This is only a preview of the October 2021 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 47 of the 112 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Tele-com – an intercom using analog phones":
Items relevant to "Two- or Three-Way Stereo Active Crossover – Part 1":
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "SMD Test Tweezers":
Items relevant to "Touchscreen Digital Preamp with Tone Control – Part 2":
Articles in this series:
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
Vintage Radio
Reinartz
Reinartz “4-valve”
“4-valve” reaction
reaction radio
radio
By Fred Lever
I built this simple battery-powered AM radio set using the “Reinartz”
tuning principal and early 1930s to 1940s components (well, mostly; I
cheated in a couple of places). I did this for a few reasons. One is that it
was a learning exercise; I knew that it was possible to build a radio set
like this, but I didn’t fully understand all the details. Now I do. I also
succeeded in turning a load of old junk into a working radio!
R
einartz tuning is also known as
reaction tuning, and I was keen
to build a radio using this principle. I
wanted to build it such that it would
appear to be a radio designed and built
in the 30s. So I drew up the circuit
shown in Fig.1.
I initially toyed with the idea of
using battery triodes such as the type
30 or mains-powered tetrodes such as
type 24A. But I ended up using two
type 57 amplifier pentodes and a type
47 pentode output valve driving the
loudspeaker.
I could have used a type 80 rectifier but instead, I used a silicon bridge
rectifier hidden in a defunct 5V4. This
allowed me to wind the HT secondary
on the transformer as a single winding.
I also wound on 2.5V heater windings,
with centre taps for bias and grounding.
To get to this arrangement, I had
to do lots of prototyping different
circuits, fabricating of parts and
re-thinking and re-designing when my
tests failed. This article presents the
receiver in its finished state, with a
lot of the development detail left out.
Circuit details
Valve V1 is a type 57 pentode which
works as a three-grid stage, with tuning, feedback, gain control and AM
detection. Each grid of the type 57
has some level of DC bias or signal applied. The combination of the
tapped antenna coil and tuning capacitor selects the desired AM signal frequency and this signal is applied, via
a grid-leak resistor and capacitor, to
the control grid (top cap).
94
Silicon Chip
Australia’s electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
The amplified plate energy is fed
back through to the suppressor grid
(pin 4) in phase, via the coil connections and varied by the feedback varicap. This sharpens up the selectivity
of the tuned circuit with the best operating position just before oscillation.
The screen grid of the valve (pin 3)
has a variable DC bias applied, which
varies the valve amplification slope,
and this is the gain control.
All three controls interact to some
degree, so they must be adjusted to get
the best reception of the tuned station.
The valve also acts as a biased detector
with a resultant RF signal at the plate
(pin 2) including the audio modulation component.
The coil labelled “RFC” and the following R/C network attenuates the RF
component of the signal, leaving only
the audio component. How is that for
all-in-one circuit operation? And this
principle was understood in 1930!
Fig.1: this circuit was built around the principle of reaction (“Reinartz”) tuning
and designed to imitate a radio from the 1930s, as shown by the use of type 47
& 57 valves from that decade. However, there is an exception in the use of a
silicon bridge rectifier for V4 instead of an equivalent valve.
Valve V2
V2 acts as an audio voltage amplifier, as the signal level from V1 is
siliconchip.com.au
The chassis in its initial, very dirty state.
Australia’s electronics magazine
October 2021 95
fractions of a volt; not enough to drive
the output valve directly. The control
grid (top cap) of V2 is fed from the volume control potentiometer. The valve
is self-biased at the cathode (pin 5).
The suppressor grid (pin 4) is connected to the cathode, and the screen
grid (pin 3) is biased at a steady DC
level. Valve V2 thus raises the signal
level to a few volts at high impedance,
suitable for valve V3’s control grid.
Valve V3
V3 acts in combination with the output transformer to supply a low impedance drive signal to the loudspeaker, as
V2 cannot drive a low-impedance load.
Its output impedance is around 50kW,
so even with an impedance-matching
transformer, it just isn’t capable.
The signal from V2 is coupled to
the control grid of V3 (pin 3) via a
20nF capacitor. V3 acts as a voltage
amplifier, but as it operates at a much
higher current and from a higher voltage supply, it can drive the speaker
transformer primary, which has an
impedance of a few thousand ohms.
The transformer steps down the
voltage and also the impedance from
V3’s anode, transferring power to the
8W speaker coil. V3 is centre-biased by
a resistor in the filament ground lead.
This raises its cathode voltage to about
+17V, placing it on a linear portion of
its operating curve.
The filaments of V1-V3 are powered
from separate centre-tapped windings
on the mains transformer. For V1 and
V2, the tap is Earthed.
