This is only a preview of the March 2013 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 20 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "High Performance CLASSiC DAC; Pt.2":
Items relevant to "Infrasound Detector For Low Frequency Measurements":
Items relevant to "Automatic Points Controller For Model Railways":
Items relevant to "Capacitor Discharge Unit For Twin-Coil Points Motors":
Items relevant to "AAA-Cell LED Torch Driver":
|
HEARING AIDS
REVISITED
We “road test” Blamey & Saunders’ new SIE-64 Digital Hearing Aids
B
ack in our July 2011 issue,
readers may recall a feature on
some new, low cost hearing aids
from an Australian company, Australia
Hears.
In a nutshell, we’d heard about
some new Aussie hearing aids which
were a fraction of the price of those
currently on the market and wanted
to try them out.
And we came away more than impressed – so much so that I bought a
pair and have been using them ever
since.
At the time, we said it was rather
unusual for a magazine such as SILICON
CHIP to be “reviewing” hearing aids but
from the letters and phone calls we received after publication, readers were
most appreciative – and many told us
they’d purchased hearing aids either
for the first time or as replacements for
aids they weren’t happy with.
Nearly two years later, the company
name has changed (apparently for legal reasons) to Blamey and Saunders
Hearing Pty Ltd, reflecting the two
siliconchip.com.au
principals of the organisation – Professor Peter Blamey and Dr Elaine Saunders, both internationally-regarded
experts in the field of audiology.
But even more importantly, they’ve
added a new model to their line-up,
the SIE-64.
It’s smaller than the previous
models and as its name suggests, is a
speaker-in-ear model (hence SIE) with
64 frequency channels versus the 32
channels of the models we tried out.
While it is more expensive (and
we’ll cover that shortly) the SIE-64
has been getting the proverbial “rave
reviews” from users, even those
who were converts to the earlier
Blamey&Saunders models.
Incidentally, when I reviewed the
hearing aids I had the choice of either
the LOF (Liberty Open Fit) or the SIE
(speaker in ear) models but I couldn’t
find much between them.
However, I purchased the LOF
by Ross Tester
models – not just because they were
$260 each cheaper than the SIE-32s
but mainly because they offered the
option of Telecoil operation.
Don’t know what we’re talking
about? Telecoil is a system which offers enhanced performance to hearing
aid users in many public buildings
(and can also be fitted to telephones).
There’s a series of DIY articles in
SILICON CHIP from September 2010
through March 2011 which will help
you understand what it’s all about.
But you want to know something?
Apart from playing with Telecoil when
I initially got the hearing aids, I’ve
never used it in anger. The hearing
aids themselves did such a great job
of pulling speech (particularly) “out
of the mud” especially in public areas
and meetings, I didn’t feel the need to
invoke the Telecoil function.
It was one of those “manãna” things
– tomorrow, maybe!
I was delighted at the way the things
worked – and being a person who had
quite a number of meetings to attend,
March 2013 53
The three models in the range: the new SIE (speaker-in-ear) 64 (left) and 32 (centre), with the LOF (liberty open fit) at right.
As you can see, the two SIE models are fairly close in size while the LOF is a bit larger. All feature digital technology with
quite advanced features – and the best part of all is the prices, especially when you compare them to others on the market.
I had far better comprehension when
someone up the back was speaking
softly.
The other biggie, at least as far as my
partner was concerned, was the need
NOT to have the TV or radio wound
up to ridiculous (to her!) levels. Now
I’m quite happy to have it at a comfortable level for her – and there has been
a pleasant side effect.
I’ve been complaining for years
about the “muffled” sound quality of
many TV programs, particularly where
any form of accent is concerned. The
English panel program “QI” (which
both of us find quite interesting . . .)
is a case in point.
But with the hearing aids, I’ve found
a rather significant increase in clarity
and hence comprehension. She’s more
than happy that “woddeysay?” has all
but disappeared from my lexicon.
So that was my experience with the
Blamey&Saunders LOF hearing aids:
very happy! Blamey&Saunders must
have been happy with my reaction
to them (and, apparently, quite a few
sales as a result of the article).
