This is only a preview of the June 2021 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 37 of the 112 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Advanced GPS Computer - Part 1":
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Recreating Arcade Pong":
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "PIC Programming Helper":
Items relevant to "Programmable Hybrid Lab Supply with WiFi – Part 2":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
Vintage Radio
1940
1940 RME
RME model
model 69
69 communications
communications
receiver
By Fred Lever
receiver
This communications receiver was designed in the mid-1930s. It appears
to have been updated by the manufacturer to keep up with competing
products. It’s a hefty bit of kit, packed with parts, with many functions
and some interesting quirks. One of these is a complete lack of labels
for the front panel controls! A matching tuned ‘pre-selector’ unit was
eventually acquired; it too required repair and restoration.
I was asked if I would like “an old
radio” as the owner, a senior gent,
wanted it to go to a good home. I am
up for just about anything, so I said yes
without even laying eyes on it. When I
finally got my hands on the set, I could
not get it home fast enough!
It was heavy (15kg), in a steel box
with a lift-up lid. The front panel had
two big dials and a bunch of knobs,
but there were no markings to indicate
which knob did what. The only text
was on a rear nameplate, advising that
this was a Model 69, serial A98 made
by Radio Manufacturing Engineers in
Peoria, Illinois, USA.
RME radio
Thus I was introduced to RME and
a type of receiver I have never had any
interest in before, a wideband commercial radio receiver with a pedigree and
high performance, at least for 1940. I
searched the web and found many references to the model and a history of
the company, including model numbers and employees.
At a later stage, I was delighted
to receive the matching DB-20 preselector unit. I believe these two items
were rack-mounted in a complete
‘ham’ setup, and are the only surviving pieces of what would have been
a comprehensive transmit/receive
installation.
The pre-selector also came with a
treasure trove of books, notes and personal papers belonging to the owner.
These items I have simply stored and
not investigated at this time.
The ‘restored’ RME69 receiver; sadly, the
front dials are still cracked.
98
Silicon Chip
Australia’s electronics magazine
I downloaded a comprehensive
operating manual from a website
called “Boat Anchor”. This helped me
to recognise what I had and figure out
what was original.
The handbook describes serial number A98 as a late production unit with
a “Lamb Silencer” in the front end. The
octal valve types and the history of the
company mean that it was manufactured around 1940. The original production radios had 6-pin valves and
no Silencer.
My first move was to survey every
part of the set and take photos. While
parts of it were undisturbed, other
parts had been replaced or looked like
they had been modified. After some
investigation, I elected not to try to
refurbish the set but just make it safe
to turn on and work in some fashion
on the AM 500-1800kHz band only.
I achieved that by replacing obviously faulty parts and removing some
strange modifications. I then carried
out what I confess to being a cosmetic
‘tart up’ on the set and the matching pre-selector, by cleaning them
and misting with a light coat of gloss
black, over the faded wrinkle finish.
The insides and chassis were cleaned,
masked off and a light coat of silver
misted over the rust and patina.
The accompanying photos show the
dusty old thing as I received it, then
in its cleaned-up state, as well as a
view of the underside of the chassis
post-cleaning.
Not having any markings on the
panel controls intrigued me. It seems
that RME never marked their model 69
siliconchip.com.au
front panels. The legend goes that the
builders reckoned that if you could not
figure out what knob did what, you did
not deserve to own the set! I am not
sure about that; I suspect more likely
they did not possess the equipment to
etch or engrave plates, and preferred
not to spend the money to buy it.
Circuit details
The inside of the receiver, as originally received, was full of dust and showed
some surface rust.
XTAL
6K7
6L7
6H6
SW5
T5
T1
(Lamb Silencer)
6J7
6B7
IF amp
42
audio output
T4
T3
6C6
1st det
6D6
RF amp
C23/34/35
6D6 oscillator
T2
L17/18
Cs
L11/12
L5/6
CH1
The set’s circuit diagram is shown
in Fig.1. It has a pretty conventional
superhet arrangement for the time,
with a 6D6 RF stage, a 6C6 mixer, two
6D6 IF stages, then a 6D7 as a combined detector, AGC and audio preamplifier and a type 42 based output
stage. One 6D6 forms a separate oscillator while another acts as a BFO. A
type 80 serves as the HT rectifier.
All of that should add up to a
high-performing design.
One great feature of the set design
is the careful sub-assembly of the tuning coils and wave change switch.
