This is only a preview of the June 2023 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 38 of the 112 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Basic RF Signal Generator":
Items relevant to "Loudspeaker Testing Jig":
Items relevant to "WiFi Time Source for GPS Clocks":
Items relevant to "Wideband Fuel Mixture Display, Pt3":
Items relevant to "Servicing Vibrators, Pt1":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $11.50. |
Dr David Maddison describes
S
TARLINK
WARM
TA
SHIELD
R
Global Wireless Internet from SpaceX
Starlink, owned by SpaceX, provides affordable
satellite internet anywhere in the world. Remote
connectivity for Internet of Things (IoT) devices
located just about anywhere can also be via
Starlink or another subsidiary, Swarm, while
Starshield is aimed at government users.
M
ost people in developed or even
developing countries can now
receive mobile, wireless internet data
via their smartphones or other devices
when near a city or town, or along a
major transport route. Internet connectivity outside such areas via satellite
tends to be expensive and slow.
Starlink is owned by SpaceX and
enables regular users to (relatively)
affordably get satellite internet anywhere in the world, no matter whether
they be at sea on a yacht or ship, on
an aircraft, in Antarctica, in a mobile
home, a remote area, or on an outback
expedition.
Low latency
Apart from relative affordability,
Starlink aims to have low latency,
ie, keeping the round trip time for a
packet of internet data as low as possible.
A finite amount of time is required
for a radio wave to travel between
transmitter and receiver at the speed
of light (about 3 × 108m/s). There are
also delays due to signal processing
and internet switching time.
The realistic round-trip time for
a geostationary satellite orbiting at
35,786km is around 600ms or more
when including switching overhead,
which is excessive for two-way live
audio or video, gaming or other interactive applications.
Starlink achieves low latency by
having satellites in low Earth orbit
of about 550km, giving a latency of
about 20ms, comparable with wired
networks. However, because the satellites are orbiting at such a low altitude, a very large number are required
to give global coverage.
Another stated objective of Starlink
is to provide internet connectivity in
developing countries, some of which
have little wired or wireless phone or
internet infrastructure. According to
the UN, about 57% of the world’s population lacks internet access.
SpaceX
Image source from SpaceX (CC BY-NC 2.0):
www.flickr.com/photos/spacex/49422067976/in/photostream/
14
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
SpaceX, or Space Exploration Technologies Corp, is largely owned by the
Elon Musk Trust (47.4% equity, 78.3%
voting control). SpaceX builds the
Starlink, Swarm and Starshield satellites and their delivery systems, such
as the Falcon 9 rocket. As of December 2022, Starlink had one million
customers, including in Australia and
New Zealand.
siliconchip.com.au
Satellite constellation & orbit
A satellite constellation is a group of
satellites working together as an integrated system. A well-known example
is the GPS satellite constellation. Starlink, Swarm and Starshield all form
satellite constellations too.
Due to the low latency requirement
of Starlink, the satellites need to be in
low Earth orbit. Because of this, the
visibility of an individual satellite to
any given area on Earth is quite limited. Therefore, a large number of satellites are required for complete Earth
coverage.
Fig.1 shows the comparative Earth
coverage for three common satellite
orbital altitudes: geosynchronous orbit
(GEO), medium Earth orbit (MEO) and
low Earth orbit (LEO). Starlink satellites will be placed in LEO. Fig.2 and
Table 1 show further orbital characteristics for GEO, MEO and LEO.
GEO
MEO
LEO
Fig.1: a representation of three common orbit types and comparative ground
coverage areas: geosynchronous orbit (GEO), medium Earth orbit (MEO) and
low Earth orbit (LEO).
Land surface visible
to a satellite
We can calculate the amount of the
Earth’s surface visible to a satellite
at a certain altitude as follows. If the
altitude above the Earth’s surface is d
and the radius of the Earth is R (nominally 6378km at the equator), then
the fraction of the surface visible to
the satellite is given by the formula
f = d ÷ 2 × (R + d).
We use this formula to calculate the
areas visible to a satellite for various
orbits in Table 1.
For practical reasons, a satellite will
not be visible all the way to the horizon due to mountains, trees etc. Also,
the signal will be degraded by extensive travel through the atmosphere. So
in practice, a certain elevation angle
is defined below which no attempt is
made to communicate with the satellite from an Earth station, as illustrated in Fig.3.
The red disc shows the absolute
horizon, while the yellow one represents the minimum coverage at the
designed elevation angle, which is
smaller than the horizon. Therefore,
the coverage a satellite can achieve
is less than we calculated with the
above formula.
