This is only a preview of the June 1988 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 40 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
|
Pt.2: Why We Need Negative Feedback
WHAT IS NEGXI'IVE
In our second article on Negative
Feedback, we see that open loop
amplifiers, with their errors, distortions,
uncertain gain, and erratic DC output
level are just not good enough. Negative
feedback is the answer.
Open loop amplifier
By BRYAN MAHER
The story goes that in one quite
"with-it" family a sister and
brother, Krystie and Tyson, both
avid SILICON CHIP readers, were interested in somewhat different applications of electronics in their
spare time.
Krystie wanted to build a small
amplifier to drive some earphones,
to be driven by her small cassette
player. Two batteries would have to
serve as the power supply for this
project.
Tyson, on the other hand, was
more interested in using electronics
to measure things, like some of the
small voltages and currents he met
in his experiments and working
models. He already had a small
cheap voltmeter, but yearned for a
good DVM (digital voltmeter). In
this direction he had a bright idea.
He would buy one of those 4-digit
panel-mount voltmeters (they're not
too expensive) and then would build
a little amplifier to go in front of it
to raise the sensitivity.
He thought that would be just as
good as those expensive lowreading DVMs he had seen advertised. Not being endowed with
much cash, both Krystie and Tyson
needed the best results-per-dollar
available.
Krystie contemplated building a
simple one-transistor amplifier
with a gain of 30. That should be
10
SILICON CHIP
sufficient for her needs. Wanting to
keep it simple she thought she
would do without this negative
feedback idea she had been reading
about - she just couldn't see why
she needed it.
Consulting a book on circuits, she
drew up a simple single transistor
stage powered by two 9-volt bat-
+
T
9V:
...L.
C1
Vin
teries, with one cheap transistor,
three resistors and a couple of
capacitors, as in Fig.l(a). She had
learned that the symbol for such an
open loop amplifier (ie, one without
any feedback) is the simple triangle
shown here as Fig.l(b) where G
represents the amplifier open loop
gain. Doing a few pages of calculations she figured G would be
somewhere about 30.
--1.--..,_----l'--I
J
T
9V :
C2
...I..
Fig.l(a): Krystie's little
headphone amplifier. Rt, R2
provide the bias, while R4 helps
to stabilise the DC levels and bias
conditions. But the results are not
good - the text tells why.
··- v-
I N P U T ~ OUTPUT
Vin ·· ··
Vout
OPEN LOOP
AMPLIFIER
Fig.l(b): we use the triangle as
the general symbol of any open
loop amplifier. G represents the
value of the open loop gain.
We could callously term any
open loop amplifier a " super optimist" amplifier where some applied input voltage produces an output which "we hope and pray" is a
faithfully magnified image of the
input.
Unfortunately, Krystie found this
simple amplifier was hopeless. Gain
was not a critical factor in her application, as long as it was near
enough, but distortion was rampant. Also the frequency range was
disappointing; both very high and
very low notes seemed pretty weak.
Why? Let's see:
Any electronic system, transistor
or linear electronic amplifier
without any feedback at all is called an open loop system. Its gain
from input to output is called the
open loop gain, and for this we use
the symbol "G".
G = open loop gain = output
voltage 7 input voltage before any
feedback is used.
For an amplifier with an open
loop gain which is not too large, we
can measure G under any one set of
conditions by measuring input and
output voltage, keeping the input
voltage small (to avoid false
readings by overdriving). An example will illustrate this concept:
Example 1: Open loop amplifier
If input voltage Vin = 50 millivolts
results in output voltage Vout =
1.5V [without any feedback), then
input and output voltage. This is
known as amplitude distortion, and
is caused partly by the transistor's
current gain, hFE, being a function
of the collector current.
Fig.2(a) shows the relation between hFE and collector cµrrent for
one particular transistor, the
2N2891. Graphs for many transistors have this familar "hump"
shape.
FEEDBACK?
