This is only a preview of the December 2020 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 37 of the 112 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Power Supply for Battery-Powered Vintage Radios":
Items relevant to "Dual Battery Lifesaver":
Items relevant to "A Closer Look at the RCWL-0516 3GHz Motion Module":
Items relevant to "Balanced Input Attenuator for the USB SuperCodec, Part 2":
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Flexible Digital Lighting Controller, part 3":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
SERVICEMAN'S LOG
A brush with disaster
Dave Thompson
It’s that time of year again; the days are longer, the clocks have changed,
and there’s more time to contemplate all those jobs I’ve been putting off
doing over the winter. While the lure of the interweb, streaming services
and reading back-issues of Silicon Chip magazine keeps me office-chair
bound, duty calls – and it’s about time I answered!
I have several yard projects lined
up; not that I’m really into gardening
and landscaping mind you, but they
need doing, and there’s nobody else
in the frame. So I’m the one who has
to do them.
You’d be forgiven for thinking
there’s nothing electronic-servicemanworthy in this type of work, but you’d
be wrong; power tools come under
that umbrella!
I’m into DIY as much as anyone else,
and like most engineers and servicemen (and as elaborated upon previously), I like to use the best tools for
the job. However, this can create problems, especially when the tools run
into certain ‘minor’ problems, such
as no longer working.
I recently had to sand some timber in the garden. While most people
wouldn’t care that the odd fence joint
doesn’t match up, as a former furniture creator and hobbyist luthier, that
type of thing annoys me greatly. In an
effort to make it as tidy as it can be, I
fired up my new-ish Bosch 1/3-sheet
sander to straighten up some edges I
had cut badly.
To my surprise, it didn’t work very
well. This was unusual, because it
had performed admirably in the past,
and I’d used it to do a small amount
of work during a house renovation
I completed a while back. But now,
while it powered on, it seemed to labour terribly and there was a distinct
electrical-type smell coming from it.
You probably know the smell I’m
talking about; it’s a type of ‘Eau de
burnt insulation’ scent that indicates
that something is not quite right.
onto my workshop floor a while back
while doing another job. I thought
nothing of it at the time, and it worked
fine afterwards; or so I remembered. I
have dropped power tools before; they
are built to be tough (frequent power
tool users are generally not renowned
for their elegance!), so I didn’t think
much about it.
Even though my tools are not designed for ‘commercial use’, they are
Items Covered This Month
•
•
•
•
The brush arcing investigation
Fluke 77 DMM repair
DAB radio screen repair
A ‘simple’ SMPS repair
*Dave Thompson runs PC Anytime
in Christchurch, NZ.
Website: www.pcanytime.co.nz
Email: dave<at>pcanytime.co.nz
Past mistakes
come back to haunt me
I then recalled dropping this sander
siliconchip.com.au
Australia’s electronics magazine
December 2020 61
very well made, and rightly or wrongly, I’ve used most of my power tools
in that role over the years. I am now
starting to think that the fall mentioned
above might have something to do with
the current state of affairs.
So anyway, I powered it down and
made a quick visual inspection of the
tool exterior. The problem is that there
is not much to see from the outside. The
sanding plate at the bottom seemed free
enough to move, but something was really stressing the motor out, and I could
see the commutator and brushes arcing like mad through the small plastic
cooling vents/grilles on the side.
The case around the motor also got
unusually warm after just a minute’s
use – a classic sign that something is
not right.
As I don’t have an X-ray machine,
the only way to find out for sure what
was going on was to open the sander
up and take a good look at its guts.
Fortunately, there were none of
those terrible security fasteners in
sight; however, the PK screws holding the two halves together were embedded very deeply down moulded
plastic channels.
To gain access, I needed a very
long-reach and thin-shanked number 2 Philips screwdriver, which in a
way is a security feature in itself. Not
62
Silicon Chip
many people have such a long-reach
driver available, but as I do (several in
fact!), it was just a matter of removing
the screws and separating the case.
Tools not made to be serviced
This is where things started going
a bit wrong. The two sections of the
case didn’t want to ‘let go’. They parted
ways by about a centimetre, but would
go no further. I couldn’t see what was
holding it up either, as there is a lot
crammed in there, and due to the narrow gap and limited viewing angle, not
much was visible.
