This is only a preview of the August 2022 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 41 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Wide-Range Ohmmeter, Part 1":
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "isoundBar with Built-in Woofer":
Items relevant to "SPY-DER: a 3D-printed Robot":
Items relevant to "Secure Remote Mains Switch, Part 2":
Articles in this series:
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $11.50. |
SERVICEMAN’S LOG
Spy games and super-villain gadgets
Dave Thompson
It’s no secret that I like gadgets and I suspect many electronics enthusiasts
do too. In my case, the weirder the gadget, the better, and even more so if the
device is something I can make myself. However, some gadgets move beyond
weird and into worrying territory, and this time I had a chance to repair one.
As a kid, I was always fascinated with Maxwell Smart’s
shoe-phone. Not so much that it was a phone, but that it
was hidden in a shoe. Throughout the 80s and 90s, I used
a couple of space-age Ericofon Cobra phones with the dial
on the bottom as my home telephone as an homage to that
shoe phone. (I have three in my collection and they all
still work!)
The fascination extends to spy gadgets in the slightly less
silly spy movies: rotating number plates, oil slicks at the
push of a button, rockets mounted behind the headlights
and so on. Of course, all those things are faked, made for
the big (or small) screen, but they are no less cool, and they
sparked my lifelong interest in such things.
I get the same feeling when I see a wall safe concealed
behind a hinged picture frame, a secret door to a passage
behind the fireplace, or a bookcase operated by a hidden
lever.
A long time ago, I messed around making ‘bugs’, tiny
radio transmitters that broadcast to a transistor radio. Of
course, in the spy movies I grew up on, bugs are tiny little
things that can be stuck anywhere with the press of a finger and transmit several kilometres, even without a prominent antenna.
In reality, they need to be a little bigger and, even then,
can reach out only a few dozen meters, even if they are relatively sophisticated. Someone needed to be nearby with
a receiver to pick up the signal, which of course, was also
detectable by the bad/good guys with electronic bug sniffers. Spy games indeed!
Editor: for some fascinating related stories, see our articles on Cyber Espionage in the September & October 2019
issues at siliconchip.au/Series/337
As time went on, I made more advanced projects, though
I would still build any ‘bug’ that appeared in any of the
magazines of the era. Some worked OK, some very well,
but regardless of performance, I loved experimenting with
them. I never used them in any surveillance role, but they
gave me hours of fun. This is how I learned; by doing.
A little while ago, I wrote about an old-school night-vision
device a customer brought in (April 2022; siliconchip.au/
Article/15283). That device was featured in a late-1970s project magazine, and around the same time, another gadget was
advertised in those publications as a “pain field generator”.
At the time, I was very curious as to what this thing was
and how it worked but never looked into it any further. It
turned out that a friend of the guy with the night-vision
scope had purchased a short-form kit and plans for one
of these ‘generators’ years ago and, had tried to put it all
together, without much luck.
He contacted me after the night-vision thing worked out
and wondered if I would like to look into it for him, and
perhaps get it working. I sure would!
Pain in the wotsit
The plans he’d imported included a reproduction of
the original magazine project article featuring this device,
explaining how it worked and what to expect from it. It
turns out that this project (or one very similar) is also featured in one of those ‘Evil Genius’ project books that were
popular a few decades ago.
On the face of it, it seemed straightforward; it is essentially a high-frequency oscillator that could be manually
varied in frequency and modulation to produce some very
annoying high-level sounds that could potentially be damaging to humans and animals. I suppose this is the “pain”
they are alluding to in the blurb.
There are several iterations of the project, from a ‘pocket’
version up to one you could mount on a perimeter fence.
The main difference was the output power and the speaker
array used. The parts used in the project (or their modern
72
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
Items Covered This Month
•
•
•
•
Spy games and super-villain gadgets
An overloaded Onkyo receiver
Intermittent lights in a trailer tow bar
Fixing washing machine PCBs
Dave Thompson runs PC Anytime in Christchurch, NZ.
Website: www.pcanytime.co.nz
Email: dave<at>pcanytime.co.nz
Cartoonist – Louis Decrevel
Website: loueee.com
equivalents) are still widely available, and I saw no reason not to have a go.