Open Loop Gain G = Vout + Vin
= 1.5V + 50mV = 30
We use the triangle symbol in
Fig. l(b) as the universal symbol for
all open loop amplifiers, large or
small, single stage or multi-stage,
and write "G" within to remind us
that G stands for the value of the
open loop gain.
This leads to distortion. The output is not an image of the input.
Changes in hFE
The other component of
amplitude distortion is caused by
the value of hFE also being a function of transistor voltage Vce, the
voltage from collector to emitter. As
Fig.2(b) shows, Vee plus the voltage
across the load V1 always add up
to the constant supply voltage Vcc·
At peaks of output, the current
through (and voltage across) the
collector load swings to its greatest
value, leaving a minimum number
of volts across the transistor,
resulting in less gain due to
decrease in hFE·
This "collector non-linearity" is
typical of all transistors.
As well, if the circuit was designed so that at no signal the transistor
operated at the peak of the hFE
curve, then for both upward and
downward signals we would be
operating at higher and lower collector current, resulting in lower
hFE as Fig.2(a) shows.
Waveform comparison
The output and input waveforms
should be exactly the same shape,
one an exact but magnified image
of the other. By applying both input
and output voltages to individual inputs of a dual trace CRO (cathode
ray oscilloscope), and carefully adjusting the CRO gain controls of
each channel, we can attempt to
superimpose the output waveform
upon the input waveform.
If the output is an image of the input, the two can be made to exactly
cover each other, no matter what
the shape of the input waveform. If
they cannot be made to coincide,
then the output contains distortion.
What's wrong with
open loop?
What was wrong with Krystie's
single transistor amplifier? Why
was the distortion so terrible? And
the frequency range so poor? The
trouble with all open loop systems
is that inadequacies in the electronic system produce an output
different from that desired. We find
that:
(1.) The value of G changes as
temperature changes.
(2.) G has different values at different frequencies.
(3.) G has different values at different input signal voltages.
Amplitude distortion
One of the most serious faults in
an open loop amplifier is the way
the gain G varies depending on the
100
90
+vcc
2N2891
80
(
;i;
~v- I'\
70
~,/'
60
C
"'ffi
.,
50
...
40
30
I\
...
0:
\
\
/
0:
~
/
...
~
=
0:
1/
...=~
\
20
10
0
1mA
10mA
100mA
1A
10A
COLLECTOR CURRENT (iC)
Fig.2(a): nearly all transistors have a
"bumpy" relationship between
current gain hFE and collector current
ilc, This is the graph for pulsed DC
values of hFE for the 2N2891, when
the collector-emitter voltage Vce is
held constant at 5.0 volts.
Fig.2{b): at the highest
power output, most of the
available voltage is
expended across the load,
leaving only a small voltage
across the transistor. Such
low values of Vce cause
reduction in transistor
current gain hFE at
maximum collector current.
w
~
=
w
.,
"'
"'
Fig.2(c): the result of reduced gain
with increasing collector current. The
transistor fails to achieve maximum
output swing, producing a distorted
output waveform.
]UNE
1988
11
+12V
147.7uA
t
t
4.8746V
'I'
12V:
'
Yin
R1
~
03
.,.
R3
-12V
Fig.3(a): in this DC-coupled amplifier, Ql's collector voltage is a
delicate balance. If a small drop in transistor temperature reduces
collector current from 147.7,uA to 141.7,uA, the quiescent voltage
would rise from 7.1254 volts to 7.3234 volts. This upwards DC drift in
quiescent voltage would be amplified by all following stages.
r----------------v+
Cc
Cc
Vin-lt-+---+-t
.,.
Fig.3(b): in an AC-coupled amplifier capacitors Cc and transformer T
isolate any DC drift in one stage, preventing amplification of DC drift
by following stages.
Soft overload
Fig.2(c) shows the output current
waveform resulting when we try to
swing the output transistor until it
is practically "full on". The top of
the current waveform looks compressed and finishes up with a different shape compared to the bottom. The rounded top of the
waveform is sometimes referred to
as a "soft overload characteristic".