“Valve” V4
V4 is the silicon diode bridge rectifier which converts the 230V AC from
Two 1930s-vintage power transformers were cleaned and reassembled to act as
the power and output transformers.
the HT winding of the power transformer into about 325V DC to power
the anodes of V1-V3 via an RLC lowpass filter.
Valve V4 is a cheat, as the diodes are
soldered into the base, and the bottle
part is disconnected completely. Thus
the set looks like it has a rectifier valve,
but it has actually gone solid state!
The ~325V DC drops to around
290V after the π filter. You will note
a sacrificial 100W resistor in one of
the AC secondary leads. If the rectifier or one of the filters shorts, this
resistor will smoke and be the (cheap)
part that burns, if the fuse does not
blow first.
The power transformer
I had two circa-1930 transformers
in my junk box that looked like they
would work as the mains power and
audio output transformers. Both had
turns ratios of 50:1. I stripped one and
found the core size was 25 x 25mm
of some poor rusty grade of iron lamination.
I have previously used a value of
five turns per volt on one-inch silicon core, so I started with that level
of flux excitation. The power required
is about 30W (for 4W audio output!),
half of which is for the filaments and
half for HT.
The primary current would therefore be about 0.125A (30W ÷ 230V).
The wire selected has to carry that
current; I had some 0.32mm diameter (120mA-rated) wire handy, so I
decided to use that for both new primary and secondary HT. Naturally,
I added several layers of insulation
between the primary and secondary,
for safety’s sake, and also between
each winding.
If I had used a valve rectifier, I
would have had to add a 5V winding
and double the number of HT turns,
with a centre tap, because the valve
would only give me a half-bridge. The
transformer would then work the iron
harder and run hotter with the extra
10W load. So it was nice to leave the
rectifier heater winding out and simplify the HT secondary.
The 2.5V secondaries provide
the valve filament current. Two
are required, and both were made
using one layer of 1.2mm diameter
(2.3A-rated) wire.
Output transformer
Before stripping the second unit, I
felt it might do the audio job as it stood
A 5V4 valve envelope was used as a
dummy with 1N4004 diodes installed
in its base. This acted as V4 while
retaining a ‘vintage’ appearance.
96
Silicon Chip
Australia’s electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
with the 50:1 ratio and the wire sizes
used. For a 4W loudspeaker, this makes
the reflected load approximately 10kW
(4W x 502); a bit higher than V3’s rating of 7kW.
This was borne out by my testing.
I wired the transformer across a type
47 valve and loaded its secondary in
steps from 2W to 16W. The transformer
has an output response rising from 2W,
flattening off at 8W and remaining constant to 16W.
There was no real peak, indicating
that the valve is very ‘soft’ in its plate
resistance, and the surrounding losses
control the power delivered more than
the active device.
I found the frequency response to
be poor below 100Hz but reasonable
between 200Hz to 3kHz, then falling
off above 5kHz. I thought this was satisfactory, especially for the 1930s level
of performance I was after.
So I left the transformer as it was
and just dipped it in varnish to seal
it up, making it look like its power
transformer mate.
The cabinet was based on a two-door utility cabinet that had been left out in a
council clean-up. The top shelf would house the RF, tuning and detector sections
while the bottom would be for the power supply and audio valves.
While not winning any points for tidiness, this is the testing bench for the early stages of the radio. Given the high
voltages involved, we strongly advise our readers not to prototype valve radios like this.
siliconchip.com.au
Australia’s electronics magazine
October 2021 97
The cabinet
The chassis was made from an old computer case and holes were marked and
drilled for the various component locations.
Having settled on the major components and after proving that each circuit section would work using breadboard lash-ups, I turned my thoughts
to the cabinet.
I looked around the workshop for
some timber or a box of some sort, and
spied the perfect thing. It was a twodoor utility cabinet left over from a
council clean-up; just the ant’s pants
to house my radio, I thought, although
I realise that others may not share my
enthusiasm.
After measuring it, I concluded that
the top section had enough room to fit
the RF valve, tuning and detector circuits, with the power supply and audio
valves at the bottom. That way, on the
front panel, the three tuning controls
(tuning, reaction and gain) would be
up top with the volume knob, power
switch and pilot lamp below.
Making the chassis
I cut some metal from old computer
cases and mocked up the front panels
for both sections. That looked promising, so I made the front-end chassis by riveting the flat steel sheets
together in an “L” shape. The valve
socket is spaced off the bottom with a
square Perspex insulating sheet. The
tuning controls bolt onto the metal
front panel.
I used as many very old components
as I could, favouring parts that had
ceramic or Bakelite in them. I used a
six-wire connecting cord to join the
front-end and power supply sections.