Starlink orbital altitude
As with any large satellite program, there will be several different
versions of satellites. For Starlink,
there are presently V1, V1.5 (Figs.4
& 5), V2 and V2 mini satellites. So
siliconchip.com.au
Fig.2: a not-to-scale representation of features of several orbital altitudes. RTT
is the round-trip time for a radio signal. The Van Allen radiation belts are best
avoided. The radius listed is from the centre of the Earth, while the height is
from the surface of the Earth. Source: https://w.wiki/6H8X
Table 1 – Characteristics of various satellite orbits
Geosynchronous
orbit (GEO)
Medium Earth
orbit (MEO)
Low Earth orbit
(LEO)
2000-35,786km
(20,500km typical)
160-2000km
(500km typical)
GPS (20,180km)
Starlink (550km)
Latency at 600ms
typical altitude
(round trip)
400ms
20ms
Proportion of 42.4%
Earth’s surface
visible
38.1%
4.0%
10-15; more for
redundancy
At least 32, but in
practice, hundreds
Slow; each
satellite is visible
for 1-3 hours
Fast; each satellite
is visible for 5-15
minutes
Fewer satellites
than LEO, lower
latency than GEO;
smaller antenna
systems; better
signal strength
above 72° latitude
Low latency,
low signal loss,
low power
Earth stations,
potentially lower
cost due to mass
production
Altitude 35,790km typical
Examples GOES, Inmarsat,
Intelsat
Min. number Three; four for
of satellites some overlap.
for full Earth
coverage
Antenna No tracking
tracking speed needed
required
Advantages Few satellites
required, no
tracking, no
handover, always
connected, simple
management, no
complicated orbits
Australia's electronics magazine
June 2023 15
Table 1 – Characteristics of various satellite orbits (continued)
Geosynchronous
orbit (GEO)
Disadvantages Weak signals, poor
coverage above
72° latitude, high
latency
Typical >15 years
satellite life
Network Low
complexity
Medium Earth
orbit (MEO)
Low Earth orbit
(LEO)
Antenna tracking
required, satellite
handover needed,
more satellites
than GEO, more
exposure to Van
Allen Belt radiation
than GEO or LEO
Small service area,
antenna tracking
needed, frequent
satellite handover,
large Doppler
shifts, short
orbital life due to
atmospheric drag
10-15 years
3-7 years
Medium
High
far, only V1 and V1.5 satellites have
been launched; V1.5 satellites are still
being launched.
Starlink V1 satellites are inserted
into various ‘shells’ in orbits of altitudes between 540km and 570km,
shown in Table 2. A satellite orbital
shell is a series of satellites sharing the
same circular orbit at a certain altitude.
Satellite deployment timeline
SpaceX is constantly launching
Starlink satellites, but the following
satellites have been launched at the
time of writing. They launched two
“Tintin” test satellites in 2018. In 2019,
a further series of 60 V0.9 ‘production
design’ satellites were launched.
SpaceX launched operational
v1.0 satellites from November 2019
through to May 2021. Usually, 60 were
launched at a time (some launches had
fewer), over 29 launches, for a total of
1675. Of those, around 183 are no longer working.
Starlink V1.5 satellites started to be
launched in June 2021 through to at
least January 2023. There have been
40 launches of V1.5 satellites, each
launch carrying up to 54 satellites, for
a total of 1881 so far, of which 52 are
no longer operational.
For a complete, up-to-date list of
Starlink satellite data, see https://
planet4589.org/space/con/star/stats.
html
There were also four Starshield V1.5
launches on the 13th of January 2022
and another four on the 19th of June
2022, for unknown US government
agencies.
Coverage area
With the first orbital shell at 53.0°,
Starlink initially provided coverage to
areas below about 55° latitude, which
covers a vast majority of the world’s
population. Later launches at other
orbital inclinations covered higher
latitudes.
The 53.2° shell extended the number of customers covered in the mid
and low latitudes. The 70.0° shell
expanded coverage to Alaska and
northern Europe (and presumably
equivalent latitudes in the southern
hemisphere). These earlier Starlink
launches were in ‘equatorial orbits’,
so they did not cover polar regions –
see Fig.6.
Four launches of 46 satellites each
for the 97.6° shell occurred in July
and August 2022, adding coverage for
polar regions. This includes Antarctica
plus areas of northern Alaska, northern
Canada, Finland, Norway and Sweden
not previously covered.
High-level Starlink
architecture
Starlink consists of three main components: satellites, ground stations
Fig.3: satellite visibility at zero
elevation (red) and designed elevation
(yellow), showing the difference
between the theoretical and actual
coverage. Original source: www.
frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/
frcmn.2021.643095/full
and user terminals. The ground stations are the connection to the terrestrial internet and can also act as a
means for Starlink satellites to communicate with each other.
The number of ground stations
needed is minimised by later (V1.5+)
satellites that can communicate with
each other via inter-satellite laser
links. When a user connects to a satellite via their user terminal, the satellite either relays the signal directly
to a Starlink ground station connected
to the internet, or to another Starlink
satellite via laser and then onto a
ground station.
This inter-satellite relay is necessary for users at higher latitudes where
the satellites have access to few or no
ground stations.
Laser communication
between satellites
V1.5 satellites can communicate
with each other via inter-satellite laser
links. This reduces latency, as a signal
travelling via laser will travel about
30-40% faster than between switching
equipment on the ground connected
via coaxial cable or optical fibre.