Australia’s electronics magazine
I reluctantly used a pry tool to try to
coerce them apart gently. I don’t usually like using tools to separate cases;
in my perfect world, they should just
come apart when all the fasteners are
removed. But in this case (hah), it was
fighting me all the way, and I had to use
quite a lot of mustard to lever it apart.
Eventually, the upper part of the
case came away, and I could see everything inside. The first thing I noticed was several bits of what looked
like one of those Airfix plastic model
kits after the parts had been snipped
out of it.
Also, I found a coil spring lying
in the bottom of the case. I was a bit
puzzled at first, but it didn’t take me
long to figure out from whence the
bits came.
At the top end of the motor, near
the commutator, is a rectangular grid
made from injection-moulded plastic.
This shaped part includes the brush
housing, and this whole assembly is
aligned and located into a corresponding moulded void in each half of the
case by a small plastic tongue. This
is designed to keep the motor assembly properly centred and the brushes
aligned with it.
These tongues had broken away on
both sides, leaving each of the pieces
half-stuck in their slots in the case.
siliconchip.com.au
Marvellous! This alone pretty much
ruined the tool, as without the motor assembly correctly aligned, it just
wasn’t going to work correctly.
Then that familiar serviceman’s
muck-up sinking feeling set in as I
realised I’d done this damage while
prying the case apart. Now I had to
scramble to find a solution that would
get this almost-new tool back up and
running.
While potentially show-stopping,
this damage didn’t explain why the
sander laboured in the first place, so I
likely had two problems to solve. Excellent! As if I don’t have enough to
do anyway….
Getting on with the job
One of the bits lying in the bottom
half of the cover was a small plastic
pillar, about 1.2cm long and 3mm in
diameter. It was smooth on one end
and had obviously snapped off on
the other.
Looking at the remains of the plastic
latticework brush housing assembly,
I could see another similar but intact
pillar holding one of the coil springs
used for maintaining brush tension. I
could also see where this pillar had
broken off the other side of the brush
housing, assisted by the tension of
the spring.
That must have happened in the
original fall, and without spring tension keeping that brush in good contact with the commutator, the motor
would run erratically, if at all.
At least I’d discovered a possible
reason for the initial running-rough
problem; the good news is that I still
had the plastic pillar, the brush coil
spring and the various broken pieces
of the brush plate assembly. This might
be salvageable after all!
Pondering plastic permutations
The problem with plastics is that not
all can be successfully glued together;
at least, with the glues I have on hand.
Some plastics are too oily, some overly
porous and some just too weak once
they have been broken from their original, moulded shape.
The grids of this brush housing
frame measure about 3mm across for
the most part, while the plate itself is
about 1.5mm thick; why they didn’t
make the whole assembly from one
solid piece of moulded plastic is a
mystery.
The saving of perhaps one gram of
siliconchip.com.au
weight and a cent or two in production costs would make no engineering
sense, except perhaps if it were made
this way for airflow/cooling purposes.
My guess is that like most manufacturers, they wanted to minimise parts
cost, maximise profits and build in
some obsolescence along the way. By
making the internal components so
fragile they cannot withstand a drop
from standard working height to a
floor, or even survive the separation
of the case for maintenance, then it
makes some sense.
I suppose this is also what separates
the home/DIY tools from their hardier
(and usually much more expensive)
commercial cousins.
But no amount of theorising would
solve my problems. To get this back
up and running, I’d have to repair that
broken spring holder and the frame it
all mounts to.
If I had a 3D printer, I could probably
sketch it out and print one up, but as I
don’t know anything about 3D printing, I have no idea whether a piece I
could print at home would be strong
enough for the job anyway.
I’m no expert, but as dad owned an
injection moulding machine for many
years, I got familiar with some of the
more commonly-used plastics. By the
look of it, this was some flavour of
glass-filled Nylon.
As is typical, there were no markings or part numbers on it, and I
couldn’t locate a service manual for
the sander either, so I had to guess.
In my experience, this stuff usually glues OK with the likes of a good
epoxy resin, and as that’s what I had
in my glue drawer, that’s what I chose
to use. (When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail, and
all that.)
First, I had to disassemble the remains of the brush holder assembly
from the commutator. That meant
pulling the bearing off as well, and
of course, it was pressed (and likely
glued) on very tightly to the armature.