This carries the filament and HT supplies, plus the audio feed.
The power supply has a deep chassis section, allowing most of the modern parts to be hidden out of view
underneath. The resistors and capacitors were fitted onto tag strips with
only the valves and transformers
showing on top.
The volume control, power switch
and a big lamp bolt onto the front
panel. The metal panels I took from
the computer case have stiffeners and
some important-looking vent holes, so
I arranged the parts around to make it
look like they were meant to be there.
Painting the chassis & cabinet
When the metal cutting was finished, I grabbed some spray cans and
experimented with getting some different textures on the metal. First I
degreased the metalwork, washed it
98
Silicon Chip
Australia’s electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
and dried it. I then sanded back the
front panels with 80 grit emery paper
so they were matte grey, with straight
scratches in a horizontal flow line, like
brushed aluminium.
I then sprayed on a thick coat of
black, and watched as it soaked into
the scratches and then dimpled up
with a mottled look. Next, I sprayed a
thick coat of gloss over the top to fix
the dimpling in position.
I also sprayed the back and top of
the chassis with a light coat of black,
followed with a misted spray of aluminium silver that “pooled” slightly
upon landing on the wet black, mimicking the old baked enamel “stove”
finish. I let that harden and sprayed
a couple of layers of clear coat over
to fix it. I left the underside of the
supply chassis in the basic light-grey
PC colour.
Next, I power sanded all the timber
cabinet surfaces to get rid of the shine
and grease, then transitioned it from
white to brown.
As the first step, I gave it a coat of
black as a base, and when that was
tacky, added a coat of mission brown
all over. When that had hardened, I
filled in some of the inset panels and
beading with gold paint as a contrast,
then sealed the lot with coats of clear
gloss.
The top section of the radio encompasses the tuner arrangement.
Front panel appearance
I thought the front panels might
look good with screw-on nameplates
over the controls. In the old days, we
used to make labels from “Traffolyte”
black-on-white sheet and mark them
with an engraving machine.
I don’t have access to an engraving
machine or a Traffolyte supply, so I
The bottom section of the radio handles the power supply and audio.
Both chassis are shown here connected together for further testing. The chassis were de-greased, sanded and cleaned
before being painted with a finish similar to an old stove.
siliconchip.com.au
Australia’s electronics magazine
October 2021 99
The completed tuner arrangement
section of the radio mounted in the
cabinet. The tuning coil is a twoinch air-core solenoid winding
without ferrite. Originally this was
mounted vertically, but mounting it
parallel to the chassis helped reduce
interference. Many of the leads were
also replaced with stiff copper wire
to prevent de-tuning and varying
feedback levels.
►
The finished audio and power supply ►
section of the radio. The type 57 valve
(V2) also needed shielding to prevent
it coupling to the output valve and
transformer.
The front view of the finished radio chassis and cabinet. The front panel uses screw-on nameplates, which were made
using thick cardboard pieces sprayed with lacquer. A low-powered laser engraver along with some nice timber would
also work well if you have one.
100
Silicon Chip
Australia’s electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
uncontrolled instability. On close
inspection, I found that I had reversed
the ground and grid wire ends of the
main tuning coil – a simple goof. Thus,
the plate feedback winding was always
adjacent and uncontrollably coupled
to the control grid by leakage capacitance.
Reversing the tuning winding wires
swapped the feedback coil back to
the Earthy end of the tuning coil, and
allowed me to connect the feedback
wires minus the screaming. The coil
then worked, but with it standing vertical on the steel chassis, it performed
poorly compared to the prototype on
timber breadboard.
Flux fields
fudged it by printing up thick cardboard pieces, spraying them with lacquer and mounting them with 5/32in
screws.
Making the RF stages work
Once I’d finished assembling the RF
and audio stages, I powered them up
using bench supplies. Despite having
proven that individual circuit sections
worked earlier, I struck some interesting problems. This is where I learnt
more about 1930s radio design and
reaction circuits.
After a safety check for shorts, I powered the tuner section up, temporarily
hooked to an external audio amplifier.
The tuner screamed and made
blurting motorboat noises, and only
faintly allowed radio 2RPH through.
The feedback gang did nothing, and
the screen gain control only worked
like a switch, all or nothing! The tuning control only vaguely worked, and
the whole thing was worse than a dud
crystal set. Oh dear.
I disconnected the coil feedback
paths and ran it as a straight TRF detector, and found the coil then tuned in
stations over the broadcast band normally, but with low gain and poor
selectivity.
Whenever I tried to put a feedback wire back on the coil, I got
The tuning coil is just a plain 2-inch
air-core solenoid winding with no ferrite to concentrate the flux field. The
flux field is therefore a toroid coming
out of the winding ends and linking
end-to-end down the length of the solenoid. Nearby metal will interfere with
this flux field.