The wiring of the coils is effected
with heavy solid core leads in a very
rigid assembly, and with the rigid
cast chassis gives a stable platform for
the front end. The tuning gangs operate with low-geared reductions and
large, heavy knobs. This construction
ensures stability and repeatability.
I am not sure how far this set has been
modified from the original design. The
old lower-gain 6-pin valves in the RF
and mixer stage had at some point been
replaced with EF36 octal valves. These
are sharp cut-off types that would not
be so amenable to AGC control.
The set also sported the aforementioned optional “Lamb noise filter”
assembly with 6K7 and 6L7 octals in
place of the 6D6. These seem to be
factory modifications, perhaps in an
attempt to keep up with other manufacturers’ new designs at the time.
The two EF36 sharp cut-off audio
valves did not sit very well with me,
and the shield paint was flaking off,
so I replaced them with 6K7 octals.
These perform more similarly to the
originally fitted types.
Fixing the RME up
T1
siliconchip.com.au
80
rectifier
6D6
amp
SW1
Australia’s electronics magazine
My first job was to remove all the
existing mains wiring as it was not
safe, due to rotting rubber and cracked
insulation. I wired in a three-core cord
with a chassis gland. After testing the
insulation and Earth conductivity of
the mains side of the circuit, I powered it up with low-voltage AC and
June 2021 99
ramped up the voltage while monitoring the power consumption, HT and
heater voltages.
The power draw settled at 70W
with 250V DC HT. Nothing smoked or
caused concern, so the next job was get
the audio section to work.
The output transformer is a monster,
with only 4kW and 600W output taps.
I connected a 4kW:4W transformer to
this so that I could use a 4W speaker
for testing. I connected my audio signal generator to the cap of the 6B7 and
wound the level up until I could see
clipping on the output wave. At that
point, the output was a couple of watts.
I measured the stage voltages and
noted that the type 42 cathode bias
resistor had 20V across it, indicating
a 50mA tube current. That seemed a
bit high to me, so I checked the control grid and measured +12V. I found
the wax coupling capacitor to be leaky
(it measured 12MW). After replacing it
with a new one, the grid voltage was
then less than 0.1V, and the tube current dropped to about 34mA.
That had the effect of taking some
load off the type 80 rectifier, so the
main HT rose to 260V.
Poor performance
Fig.1: the circuit diagram for the RME-69 receiver. Values for resistors and
capacitors have been added. Note that there were some errors in the original
service manual, such as C18 missing (estimated at 100nF) and C15 is listed as
0.00025µµFd rather than 0.00025µFd (250pF).
100
Silicon Chip
Australia’s electronics magazine
At this stage, I hooked up an aerial
to the set, worked out which switch
position selected the AM broadcast
band (no panel markings!), and tuned
in very faintly station 2RPH that in my
locality (Toongabbie, Sydney) is usually overwhelming.
So the set was working in some way,
but producing less output than even a
crystal set! I then re-read the handbook
to work out what control did what, and
with a bit of fiddling, could receive a
few more stations at very low volume
and at odd places on the dial.
Even with low-gain tubes such as
the 6K7 in the tuner, with one RF and
two IF stages, the set should be highly
sensitive, and stations should pull in
from everywhere with a short aerial. I
checked the AGC feedback loop, and
the best voltage from the 6B7 diode
was about -5V, with a couple of volts
of 465kHz injected on the preceding
IF valve plate.
I measured the resistance from the
AGC line to ground and found it to be
low at 2MW, so I replaced all the time
constant capacitors. Out of the circuit,
they each measured about 10-20MW,
so replacing them did lift the AGC
voltage a bit.
siliconchip.com.au
The original mains wiring in the
receiver was unusable and unsafe, as
shown. It was replaced with threecore cord with a chassis gland.
The IF section
I then did another check of the plate,
screen and cathode voltages of each IF
stage. Measuring the gain from each
grid to plate made it plain that the IF
strip was low on gain.
I injected a 465kHz sinewave and
checked the peaking of each trimmer
in the IF cans. All six were off frequency a bit, but importantly, each had
a definite peak point with a drop-off
one-quarter of a turn each way. That
indicated to me that all the coils were
active and resonating, and most likely,
the low gain was a system problem and
not due to the coils.
What I found a bit odd was that
the IF strip had oodles of gain when
fed with the 465kHz signal, but the
set was a lame duck when I let the
oscillator control the frequencies. Then
the penny dropped. The broadcast band
oscillator frequency was way off, outside of the peak of the passband of the
IF coils. This was why the stations were
appearing at weird places on the dial.