Also, due to the shorter distance
between satellites compared to cables
on the ground or undersea, overall
latency is reduced by up to 50%.
Laser connections between satellites
are necessary for the Starlink satellites
Table 2 – orbital shells and numbers of Starlink V1 and V1.5 satellites (4408 in total)
Inclination
16
Orbital altitude
Orbital planes
Eventual satellites/plane
Total satellites
Shell 1 53.0°
550km
72
22
1584
Shell 2 70.0°
570km
36
20
720
Shell 3 97.6°
560km
6 (polar)
58
348
Shell 4 53.2°
540km
72
22
1584
Shell 5 97.6°
560km
4 (polar)
43
172
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
Laser comms.
All
All
siliconchip.com.au
Fig.4: an artist’s
concept of a
Starlink V1
satellite. Source:
https://w.wiki/6H8Y
in polar orbit, as they won’t have
access to many or any ground stations.
Geographic availability
of Starlink
Starlink can be used everywhere
on the surface of the Earth; however,
under International Telecommunication Union (ITU) regulations and international treaties, each country and its
telecommunications regulators must
grant rights to use satellite communications such as Starlink. This means
that Starlink has to set up operations
in each country in which it does business.
Australia and New Zealand provided rapid regulatory approval for
Starlink in April 2021, the 6th and
5th countries to do so after the USA,
Canada, the UK and Germany. Fig.7
shows Starlink availability by country.
Starlink equipment is programmed
only to work at or near your residential address if on a residential plan, or
other areas on an RV plan.
Fig.5: a rendering
of Starlink V1.5
(left) and V1
(right) satellites.
V2.0 satellites
have five times as
much surface area
for Earth-facing
antennas and
are much more
capable. Source:
www.teslarati.com/
spacex-elon-musknext-gen-starlinksatellite-details/
Number of satellites in orbit
To appreciate the enormousness of
the Starlink project, it is important
to consider the number of satellites
already in orbit.
According to the United Nations
Office for Outer Space Affairs
(UNOOSA) searchable index at www.
unoosa.org/oosa/osoindex/search-ng.
jspx, as of 3rd January 2023, 14281
objects had been launched into space
since Sputnik 1 in 1957. Of those, 8734
are classified as still ‘in orbit’ although
not necessarily functional.
Of the 8734 objects classified as ‘in
orbit’, 3568 were labelled Starlink and
5166 were not. This means that nearly
41% of orbiting objects are associated
with Starlink. Still, that number will
increase dramatically as the entire
constellation is rolled out. So, in a few
years, a large majority of all artificial
satellites could be part of Starlink!
According to a web page that keeps
a tally of Starlink satellites at https://
planet4589.org/space/con/star/stats.
html, as of 20th January 2023, 3389
Starlink satellites are currently operational.
Fig.6: the incomplete global coverage provided by earlier Starlink satellite
launches in equatorial orbits (left) compared to the complete global coverage
after later launches into polar orbit (right).
Starlink satellite features
Some features of the Starlink satellites not already mentioned include:
• a flat design for easier and higher
density packing into Falcon 9 rockets
• a star tracker for guidance
siliconchip.com.au
Fig.7: the availability of Starlink services. Green means approved and activated,
blue means activated and grey is unknown. Source: https://w.wiki/6H8Z
Australia's electronics magazine
June 2023 17
• each satellite has four phased-
array antennas and two parabolic
antennas (see www.starlink.com/
technology).
The current lineup of Starlink
ground station antennas for users is
shown in Fig.8.
Aviation antennas
An aviation application for Starlink
with an aerospace-certified antenna,
shown in Fig.9, is to be released in
2023. Link speeds will be 350Mbps
with no data volume restrictions and
latency as low as 20ms.
While internet connectivity is
already available in some aircraft, it
is slow and can be expensive. Starlink
will enable high-bandwidth or low-
latency activities on aircraft, such as
video calls, streaming high-definition
video, online gaming etc. Devices on
the plane will access the Starlink internet via a standard WiFi connection.
For those interested in costs, at
the time of writing, there is a onetime hardware cost of US$150,000
(~$210,000) and monthly service fees
with unlimited data are US$12,50025,000 (~$18,000-$35,000).
Initial certification is being obtained
for the following business and regional
aircraft types: ERJ-135, ERJ-145, G650,
G550, Falcon 2000, G450, Challenger
300, Challenger 350, Global Express,
Global 5000, Global 6000, and Global
7500, with more applications being
developed for larger commercial jets.
How Starlink antennas work
Unlike an antenna pointed at a geostationary satellite, which needs a
clear view in only one direction, Starlink antennas need to be unobstructed
from horizon to horizon, as the LEO
satellites can be anywhere in the sky.
When setting up a Starlink antenna,
a phone app will guide your placement
to confirm a good signal.