The solution was to mount the coil
with its axis parallel to the chassis,
high enough off the metal surface to
avoid any damping, as you can see in
my photo at upper left. Also, I found
that moving some of the leads de-tuned
the station or changed the feedback
level. I replaced those sensitive wire
runs with stiff tinned copper wire.
The whole thing then settled down
and became reliable, stable and
worked as in my prototype tests. Stations could be tuned in and lifted
clear of adjacent stations with appropriate settings of the gain and feedback controls.
Finishing the power supply
The underside view of the chassis that houses the power supply section.
siliconchip.com.au
Australia’s electronics magazine
In building this section, I wanted to
put all the parts onto tag strips, but I
did not fuss too much about using all
1930s components.
Some of the capacitors are brand
new but being out of sight, don’t
detract from the look of the chassis.
I fitted the clunky-looking old school
parts on the top where they could be
seen.
I wound the smoothing choke on a
15mm core with about 600 turns of the
same gauge wire as used on the power
transformer. The resulting choke measured about 2H and with the 40μF filter
caps, it’s good enough to remove most
of the hum. See the photo adjacent for
an underside view.
October 2021 101
Fig.2: the detector plate (V1) was fed
with a 915kHz sinewave, showing just
the carrier signal.
True to form, once I’d finished everything, plugged in the speaker and powered it up, there was more screaming
instability and wall-to-wall 50/100Hz
hum that was not there before!
The 50Hz and 100Hz components
were mainly due to the negative HT
and signal rails not being bonded to
chassis ground.
Another minor source of hum and
instability was not having the speaker
secondary grounded. With those problems cleared up, I was left with oscillation when the volume control was
turned up.
The reason was simple. There is no
way you can have an unshielded valve
like a type 57 adjacent to the output
valve and transformer and not get coupling through the air. Just placing a
hand between the two valves removed
the instability. I fitted a shield over the
type 57 valve, and that was all that
was needed.
The tabletop speaker
Fig.3: this carrier signal was then
modulated at 450Hz, but note this
isn’t a ‘typical’ modulated waveform,
as the valve is already affecting it.
I wanted something that looked
the part and once more, dipped into
the junk box looking for inspiration.
This speaker was made from a kitchen
colander, a monitor stand and a discarded car speaker driver (as shown
in the photo at upper right). I sprayed
it the same mission brown as the set,
and it plugs into the audio chassis via
a jack plug.
The result may make the purists
wince a bit, but I was quite pleased
with the finished product.
It works!
Fig.4: at the tuner’s output the choke
and stray capacitances have rolled off
the RF carrier to nearly zero.
To my joy, the whole radio then
worked as expected. With a 10m external aerial, at Springwood in the NSW
Blue Mountains, I could tune in all the
Sydney stations plus a hint of others
down in the hiss and crackle.
The feedback and gain controls
worked as before, varying the gain and
selectivity. With an output of only a
couple of watts, the speaker delivers
a comfortable listening level.
Detector wave shapes
Fig.5: the audio at the amplifier
valve’s plate (V2) before being sent to
the grid of V3.
102
Silicon Chip
I took some scope screen grabs of
the wave shapes around the detector.
They are a bit different from those of a
receiver with clear-cut RF stages with
separate diode detectors.
Feeding the detector with a 915kHz
sinewave gave the waveform shown
in Fig.2 at the detector plate. This
shows a carrier with some small,
Australia’s electronics magazine
The completed tabletop speaker. It
consists of a computer monitor stand,
colander, and an old car speaker. Like
the rest of the design, it’s a hodgepodge of parts.
unknown modulation at about 9kHz.
Perhaps this is a beat frequency from
an adjacent carrier, or some form of
low-frequency self-oscillation.
I then modulated the carrier at
450Hz and the plate signal, shown in
Fig.3, illustrates the valve ‘detecting’
the signal in its own way.
At the output point of the tuner, the
audio signal has most of the carrier
(and the odd 9kHz signal) removed by
the radio-frequency choke (RFC), acting as a low-pass filter (Fig.4). Valve
V2 then amplifies the audio, providing plenty of voltage for the grid of
V3 (Fig.5).
The whole story
For those interested, I’ve written
a series of articles with much more
detail on the design and construction
of this set. The complete saga has all
the gritty of design failures and goofups.
I’ve posted it on the “Vintage Radio”
website hosted by Brad Leet. You can
read all these details at the following links:
https://vintage-radio.com.au/
default.asp?f=12&th=30
https://vintage-radio.com.au/
default.asp?f=12&th=44
SC
siliconchip.com.au
|