So much so that they not only advertised their new models in SILICON
CHIP (obviously they recognised a
significant portion of the SILICON CHIP
readership was their target market),
they also offered me the opportunity
to “road test” the SIE-64s.
As I commented in the earlier article, I paid full price for the originals
– so who was I not to take them up on
their offer!
SIE-64 observations
The first thing I noted was the difference in size – at 23 x 10 x 6mm,
the ’64s are about 30% smaller than
the LOF models (34 x 14 x 8mm) and
slightly smaller than the SIE-32s (25 x
14 x 8mm); they take a smaller battery
54 Silicon Chip
(size 312 vs size 13) and in fact are half
the weight – 2g vs 4g – not that I noted
much difference in use.
But as I mentioned earlier, the major
difference is a significant upgrade in
technology, with 64 frequency channels (both the LOF and SIE-32s have
32 channels) and much better battery
life over the SIE-32s (at 150+ hours,
they approach the life of the LOFs and
are half as much again as the SIE-32s).
What difference does 64 channels
make?
The sounds we hear in the real
world are a complex mixture of smaller
sounds. The world of sound is made
up of dull thuds, high pitched squeaks
and everything in between. A properly
designed hearing aid filters the whole
spectrum of sound into separate parts
that are called frequency channels.
A good way to think of it is like a
rainbow.
By analysing sound in its smaller
components, the hearing aid can
adjust different parts of the sounds
independently without affecting other
parts. With more channels the hearing
aid can be more selective in what it
chooses to amplify.
The result is clearer sound in noise
and less distortion in some environments.
Of course, having 64 channels
doesn’t mean that the device is twice
as good as having 32 channels. And the
quality of a hearing aid doesn’t depend
just on the number of channels – the
quality of the underlying amplification technology is paramount, as is
the ease of use.
The price
Let’s get a possible negative perception out of the way up front: at
$1725.00 each, the SIE-64s are $500
more expensive than the $1250.00
SIE-32s. And they’re an even more
significant $735.00 more expensive
than the LOFs, which sell for $990.00
each. Obviously, for a pair you double
the prices.
Those prices might look expensive – but mosey into any audiologist
(particularly those with shop fronts in
shopping centres) and discuss digital
hearing aids and you’ll find that prices
start at a few thousand each and go
up – way up – from there.
As I mentioned in the earlier review,
I was told when I first had my hearing
tested that I’d have to spend at least
$10,000 each to get a reasonable digital
hearing aid: “anything under that is
not much good”. Well, not from them,
anyway.
So $1750 each compares very well
with what is currently offered on the
“professional” market (as long as you
are comparing apples with apples). If
your budget can’t quite stretch that
far the LOFs at $990 each are still a
perfectly viable alternative.
All models come with a “starter
kit” containing ear tips (a variety pack
with various sizes), a carry case, a box
of 60 batteries, wax cleaning tools, a
drying jar and instructions. Most of
the ear tips are open type but two are
occluding, which means they seal the
ear canal to stop extraneous sounds
getting in and sound produced by the
in-ear speakers from getting out!
By the way, don’t be tempted
(conned?) into buying some cheapie
out of China – with all the claims in
the world – for perhaps fifty bucks or
so. They’re all over ebay.
I know someone who was tempted
and their purchase lasted less than a
day before going into the bin! The difference between a properly designed
hearing aid and a cheapie really is the
proverbial chalk and cheese.
siliconchip.com.au
Or is it simply that one works and
one doesn’t!
Controls
On-board controls are minimal
but also different between models:
all three have an automatic volume
control but the 64s have an up/down
button, where the 32s have a digital
dial and the LOFs an analog dial.
Program selection on the 64s is via
an up-down button, the 32s use a magnetic wand while the LOFs use both a
magnetic wand and button.
Apart from the Telecoil option mentioned earlier, the only other “obvious”
difference was in the prompts: the 64
has pre-programmed voice message
while the others have a series of beeps,
which you need to remember or refer
to the instructions to interpret.
Programming
If you already have an audiogram and submit it with your order,
Blamey&Saunders will supply your
hearing aids pre-programmed to suit.
Alternatively (or if you want to
experiment!) they have available PC
software called “I Hear You”, which
suits all three models.