Starlink antennas are motorised and
Frequencies used by Starlink satellites
According to www.elonx.net/starlink-compendium/, the following
frequencies are used by Starlink:
● Satellite to user terminals: 10.7–12.7GHz, 37.5–42.5GHz
● Satellite to gateway: 17.8–18.6GHz. 18.8–19.3GHz, 37.5–42.5GHz
● Terminals to satellites: 14.0–14.5GHz, 47.2–50.2GHz, 50.4–51.4GHz
● Gateways to satellites: 27.5–29.1GHz, 29.5–30.0GHz, 47.2–50.2GHz,
50.4–51.4GHz
● Tracking, telemetry and control (downlink): 12.15–12.25GHz,
18.55–18.60GHz, 37.5–37.75GHz
● Tracking, telemetry and control (uplink): 13.85–14.00GHz, 47.2–
47.45GHz
self-aligning, but once the antenna is
pointed in the optimal direction, it
does not need to move much more
by itself. That is because, apart from
antenna motors used for basic alignment, the antenna can electronically
steer its beam using a phased array.
New versions of Starlink antennas
intended for rooftop RV mounting or
aircraft are not mechanically steered
at all; they are electronically steered
only.
Hacking antennas
Starlink antennas are not designed
to be disassembled by users. An
attempt to do so might void the warranty if it causes damage, but some
hackers have done so.
Various people disassembled their
antennas, either to see what was inside
or to repurpose stationary antennas for
mobile (car) or lightweight expedition
(on foot) use. While a mobile antenna
is now available, that was not always
the case.
Antenna teardown
There is very little officially published information about the construction of the Starlink ground station antennas. What we know is only
what has been discovered by hackers
– see Figs.10, 11 & 12.
The Starlink antenna is a remarkably complicated device and arguably
Fig.8: a standard Starlink antenna for regular residential users (left), with a
100° field of view. The high-performance antenna (middle) is for businesses
and enterprises as it can connect to more satellites, is more tolerant of extreme
environments and has a 140° field of view. The flat high-performance antenna
(right) is intended for mobile applications such as motor homes and boats, also
with a 140° field of view. Source: Starlink.
18
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
the most critical part of the ground
equipment. If you watch the teardown
videos, you will see that it is an engineering masterpiece. It has a lot of
electronics in it, including an ARM
processor, RAM chips and many custom ICs. Presumably, these are all to
drive the phased array.
Teardown videos include:
● Starlink Teardown: DISHY
DESTROYED!
https://youtu.be/iOmdQnIlnRo
● TSP #181 - Starlink Dish Phased
Array Design, Architecture & RF
In-depth Analysis
https://youtu.be/h6MfM8EFkGg
● Starlink Dish TEARDOWN! - Part
1 - SpaceX BugBounty is open during
the Starlink Public Beta
https://youtu.be/QudtSo5tpLk
● Starlink Dish TEARDOWN! - Part
2 - Serial console and login prompt.
Can you guess Dishy’s password?
https://youtu.be/38_KTq8j0Nw
● Starlink RECTANGLE Teardown
Details - Working on trimming Rectangle dish to make a low-power panel
https://youtu.be/AlvIWF0AXI0
There is also a good article on this
at siliconchip.au/link/abjf
Mobile phone service
In August 2022, Starlink partnered
with T-mobile in the United States
to provide cellular phone service via
V2 Starlink satellites, to begin testing
in 2023. Unlike other satellite phone
systems, this will use standard mobile
devices. The service will initially support text messaging and voice calls.
The total bandwidth available
per satellite will be 2-4Mb/s, which
equates to 1000-2000 simultaneous
voice calls or millions of text messages across a cell. The intention is
to use this service in remote areas
with no existing cellular service or in
emergencies. It will be initially offered
in the USA only, but T-mobile will
siliconchip.com.au
Fig.9: a rectangular Starlink antenna facing up is visible toward
the front of the aircraft. Source: Starlink.
Figs.10 & 11: part of a Starlink antenna PCB. The PCB traces are
curved to provide constant lengths for all traces (and RF signals
don’t like sharp corners). Source: https://youtu.be/AlvIWF0AXI0
eventually partner with providers in
other countries.
The technological challenges in
providing satellite connectivity to a
standard mobile phone are significant. Firstly, by the time the phone
signal travels around 550km or more,
it will be very weak. With the satellite
moving at around 27,000km/h, there
will be a significant Doppler shift to
account for.
The phone will be electronically
locked onto using a phased array
antenna, which can steer the satellite
beam to the phone’s location as the
satellite moves in its orbit. According to Elon Musk, these are the most
advanced phased-array antennas in
the world.
The satellites used for this service
will be very large at 7m long, with
a mass of 1.25 tonnes each, and the
antenna will be 5 × 5m but folded
for launch. They are too big for the
SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, so they will be
launched on a SpaceX Starship rocket.
SpaceX has also proposed a miniature
version of the V2 satellite, which will
fit on the Falcon 9.
Each V2 satellite will represent one
mobile phone cell covering an area of
nearly 17,000km2. There will eventually be 30,000 V2 satellites (see Table
3), enough to cover the Earth’s entire
surface of around 510 million km2!