It always amazes me how a small job
can snowball into something requiring
a workshop full of specialised tooling!
Fortunately, I’ve been collecting
tools for years, so I had what I needed; using an arbour press and various
vices and mandrels, I first cracked the
glue and then slowly eased the bearing from the shaft without any damage
to the armature. If I didn’t have those
tools, I’d likely be throwing this sander
Australia’s electronics magazine
December 2020 63
in the bin and writing off the purchase
price of a new one.
If anyone needs an excuse to buy
more tools, look no further! Feel free to
clip out that last paragraph and bring
it with you next time you walk out of
a hardware store with several hundred
dollars in tools you hadn’t planned on
purchasing.
Anyway, once the brush assembly
was free, I pieced it all back together
on the bench, CSI: Christchurch style.
I only had seven bits to assemble, so it
wasn’t exactly rocket surgery, and fortunately, they had all snapped cleanly
and fit back together quite nicely.
Once I was happy with it, I put a few
strips of two-inch (~50mm) masking
tape down on my flat melamine workbench and mixed up a swag of longcure epoxy resin (the quicker-setting
epoxies aren’t as strong). After painting the ends of each piece with glue,
I press-fitted it all together.
I held it all as tightly as I could with
more masking tape, leaving the gaps
clear, and then filled those gaps with
what was left of the resin. I left it for
two days before attempting to get it
off the bench. By then, it was as set as
it was going to get, so I removed the
tape from the top, then carefully lifted the now-almost-solid brush housing off along with the masking-tape
foundation.
It came off relatively easily and was
dead flat. After removing any remnants
of tape, I prepared it for reassembly.
One problem left to solve
Except, I still had a broken brushspring pillar. The sander wasn’t going
to work without that being resolved.
The problem I had was that no amount
of glue (that I had or could fit in the
limited space) was going to be able to
hold that spring pillar in place.
I could try gluing it, but my experience told me that as soon as I tensioned
the coil spring, the pillar would just pop
off. I might be able to get it stuck onto
the plate strongly enough with a decentsized blob of glue, but this would foul
the operation of the spring, so I needed
something more robust but which still
allowed the spring to do its job.
I ended up drilling a 2mm hole
through the brush plate, precisely in
the centre of where the pillar used
to stand, and literally bolted in what
looked like an old tape machine capstan screw from my parts box. The
shaft height and diameter of the ‘screw’
64
Silicon Chip
was almost the same as the broken
plastic one, and there was enough
thread protruding underneath to fit a
decent nut and washer.
There is nothing directly below
that part of the plate anyway, so I had
plenty of room. I put the brush into
the holder and slipped the spring onto
the screw first before mounting it, and
a dab of Loctite on the threads before
tightening the nut up should ensure it
doesn’t move in a hurry.
I pondered whether I should do the
same thing to the other pillar as well,
but I’d tempted the servicing Gods well
enough already.
The first acid test was to reassemble
the tool and hope everything fit into
the case with the ‘mods’ I’d made. It
was a bit finicky putting the brush
plate back onto the armature and refitting the bearing with it in place, and
I was very careful not to put any stress
on anything lest it all come crashing
down.
It went together OK, though. I used
an old trick (which no doubt everybody else uses too) to keep the brushes out of the way while I installed
the commutator/armature assembly. I
pulled the brushes out of their holders
about halfway past the springs, then
used the tension of the springs to hold
them open while I slipped the commutator between them.
Once in place, it’s then a simple matter of prodding the brushes inwards a
little until the springs snap back behind them.
With all that now in one piece, it
was time to re-fit it back into one half
of the case. This is where it could all
come unglued (ha ha!). I was reasonably sure the brush plate would fit,
because it was glued back together
flat, but you never know until you try.
I also knew that if I pushed the now
re-glued locating tongues into position, I might not get a second chance at
repositioning them. After a bit of give
and take, I managed to get the assembly sitting flat into the case. Halfway
there! Making sure everything was in
the right place, I got the top half of
the case and gently positioned it until I was reasonably sure it was in the
right place.
The next move would make or break
the repair. After lining it up, I gradually
applied pressure and finagled everything into place; the cable clamp boot,
the wiring pushed into the channels,
and the case perfectly aligned to the
Australia’s electronics magazine
bottom half. With a final push, it all
went together.