This lack of symmetry causes
distortion rich in even harmonics.
Music waveforms so mistreated
have a kind of "squashed" or muffled distorted sound, lacking in any
"brilliance".
Odd harmonics
No doubt you have heard the
familiar saying "all transistors are
non-linear". This results from the
non-linear base voltage/base current diode characteristic in every
12
SILICON CHIP
junction transistor. This causes
considerable odd (particularly
third) harmonic distortion.
With open loop systems that's
just too bad! Whether a simple onetransistor stage or the largest of
open loop amplifiers, the results
will always be distorted music.
Quite disgusted by the distortion
of her little open loop amplifier
spoiling her favourite music,
Krystie put it aside and wandered
off to see her brother's progress
with his voltmeter project. She
found Tyson in deep dejection, staring unbelievingly at a small printed
board sporting two transistors and
a handful of resistors. Clearly
everything was not right.
Uncertain gain and DC level
The story she heard, different
from hers, was nevertheless just as
sad. He had built up this tiny open
loop amplifier which we show here
as Fig.3(a), and while it worked and
drove the DVM (digital voltmeter)
he had purchased, the whole affair
was useless because of errors.
He couldn't quite understand it,
as he had previously built another
amplifier, shown as in Fig.3(b),
which was more-or-less successful.
His new circuit had three things
wrong with it:
(1.) The amplifier was supposed to
have a gain of 100, but for his
4-digit DVM reading to be meaningful in all digits, that gain needed
to be 100 ± 0.1 %. Though his gain
was about 100, accurate it wasn't!
(2.) The gain of the open loop
amplifier was too hard to calculate.
Even though Q3 of Fig.3(a) is an
emitter follower, it does not have
gain equal to one; actually its more
like 0.95. As for the other stages,
Ql and Q2, it was an awful lot of
work calculating the two-stage
gain, and even then his calculation
didn't come out equal to the
measured figure.
(3.) Worst of all, his new DVM did
not read zero when the amplifier input voltage was zero. Adding potentiometer VR1 as a DC level adjustment seemed like a good idea. But
when he adjusted VR1 for a zero
reading on the DVM (with the
amplifier input zero and grounded),
it did not stay at zero.
If it couldn't do that no other
reading of input voltage would have
any real meaning. Instead of maintaining a steady reading of four
zero digits (with zero input), the
DVM reading varied all over the
place, "like something crazy", as he
put it!
Consolation he deserved, but he
needed to know how to fix it.
Forgetting her own distortion
problem for a moment, Krystie
realized that Tyson's amplifier badly needed:
(a) Gain that could be calculated
and achieved with ease and accuracy; and
(b) A DC output level that would
stay put; ie, remain reading zero all
day if necessary, as long as the input was zero volts.
If he could achieve those two
goals, his DVM would be an inexpensive, accurate and useful piece
of equipment.
Gain calculations
The gain of a multi-stage open
loop amplifier is quite difficult to
calculate accurately.
To do such a calculation all the
component values, all the transistor
parameters and many interconnected factors have to be known
and taken into account. The output
impedance is often higher than we
would like, and the DC level is not
sufficiently constant for some
applications.
Indeed, in some DC-coupled high
gain open loop amplifiers it is quite
usual for the DC output level to be
positively erratic, drifting wildly.
DC level in open loop
Generally, in all open loop
amplifiers, the actual DC output
level depends for a start on
whether the various stages are DCcoupled to each following stage.
If they are all AC-coupled (ie, via
a capacitor or transformer) as in
the example of Fig.3(b), there isn't
much of a problem. The coupling
capacitors block all DC voltages
while AC signals are passed to the
next stage.
In Fig.3(b) we have shown the use
of coupling capacitors and also a
transformer, either of which
isolates DC levels. Though popular
once upon a time, transformercoupling is little used these days
because of the cost and the distortion introduced by the transformer
itself. But a few applications still
need transformers.