Until the whole constellation of V2
satellites is up, cell phone connectivity will only be when V2 satellites are
visible to the user.
Tesla cars will also be able to connect to Starlink cellular service in
T-mobile coverage areas or other areas
with other providers as they become
available.
Besides cellular coverage, V2 satellites will also provide internet
connectivity through conventional
ground or air stations.
Collision avoidance and
satellite lifespan
Starlink satellites, indeed all satellites these days, need to be able to
manoeuvre to avoid collisions with
other satellites and adjust their orbit.
They also need to be able to deorbit at the end of their life to prevent
excessive debris from accumulating
in orbit.
Starlink satellites are equipped with
Hall-effect thrusters (HETs), electric
ion engines that use krypton gas as
the propellant to effect the required
manoeuvres. Even if the thruster malfunctions at the end of a satellite’s life,
its orbit will decay due to atmospheric
drag within about four years, and it
will re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere
and incinerate.
Table 3 – proposed orbital shells & numbers of Starlink V2 satellites (29,988 total)
Fig.12: part of the phased array
‘sandwich’ on the non-component side
of the antenna PCB. Source: https://
youtu.be/AlvIWF0AXI0
siliconchip.com.au
Inclination
Altitude
Orbital planes
Satellites/plane
Total satellites
53.0°
340km
48
110
5280
46.0°
345km
48
110
5280
38.0°
350km
48
110
5280
96.9°
360km
30
120
3600
53.0°
525km
28
120
3360
43.0°
530km
28
120
3360
33.0°
535km
28
120
3360
148.0°
604km
12
12
144
115.7°
614km
18
18
324
Australia's electronics magazine
June 2023 19
Fig.13: Starlink satellites can lower
their profile to avoid collisions.
Source: https://astronomy.com/
news/2022/02/spacex-defendsstarlink-over-collision-concerns
Avoiding collisions with the large
number of satellites now in space is
vital to avoid the Kessler syndrome.
This is a phenomenon where a satellite collision generates a large amount
of debris. That debris creates more
collisions and debris, leading to a cascading effect, rendering orbital space
unusable.
Starlink uses an AI-based autonomous collision avoidance system with
tracking data from the US Space Force
18th Space Defense Squadron (see
siliconchip.au/link/abjg).
Suppose a Starlink satellite is
expected to come very close to another
object and cannot manoeuvre out of
the way. In that case, it can lower its
solar panel to present a lower profile
and less chance of collision, as shown
in Fig.13.
A major loss of
Starlink satellites
Starlink satellites are deployed at a
much lower altitude than they operate at. This is for initial testing; if the
satellite is entirely non-functional, the
orbit will quickly decay at the lower
altitude, preventing orbital debris from
20
Silicon Chip
Fig.14: a 2019 photo taken at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory
(CTIO) in Chile after the launch of the second batch of Starlink satellites. This
333-second exposure contains 19 streaks from satellites. Source: https://noirlab.
edu/public/images/iotw1946a/
accumulating. If the satellite tests OK,
its orbit is raised.
On the 4th of February 2022, while
49 V1.5 satellites (Group 4-7) were
deployed into low orbit, there was a
major geomagnetic storm. This caused
increased atmospheric drag, and 38 of
the satellites deorbited, leaving only
11 to raise their orbits.
configuration just after launch is
changed to a ‘shark fin’ configuration
for the solar panel when on-orbit, with
the panel pointing away from Earth
(see Fig.15).
• They are also testing a roll
manoeuvre during orbit raising to minimise reflections (see Fig.16).
Interference with astronomy
Naturally, Starlink has been a target
for hackers. We do not recommend you
do this but we present this as a matter of interest. A group has published
“Glitched on Earth by Humans: A
From the outset of the Starlink project, with its thousands of satellites,
astronomers have had concerns about
interference with their observations.
Fig.14 is a very early example of image
interference due to the second batch
of Starlink satellites being launched
in November 2019.
Mitigation strategies include:
• A ‘visor’ called VisorSat to cover
radio antennas and other parts of the
satellite. It is transparent to radio
waves but stops light reflections (see
Fig.17).
• A light-absorbing coating on the
satellite (‘DarkSat’); however, this
makes the satellite get too hot, so the
preference is for the visor.
• The high-reflection ‘open book’
Australia's electronics magazine
Hacking Starlink!
Fig.15: the shark fin configuration
reduces the amount of sunlight
reflected towards the Earth. Source:
https://astronomynow.com/2020/05/05/
spacex-to-debut-satellite-dimmingsunshade-on-next-starlink-launch/
siliconchip.com.au
Black-Box Security Evaluation of the
SpaceX Starlink User Terminal” at
https://github.com/KULeuven-COSIC/
Starlink-FI that enables execution of
arbitrary code on a Starlink User Terminal – see Fig.18.
This has no stated purpose except
for experimentation. We expect by
now that the exploited security deficiencies have already been patched.