I installed the screws, held my breath
and plugged it in. It powered up and
with a bit of arcing (I’d probably put
the brushes back in the wrong holders), it worked a treat. After an hour’s
work, it is sanding as well as it ever
did. Phew! The job was done!
Editor’s note: power tools with brushless motors are becoming more common and are now available at reasonable prices. Besides avoiding this sort of
problem (you can’t have a brush spring
detach if you don’t have brushes!),
they also seem to have better power,
less noise and more battery life than
their brushed counterparts. I am impressed, and recommend you take a
look next time you are tool shopping.
Fluke 77 digital multimeter repair
J. R. of Tauranga, New Zealand, had
to use a fair bit of creativity for this
repair, as the replacement parts he
needed were not available. We think
his solution is ingenious...
I’ve had a Series I Fluke 77 DMM
since the early 1980s. It has given
me excellent service over countless
hours. Unfortunately, I managed to
connect it across a 2kV supply, and it
was no more.
Buy another? Flukes are very expensive, and I can probably no longer
justify a new one. Throw it out and replace it with a cheap clone? Perhaps
the best option, but nostalgia has its
place even in the minds of dispassionate, ruthless engineers. So I thought I
would see if I could fix it.
Fluke multimeters have input protection which many times prevents
expensive damage when oopses like
this happen. 80-series meters employ
the same concept as the 70-series, as
do some of the 20-series.
The current circuits are properly
fused, and the volt/ohm ranges are
protected by a combination of series
fusible resistors and either a pair of
high voltage MOVs or, on early models, a spark gap which arcs over at
around 1500V.
In either case, the resulting highbut-limited current blows the fusible
resistor and open-circuits the input
before anything else happens. Mine
has the spark gaps.
Indeed, that is what had happened.
Spark gap E1 had been destroyed, and
resistor R1 was split along its length
and measured open-circuit.
siliconchip.com.au
I had repaired another Fluke 77 multimeter with the same fault around
2013, and at the time, the special resistor and spark gap together cost NZ
$69.00 from Fluke. So I while expected
the fix would be worthwhile, I knew
it wouldn’t be cheap.
I quickly found out that the genuine
resistor from the Fluke NZ repair agent
would be over NZ $60 by itself, but
the spark gaps were no longer available. A Google search confirmed this
is a well-known problem, with lots of
people asking where to get them and
none showing up anywhere, even on
eBay. It seems like when you blow up
the protection, you now have to throw
away the meter!
I then thought about converting the
input circuit to use the two MOVs that
the later models use instead. However, I found from Fluke that the MOVs
were NZ $55 each, so without any labour cost, a repair would be nearly
NZ $200 once freight and packaging
were added. Anyway, I couldn’t fit the
MOVs without butchering the PCB.
Even third-party MOVs on eBay ostensibly meeting the Fluke specification were also scarce and expensive.
It is essential to use the correct fusible resistor for R1, because it limits
the energy in a fault and then opens,
so preventing real damage and perhaps even injury. Any old 2W resistor looks pretty much like the real
thing, and I found quite a few sellers
on eBay offering “Fluke R1 resistors”
or “fusible resistors for Fluke” for a
few dollars each.
But on close examination, none of
the resistors being offered seemed to
be anything but ordinary 2W metalfilm resistors which the sellers could
have been buying for a few cents. The
manufacturers do not state the fusing characteristics of most resistors
at all, and they are typically designed
for 300V whereas the correct resistor
has a short-time withstand of 1000V.
Before giving up, I had one last look
on Google and ran across a chap who
repaired meters, and who seemed
pretty authoritative. While he had no
solution for the spark gaps or MOVs,
he had done the homework and found
that at the time of posting (2015), one
type of resistor was still being made by
TT/IR which was fusible and had the
right short-term voltage rating.
He stated that it had been used by
Fluke in the past, although they had superseded it with an upgraded version,
siliconchip.com.au
An old Series I Fluke 77 DMM from
the 1980s.
The destroyed spark gap E1 and opencircuit resistor R1 adjacent.
The input protection section of
the Fluke multimeter circuit.
Australia’s electronics magazine
December 2020 65
New rectangular spark gaps were made using copper wire and polyester resin.
