This is only a preview of the December 2013 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 23 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Build An Electronic Bellbird":
Items relevant to "PortaPAL-D: A Powerful, Portable PA System, Pt.1":
Items relevant to ""Tiny Tim" 10W/Channel Stereo Amplifier, Pt.2":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
SILICON
SILIC
CHIP
www.siliconchip.com.au
Publisher & Editor-in-Chief
Leo Simpson, B.Bus., FAICD
Production Manager
Greg Swain, B.Sc. (Hons.)
Technical Editor
John Clarke, B.E.(Elec.)
Technical Staff
Ross Tester
Jim Rowe, B.A., B.Sc
Nicholas Vinen
Photography
Ross Tester
Reader Services
Ann Morris
Advertising Enquiries
Glyn Smith
Phone (02) 9939 3295
Mobile 0431 792 293
glyn<at>siliconchip.com.au
Regular Contributors
Brendan Akhurst
Rodney Champness, VK3UG
Kevin Poulter
Stan Swan
Dave Thompson
SILICON CHIP is published 12 times
a year by Silicon Chip Publications
Pty Ltd. ACN 003 205 490. ABN 49
003 205 490. All material is copyright ©. No part of this publication
may be reproduced without the written consent of the publisher.
Printing: Hannanprint, Noble Park,
Victoria.
Distribution: Network Distribution
Company.
Subscription rates: $105.00 per year
in Australia. For overseas rates, see
our website or the subscriptions page
in this issue.
Editorial office:
Unit 1, 234 Harbord Rd,
Brookvale, NSW 2100.
Postal address: PO Box 139,
Collaroy Beach, NSW 2097.
Phone (02) 9939 3295.
Fax (02) 9939 2648.
E-mail: silicon<at>siliconchip.com.au
ISSN 1030-2662
Recommended and maximum price only.
2 Silicon Chip
Publisher’s Letter
Should Australia continue to
subsidise the car industry?
There is considerable debate at the moment about
whether the level of subsidies granted to the Australian
car industry should be continued by the Government. As
with many debates about government action, it is not a
simple question and whichever way it is finally resolved
will have major ramifications for the tens of thousands of
people either directly or indirectly employed by the car
industry and for the whole Australian economy.
Much of the debate hinges around high labour costs in Australia, apparently low
productivity and falling sales of locally manufactured cars. The real problem is
the last item, not enough sales. While the cars manufactured by Ford, Holden and
Toyota are undoubtedly well-designed and competitive with equivalent cars made
overseas, there simply are not enough of them being sold to make production viable.
But what is the real reason not enough Australian-manufactured cars are being
sold? Virtually zero tariffs. In the past, Australian cars had considerable protection
by dint of the high tariffs levied on all imported cars. Over the years, these have
been whittled away by successive governments and reduced to zero for cars sourced
from countries with which we have free trade agreements, as in the case of cars
sourced from Thailand, for example. That is why we now have such a wide range
of motor vehicles. Years ago, the choice was much more limited.
Make no mistake, tariffs are very beneficial for a country’s employment, as they
make it difficult for imported products to compete with those produced locally.
But the downside of high tariff protection is that it makes all products (ie, those
protected by tariffs) more expensive. So whether or not a person decides to buy a
locally made or equivalent imported product, the cost will always be higher than if
there were no tariffs at all. As well as that, as with the car industry, with low tariff
protection, the range of products available is bound to be dramatically broader.
So where is this headed? Will the Government give in to all the special pleading
and carry on the subsidies for years to come as the sales of Australian cars continue
to decline? Or will they bite the bullet and say enough: no more subsidies?
I suggest that we can look to history for the best guide to what the decision should
be. In 1973, the Whitlam Labour Government reduced all import tariffs by 25%.
By any measure, it was a precipitate decision and the almost immediate result was
that a large portion of the Australian electronics industry was wiped out. Probably
more than 100,000 people lost their jobs in the years immediately following. Many
people would have regarded it as a complete disaster.
But looking at it with 40 years of hindsight, it was a brilliant decision, and I make
that statement as one who had worked in the electronics industry. Up to that time,
imported electronic appliances such as TV sets, stereo systems, radios and other
items were virtually unavailable or very expensive. Then came the flood, mostly
from Japan, and prices of TVs and other consumer electronic appliances dropped
overnight. They have been dropping ever since.
Can anyone imagine Australia ever producing the huge range of electronic equipment that we now enjoy, behind a 25% tariff barrier? Clearly that is preposterous.
With a population of only 23 million people, how could an Australian electronics
industry ever hope to compete with all that is made everywhere else? Australia still
has an electronics industry but as in most other western countries, it is confined
to specialised or niche products.
Personally, I regret that we will lose much of the large skill base and all
the employment that pertains to the car industry but I think it is inevitable,
whether subsidies are maintained or not. In the long term though, Australia
will be better off.
Leo Simpson
siliconchip.com.au
![]() ![]() |