmania was an older publiclyowned scheme but is no longer operational, having operated
between 1895 and 1955.
To put the Rubicon Scheme’s capacity into perspective,
consider that the total installed hydroelectric capacity in
Australia is currently 8,186MW which is about 16% of total
electricity generating capacity. However the total power
produced by hydro is about 5% as it is not operating at
capacity. This scheme represents about 0.16% of Australia’s
hydroelectric capacity.
How the scheme works
The hydroelectric scheme involves two rivers (Royston
and Rubicon, both tributaries of the Goulburn River), four
power stations, three dams, various aqueducts, penstocks
(the pipes that convey water to the turbines), roads, power
lines and switchgear and associated (but now unused) infrastructure such as an industrial tramway and trestle bridges.
The first (most upstream) power station is the Royston
(0.8MW). The water for this is supplied by the Royston Dam
on the Royston River and is conducted to the station via about
2km of aqueduct and then a penstock of 549m in length.
The outlet side of Royston Power Station with water
discharged into aqueduct. Yes, it really is a big “tin shed”.
siliconchip.com.au
For those people interested in taking a closer look at most
of this system they can go on a 15km bush walk starting at
Rubicon Power Station.
Along the trail it is possible to view the Rubicon Falls Power
Station, the Rubicon Falls Dam, the Royston Power Station,
beautiful scenery, aqueducts, old sawmilling and power station
tramways and historic sawmill sites. The walk can be completed
within one day.
Note, that as with any bush walk you should only attempt it
if you are suitably equipped and experienced. It is not the easiest of walks for the inexperienced, especially the final descent.
Unfortunately, the power stations can be viewed from afar but no
internal access is permitted. (See a suitable bushwalking guide
book for the specific route.)
The area can also be visited by an appropriate off-road
vehicle, subject to seasonal road closures. See www.dse.vic.
gov.au/–data/assets/pdf–file/0017/101744/Rubicon–Valley–
Historic–Area.pdf
Map courtesy of Department of
Sustainability and Environment, Victoria
February 2013 17
An 8.8km aqueduct delivers water to the Rubicon Power
Station. Note part of the disused industrial tramway track
(2ft gauge) to the left.
The forebay at the end of the aqueduct that delivers water
to the Rubicon Power Station. The function is to collect the
water and ensure debris is trapped and removed before the
water is discharged into the penstock.
The water discharged from Royston enters an aqueduct,
the flowing water from which is also used to power a saw
mill which is no longer in regular use except for historic
demonstrations.
Rubicon Falls (0.3MW) is the second power station
downstream in the scheme. Water is supplied to this via
the Rubicon Falls Dam by a 420m long penstock.
The Rubicon Power Station is the third downstream
and most powerful power station in the scheme with two
turbines generating up to 9.2MW. Water for this station
comes via the Rubicon Dam on the Rubicon River.
To reach the Rubicon Power Station the water travels
along an aqueduct for a total of 8.8km. Along the way, the
discharge water from the Royston Power Station (the first
of the power stations) also flows into this aqueduct. A
disused industrial tramway track (2ft gauge) follows the
aqueduct’s path. This track could not now be used without
major works as the track has been warped in places from
the heat of bushfires and log-falls, among other causes. It
operated until the 1990s.
The forebay
At the end of the aqueduct the water is discharged into
a “forebay”. This consists of a water-collecting pool and
grates to trap logs, sticks, leaves, rocks and other debris
that has fallen into the open aqueduct, to prevent it from
The Pelton wheel
The Pelton wheel is a highly
efficient type of water impulse
turbine. Its efficient design
means that nearly all the useful
energy (>90%) is extracted
from a water jet that impinges
upon the turbines’ buckets (the
impulse) transferring kinetic energy
from the water jet and causing the
turbine to spin.
After the main work has been
done, just enough kinetic energy is
left in the water to remove itself
from the bucket.
This is achieved by causing
the impinging water jet to be
deflected a nominal 180° (a
“U-turn” but in practice, a
little less) within the bucket
which results in most of its
Diagram of typical Pelton
kinetic energy being transferred wheel from original 1880
US Patent US000233692.
to the wheel.
Based upon mathematical considerations, for optimal efficiency, the velocity of the water jet is designed to be twice that of
the bucket.
18 Silicon Chip
Pelton wheel on display at Rubicon
Power Station. This power station has two
generators, each of 4.6 MW capacity and each
using a horizontally mounted Pelton wheel.
Note the side-by-side bucket arrangement and
the heavy structure of the wheel. This was one
of the original wheels used at the station and
was removed when the station was upgraded
for increased power in 1954-55.
Often, in order to achieve better mechanical load balancing,
two buckets are mounted side to side on the wheel as is the case
for the Rubicon Power Station.