Thermal DC drift
If, on the other hand, the stages
are all DC-coupled, as in Fig.3(a),
then any drift in DC output level in
the first stage becomes part of the
signal seen by the second stage.
Hence DC drifts of early stages are
amplified by the following stages to
become dangerously large at the
final output.
Tiny DC drifts in the first stage
can be due to seemingly minor
events. Typically, the breezes that
blow through a room may cool the
transistor slightly, reducing its hpE
(and hence the collector current)
just a tiny bit.
This raises the collector voltage
and hence the output voltage of that
stage. But that small DC rise may be
many times the size of the wanted
signal at that point. Let's look at a
second DC-coupled example:
Example 2: if in Fig.3(a):
Ql gain = 10
Q2 gain = 10.53
Q3 gain = 0.95
Load resistor R6 = 33kfl, then
Ql collector current = 147.7µ,A,
Ql collector voltage = + 7.1254
volts
Wanted signal = 4.3 millivolts at
Ql collector
Now if a small drop in transistor
temperature reduces hFE causing
Ql 's collector current to fall by
6µ,A, then:
Ql collector current = 141. 7µ,A,
Ql collector voltage = 7.3234
volts.
Thus, the DC drift in the collector
voltage is
Vdrift = 7.3234 - 7.1254 volts =
198 millivolts.
Notice that the change in the collector voltage caused by the
temperature drop is about 46 times
bigger than the wanted signal at
that point.
Amplified DC drift
As all stages are DC-coupled, this
DC shift caused by the change in
Ql's temperature will be amplified
(along with the wanted signal) by
later stages. In all stages, and in the
output, the erroneous DC drift remains 46 times bigger than the
wanted signal!
To Krystie and Tyson it was obvious that the output of the last
stage will be mostly the erroneous
amplified DC drift of the first stage.
They will have the ridiculous situation of an output signal with about
4600 o/o error.
But help is at hand in the form of
negative feedback. The application
of that great friend, negative feedback, in the correct quantities can
turn poor ugly duckling amplifiers
into star performers!
But wait, enthusiastic reader,
first let's look into a few more
details of open loop amplifiers.
Amplifiers can have two types of
input terminals. We call an input
t e rminal "non inverting" or
"positive" or "+" if the input
signal to that terminal causes an
output of the same polarity. But we
call an input terminal "inverting"
or "negative" or " - " if the input
signal to that terminal produces an
output of inverted (ie, opposite)
polarity.
Amplifiers with both types of terminals are said to have "differential inputs" and the absolute value
of gain from either terminal to the
output is the same. The symbol for
such an open loop linear amplifier
with differentiRl inputs is shown in
Fig.4.
Vin(1)=t>G
I
Yin (2)
Vout
-
Fig.4: the symbol for a
differential open loop amplifier.
The two inputs are explained in
the text.
Gain with two inputs
The output is proportional to the
input signal applied to the noninverting terminal; and also proportional to 'the negative of the input
signal' applied to the inverting
terminal.
That is (still with no feedback
applied):
Gain from non-inverting input terminal to output = G;
and Gain from inverting input terminal to output = - G.
In Fig.4 where we have named
two inputs: if Vin(l) is the signal applied to the non-inverting input;
Vin(2) the signal applied to the inverting input; and Vout is the output
resulting from both inputs together,
then
Vout = G(Vin(l)) + ( -G)(Vin(2))
Vout = G(Vin(l) - Vin(2))
Differential polarities
Two examples will illustrate a
vital point.
Example 3: if
Vin(l) = 56.0mV
Vin(2) = 51.0mV
and G = 387; then
V0 ut = 387(56 - 51)mV
= 387(5)mV
= 1935mV
Vout = 1.9V
JUNE 1988
13
Problems?
... and you
don't have our
112 page
catalogue ...