As well as enabling you to take
total control of the aid programming, you can also send data to
Blamey&Saunders support staff for
advice if you need it.
On the SIE-64s, programs are
“stepped through” by pushing the
up-down button (no magnetic wand is
required as is the case with the others).
Four programming “channels” are
provided (on all three models); however a Telecoil option is normally preprogrammed into channel 2.
Digital technologies
As a final note, it’s worth mentioning that Blamey&Saunders hearing
aids offer, possibly uniquely, four different technologies in these Australian
designed and developed hearing aids.
First is the “ADRO” system, which
stands for Advanced Dynamic Range
Optimisation. This ensures that sound
is always presented at a comfortable
and audible level – not too loud, not
too soft at every frequency.
Second is ADM – the automatic
adaptive directional microphone,
which increases the signal-to-noise
ratio by reducing the loudness of background noise from some directions.
Third is AFC – adaptive feedback
cancellation. This time-domain design
is inherently resistant to distortion
and provides up to 19dB of additional,
stable gain.
Finally, they include ultra-lowdelay sound processing. The shorter
the delay (and by definition there must
be some delay) the better the sound
quality. Earlier hearing aids often produced reverberation and even echoes
of the sound – most disconcerting!
The SIE-64s have the shortest delay
of any device in the industry, with no
perceptible distortion or echo.
Are the SIE-64 worth the
extra money?
I’ve been using both the old and the
new hearing aids for about six weeks
now, a few days with one type then
I’d swap over to the others, just for a
reasonable comparison. I’ve even gone
without both for a few days here and
there (and that was a real struggle!).
I noticed pretty well straight away
that the SIE-64s are better than the
LOFs. Even though I was very happy
with those and, without knowing
about the new models, would have
remained more than satisfied.
But I do know – and I know that my
hearing was better with the 64s. They
have a crispness and clarity which I
thought was pretty good in the LOFs
but it is even more pronounced in the
64s. So yes, as far as I am concerned,
they are worth the extra.
I didn’t notice any particular difference in wearing them, despite the
64s being half the weight and quite a
bit smaller. In all cases, they are quite
unobtrusive behind the ears – most
people will not know you are wearing hearing aids unless you tell them
(especially if you have long hair!).
Conclusion
So once again, we take our hat off
to an Australian company (pioneers in
their field) which has again produced
the goods with these hearing aids
which compare so well with models
SC
many times the price.
For more information:
Blamey & Saunders Hearing Pty Ltd,
364 Albert St,
East Melbourne, Vic 3002
Phone: (03) 9008 6371
Fax: (03) 8678 1266
The In-Circuit CapAnalyzer 88A, Series II
Checks and analyzes electrolytic capacitors IN CIRCUIT – no need to unsolder!
Troubleshooting and locating defective electrolytic capacitors has been a thorn in the side
of all technicians for many years. The CapAnalyzer 88A will detect dried up and shorted
electrolytics in all PCBs easily without having to unsolder and test, or cut up the PCB
tracks, or needing the service manual! The American designed and built EDS-88A is the
only asked-for-by-name Cap Checker in the world.
Check capacitor DC Resistance and ESR instantly – Turn hours of service and trouble-shooting
time into moments – Repairs you once considered “no fixers” can now be profitable!
002211((<<
%%$$&&..7(((
$117(
$
**8if8y$yo5ou5u$
’r’reennoott
if
('
66$$77,,66)),,('
siliconchip.com.au
Used and renowned amongst industry tycoons such as:
NBC, ABC, CBS TV,
Verizon, Comcast, AT&T, Time/Warner Communications,
Panasonic Broadcast and Authorized Service,
Matsushita Industrial, Sony, Pioneer Electronics,
Circuit City, Sears Service,
Ford, General Motors,
NASA / Kennedy Space Center,
USA Shuttle Logistics, U.S. Military
and tens of thousands of independent electronic
technicians and broadcast engineers throughout the world.
60-day satisfaction or money-back guarantee
Three Years Limited Warranty
CE Certified
Exclusive Australian Distributor:
DWR]HOHFWURQL[FRPDX
March 2013 55
|