The spark gaps removed from the
moulds.
A hobby mill was used to cut the
0.008in slits for the spark gaps.
A new resistor was fitted for R1 and
the spark gap placed as well.
The spark gaps were tested with a high-potential (hi-pot) insulation tester.
They were consistent and arced between 1550-1650V.
66
Silicon Chip
Australia’s electronics magazine
he could not locate it from third parties. I found the manufacturer’s specs
and confirmed what he said. Even better, I found they were still available in
2020 from Mouser.
So I had a source of safe resistors
but no MOVs or spark gaps.
The Fluke 77 has two spark gaps, but
only one was damaged. I had a close
look at the clean one and found the
air gap to be just under 0.2mm (actually 0.007 inches, ie, 7 mils). I found a
website which had a credible relationship between air gap length and strike
voltage for small air gaps (and no it’s
not 30kV/cm!) and tried a few sums.
A gap of 0.007in predicted a voltage
just a little under the 1500V specified
by Fluke, so given things lined up, it
looked as if there was probably nothing magic about the gap, meaning it
might be worth trying to make one.
I could buy a 0.008in (0.2mm) slitting saw. Using the website formula,
I found that the arc voltage wasn’t
very sensitive to the gap; the predicted voltage for a 0.008in gap was a bit
over 1500V. So I ordered a saw and
the Mouser resistors, which are TT/
IR SPH1001J 1kW 2W wirewound fusible types.
I made the gaps out of copper wire
and polyester (fibreglass) resin that
I had in the shed. The new gaps are
rectangular: 8mm wide, 4.5mm thick
and 10mm high and more-or-less fit
into the space occupied by the original oval commercial ones.
I machined a few simple mould
shapes into a polyethylene chopping
board. I thought the resin would release easily from that plastic, but I
sprayed the holes with Teflon garage
door dry lubricant to make sure. I used
Blu-tack to hold the wires in the right
place and poured in the resin.
Once set, I removed them from the
moulds (easy) and eventually got rid
of the Blu-tack (hard). I won’t use Blutack for this sort of job again.
I then put them into the little hobby
mill and cut the 0.008in slits. I found
the gaps were a bit bigger than 0.008in
– they were actually around 0.009in.
This was probably due to run-out on
the saw arbour, or the saw itself. But
the web formula indicated they would
still meet the spec.
I then tested them with a hi-pot insulation tester. They were pretty consistent, arcing at between 1550V and
1650V. The hi-pot has current limiting,
which I set to 20µA, so the gaps were
siliconchip.com.au
not damaged or altered by the test.
Since Fluke’s specification for the
original spark gaps is 1500V ±20%
(1200-1800V), the home-made ones
are satisfactory. I tested the remaining
good original spark gap, and it arced
over at 1500V.
I then fitted a new resistor for R1 and
one of the home-brew spark gaps and
reassembled the meter. When compared with an HP bench voltmeter,
the Fluke 77 is as good as ever. No, I
don’t propose to deliberately test the
over-voltage failure mode!
All in, the exercise cost me about
$70 NZ, of which FedEx got a fair
chunk for shipping $5 worth of resistors from Mouser. The repair (apart
from my labour) was therefore economic; nostalgia has its place it seems.
I now have nine spare resistors and six
extra spark gaps, a mould plate and a
slitting saw in case I do it again to my
meter or come across someone else
who needs the same fix.
Radio LCD screen repair
G. McD., of Jindalee, Qld had some
spare time over the Christmas break
and decided to spend some of it repairing the faulty LCD screen on his
wife’s radio. Here is what happened…
My wife bought herself a brand new
DGTECH BC76183 DAB/FM digital
radio soon after digital radio became
available to listeners in the Brisbane
metropolitan area. It served her well
on a daily basis until the LCD screen
suddenly went blank.
The idea of binning it and purchasing another had crossed our minds. But
first, I decided to have a closer look at it
to see if I could repair the screen as she
was otherwise happy with the radio.
Before pulling it apart, I ran some
quick tests to try to narrow down the
likely cause of the fault. I switched on
the radio and sure enough, the sounds
of ABC Jazz came through as impressively as it did when the radio was
new. Then I reached for my torch and
shone it directly at the screen. As if
by magic, I could once again read the
name of the station as well as details
of the tune being broadcast.