However, I was initially a bit cautious because I didn’t
know these guys or what they would use something like
this for, and I was unsure of the legalities of even owning/
building something like it.
A bit of research on the topic showed that something
very similar in theory – though much more powerful – is
already in-use at a military level by the USA and shipping
companies (against pirates, among other possible uses).
The Israeli Army developed another version for use in the
Middle East.
Called LRAD, or Long-Range Acoustical Device, they consist of a large, focused speaker array that can emit sounds
at very high levels to make the ‘listener’ very uncomfortable, theoretically without doing any permanent damage.
Another similar ‘civilian’ unit is marketed and used
worldwide to prevent groups of young people from congregating around shopping malls or other areas where loitering kids could potentially cause problems. Older people
cannot usually hear the high-frequency sound these devices
emit and are mostly unaffected, but it is apparently quite
uncomfortable to younger ears.
Of course, the kids soon learned that by wearing earpods
or headphones, they could easily defeat the system. Even
so, these devices are apparently still deployed in many
countries for this very purpose.
I suppose it would be like anything else – a stereo system
can be used as a sound weapon (ask annoyed neighbours!),
so it matters what something will ultimately be used for as
to whether it is deemed dangerous or not. I asked the customer, and he said that for him, it was only about curiosity and experimentation – much like my own motivations
for wanting to make one.
Perfidious perfboard
With that dealt with, I looked at what he’d done already.
And the answer was “not much”. The ‘kit’ came with some
of that older-style perfboard prevalent in the days before
DIY PCBs. The project required component leads to be put
through holes and then routed underneath and soldered
together to create pseudo ‘tracks’, creating a facsimile of a
hand-wired printed circuit board.
This construction method is fine when done correctly –
however, this one wasn’t; it was a bit of a mess. I thought
it best to salvage what components I could and replace
those I couldn’t.
siliconchip.com.au
Australia's electronics magazine
August 2022 73
happened. Cranking the pots and toggling the sweep switch
did nothing.
No pain, no gain
For example, the project used a couple of 555 timer ICs,
and I couldn’t easily extract them from the rats’ nest. It
would take way more effort (and potentially do more damage) to try to remove them, so instead, I reached into my
parts box for a couple of new ones.
I recovered an IRF540 Mosfet, a custom-wound transformer/choke and a couple of other inductors; the rest I
just replaced with new components.
I used Veroboard for this build. I know it isn’t very popular among some out there, but for something like this, it
is (relatively) cheap and easy to work with. The voltages
and currents involved are well within the limitations of a
construction method like this.
I have used the excellent open-source VeeCAD software
(veecad.com) in the past for complex layouts on Veroboard,
but this would be a reasonably straightforward build, so I
just ‘winged it’. If push came to shove, I could easily redo
it using the CAD program.
Almost all the components mount on one board, with
two Motorola piezo tweeters mounted externally in a
suitable enclosure. Those tweeters have off-board inductors mounted directly on their terminals. Two pots are
mounted into whatever case is used and these, along
with a modulation setting and a power switch, are the
only controls.
The first 555 in the circuit is configured as a free-running
oscillator with variable frequency control. In contrast, the
second 555 is configured to produce a sweep voltage that
modulates the output of the first oscillator. This sweep is
controlled by the second pot and can be switched in and out.
The output is fed to a Mosfet and then on to the LC network of the tweeter array. The whole thing actually reminds
me of the Barking Dog Blaster project from the September
2012 issue of Silicon Chip (siliconchip.au/Article/529); that
is far more advanced, but the output section is very similar.
I also made one of those ‘blasters’ back in the day and,
with it, successfully ‘trained’ a dog a few doors down. It
learned that if it barks constantly, some uncomfortable
sounds would come its way!
I assembled the project and fired it up on the bench. I
powered it using a benchtop power supply (it runs from
9-12V DC) and flicked the power switch on. Nothing
74
Silicon Chip
Now, it could be that I am so deaf after years of racing
model aircraft and playing in bands that I just couldn’t
hear it. Still, as I also didn’t experience any of the disorientation, dizziness or headaches they claimed in the
promotional material, I was pretty sure it wasn’t working. Time to dig a bit deeper.
