This is only a preview of the July 2024 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 42 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Automatic LQ Meter":
Items relevant to "180-230V DC Motor Speed Controller":
Items relevant to "New use for Mains Sequencer":
Items relevant to "Lava Lamp Display":
Items relevant to "Digital Compass":
Items relevant to "Workman 1kW Loudspeaker":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $12.50. |
Adding automatic solar
charging to an electric van
By Roderick Boswell
How far can an EV travel without having to visit a charger? We added solar
panels to the roof of a Renault Kangoo ZE van, plus an onboard inverter. This
gives us up to 18,000km a year of driving at no further cost!
H
aving built the solar van, we’ve
achieved up to 50km of driving
per day using just the solar panels.
Multiply that by the number of days
in a year to get the 18,000km figure,
although that assumes nice sunny
weather year-round, which is perhaps
a little unrealistic.
Still, sitting in the van watching the
onboard batteries charge at 50A for the
first time, it certainly was pleasing to
realise that it was working as intended.
There are surprisingly few reports of
this having been done, so we thought
we would create a company, “Solely
Solar”, based on the concepts of autonomy and freedom.
In this article, I will describe how
the decisions were made, what we
purchased, how we configured and
tested it, the integration of the solar
58
Silicon Chip
system into the van and the on-road
tests.
The solar panels
Photovoltaic (PV) solar panels have
been slowly improving over the past
few years. It is possible to purchase
single crystal silicon arrays with passivated emitter rear cells (PERC),
which were invented by a team at
UNSW in Sydney. They are cut in half
to reduce the resistance and hence
losses.
These cells have an efficiency of
around 22%, so with full sun delivering 1kW per square metre, you can
obtain 220W from a 1m2 panel.
So, off I went to eBay to check prices;
I found a real Aladdin’s cave of solar
treasures. Having purchased a few, I
quickly discovered that the power they
Australia's electronics magazine
could produce was often overstated by
as much as 100%.
Unless you like opening protracted
disputes with eBay (which I did to see
how the system works; it does, sort of),
be aware that the only reliable indicator of the potential power of the panel
is its area. I learned this by spending
money and testing the product, an easy
task with a multimeter that can measure up to 20A.
The two main parameters to measure are the open circuit voltage (Voc),
which increases with the area of the
panel, and the short-circuit current
(Isc), which manufacturers try to keep
as low as possible to reduce Joule heating (I2R). For example, I tested a 2m2
solar panel with a Voc of around 50V
and an Isc of around 10A.
Of course, multiplying those two
siliconchip.com.au
figures won’t tell you exactly how
much the panel will produce since
they are measured under different
conditions. Still, it gives you a way to
estimate the power and compare different panels.
We decided to use Longi 510W panels that measured 2093 × 1134mm and
weighed 25.3kg since they just fitted
onto the roof of the Kangoo. Interestingly, some tests showed around 550W
being produced per panel.
There is an efficiency temperature
coefficient of -0.25%/°C, with the
stated performance being at 25°C. So,
on a cold morning, with a temperature around 0°C, the panels will be 5%
more efficient. Conversely, of course,
during the afternoon in summer, the
air temperature may be 40°C, and the
panels will be so hot you cannot touch
them, leading to a performance reduction of up to 10%.
The van
There are currently several very
expensive electric vans on the market.
Still, a couple of years ago, the only
real option was the Renault Kangoo
Zero Emission, although BYD slipped
around 50 T3 electric vans into Australia as they were mucking about with
distributors.
I decided on a 2019 Kangoo ZE that
had been used to drive from the Blue
Mountains to Sydney every day and
back, which had travelled around
85,000km. The Kangoo has a Mennekes Type 2 7kW onboard charger
that requires a Type 2 to Type 2 cable,
or a destination charging cable with a
Type 2 on one end and a regular 10A
230V mains plug at the other.
Two of us would have to drive to
Sydney from Canberra, pick the van
up, and drive it back. Since the top of
the CCS (Combined Charging System)
plug is a Mennekes Type 2 plug, we
purchased a Type 2 to Type 2 cable. We
made an unpleasant discovery when
we stopped at a commercial charging
station at Sutton Forest on the way
back to Canberra. The top Mennekes
socket of the CCS charging station was
not connected!
As night was about to fall, we swiftly
returned to Canberra in the other car,
leaving the Kangoo in the parking area
adjacent to the chargers. Rats!