This doesn’t bother Starlink; in
fact, they encourage it under the “Bug
Bounty Program”. Starlink will pay
US$25,000 ($35,500) to anyone who
finds a bug in their network. If you
want to have a go, see siliconchip.au/
link/abjh
Also, a group at The University of
Texas at Austin devised a way to use
Starlink signals as a GPS alternative.
See siliconchip.au/link/abji
Swarm
Swarm (https://swarm.space/) offers
low-bandwidth IoT (Internet of
Things) global connectivity via dedicated SpaceBEE satellites (see Fig.19)
– BEE stands for ‘basic electronic elements’.
Swarm Technologies became a subsidiary of SpaceX in July 2021. Interestingly, the venture capital arm of the
US CIA (Central Intelligence Agency),
In-Q-Tel, lists Swarm as one of their
start-ups (see https://www.iqt.org/
portfolio/).
The satellites used for Swarm are
thought to be the smallest commercially active satellites at ¼U (11 × 11
× 2.8cm), with a mass of about 400g.
¼U is a Cubesat designation referring to the size relative to a standard
1U cube of 10 × 10 × 10cm, although,
strictly speaking, the Swarm satellite
slightly exceeds the Cubesat standard.
For more information, see our article on Cubesats in the January 2018
issue (siliconchip.au/Article/10930).
The Swarm satellites are classed
as ‘picosatellites’. They are in a sun-
synchronous orbit at 450-550km with
an intended constellation size of 150.
A sun-synchronous orbit is a special
kind of polar orbit (travelling roughly
north-south) in which a satellite visits
the same spot on the Earth’s surface at
the same time each day. You can check
when the next Swarm satellite comes
into your area at https://kube.tools.
swarm.space/pass-checker/
Solar panels and batteries power the
SpaceBEEs, and the antenna unfolds
when the satellite is deployed.
siliconchip.com.au
ORIENTATIONAL ROLL
ARRAY MITIGATION DURING ORBIT RAISE
The rolling satellite makes
sunlight bounce off the
smaller ‘knife edge’ of the
array, reducing reflection.
Fig.16: detail of the shark fin configuration. Source: same as Fig.14.
VISORSAT
ANTENNAE MITIGATION ON STATION
On station, sun shade blocks
sunlight from antennas,
preventing reflection.
Fig.17: the visor was added to later Starlink satellites to reduce the amount of
light reflected at the Earth. Source: same as Fig.15.
Fig.18: a “Modchip”
board (red) and
interface added to
a Starlink antenna
panel. Source: https://
github.com/KULeuvenCOSIC/Starlink-FI
Fig.19: a Swarm
SpaceBEE satellite,
the tiniest satellite in
commercial use.
Australia's electronics magazine
June 2023 21
IIoT gateway satellite
mounted on rear of
panel
Wind speed &
direction sensor
Temp, humidity
& barometric
pressure sensor
12W solar panel
Multiple mount points on
base & rear
Fig.20: an example of a commercial
remote ModuSense Weather Station
with built-in Swarm connectivity.
Source: www.freewave.com/
products/modusense-weather-station/
Fig.21: the Swarm asset tracker fitted to an asset. Source: https://swarm.space/
swarm-announces-new-asset-tracking-product/
All satellites in orbit have to be able
to be tracked for collision avoidance
and orbital planning purposes. There
were concerns about the trackability of
these satellites due to their small size,
but that was addressed by:
• Incorporating a passive ‘Van Atta
array’ radar retro-reflector, increasing
their radar return strength.
• The satellite has a GPS and sends
its location when requested.
• The 1m-long antenna improves
visibility to ground-based tracking
radars and other sensors (eg, by the US
Space Surveillance Network).
One of the main attractions of
Swarm, apart from its global accessibility, is its low cost. Swarm devices
and data plans are easily within reach
of typical hobbyists and are also suitable for professional users.
According to the Swarm website, a
typical data plan costs US$5 ($7) per
month per device and “provides 750
data packets per device per month (up
to 192 bytes per packet or 144kB per
month), including up to 60 downlink
(2-way) data packets, AES256-GCM
encryption for secure transmission,
annual contract with no setup or hidden fees and data delivered via a REST
API or Webhook to any cloud service”.
That amount of data should be sufficient for hourly readings from a remote
weather station, like the one shown
in Fig.20.
Devices available to connect to
Swarm include an asset tracker
(US$99/$140) to globally track assets
with “one GPS acquisition every two
hours with one transmission per twohour window” and “motion detection
enabled”. The data rate is 1kbps (oneway) and the frequencies used are 137138MHz (downlink) and 148-150MHz
(uplink).
The device weighs 227g and the battery lasts 40+ days on internal power,
or it can be connected to external
power. Data can be accessed from the
Swarm Hive – see Fig.21.
Another Swarm device is the M138
Fig.22: a SparkFun
M138 modem
breakout board. The M138
is the device in the centre with
“Swarm” written on it. Source: www.
electronics-lab.com/sparkfuns-swarm-m138modem-satellite-transceiver-breakout-board/
22
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
modem, designed to be embedded in a
third-party IoT device with data delivered via a REST API or Webhook to any
cloud service. These cost US$89 ($125)
with a minimum purchase of 25.