The Pelton wheel is a commonly used type of turbine in
hydroelectric installations and excels in cases of relatively low
volume flow with a high head.
siliconchip.com.au
Hg
The penstock leading to the Rubicon Power Station. The
elevation drops 443m over a pipe length of 1305m. Note the
riveted pipe construction. As the pipe descends toward the
bottom, more rows of rivets are installed to cope with the
extra pressure. Modern penstock pipe would be of seamless
construction with welded joints if made from steel or be of a
composite construction such as fibreglass.
going into the penstock and then damaging or destroying
the turbines. It also has an important safety function to
prevent people who may have fallen into the fast-flowing
aqueduct getting sucked into the penstock. At the forebay
they presumably could safely extricate themselves from
the pool of water.
The forebay discharges water into the penstock, where
it falls a vertical distance of 443m over a pipe length of
1305m, after which it is directed into twin Pelton wheel
turbines (see box).
mercury free
SEE
FEATU
THIS IS RE
SUE
Lower Rubicon
The final power station in the scheme is the Lower Rubicon Power Station (2.7MW). It utilises the discharge water
Remote control and
fault monitoring
The remote control and fault monitoring functions implemented within the system were remarkably advanced
for the time.
Remote control was possible for opening and closing circuit breakers, starting and stopping a station and
changing the electrical load of a station.
There were also safety interlocks to prevent starting
of a station under a fault condition; shutting down a station if a fault was detected; only allowing as much power
loading as the available quantity of water could generate
and prevention of power loading beyond operational limits.
Automatic station shutdown would be initiated under
the following fault conditions: bearing overheat, generator field failure, electrical overload, electrical insulation
failure, over-voltage, single or reverse phase generator
operation and generator over-speed.
Remote monitoring of water parameters was also
possible including stream flow, aqueduct flow, pondage
water level and water flow at the turbine.
siliconchip.com.au
February 2013 19
Rubicon Power Station showing penstock running down
the hill, the corrugated steel shed containing generating
equipment and the switchyard at left. The discharge
aqueduct and control gates are in the foreground.
View (from afar) through the window of the Rubicon
Power Station showing some of the equipment.
from the Rubicon Power Station which travels 3.2km along
an open aqueduct before entering a 320m long penstock.
After this, water is discharged back into the Rubicon River,
most of its useful energy having been extracted by the
hydroelectric system.
In recent times there has been a shift from large-scale
hydro-generation to small-scale generation because most
areas suitable for large scale generation have been fully
exploited (eg the Snowy Mountains Scheme) or there are
environmental concerns with further large-scale development. Also, since Australia is topographically reasonably
flat, there are limited opportunities for hydro-generation
compared with many other countries. Nevertheless, there
remain some opportunities for exploitation of hydro resources at smaller scales, where the environmental impacts
are of much less concern.
Hydroelectric power can be economical and comparable
to the cost of coal and gas-fuelled electricity production as
well as nuclear. However, no political party in Australia
is prepared to consider nuclear electricity in a serious
manner. Hydro is still cheaper than “green” alternatives
such as solar and wind. Perhaps for economical electricity
production in the future, a choice has to be made for further
limited hydro production with environmental impacts
versus a nuclear option with few environmental impacts
but significant political contention.
Old disused tram car which was once used for conveyance
of goods and equipment precariously poised at the top of the
hill above the Rubicon Power Station near to the forebay.
Access to the Scheme infrastructure is now by dirt roads.
Author’s note: The owners of this power scheme, AGL, were invited
to participate in this story but unfortunately were unable to provide
any personnel familiar with the system and so information has been
obtained from various other sources.
SC
Smaller Scale Hydro
Commercial hydro-electric generation does not need to be large
in scale (of the order of hundreds of megawatts).
There are many small scale commercial (and also grid-feed)
hydro generation projects in Australia ranging in capacity from a few
kilowatts to a number of megawatts such as the Rubicon Scheme.
According to one definition, “small hydro” refers to any hydro
scheme below 30MW in size.
Examples of some randomly selected smaller scale systems
of different vintages and different areas of Australia and New
Zealand include:
20 Silicon Chip
The Future of Hydro in Australia
Steavenson Falls at Marysville, Vic. This employs a unique
cross-flow turbine. Australian Anthony Michell patented this
invention in 1903. This recently rebuilt installation has a typical
output of 3.3kW.
Paronella Park, Qld, 25kW.
Tinaroo Hydro Power station, Qld, 1.6MW.
Terminal Storage Mini Hydro on the Mannum/Adelaide pipeline,
SA, 1.9MW.
Wellington Dam Hydro Power Station, WA, 2MW.
Arnold Power Station, NZ, 3MW.
Cardinia Dam Power Station, Vic, 3.5 MW.
Brown Mountain Power Station, NSW, 4.5MW.
Rowallan Power Station, Tas, 10.5MW.
siliconchip.com.au
|