After some research, we found that
the commercial CCS charger providers
wanted a fast turnover so their chargers
only provided DC fast charging. The
siliconchip.com.au
The inside of the Renault Kangoo ZE van with some basic wiring for the solar
panels.
The onboard inverter and the other electronics required for the solar panels are
stored in the large timber cabinet on the side that doubles as a kitchen.
poor old Mennekes is generally limited
to 7kW, resulting in a wait of several
hours. The company supplying the
chargers evidently didn’t want anyone
sitting on their charger for that long,
so they removed the Type 2 option.
The following morning, we returned
much wiser and drove the Kangoo to a
local winery that had a couple of Type
2 chargers. We plugged in and then
discovered that you have to download
Australia's electronics magazine
the charger supplier’s app on your
phone to arrange payment before you
can start charging. After doing that, it
was finally charging, and we had four
hours to kill.
We had lunch at the winery and
drove around the area, which was
really quite beautiful, and got back to
discover that a watched charger never
boils. Eventually, we were back on the
road again, popping into the Goulburn
July 2024 59
Workers’ Club later for supper and
another couple of hours of Type 2
charging. That got us home.
At home, we used the cable with the
Type 2 connector on one end and 3-pin
mains plug on the other to recharge the
van overnight.
The dash instruments show the
instantaneous kWh/100km figure,
estimated range, distance travelled
and instantaneous power usage. It
also has a ‘fuel gauge’ that correlates
more-or-less with the battery state of
charge (SoC).
At 1/8 SoC remaining, you touch the
red line and a warning light suggests
you look for a charger, as there is only
about 30km of range remaining. A double red line follows at 1/16, and another
light appears that the manual explains
is to warn that you are about to go
into ‘limp home’ mode. I checked this
scheme out, down to 1/16th full, and all
worked as expected.
A few tests showed that the charger
is about 90% efficient, with 10% lost
between the mains and the van battery.
The majority of the losses are from the
inverter built into the Kangoo.
I conducted a sequence of tests
on range and efficiency at different
speeds, with the main result being
that the battery still had about 30kWh
left of the original 33kWh. Not too bad
after 85,000km! The best efficiency of
14-15kWh/100km was at 50-60km/h. It
read about 17.5kWh/100km at 80km/h
and over 25kWh/100km at 110km/h.
It is interesting to get used to nearly
one-foot driving with the regenerative
braking.
I performed another test in hilly
terrain, taking the van to the Picadilly Circus pass through the Brindabellas, a voyage about 50km long and
1000m vertical. At the top of the mountain, the consumption had increased
to 22kWh/100km, but on returning
home, it had dropped back to around
15kWh/100km, having regained most
of the energy used to ascend.
This was with careful driving, trying to keep the efficiency indicator
out of the red, even if it meant going
at only 30km/hr on the steep parts of
the ascent. The regenerative braking
certainly is effective.
To sum up the efficiency/range tests,
keeping to 50km/h, I got a range of
about 220km, but at 80km/hr, it drops
to around 150km. These results agree
with the USA Electric Vehicle Design
Base (EVDC) range estimate for the
Kangoo ZE of 160km. There is real
optimism in Europe with the New
European Driving Cycle (NEDC) that
claims a range of 270km, while the
Americans take a more realistic view.
Attaching the solar panels
According to the Australian Design
Rules (ADR) for loads carried on
The inside of the timber
cabinet, which contains
the Victron MPPT solar
chargers, circuit breakers,
busbars, battery charger
etc, as shown in Fig.1
opposite. The eight
batteries sit under a piece
of wood on which the main
circuit breaker is fitted.
vehicles using public roads, an overhang of 1200mm without flags is
acceptable both front and rear. For side
protrusions, 150mm on each side is
allowed beyond the vehicle’s width.
This meant the Longi 510W panels were a good fit, so we decided on
having three lengthwise on the roof,
with the first in line with the top of the
windscreen and about 500mm of overhang at the rear. MORID Pty Ltd did the
design using the roof rack attachment
points (three on each side). The main
challenge was the roof loading rating
of the Kangoo, which is just 100kg.
Having three 25.3kg panels means
that the whole roof rack structure
could weigh only 24.1kg and had to
be strong enough to hold the panels.
A plastic 3D printer was employed
to print the fittings for the prototype.