For fewer units, the SparkFun M138
Modem breakout board can be purchased for US$149.95 ($215; www.
sparkfun.com/products/19236) or a
later version for US$199.95 ($285;
www.sparkfun.com/products/21287)
– see Fig.22.
The M138 comes in a Mini PCB
Express card form factor weighing
9.6g and includes a GNSS receiver for
GPS and other navigational systems.
Data is sent to the modem as a hexadecimal ASCII string, and two-letter
NMEA-like (National Marine Electronics Association) commands are sent
over a 3.3V serial (UART) link.
The M138 modem is incorporated
in the asset tracker mentioned above.
Applications for the M138 modem
with the breakout board include reading remote sensors such as for weather
monitoring, remote equipment monitoring, asset tracking and environmental monitoring – see Fig.23.
Finally, the US$449 ($637) Swarm
Eval Kit (Fig.24) “is designed to provide the developer with an easy-to-use
platform, with the included FeatherS2
– ESP32 board + OLED, a USB-C port
and I2C port for sensors. FeatherWing
add-on modules can provide a suite of
additional capabilities”.
“The Eval Kit includes a tripod,
solar panel, batteries, and integrated
VHF and GPS antenna. A live readout of RF background noise helps you
siliconchip.com.au
Fig.23: a mountaintop sensor array
connected to Swarm.
Source: https://swarm.space/
achieve the best possible link quality”.
Devices can be connected via WiFi (AP
or STA mode), USB, or serial interfaces, and data can be managed via the
Swarm Cloud and REST API.
The data rate is 1kbps with a maximum packet size of 192 bytes, and it
supports AES256 GCM encryption.
The command format is two-letter
NMEA. The kit comes with an M138
modem described above and weighs
2.6kg.
Starshield
Starshield (www.spacex.com/
starshield/) is a derivative of Starlink
specifically for US government and
military use. According to the SpaceX
website, Starshield’s initial focus is on
Earth observation, communications
and hosted payloads.
Earth observation involves launching satellites with sensing payloads
and delivering processed data directly
to the end user (a government agency).
This includes global communication
with Starshield equipment, having
an even higher level of security than
Starlink, which is already end-to-end
encrypted.
Hosted payloads involve building
appropriate satellite buses to suit customer needs. A satellite bus is the basic
structural element of a spacecraft with
equipment such as command and data
handling, comms, power, propulsion,
thermal control, attitude control and
guidance.
There is room to install a customer’s specialised payload, such as a
sensor array to suit a specific mission.
siliconchip.com.au
This is less expensive than building a
dedicated satellite from scratch. The
spacecraft bus will be based on existing Starlink V1.5 and V2.0 satellites
with a much greater solar array area.
If desired, Starshield satellites can
be made interoperable with Starlink
via inter-satellite laser communications.
Starlink applications can be rapidly
developed because of SpaceX’s delivery systems, their manufacturing of
the satellites and their ability to rapidly deploy large numbers of satellites
in a single launch.
Similar satellite systems
AST SpaceMobile ast-science.com
AST is launching a cellular broadband service in LEO that will allow
the use of standard unmodified
smartphones via a satellite with
an enormous 64.4m2 phased array
antenna. Its prototype BlueWalker 3
satellite launched in November 2022,
orbits at 508-527km and has a field of
view of 777,000km2.
AST SpaceMobile eventually plans
to deploy a constellation of 243 BlueBird satellites in orbits between 725740km in late 2023. The BlueBird
satellites are similar to the prototype
BlueWalker 3; later versions will have
an even larger antenna array. Their
partners are AT&T, Vodafone, Orange
and Rakuten Mobile.
BlueWalker 3 was launched as a
‘rideshare’ on a SpaceX Falcon 9 along
with Starlink satellites.
Globalstar www.globalstar.com/en-ap
Globalstar offers a constellation of
LEO satellites at 1400km altitude for
Fig.24: the Swarm Eval
Kit. Documentation can
be found at https://swarm.
space/documentationswarm/ and www.sparkfun.
com/products/19236 under
the “documents” tab.
Australia's electronics magazine
June 2023 23
Notes on accuracy and timeliness
We have done our best to provide the most accurate and up-to-date information,
but precise information on specific details of Starlink satellites and their numbers
in orbit are either not published or are subject to variation as the commercial
plans of SpaceX change with time.
Remember that Starlink, Swarm and Starshield are systems that are being
built even as you read this, and plans are constantly evolving.
voice telephony with special phones
and low-speed data. There are 24
2nd-generation satellites in the constellation. Users of the iPhone 14 in the
USA and Canada can send emergency
messages via this satellite system.
Hughes Network Systems hughes.com
Hughes Network Systems is a US
provider of broadband internet services worldwide, mostly in remote
areas. They also offer ‘cellular backhaul’ services via geostationary satellites (connections between parts of
mobile networks) and internet services
on aircraft.
