This is only a preview of the March 2021 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 36 of the 112 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "High-Current Four Battery/Cell Balancer":
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Mini Isolated Serial Link":
Items relevant to "Battery Multi Logger - Part 2":
Items relevant to "Electronic Wind Chimes - Part 2":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
SILICON
SILIC
CHIP
www.siliconchip.com.au
Publisher/Editor
Nicholas Vinen
Technical Editor
John Clarke, B.E.(Elec.)
Technical Staff
Jim Rowe, B.A., B.Sc.
Bao Smith, B.Sc.
Tim Blythman, B.E., B.Sc.
Nicolas Hannekum, Dip. Elec. Tech.
Technical Contributor
Duraid Madina, B.Sc, M.Sc, PhD
Art Director & Production Manager
Ross Tester
Reader Services
Ann Morris
Advertising Enquiries
Glyn Smith
Phone (02) 9939 3295
Mobile 0431 792 293
glyn<at>siliconchip.com.au
Regular Contributors
Dave Thompson
David Maddison B.App.Sc. (Hons 1),
PhD, Grad.Dip.Entr.Innov.
Geoff Graham
Associate Professor Graham Parslow
Ian Batty
Cartoonist
Brendan Akhurst
Founding Editor (retired)
Leo Simpson, B.Bus., FAICD
Silicon Chip is published 12 times
a year by Silicon Chip Publications
Pty Ltd. ACN 626 922 870. ABN 20
880 526 923. All material is copyright ©. No part of this publication
may be reproduced without the written
consent of the publisher.
Subscription rates (12 issues):
$105.00 per year, post paid, in Australia.
For overseas rates, see our website or
email silicon<at>siliconchip.com.au
Recommended & maximum price only.
Editorial office:
Unit 1 (up ramp), 234 Harbord Rd,
Brookvale, NSW 2100.
Postal address: PO Box 139,
Collaroy Beach, NSW 2097.
Phone (02) 9939 3295.
E-mail: silicon<at>siliconchip.com.au
ISSN 1030-2662
Editorial Viewpoint
Older devices involved
creative engineering
While I am not particularly into ‘retro’ electronics
like vintage radios, vintage computers etc, I find some
of the articles on these topics quite interesting. You
can tell that the designers of these devices had to be
very clever to use the meagre resources available to
them to solve some quite tricky problems.
Take the four-part series of articles on Videotape
Recording starting in this issue (on page 44). Younger readers (say, those
under 30) probably don’t remember much about videotape.
I was young when the VHS/Beta ‘war’ was raging, and by the time I was
old enough to use a VCR, VHS had taken over. I remember the machines
being quite finicky, and they would sometimes go wrong (in the worst case,
‘eating’ a tape) for no apparent reason. But for the most part, they worked
quite well, albeit with video quality that I now consider awful.
Having read the articles mentioned above, I realise now how complicated
the loading systems were. With so many parts having to move in concert, in
a device produced at a relatively low cost, it’s no wonder they went wrong
sometimes! So my hat’s off to the engineers that designed those mechanisms;
it must have been a lot of effort to get them to work reliably.
Another thing that’s apparent in reading these articles is how much ‘outsidethe-box’ thinking went into developing the core technologies enabling video
recording, especially helical scan. It seems kind of obvious in retrospect,
but it took lots of smart people many years to develop a device which could
record an hour or two of video on a reasonably compact, easy-to-use and
low-cost cassette.
It was an incremental, evolutionary process too, as is so common with
technological advancements. There were several generations of video
recording between the first useful machines (Ampex quadruplex) and the
final ‘sorted’ generation of consumer machines, which I guess you could say
was hifi VHS.
Each generation made certain improvements, but often retaining
shortcomings that would be addressed in future. It helped that the later
semiconductor technology allowed more signal processing to be crammed
into smaller machines.
I guess my point is that you might enjoy those articles even if you’re
too young to remember the technology being described, and aren’t terribly
interested in the topics themselves. You might still learn something and enjoy
the journey of discovery.
I can make a similar comment about the article on Fetrons; they are
interesting because they give you a glimpse of the transitional period when
valves were being phased out in favour of transistors. Again, it took innovative
engineering to make transistors operate like valves.
Also, consider some of the techniques described in our Vintage Radio
columns like reflexing, combined mixers/oscillators and some of the design
choices in early transistor sets. Even if you aren’t really into radio, you can
appreciate the amount of work that went into getting the most performance
out of a few (then costly) active devices.
That’s the sort of engineering that I really appreciate, and I think the people
who came up with those ideas must have done a lot of brainstorming to reach
those ‘Eureka!’ moments.
Printing and Distribution:
Nicholas Vinen
24-26 Lilian Fowler Pl, Marrickville 2204
2
Silicon Chip
Australia’s electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
|