A screw loose!
I manually forced the oscillator
valve to run at the correct frequency by
padding the tuning circuit with capacitance, and the set came alive with lots
of background noise and stations all
over the dial, in the correct order. That
led me to conclude that something
was badly adjusted or faulty with the
oscillator tuning.
I needed to check the padder and
trim components and after much
searching, realised that they were
fitted inside the broadcast coil can. It
was a heck of a job to get the can off,
but once exposed, I found the adjusting
screws on the calibration trimmers had
simply unwound from vibration. You
can see this clearly in the photo below.
Simply recalibrating the settings
made the receiver work in a lively
manner with gain, not loss, from the
IF stages. Therefore, those two loose
screws crippled the receiver on the AM
band! From the corrosion on the parts, I
think they had been that way for a long
while. Possibly, the receiver was not
used on the broadcast band in its ham
duty, so this fault was never found.
Now that the receiver was working
better, I turned my attention to some of
the other aspects of this set. My experience in radio to this point has been
Above: the underside of the RME chassis before any restoration work was done.
Right: the calibration trimmers inside the broadcast coil had their screws
unwind over time due to vibration.
siliconchip.com.au
Australia’s electronics magazine
June 2021 101
The circuit is balanced like a seesaw,
and if not set correctly or the wrong
currents flow, the meter can easily go
in reverse. The null control sets the
meter to zero with no signal. The presence of a signal causes the valves to
draw more current, so the meter reading goes up.
The set had some prominent
non-original parts fitted with strange
values. I replaced them with the original values, and the S meter then
worked sensibly.
The crystal filter
The carrier level indicator dial
(“S” meter) needed to be checked
for correct operation.
with AM broadcast band receivers, so
all the extra functions and knobs in a
commercial set like this were mysterious to me.
That “S” meter
The meter circuit bugged me as it
is not clear how it operates, and the
zero adjustment (null) control did not
do anything sensible. I was not sure if
the meter was working, so I decided to
pull it out and hook up to a bench test
circuit that mimicked the set circuit.
I found that the meter had an internal
impedance of 32W and needed about
1.5mA for full-scale deflection (FSD).
That seemed about right.
The meter is actually in a bridge circuit with ~1kW upper arms and 100kW
lower arms. The upper arms connect
to the HT, with one of them being
adjustable via the 500W zero-set pot.
One lower arm is a fixed 100kW resistor passing about 2.5mA, while the
other is formed by the current draw
of the AGC-controlled valves of about
3-15mA, being equivalent to a resistor
of about 20-100kW.
Without the filter, tuning on the
broadcast band is inherently very
sharp, and the set will separate Sydney stations 2CH (1170kHz) and 2RPH
(1224kHz) with ease. The set rides up
and down the different signal strengths
with AGC control (meter readings S9 to
S3), and despite the vast S-difference,
the audio output is level, and there is
no adjacent channel chatter.
The crystal (a BLILEY type CF1
465kHz, serial no. G20326) is supposed to resonate and provide a narrower pass filter at the intermediate
frequency, to sharpen the selectivity
for sorting out really close stations.
There are panel controls to vary the
insertion effect.
The problem was that with the crystal switched in, there was no real resonant point around the nominal frequency of 465kHz, and the IF response
was worsened.
I stripped the crystal, thoroughly
Fig.2: an IF pass response without the
Bliley crystal filter
The old carrier meter zero adjustment
is shown above with its replacement
circuit at right (200W potentiometer
R10).
102
Silicon Chip
Fig.3: the same IF pass with the
crystal filter switched in.
Australia’s electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
Fig.4: the “Lamb Silencer” section of the
circuit, also called the LS-1 noise suppressor.
cleaned and refitted it. This produced
a result where the crystal does ‘something’ to the response of the IF strip,
but I did not believe that it was working correctly. The IF pass response
with filter out is about 10kHz (Fig.2)
while with the filter switched in, the
response is about 5kHz (Fig.3).
What I expected to see was a mirror-image of the left side on the right,
with maybe 1kHz width, not a ringing
decay stretching the response out. The
filter circuit is certainly not a narrow
crystal resonance, but surely, this is
not the best it can do. I think the crystal may be too old to work properly, but
not having a replacement, I left it at that.
Silencer of the Lamb
So far, I had ignored the Lamb
Silencer section. I had disconnected the
The Bliley
465kHz
crystal filter
is shown
enlarged
for clarity,
with an
actual
size of 30
x 40mm.