We then attached them to the roof to
verify their stability, size and appropriateness. Having passed this first
hurdle, the design was sent off to PCBWay for machining out of aluminium.
These guys are really good and they
have never disappointed us. The six
adaptors were finished and sent to
us. Perfect!
Assembling the panels into an aluminium frame, drilling holes in the
roof and attaching them to the van
took some time. We just managed to
get it a few millimetres under the protrusion rules.
We were then faced with the one
task we had been avoiding: drilling
holes in the roof to get the cables from
the panels into the van so they could
be connected to the interior electronics. We took the plunge, drilled the
holes in the roof (sorry Mr Renault)
and fitted the grommets.
As usual, after the cables were
slipped through and the connectors
attached, we found that we had forgotten to slip a clip on the connector;
oh dear! We had to desolder the connectors, attach the wayward clip, then
resolder the connectors.
The Maximum Power Point
Trackers (MPPTs)
The solar panels do not charge
the Kangoo’s battery directly, as the
onboard charger does not support
charging from low-voltage DC. Instead,
the solar panels charge a secondary
24V battery that we installed (more
on that later), and that battery runs
an inverter that feeds the onboard EV
charger – see Fig.1.
60
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
Our solar panels put out about 50V
and 10A, and we need to charge a 24V
battery, so a conversion is necessary,
conserving as much power as possible. By chopping the input voltage at
around 100kHz, small inductors (or
coils) and an electronic circuit called a
buck converter can reduce the voltage
without wasting too much power. As
a result, the output current is higher
than the input current.
If we are charging the 24V battery
at, say, 27V, the charge current would
be 18A minus the losses from the buck
converter, which are only around 5%
nowadays (ie, 95% conversion efficiency). MPPT is needed to get the
most power from the panels, as the
voltage/current curve has a peak that
moves depending on the ambient conditions. We want to manage the panel
voltage to keep it at that point while
doing the buck conversion.
The MPPT chargers also continuously monitor the battery SoC to provide the correct charging profile. A few
years ago, such circuits comprised lots
of individual components and were
pretty expensive, but now a single
chip can carry out most of the operations and the price of MPPT chargers
has fallen dramatically. It pays to shop
around!
The secondary battery
Once again, this was a learning
experience. For safety, we decided
on Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4)
cells since they are less likely to fail
than Lithium Manganese Nickel cells
(and if they do fail, it’s usually less
spectacular). However, they have a
lower energy density.
The next choice was the voltage. Using a 12V DC battery would
require high currents and hence significant Joule losses, so we went for
24V. Should we use a series/parallel
arrangement of 12V batteries or build
our own 24V system from 3.2V prismatic cells? If the latter, we would
need a battery management system
(BMS) to balance the voltages of all
the cells and prevent overcharging and
overdischarging.
I tried both approaches and started
by purchasing four 12V 135Ah batteries. These were bought at different
times during the COVID-19 years, and
we soon discovered that we needed
to get a balancing system, so we purchased that as well. It worked, but it
was a clunky solution, so off to AliExpress to purchase eight 3.2V 320Ah
PWOD prismatic cells and a 24V BMS.
These took some months to arrive,
and we eagerly assembled them with
the BMS attached to a 20A charger and
waited until the BMS cut out. We then
discharged it into a bathroom heater
via an inverter and surprise, we only
got 275Ah. We charged it again and
only got 275Ah the second time, so
what should we do?
Messaging the PWOD AI was highly
frustrating, as it was impossible to
have a coherent discussion. They
finally offered $26 off the next purchase, or we could send them back at
our expense. Sigh. So we swallowed
the bitter pill and realised how the
price could be so low – caveat emptor. We would have to make do with
6.7kWh of stored energy, 14% lower
than expected.
The inverter
There are a great many DC/AC
inverters on the market. The first one
I bought was from Victron and it is
installed in our solar off-grid shed.
Actually, I did buy a few smaller
inverters before that for use in the car
Fig.1: each solar panel has its own MPPT battery charger to maximise charging efficiency. The battery management
system ensures the cells remain in balance and are not overcharged or overdischarged.
siliconchip.com.au
Australia's electronics magazine
July 2024 61
and for camping, but nothing in the
kW range that we were investigating.
Pretty much all the inverters now
use chopped voltages rather than
heavy transformers, making them
quite compact. We needed 3kW continuous and 6kW peak (for a few seconds), with a charger, and we got those
capabilities for well under $1000.