Their cellular backhaul services are
via satellite because wires or traditional microwave links to a remote site
are too expensive. Since geostationary
satellites are used, there is the problem
of high latency, meaning the system is
unsuitable for videoconferencing and
gaming, and there is a significant delay
in voice communications.
Inmarsat www.inmarsat.com
Inmarsat uses 14 satellites in GEO
orbit and offers a range of services and
coverage options, including connectivity for 160,000 ships and 17,000
aircraft, plus government agencies and
large businesses.
Their services include tracking,
high-speed internet, distress and
safety services. A special phone or
other terminal equipment is required
to connect to Inmarsat. Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 that mysteriously
disappeared used Inmarsat’s satellite
phone service, and the analysis of that
data determined it flew into the southern Indian Ocean.
Iridium www.iridium.com
Iridium uses 66 active satellites in
polar LEO with a 100-minute orbital
period in six orbital planes, 30° apart
at an altitude of 780km. Communication is via dedicated equipment by
Iridium or third parties (www.iridium.
com/products/) and includes options
for text, data, SOS, voice and others.
The frequencies used are 1616.0MHz
to 1626.5MHz, while gateway uplink
is 29.1-29.3GHz, gateway downlink is
24
Silicon Chip
19.1-19.6GHz and inter-satellite links
are at 22.55-23.55GHz.
Kuiper Systems LLC
www.aboutamazon.com/news/tag/project-kuiper
Kuiper Systems is a subsidiary of
Amazon. Its objective is to provide
accessible and affordable satellite
broadband internet to “unserved and
underserved communities around the
world”.
It is building a constellation of 3276
satellites in LEO, with the prototype
satellites to be launched in early 2023.
The satellites will orbit between 590630km.
Lynk Global lynk.world
Lynk wants to create a “cell tower
in space” so standard mobile phones
can connect to its satellites in LEO at
500km. It will focus on providing coverage to people in ‘third-world’ countries so they can use cheap, affordable
phones. They will also cover areas of
the world where there is no mobile
signal coverage or coverage is down
due to a natural disaster.
Lynk is currently in a testing phase
and will need 1000 satellites for full
broadband coverage, which it expects
to achieve by 2025, and ultimately a
full constellation of 5000 satellites.
O3b www.ses.com
O3b uses a constellation of 20 satellites in medium Earth orbit (MEO),
8000km above the surface, for relatively low latency. The idea is to provide internet connectivity to rural and
remote areas at altitudes between 50°N
and 50°S (covering 96% of Earth’s population) for mobile network operators,
telcos, enterprises and government.
Examples include telemedicine,
electronic banking and virtual classrooms in places like American Samoa,
Brazil, Chad, East Timor and Papua
New Guinea. 4G+ mobile phone services can be offered in places like the
Cook Islands by providing backhaul
services. They can also provide internet connectivity at sea, such as on
cruise ships.
For the next generation of services, O3b is also launching mPower
Australia's electronics magazine
satellites for government, military and
various enterprises and will have 11
satellites in MEO, each of which can
produce 5,000 digitally-formed beams
directed to various users.
OneWeb oneweb.net
OneWeb is in the process of launching a 648-satellite constellation into
LEO (1200km) to provide global
broadband internet services by the
end of 2023. Customers are intended
to be government, military, telcos and
remote communities, not individuals.
Orbcomm
orbcomm.com/en/partners/connectivity/satellite
Orbcomm offers a constellation of
Isat Data Pro satellites in GEO orbit and
ORBCOMM OG2 in LEO for satellite
IoT (Internet of Things) connectivity.
Project Loon is a now-defunct proposal to use high-altitude balloons at
18-25km to create a wide-area wireless network. Manoeuvring to stay on
station was by adjusting buoyancy to
find winds in the correct direction.
Links
• Find naked eye visibility of Starlink satellites in your area at https://
findstarlink.com/ Note that Starlink
satellites are less visible now than
they used to be due to measures taken
to minimise the disturbance to astronomers. An App is also available for
Android and iOS devices.
• See the present location of the
Starlink constellation, as well as OneWeb and GPS constellations, at https://
satellitemap.space/
• There is an interactive map to
determine availability at your service
address at www.starlink.com/map
While the availability of the satellite
service is global, there still needs to
be ground-level national agreements
and billing arrangements.
• There is a video of an Australian review of the Starlink system for
travel in an RV titled “The Truth About
Starlink RV! Is It Worth It?” at https://
youtu.be/d29jURzZGe0
• A video of the ‘satellite train’
shortly after launch, before the satellites were put in their final orbits, titled
“Starlink Satellites train seen in the
sky” at https://youtu.be/ihVuz8uM1qU
• A very interesting and simple
project to receive Starlink beacon
(tracking) signals with a Raspberry Pi
computer, a software-defined radio
and a satellite antenna receiver (LNB):
siliconchip.au/link/abjm
SC
siliconchip.com.au
|