The first thing I did was check my layout and make sure
I’d cut all the tracks that needed cutting, ensuring I hadn’t
cut any that didn’t! Tracing through the circuit diagram and
comparing it to my layout, it all looked fine to me.
The next easiest thing to check was the Mosfet. The
IRF530/IRF540 used in the project needs a heatsink fitted, but even though I hadn’t added one yet, the component wasn’t getting warm. I didn’t bother checking it; I
have many types with similar specs in my parts bins that
would work in this circuit (N-Channel, 100V 30A 100W in
TO-220). I found a suitable alternative and soldered it in.
The only other thing was the choke, which the customer wound himself. I know from my own experience
of winding transformers and inductors that they can be
tricky things to get right. Since the bobbin and E-cores
the guy used came as part of the kit, I knew they were at
least the correct types.
As it has only 50 turns of “#24 magnet wire” on the
bobbin (24 gauge, or 0.51mm diameter enamelled copper wire), it was easy enough to strip it off and rewind it
myself using nice new wire. Fortunately, using one of the
winding jigs I’ve made up over the years made this a simple, though laborious, task.
One anomaly I did spot redoing this choke was that
the original plans called for three six-thou (0.006-inch or
0.15mm) shims to be placed between the two E cores. No
such shims fell out when I pulled the cores apart, so I created some from plastic and tacked them to the prongs of
one of the cores with superglue before putting it together.
According to the component description, it should measure 1.5mH (millihenries), and my Peak LCR meter tested
it as 1.71mH, which was close enough for me. After taping
everything up, I scraped the enamel from the two flying
leads and soldered it back into the board.
After another quick check-over, I powered it on once
again. This time I could hear noise from the tweeters. It
almost sounded like white or pink noise until I started
messing around with the frequency and modulation controls; then, all hell broke loose!
This thing was loud!
I powered it off, closed the workshop doors and put a
pair of earmuffs on. I also buried the tweeters under a couple of folded-up drop-cloths.
I tried it again and ran it at a reasonable level, noting the
current draw and onboard temperatures.
It was almost unbearable at the audible (for me) end
of the range. At the upper end, all I could hear was that
slight hiss, but I could feel a kind of pressure in my skull,
a very odd and uncomfortable sensation. This sound pressure level is still likely to cause hearing damage if I was
exposed to it for long enough, even though I couldn’t hear
the actual output.
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
The Mosfet was now starting to get warm, and as I
knew the unit was going to work, I powered it off and
set about prepping to mount it in a case of some sort.
As I was fixing a heatsink to the Mosfet, there was
a knock on the workshop door; it was our nearest
neighbour wondering if our alarm was going crazy. I
apologised and assured him everything was fine and that
it was just a project I was working on. I also apologised in
advance, explaining I would have to test this thing again
once I’d built it into an enclosure.
I told him I would try to keep any noise to a minimum
(if that was really possible)!
I found a plastic Jiffy box that would accommodate the
circuit board, though it would require the usual drilling
and chopping around to fit all the stuff into it, and I’d still
have to find some way to mount the tweeters.
Looking around my workshop, my eye settled on an old
set of computer speakers under the bench. These were reasonably large, with timber backs and sides and a moulded
plastic front. I reckoned the whole shebang would fit into
one of them, and the pots and switches could poke out of
the back side – this way, they could be manipulated with
the speakers pointing the other way!
There was plenty of room, and all I’d need to do was
remove the plastic front (held on by four screws) and the
old drivers with it, and replace it with one made from Thinline MDF. The tweeter holes were easy enough to mark out
and cut in the timber, and with a quick sand and a spray
with matte black paint, it looked like a bought one.
I used the original mounting holes to fix the tweeter array
to the rest of the cabinet.
The project was designed to be portable and run on
batteries; the customer was not keen on this and asked if
it could be mains-powered; he’d only be playing with it
around his home anyway. I dug out a 12V 1A ‘wall wart’
type power supply from my bins and simply added a socket
to the back of the unit to match the plug on the supply.