However, we soon realised that the
inverter’s internal charger could only
draw a maximum of 2300W from the
wall (230V <at> 10A).
Since it was to be used for charging
the Kangoo, we purchased a second
inverter rated at 4kW continuous and
8kW peak for around the same price.
We tested the batteries and inverter
before installation to verify that everything was operating as expected. With
everything installed in the van and
the solar panels connected, the isolating circuit breakers were flipped
on and, hooray, the Bluetooth app on
our Android phones showed the voltage, current and power being delivered
by each of the three panels. The BMS
showed the battery charging.
Charging the Car
The last step was to charge the car
with solar panels. On the first try,
using the 24V battery, inverter and
10A home charger, the car refused to
charge. The charger was blinking; after
reading the manual, we realised that
the error was related the Earth connector on the socket.
Most inverters have Earth wiring,
however, most of the time, it is floating. To solve this problem, we connected the Earth and Neutral inside the
inverter and the car started charging.
Using only the 24V battery for
charging the car, the inverter would
draw around 90A and could add
6.5kWh (~40km range) to the car.
Using a fully-charged 24V LFP battery
and solar panels on a sunny day at the
same time, the solar panels provide
around 50A and the battery around
40A, adding up to 16kWh (~100km
range) to the car in one day.
You can’t do that two days in a
row, though, as the secondary battery
would be discharged at the end of the
first cycle, and it needs to be charged
initially to provide so much energy to
the EV battery.
be ideal for camping. Since micro-
campers are popular, we took the van
to Kata Camperbox in Sydney to do
their magic. As can be seen from the
photos, the fittings are all real timber, and the result is a true beauty to
behold.
There is a pull-out kitchen, a slideout fridge that runs from the 24V battery and a space large enough for two
electric bikes that can also be used as a
sleeping space. It is about the same size
as a business-class bed on an aircraft.
To get an idea if everything would
work, we took a camping/cycling trip
to the Orroral Valley campsite that had
recently reopened after the bushfires.
This 55km trip from Canberra was
successful; all the subsystems worked,
and nothing fell off the van. My electric bike fitted in the van OK. However,
I must say that I am not a great fan
of sleeping in enclosed spaces, even
those at the pointy end of an aircraft.
I know; first-world problems!
Planning for a trip
In Australia, the Bureau of Statistics has determined that the average
passenger vehicle travels a smidgen
over 10,000km a year, an average of a
bit under 30km per day, well within
the parameters of our Solely Solar van.
The van would have to be left out in
the sun all day; still, rooftop parking is
generally the last to fill up, so perhaps
that is not too much of a drawback.
So what sort of a trip could be made
with our little Solely Solar Renault
Kangoo ZE, just relying on solar generation of electricity? The Kangoo
has 30kWh in its primary battery and
6.7kWh in the secondary battery.
Assuming you have solar panels on
the roof of your house connected to a
home battery, it is simple to just charge
the Kangoo at home without paying
for grid energy.
You could have a separate solar
system for charging the car, but then
you could argue that you are losing
around 10¢/kWh by not selling any
excess power back to the grid power
supplier. Then again, nothing is completely free.
However, if you would like to travel
further than a few tens of kilometres
(eg, to work and back), you need to
do a bit of planning, especially if you
want to get back in under a week.
And there are limitations on how the
remote charging is carried out.
As mentioned, the solar panels
alone cannot supply the full power
necessary for charging via the inverter;
they need to be supplemented with
power from the solar batteries. Arriving at a campsite in the evening, the
solar battery will generally be full,
allowing the 6.7kWh (ignoring losses)
to be transferred to the traction battery
in a few hours while it is dark.
The next morning, the panels will
start charging the empty solar battery
and will absorb around 4.5kWh by
midday, at which time the inverter can
be brought into play, allowing both the
solar electrons and the secondary battery electrons to flow into the traction
battery for the daylight that remains.
Given a sunny summer day, the solar
panels would provide around 9kWh, so
the Kangoo would need about 3½ days
to fully recharge if exhausted. So, with
judicious planning and good weather,
you could take a long weekend and
travel within a radius of around 180km
from your house and return, paying
virtually nothing for the trip. Not too
SC
shabby!
The camper conversion
Our group had some discussions
and decided that the Kangoo would
62
Silicon Chip
The van with solar panels being used for camping for the first time. Removing
the bike frees up space to sleep inside.
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
|