This is only a preview of the September 2014 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 35 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Create Eerie Music With The Opto-Theremin, Pt.1":
Items relevant to "A Wideband Active Differential Oscilloscope Probe":
Items relevant to "Mini-D Stereo 10W/Channel Class-D Audio Amplifier":
Items relevant to "An Improved Tweeter Horn For The Majestic Loudspeaker":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
SILICON
CHIP
www.siliconchip.com.au
Publisher & Editor-in-Chief
Leo Simpson, B.Bus., FAICD
Production Manager
Greg Swain, B.Sc. (Hons.)
Technical Editor
John Clarke, B.E.(Elec.)
Technical Staff
Ross Tester
Jim Rowe, B.A., B.Sc
Nicholas Vinen
Photography
Ross Tester
Reader Services
Ann Morris
Advertising Enquiries
Glyn Smith
Phone (02) 9939 3295
Mobile 0431 792 293
glyn<at>siliconchip.com.au
Regular Contributors
Brendan Akhurst
Rodney Champness, VK3UG
Kevin Poulter
Stan Swan
Dave Thompson
SILICON CHIP is published 12 times
a year by Silicon Chip Publications
Pty Ltd. ACN 003 205 490. ABN 49
003 205 490. All material is copyright ©. No part of this publication
may be reproduced without the written consent of the publisher.
Printing: Hannanprint, Warwick
Farm, NSW.
Distribution: Network Distribution
Company.
Subscription rates: $105.00 per year
in Australia. For overseas rates, see
our website or the subscriptions page
in this issue.
Editorial office:
Unit 1, 234 Harbord Rd,
Brookvale, NSW 2100.
Postal address: PO Box 139,
Collaroy Beach, NSW 2097.
Phone (02) 9939 3295.
Fax (02) 9939 2648.
E-mail: silicon<at>siliconchip.com.au
ISSN 1030-2662
Recommended and maximum price only.
2 Silicon Chip
Publisher’s Letter
Debate on the MEN system
Well, well, well. My Publisher’s Letter and article on
the dangers of Australia’s Multiple Earth Neutral (MEN)
system in the August issue has certainly triggered a lively
discussion, as I thought it might. Some of the ensuing correspondence is featured in the Mailbag pages of this issue.
No doubt we will have more next month.
As you would expect, most of the correspondence
has come from electricians who are very familiar with
the MEN system and wiring practices as specified in the
SAA wiring rules (AS/NZS3000:2007). Typically, these
tradesmen are conscientious and concerned about any deviation from what they
perceive as standard practice. As you will see, some readers were concerned about
the standard of wiring shown in the photos of the meter box/switchboard in the
article and claimed that it was not “up to scratch”.
To be honest, the sight of the bundle of Earth wires behind the hinged-out panel
on my switchboard was a surprise to me. If I had thought about it at all, I would have
assumed there was an Earth link for all these connections. Prior to taking the photos
in the article, I had never looked at it. But I am assured that it does meet the relevant
clauses in the wiring rules. If you think about the number of connections necessary
for an Earth link bar, it would be quite a long bar and a lot of screw connections, all
of which can gradually come loose over time, due to the effects of creepage. So the
soldered bundle is probably the better approach for long-term safety.
Other readers were concerned with the fact that I found considerable current
flowing in the Earth. Some were adamant that no current at all must flow in the
Earth. If you think about it, there must always be some current flowing in the Earth.
Consider an installation in which the Neutral circuit back to the power pole is 300
milliohms, a fairly typical value. Now the Earth circuit should also have a very low
resistance and what if it, too, is 300 milliohms? This means that regardless of how
much current flows in to the Active connection, half flows back to the distribution
transformer (or sub-station) via the Neutral and the other half will flow via the Earth.
Other readers maintained that the consumer’s Earth should only be a copperplated stake driven into the ground and no connection to the water pipes. Well good
luck with that idea if you live in a hilly area where most of the houses are built on
rock. That describes my house and while I do have an Earth stake, it was buried in
concrete years ago and even then it must have been in a small pocket of shallow
soil over solid sandstone.
And good luck with the idea of keeping the area around the Earth stake wellwatered to keep soil conductivity high. How many people even know where their
Earth stake is or what it is for, let alone the idea that it should be watered in periods
of dry weather? This is why the water pipes become part of the consumer’s Earth – it
is bound to be a better long-term connection.
And that is the way it has been for a very long time. If not, why are plumbers
generally aware of the hazards of removing a water meter? It must be bridged with
a heavy jumper lead to provide an alternative path for the Earth currents while
the water meter is removed. In that respect, plumbers seem to be more aware than
electricians, even though they might not know the reasons why hazardous currents
(or voltages) could be present.
Finally, a couple of readers wanted to know if Energy Australia had subsequently
made efforts to find out where the apparent Neutral fault in my immediate locality
was. The answer to that is “no” and that was the subject of some discussion between
the inspector who checked out my installation and his supervisor. The problem is
that it could be anywhere or it might be the result of a number of less than optimum
consumer Neutral connections, in their switchboard, at the pole or wherever.
Overall, the reaction to the article has been very favourable and everyone agrees
that if any person ever gets a tingle from water taps or pipes within their home, they
should immediately contact their electricity supplier.
Leo Simpson
siliconchip.com.au
|