That should be ample.
The finished device looked pretty good. I once again
packed bunched-up material in front of the tweeters, put
on earmuffs and switched it on. And again, I was greeted
with a lot of noise, and after playing around with the
controls found I could get some hugely annoying sounds
out of it.
I could see it would be very disorientating if someone
were suddenly exposed to it. With earmuffs off, it was literally unbearable to be around, with even my teeth feeling as if they were vibrating when the sweep was set just
right. Nasty!
The guy was very happy with it and looked forward to
his ‘experiments’. I don’t think his neighbours will be that
happy, though!
I almost feel sorry for the real-life pirates at the receiving
end of the ‘big daddy’ LRAD devices. Almost. Those guys
are not quite as affable as Jack Sparrow, and the AK-47s
they carry are a bit more menacing than a single-shot flintlock pistol...
An overloaded Onkyo receiver
R. S., of Fig Tree Pocket, Qld repairs a wide variety of
devices. This time it’s an old Onkyo TX-SR506 7.1 AV
Receiver which would have cost a pretty penny new.
Here’s what he found...
The Onkyo receiver would not switch on, indicating an overload. It has seven amplifiers, and one of
them had shorted output transistors. Q6053 and Q6063
(visible in this section of the circuit diagram overleaf) had
failed short-circuit.
Replacing the output transistors with new ones, protected by 100W 5W resistors in the collector circuits (to
siliconchip.com.au
Australia's electronics magazine
August 2022 75
NAAF-941
U01 AMPLIFIER PC BOARD
R6093
0.22
(1/4W)
Q6013
-0.6V
P6083
ID+
ID-
R6103
0.22(3W)
Q6063
LIST
R6173
VPRO
47K R6183
Q6043
2SA1930
-1.1V
33K
R6163
SPSL
D6013 220K
C6043 +47/50
IDLING
CHECK
Q6073
2SC2240
C6053
103J
R6143
22K
VOLH
D6003 47K
D6003, 6013 : KDS4148U
R5193
10 (1/4W)
-52.5V
A close-up of the power amplifier section of the Onkyo
TX-SR506
receiver
circuit.
Q6004, 6014
: 2SC1740S-S
R5184
SR
IPRO
Q6053
LIST
R6193
Q6033
2SC5171
R6083
0.22
(1/4W)
Q6003
+
C5053
47/50
R6043
2K
-0.4V
3.3K
22K
R5133
C5093
101K
Q5043
2SC2229-Y
R5173
LIST
+52.5V
R6153
12K
470
-0.3V
+0.6V
R6073
LIST
R5203
+1.0V
3.9K 5.6K
R6013 R6003 R6033
Q5033
2SA949Y
R5163
LIST
2.2
(1/4W)
IDLING
ADJ.
C5113
+
22/100
Q5053
LIST
R5063
R5073 1.2K
100K
C5023
+
10/50
R5103
D5003
MTZJ5.6B
-51.5V
R5233
120K
R6023
+1.1V
R5033
120K
C5083
040D
C5103
+
22/100
Q5013
R5053
4.7K
-46.5V
10 (1/4W)
C5043
+
220/25
-0.65V
470
56K
330
NC
R5083
R5043
0V
2.2K
R5013
R5023
221K
C5003
1K
R5113
Q5003
Q5003, 5013 : 2SC2240
R5003 C5013
47/50
1K
+
+50.5V
100K
R5093
Surround Left ch
+51.5V
+52.5V
R6026
0
+1.1V
R6164
33K
R6165
33K
D6015 220K
R6195
Q6005
+
C5055
47/50
Q6015
siliconchip.com.au
Q6006, 6016 : 2SC1740S-S
36
Y
R5166
LIST
1K
10 (1/4W)
D6014 220K
C6054
103J
C6055
103J
R6194
R6154
12K
C6044 +47/50
C6045 +47/50