Serial
number:
G20326.
siliconchip.com.au
IF feed to the control valve for all my
testing so far, but now that the set was
running, I decided to see what it did.
The circuit diagram of this Lamb
Silencer is shown in Fig.4. Upon reading a bit about this type of circuit, I
determined that it is a type of ‘impulse
blanker’. The Lamb patents are a treat
to read; my eyes glazed over by the end
of the second page.
Ignoring all the scientific gobbledygook, it seems to me that the filter
samples the IF 465kHz carrier, detects
bursts of interference such as from
vehicle ignition systems or lightning
and gates an IF pass valve off during
the interference burst.
In this version, the IF signal is sampled from IFT2 to the grid of the 6L7.
This 6L7 amplifies the IF signal in the
usual way using control grid G1, but
one of the other pentagrid inputs of
the 6L7 is used as a back-fed DC gating control. The sampled IF signal is
fed to a 6J7 wired as an amplifier, and
the output of the 6J7 is fed to a resonant IF transformer.
This is where the clever bit comes
in. The output of this transformer,
with the 465kHz removed, is rectified by a 6H6 diode to give a negative
gating voltage. Some smart time constants ensure that the gating voltage
is a derivative of the interference, and
persists long enough to gate the 6L7 off
during the interference burst.
This gating is timed so that a ‘hole’
is ‘poked’ in the main IF signal right
where the ‘pop’ was; therefore, you
do not hear it.
Upon testing it, I found that this
filter was simply not doing anything.
Fig.5: with the Lamb Silencer
switched out, spark interference is
visible in the output.
Fig.6: with the Silencer switched in
and threshold set, the interference
spikes go away.
Australia’s electronics magazine
June 2021 103
The DB-20 preselector had a very
worn filter choke
hanging off the
lower left of the
chassis. This choke,
the power supply
transformer and
the type 80 rectifier
valve were removed
and replaced with a
π filter.
With some signal tracing and testing,
I found leaky capacitors; resonant
IF transformer T1 needed peaking
at 465kHz; and worst of all, the 6H6
was dead.
Once that lot was fixed, the threshold control now suddenly cut the IF
response at too high a setting, so the
circuit was clearly active. I then rigged
up an “interference tester” involving a
magneto air spark gap next to the set,
to simulate automotive ignition interference, and was delighted to see Mr
Lamb’s patent theory vindicated. See
the sweeps without (Fig.5) and with
(Fig.6) the filter.
Pre-selector
The pre-selector looks like a baby
version of the main set, with similarly styled metalwork. It also has
a flip-top lid and many large parts
shoved into a small space. Its circuit
is shown in Fig.7. The range switch
and coils looked just like those in the
main receiver, but the circuit is a tuned
radio frequency (TRF) receiver with
manually adjustable gain.
The first thing I noted inside was a
huge filter choke held down by gravity!
I eased the chassis out of the case and
found that the choke was connected
with BB points through a bit of figure-8 wire. It seems that the original
had failed, and anything handy had
been pressed into service.
I again replaced all the mains wiring
and removed the substantial floating
choke. Next, I pulled the filter block
can off, thinking of either re-stuffing it or just replacing the new units
underneath.
The power supply transformer and
choke were big enough to run a small
village! All it has to do is run two valve
filaments at 0.6A, supply about 20mA
of HT plus the type 80 filament current.
I decided to ditch the choke altogether, wire in some silicon diodes in
place of the type 80 valve and mount
some appropriate filters and dropping
resistors on some tag strip. In place of
the choke, I put a 3.3kW 5W resistor
and a pair of 150µF 400V capacitors
in a π filter arrangement. I left a dud
type 80 bottle plugged in the rectifier
socket to fill the space.
Left: the original underside of the DB20 pre-selector. The DB-20 provides
continuous coverage from 550kHz to
32MHz in six bands, and has a gain
of ~20-25dB which is the basis for its
name. The DB-20 was also used by the
US Navy under the name CME-50063.
Below: a replacement switch for gain
control “A” on the front panel.
104
Silicon Chip
Australia’s electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
I ramped up the mains input voltage
to form the electros, and once I reached
typical mains voltages, the set drew
25W. The total HT draw is 30mA, and
this arrangement gave me 270V DC at
the HT feed point to the valves.
A quick check with RF signal
applied showed the TRF circuit amplifies the signal from the aerial and provides “pre-tuning”, to upgrade the
overall specifications of the receiver to
match the performance of later competing units.