This indicated to me that there was
nothing wrong with the LCD screen
itself or the wiring connecting it to
the PCB. The fault lay with the LCD
backlighting.
It was now time to explore the innards of the radio. After turning it off
and unplugging the mains lead, I unsiliconchip.com.au
did two screws on the back cover as
well as the two marked screws hidden
beneath rubber pads on the underside
of the enclosure. The back cover could
then be carefully prised open, after
gently pushing the earphone socket
clear with a small screwdriver.
This exposed the inside of the radio,
but the rear cover remained connected
to the main body by the speaker wires.
I unplugged this and three other wire
harnesses from their sockets, allowing the two halves of the enclosure to
be separated.
I now had access to the PCB on
which the LCD screen was mounted.
But as is usually the case, I couldn’t
get to it as the screen was on the underside of the board; I would need to
remove the PCB.
The PCB was held in place by four
white plastic retaining clips which
needed to be swung clear. Next, two
of those that were marked needed to
be unscrewed as they provided additional stability to the pushbutton arrangement. Then four screws on each
corner of the PCB were removed and
set aside.
After pulling off the volume control
knob, the PCB came clear and turning it upside-down exposed the LCD
screen. I unclipped the white plastic
cover that butted up to the right-hand
side of the screen; this housed the LED
that I suspected to be the problem. To
verify this, I reconnected the four wire
harnesses, plugged the power cord
into the mains supply and turned the
radio on.
Once again, the radio came alive but
the screen remained defiantly blank. I
turned on my DMM, which had been
set to read 20V DC, and probed the
two leads of the unlit LED; I obtained
a reading of 2.65V.
Now that I had verified there was
voltage across the LED, I assumed that
the fault lay with the LED. Not having
a spare white LED in my spares storage,
I paid a quick visit to Jaycar and purchased the closest I could find to the
original, Cat ZD0192 for $1.65 each.
On arriving back at the workbench,
I discovered that the replacement
LED was longer than the original and
wouldn’t fit into the space provided (the original LED was flat-topped
and not domed as the one I had just
bought). This was verified after I had
removed the offending part, cleaned
up the two through-holes with solder
wick and tried the replacement for a fit.
Australia’s electronics magazine
So it was out with my trusty modeller’s knife, with which I began shaving away at the inside of the housing
until there was just enough space for
the replacement part to squeeze in. The
new LED was soldered into place, the
leads trimmed and the lid of the housing clipped back into place.
All that was left for me to do then
was to reassemble the radio, taking
care not to crimp any of the wire looms
during fitting, and run a “smoke test”.
To my delight, the screen lit up immediately upon switching on, with
everything operating as it should. My
wife can now look forward to many
happy years of service from this excellent radio.
A ‘simple’ SMPS repair
R. S. of Fig Tree Pocket, Qld, has a lot
of experience repairing switchmode
power supplies. This turned out to be
one of his simpler repairs, although not
necessarily the easiest to diagnose...
I had a problem with a Bosch 30V
0.5A battery charging plugpack for a
cordless vacuum cleaner. It stopped
producing any output, so the vacuum
cleaner battery was not charging.
This charger uses an On Bright Electronics OB2358 IC in an 8-pin DIL
package. This IC has an inbuilt 600V
FET, which connects directly to the
primary of the flyback transformer.
The OB2358 was not starting up, and
therefore not generating its own supply voltage, via an extra winding on
the flyback transformer.
For some reason, there is a surfacemount zener diode on the board from
the feedback pin 3 of the OB2358 to
ground pin 8. This was leaking enough
current to hold pin 3 low and prevent
the circuit working.
Removing the zener diode got the
plug pack working again. I cannot see
any reason for the zener diode; it is
not shown in the typical application
circuit in the IC data sheet.
Editor’s note: probably to protect the
IC from damage if the feedback mechanism stops working for some reason
or the output is externally pulled high.
Luckily, this plugpack can be split
open without damage. Usually, they
are glued together so well that the case
breaks when you try to open them.
One other note: the feedback circuit
on the low voltage side uses a 6-pin
surface mount IC marked OD=28X instead of a TL431. Can anyone identify
this part?
SC
December 2020 67
|