R6155
12K
R6074
LIST
Q6014
R6075
LIST
Q6004
+
C5054
47/50
470
3.9K 5.6K
3.3K
470
22K
22K
R6015 R6005 R6035
R6055
C5095
101K
Q5045
2SC2229-Y
R5175
LIST
3.9K 5.6K
R5204
R5134
22K
22K
R6054
R5205
R5135
C5094
101K
C5085
040D
Q5035
2SA949Y
R5165
LIST
R5174
LIST
Q5044
2SC2229-Y
C5114
+
22/100
470
C5105
+
22/100
C5045
+
220/25
C5115
+
22/100
470
3.3K
R6014 R6004 R6034
Q5034
2SA949Y
R5164
LIST
C5044
+
220/25
Q5054
LIST
Q5015
R5186
+51.5V
R5116
Sorround Back
NC
R5085
R5065
R5075 1.2K
Q5055
LIST
56K
2.2K
NC
R5084
R5064
R5074 1.2K
R5115
R5015
R5045
Q5005
100K
R5095
1K
100K
C5024
+
10/50
R5104
D5004
MTZJ5.6B
D5005
MTZJ5.6B
C5025
+
10/50
R5105
100K
Australia's electronics magazine
Silicon Chip
SBR
C5084
040D
Q5014
Q5004
R5014
56K
2.2K
R5044
C5004
221K
SBL
76
C5104
+
22/100
1K
100K
R5094
R5114
R6024
(1/4W)
the supplies), did not work. The output of the 10
amplifier
cosmetic
panelling
of the boot. This picks up the various
2.2 (1/4W)
Q6034
+1.1V
Sorround
Right
ch
2SC5171
went to the positive rail immediately. The driver transis- signals (brakes, turn
indicators, taillights and soIPRO
on) and
R6084
Q6054
tors, Q6033 and Q6043, were also +50.5V
shorted, as was the Vbe drives
the trailer lights
putting any load on the
0.22without
+1.0V
LIST
(1/4W)
multiplier Q6013, and 100W resistor R6073 (between the car’s internal
electronics. Otherwise, the
trailer connec+0.6V
Q6074
R6144
2SC2240
22K
driver
emitters)
was
burned
and
open-circuit.
I
replaced
tion
could
interfere
with,
say,
flasher
timing
or blown
Q5004, 5014 : 2SC2240
all of these.
globe
detectors.
R5034
IDLING
C5014
R5004PNP
The
transistorR5024
Q5033 controlling the driver120K
transis- -0.3VI took my car to the
trailer dealer and tow bar installaCHECK
47/50
1K
0V
SPSR
+
tors seemed OK, but 330
I have had trouble before with tran- tion experts, which involved
a round trip of about
200km.
P6084
R6104
-0.65V
R5234
sistors in this part of the circuit, as they can be leaky.
So After spending a day wandering
around shopping centres,
0.22(3W)
ID+
120K
R5054
IDI replaced it as well.
I returned to be shown
everything working correctly.
4.7K
IDLING
This time the amplifier worked, and the output centred
So I drove the hundred or so kilometres home and
ADJ.
R6094
close to 0V. Maybe what happened was that Q5033 leaked R6044
thought, this is pretty0.22
good; I’ll just have a look at the
(1/4W)
Q6064
2K
-0.6V
enough current to destroy
Q6013,
then
the
voltage
between
lights
before
putting
the
trailerLIST
away. Oh, dear! Some of
-46.5V
-0.4V
R6174
the bases of the driver transistors rose high enough to the lights didn’t work or were intermittent.
A phone
call
VPRO
47K the
destroy them, and the output transistors as well.
to the dealer later, we decided that
job had VOLH
to go back
R6184
The circuit is unusual as it has two Vbe multipliers, with to be fixed.