Example 4: If
Vin(l) = 47.0mV
Vin(2) = 51.0mV
and G = 387; then
Vout = 387(47 - 51)mV
-= 387(-4)mV
= -1548mV
Vout = -1.5V
Polarities
Notice that where both inputs
are positive:
if Vin(l)> Vin(2), the output is also
positive but if Vin(l) <Vin(2), the output is negative. Keep that fact in
mind. We will use it again soon.
Notice another point in those two
examples. We have expressed the
answer to only two significant
figures (and even feel tempted to
use only one figure), because we
know that the value of the open loop
gain G is so unreliable.
you've got
real
problems!
ARISTA ... your one-stop
problem solver. Audio leads
... Batteries ... Chargers ...
Battery holders ... Cables
... Car accessories ...
CD accessories ... Converters
... "Cutec" ... Earphones .. .
Fuses ... Headphones .. .
Intercoms ... Knobs .. .
Microphones and accessories
... Mixers ... Multi meters ...
Plugs/Sockets, etc ... Plug
adaptors ... Power packs and
leads ... PA ... Disc and Tape
care ... Security equipment ...
Signal modifiers ... Solderless
terminals .. . Storage boxes ...
Switches ... Telephone and
TV accessories ... Tools and
Technical aids .. .
Video accessories ... Wiring
accessories ... You name it
and we're bound to have it
...Try us ... NOW!
Get your catalogue... it'II solve a
whole lot of your problems!
Just send $2 + 50c p&h and
your return address to:
ARIST~
ELECTRONICS PTY LTD
PO BOX 191, LIDCOMBE, NSW 2141
14
SILICON CHIP
Variable open loop gain
The value of open loop gain
quoted in the above examples, 387,
could be the value for some
amplifier at one set of conditions.
The pertinent conditions are the
temperature of the transistor junctions, the values of Vin(l) and Vin(2)
and the signal frequency .
The change in hFE with temperature in all transistors, the
temperature coefficient of the
resistors used, and the circuit configuration all influence the sensitivity of the circuit gain G to thermal change.
A wide ambient temperature rise
could even slowly double the value
of G! But the change in G could be
quite fast by self-heating at the
semiconductor junction if a large
signal is applied to the tiny base of
a very small transistor.
Changes in any of those pertinent
conditions will lead to distortion
and errors in the output. So distortion and errors are inevitable with
open loop amplifiers.
The problem is that all open loop
amplifiers, knowing nothing of the
errors in the output, are content to
go on merrily leaving us to put up
with their distortions and other
errors.
As we saw last month, we can improve on this state of affairs if the
first stage of the system could be
"informed" of the output errors so
that the system can compensate for
its own "mistakes".
Basic block diagram
The general idea of how such "information about errors" can be
conveyed back to the front end of
the amplifier is illustrated in the
basic block diagram of Fig.5. Of
course the amplifier has to be so arranged that it will " act on" this information about errors in the output and do something to correct the
situation.
Vin
FEEDBACK PATH
Fig.5: the basic idea of all
feedback amplifiers is that
information about the state of the
output is fed back to the
amplifier input, to allow the
amplifier to take action to
compensate for its own faults.
The operation of all negative
feedback systems is simply that a
sample of the output is "fed back"
to the front end of the system to be
compared with the input signal. The
result of this comparison controls
corrective action automatically
taken by the system.
Negative feedback action
(1.) The input signal gives an idea of
what the output should be.
(2 .) The sample of the output fed
back to the front end gives an indication of what the output actually
is.
(3.) The first is what you want, the
second is what you've got.
(4.) The two should be the same.
(5 .) If they are not, we must arrange
for the amplifier to take corrective
action .
(6.) This comparison is done by subtracting the fed-back output sample
from the input, to give tp.e difference (Input - Feedback).
(7.) This "difference" is the vital
quantity which the self-correcting
amplifier will use to compensate for
all its errors and distortions.
Then life will be beautiful. Exactly how this is done we must leave
until next month. Bye for now. ~
|