The overall gain is in the order of
16 times at maximum setting, but the
unit was unstable, self-oscillating at
the tuned frequency. This turned out
to be a valve shielding problem, as
one of the valves was a glass EF39 fitted in place of a 6K7. The red metallic
shielding paint had flaked off. Swapping back in a 6K7 with a metal shield
fixed that.
I gave the cabinet and front panel
a mist of black paint, burnished the
knobs, cleaned the glass and put it
all back together. When stacked onto
the main receiver, I could hook the
two together via the receiver antenna
wires, and found they worked as a
Fig.7: the circuit diagram for the DB-20 pre-selector. It’s a pretty simple 3-valve companion unit for the RME-69. This
circuit has alternative versions around with most using two electrolytics to filter the power supply, while this one has
three. There is no parts list to confirm it, but the capacitor C6 should likely be around 10-12µF 450V as noted here.
siliconchip.com.au
Australia’s electronics magazine
June 2021 105
A Jaycar Cat. MM2007 transformer was rewound to act as the matching transformer for the speaker unit.
pair, giving four tuning controls to
play with!
Making a suitable speaker
One thing the set up did not have
was its own speaker box. I sorted
through my junk speakers, looking for
a sensitive unit around eight inches
(~20cm), and came across a Goodman
Hi-Fi mid-range driver from the 1960s
that had a very light movement.
The frame was rusted, and the rubber surround had perished with splits
and cracks, but the inner suspension
was sound and a test showed that it
played music.
I painted a couple of layers of my
favourite water-based latex over the
cracked outer ring of the speaker, left
that to dry and turned my attention
to sourcing a matching transformer.
I had an old Jaycar MM2007 240:30V
AC transformer from a junked power
supply. That gave me a primary winding capable of handling hundreds of
volts, and a secondary that I could
rewind to suit the speaker and radio.
Having rewound it, I restacked the
lamination with an air gap.
I masked the speaker up and found
a “copper” gold rattle can, so I gave
the speaker and the assembled transformer a dose of that. That covered
the rust and dirty bits nicely. I made a
small open-backed cabinet from scraps
of five-ply and bolted the speaker and
transformer into it.
I had some automotive rocker cover
“crackle” paint, so I applied three coats
of that over the ply, and that dried to
a matte wrinkle finish not far off the
RME radio wrinkle finish. A light coat
of gloss black on top put some shine on
it. Finally, I had a ‘matching’ speaker
for the set.
and close-enough capacitance values.
Editor’s note: these capacitors can
have age-related failures which damage other components, so ideally they
should be replaced anyway.
The wax dripping seems to be
related to the type of wax used. It has
a very low melting point, so in Australian summer temperatures, the wax
simply runs, forming stalactites. The
large carbon resistors seem very stable
and generally were within 10% of the
colour value.
The present state
As my first look at a commercial
communications receiver from the
1940s (although in a sense, this is
really a 30s design), I learned a lot
about communications valve circuits.
I also had the pleasure of preserving
a serious piece of gear that was made
over 80 years ago.
This article is a shortened version
of a series of vintage radio website
posts in six parts, replete with much
more tedious information and blowby-blow accounts of troubleshooting
and testing. These posts can be seen
at the following links:
siliconchip.com.au/link/ab5a
siliconchip.com.au/link/ab5b
siliconchip.com.au/link/ab5c
siliconchip.com.au/link/ab5d
siliconchip.com.au/link/ab5e
SC
siliconchip.com.au/link/ab5f
I removed the headphone socket
and moved the BFO on/off function to
that hole using a period switch. That
put that function adjacent to the BFO
pitch control.
A new power on/off switch is now
in the hole below that. Previously,
the mains switch had been part of the
audio “top cut” control that is located
within the BFO shield box. Crazy stuff!
The complete primary mains circuit
is now short, well-insulated, Earthed
and fused. It’s much safer than it was
when I got it.
The whole set-up is now operational,
and most parts of it work. I decided
not to replace any more parts and not
pursue repair any further. Many of
the capacitors left were dripping with
wax, but had no measurable leakage
Conclusion
Since the speaker was an optional
extra, one was made in lieu, with a
black cabinet to match.
106
Silicon Chip
Australia’s electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
The ‘restored’ underside of the chassis can be seen above, with the topside shown below. This receiver was manufactured
by RME at 306 First Avenue, Peoria, Illinois USA as stated on the label on the rear of the set. Around 1953, RME merged
with Electro-Voice who are still around today.
siliconchip.com.au
Australia’s electronics magazine
June 2021 107
|