D6004 47K
Q6044
-1.1V
Q6013 in contact with driver Q6063 and Q6003 in contact
After a fair bit2SA1930
of fiddling with multimeters and test
D6004,
: KDS4148U
with the output transistor heatsink. I have not seen
lamps, the mechanic decided that
the 6014
electronic
control
R5194this
10 (1/4W)
-52.5V
-51.5V
before; perhaps it offers better quiescent current stability. unit must have a faulty ground (connection to the chasI recently discovered that the quiescent current set- sis). Rather than pull the boot lining out again, he decided
ting trimmer pot R6043
pin goes
run
a separate wire from the+52.5V
trailer plug to the vehicle
Q6005,to
6015
: 2SC1740S-S
+51.5V was faulty. The wiper R5185
open-circuit as the control is adjusted. This would
stop chassis. Lo and behold, everything worked again. Problem
10 (1/4W)
R6025
Q6035
+1.1V
Q6013 from working correctly and possibly destroy the
solved. Oh yeah!2SC5171
IPRO
Sorround
Back
2.2
R6085trip home, I decided to check the
output and driver transistors. This +50.5V
small, low-cost part has
After
the
100km
return
(1/4W)
Q6055
+1.0V
Left ch
0.22
(1/4W) why; ILIST
caused a lot of trouble.
lights again. I don’t know
guess IQ6075
didn’t have much
+0.6V
R6145
2SC2240
confidence in the system. Of course,
it
isn’t necessary to
22K
Intermittent
lights in trailer tow bar
Q5005, 5015 : 2SC2240
tell you what I found, is it?
R5035
IDLING
R.
G. B.,
of Ararat, Vic had that frustrating experience
that I had to fix it myself. Like the
120K
R5005
C5015
-0.3VThat’s when I decided
CHECK
47/50
R5025
1K
0V
of taking +something to the so-called experts,
and it still Serviceman, I found that the quality of the wiringSPSBL
was atroP6085
R5235
-0.65V you need to take
R6105
comes back broken. 330
Sometimes
these
cious.
I
have
a
license
to
test
and
tag,
so
I
did
have
some
120K
ID+
0.22(3W)
R5055
things into your own hands,
and
doing
so
saved
him
quite
idea
of
what
I
was
dealing
with.
It
was
very
difficult
to
get
ID4.7K
a bit of hassle...
at anything to check if the various circuits were intact, but
IDLING
R6095that all was well with the wiring.
I just finished reading the December 2021 Serviceman’s ADJ.
eventually, I determined
0.22
R6045
(1/4W)
story about his problems with trailer wiring (siliconchip. 2K The lights were sealed LEDs,Q6065
so that had to be taken on
LIST
-0.6V
-46.5V
au/Article/15141). Apparently,
the demon affecting trailer -0.4V
faith; they worked before, and R6175
it was unlikely they had
VPRO
wiring has international relatives. The Serviceman could suddenly failed.
47K R6185
VOLH
have been talking about the wiring on a new trailer I bought
So, I phoned the dealer again and47K
told them there was
D6005
Q6045
recently.
still a problem. For
some reason, I was now talking to an
2SA1930
-1.1V
When a tow bar is fitted to a modern vehicle, some older man whom I doubted was D6005,
a qualified
electrician or
6015 : KDS4148U
R5195
sort of electronic device
a mechanic. There was a bit of
silence on the other end,
10 (1/4W)the
-51.5V is installed, hidden behind
-52.5V
C5005
221K
P6902A
Q6003, 6013 : 2SC1740S-S
R5183
+51.5V
R6053
SL
WHITE
22K
902B
2.2
+52.5V
Q6036
2SC5171
IPRO
A selection of our
best selling soldering
irons and accessories at
great Jaycar value!
25W Soldering Iron TS1465 $14.95
Build, repair or service with our
Soldering Solutions.
We stock a GREAT RANGE of gas and electric soldering irons,
solder, service aids and workbench essentials.
ESD Safe Tweezer Set
TH1760 $19.95
Solder Flux
NS3070 $17.95
Precision Angled Cutters
TH1897 $19.95
1.5 to 3mm Desolder Braid
NS3026-NS3028 $5.95EA
0.71mm & 1mm Solder
NS3001-NS3096 FROM $2.95
240V Fume Extractor
TS1580 $74.95
PCB Holder with LED Magnifier
TH1987 $24.95
48W Soldering Station
TS1564 $119
160pc Heatshrink Pac
k
WH5524 $24.95
Shop at Jaycar for soldering essentials:
• Battery, gas and electric
soldering irons & stations
• Wide range of solder
• Desoldering braid & tools
Explore our great range of soldering gear, in stock on our
website, or at over 110 stores or 130 resellers nationwide.
• Soldering iron stands, cleaners
& PCB holders
• Heatshrink tubing
• Tools & service aids
jaycar.com.au/soldering
1800 022 888
As the PCB had been significantly damaged along with the relay, the new relay had to be connected point-to-point using
solder on the underside of the board, with the top of the board coated with epoxy resin.
then he came back on and said check the plug. By now, I
was nearly at the point of rudeness, but fortunately, I only
thought to myself, “of course I checked the wiring to the
plug, you fool”.
After mildly telling him I had done so, he said, “No,
check the plug itself”. When I looked at this device from a
mechanical viewpoint, it consisted of several brass holes
into which brass pins were inserted. The pins were slit
lengthwise, allowing them to make a springy contact with
the holes. Inserting a screwdriver into each pin and spreading the contacts slightly fixed the problem.
I still check the lights each time I use the trailer, but so
far, this simple repair has lasted over two years.
Fixing washing machine PCBs
N. B., of Taylors Lakes, Vic runs a laundry repair business, so he sees a lot of broken washing machines. Here
are some repairs he’s undertaken lately...
The first one is an obvious fault, but at first glance, it
looks like a write-off. There was a giant scorch mark and
significant damage to the PCB around the relay pin that
connects to the mains-potential “FS1” spade lug.
Replacing the relay and repairing the board was the challenge. The relay switched mains to a high-current resistive
heating element to maintain the desired wash temperature.
So the repair insulation had to be good, and the resistance
had to be low.
After removing the relay, I cleaned the soot off the damaged area on both the top and bottom sides of the board
Servicing Stories Wanted
Do you have any good servicing stories that you would like
to share in The Serviceman column in SILICON CHIP? If so,
why not send those stories in to us? It doesn’t matter what
the story is about as long as it’s in some way related to the
electronics or electrical industries, to computers or even to
cars and similar.
We pay for all contributions published but please note that
your material must be original. Send your contribution by
email to: editor<at>siliconchip.com.au
Please be sure to include your full name and address details.
78
Silicon Chip
using an old toothbrush and PCB cleaning spray. I had to
ventilate the room well while doing this.
After I scraped through and removed the charred area, I
filled the hole left with epoxy resin from both sides. When
it was set, I marked and re-drilled the hole. Then I soldered
in a new relay. The hole I had drilled was large enough
to feed a crimp pin through it and onto the relay pin and
flow solder through to the relay pin.
I had enough clearance between the pin and the PCB,
so there would be no problems with arc-over (especially
as it’s a non-inductive load). I soldered two strands from
a 2mm2 mains cable between the spade connector and
the extended pin of the relay, snipping off the excess pin
length. A quick insulation test between the spade terminals told me the job would be reliable.
After testing it under load, I sprayed plumber’s clear rubber pipe sealant on both sides to seal the deal.
On another similar PCB, I had a problem with the door
sense circuit not recognising that the door was closed. The
circuit for this is a simple series circuit comprising a mains
source, a dropping resistor, a 1000V 1A diode, an optocoupler and the return Neutral.
The diode tested open-circuit between the diode side of
the resistor and the opto-coupler input pin. Still, it seemed
OK when I tested the diode directly in both directions. I
removed the surface-mount diode, and there was the remnant of the solder mask under one of the pads (the coating
applied to PCBs to prevent solder from sticking in unwanted
areas and forming solder bridges).
I removed the coating and re-soldered the diode, and it
tested OK. I then found that the opto-coupler internal LED
was shorted, so I had to replace that too.
I’ve also come across PCBs with breakdowns in high
voltage areas, where white streaks can be observed running between components. This is high-voltage arcing in
the intermediate layers of the board. The cure is to drill a
hole wider than the arcing track but, of course, not through
any internal or external traces on the PCB unless you bridge
them out by another path. The sides of the hole and the
edges of the PCB can then be sealed with lacquer.
Moisture ingress into the PCB can cause this and can
also affect layer capacitance, affecting the performance of
tracks carrying high-speed digital signals.
SC
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
|